Liberals: How much more would have the other Republicans candidates beat Hillary by?

[TheGreatGatsby]

Trump only won because he ran against free trade that was destroying our jobs...That is the only reason he won PA, MICH and Wis.

Nearly any other Republican would of been slaughtered.

So, you're saying that he was smart and the field was stupid; that belies the lies you promoted.

Not smart at all, a stupid fucking liar. The asshole is now making accusations that are very serious, and must be backed up. If he cannot, he needs to be impeached for mental problems, or the 25th Amendment used.

This was not intended to be a distraction thread. I have no problem with the discussion on Obama wire tapping Trump Tower (in the appropriate threads). Now try to own your lie (claim) about Trump being the worst Republican candidate if you dare.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

I remember you guys presenting polls showing us that Trump would lose to Hillary by the biggest margin out of any one in the 17 person Republican field. How about you tell us how much worse Hillary would have lost versus the others?

TBH I don't think any of the rest could have beat her. They were the same old shit...globalist,neocon,don't give a shit about America or working Americans....People who had voted democrat or never voted,came out to vote for Trump.

That's what I think. Even the ones that had something going for them as people were not getting much traction. And Hillary was salivating at the prospect of taking on a Dubya doughboy wanker like Cruz or a gimp like Rubio.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

I remember you guys presenting polls showing us that Trump would lose to Hillary by the biggest margin out of any one in the 17 person Republican field. How about you tell us how much worse Hillary would have lost versus the others?

There's very few polls out of wis, mich and pa....The national percentage was very close to reality.

Ad nausea, we were told that Trump polled the worst nationally. We were given polls like Hillary 57 Trump 29. It was all made up garbage all along.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Actually I believe the one that would have stomped her was Rand Paul...

Kasich might have taken Ohio and rustbelt states...

I do not believe Cruz or Rubio would have won and same for Jeb Bush...

 

[JakeStarkey]

Kasich would have beat her by seven or eight points, easily.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

I remember you guys presenting polls showing us that Trump would lose to Hillary by the biggest margin out of any one in the 17 person Republican field. How about you tell us how much worse Hillary would have lost versus the others?

I think Rubio and Kasich would have obliterated her in the EC and popular vote. I think Cruz may have been able to win as well, but not by as much.

Why? What makes them so special? Rubio had turned his back on the Tea Party and has plenty of skeletons. And he has the personality of a dumb dog. Kasich is a little more pragmatic and had some results in Ohio to point to; but the fact that "he would have ran better as a Democrat" hints at him not bringing the base in a "historic election." Neither of them would have gotten anything near the traction that the enigmatic Trump got to overcome a propagandist media. There's a reason that Trump destroyed the field.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Actually I believe the one that would have stomped her was Rand Paul...

Kasich might have taken Ohio and rustbelt states...

I do not believe Cruz or Rubio would have won and same for Jeb Bush...

I agree. Besides Trump, I see genuine candidates like Rand and Carson having had a chance. Otherwise, this election was about leaving the panty waste system trash behind.