Looks like Trump's lawyers are out to get him too

[BlindBoo]

They didn't ask for one.

Not because they are incompetent or forgot, or because it was raining.
The case was brought in such a manner that a jury trial was not an option.

They can't accept that, but -

"No, we didn't have that. That's not how this works. They brought it under Section 63(12), which is a very narrow, not appropriately used section of the law, which is for consumer protection," Habba argued.

Alina Habba Denies Trump’s Failure to Get Jury Was Her Fault: ‘That’s Not How This Works’

Alina Habba rejected the claim that Trump was unable to get a jury trial because she failed to tick a box on a document, calling it a "misconception."

www.mediaite.com

Here it is. Where does it prove the Judge was wrong, or was his lawyer wrong or lying?

https://codes.findlaw.com/ny/executive-law/exc-sect-63/

12. Whenever any person shall engage in repeated fraudulent or illegal acts or otherwise demonstrate persistent fraud or illegality in the carrying on, conducting or transaction of business, the attorney general may apply, in the name of the people of the state of New York, to the supreme court of the state of New York, on notice of five days, for an order enjoining the continuance of such business activity or of any fraudulent or illegal acts, directing restitution and damages and, in an appropriate case, cancelling any certificate filed under and by virtue of the provisions of section four hundred forty of the former penal law   3 or section one hundred thirty of the general business law, and the court may award the relief applied for or so much thereof as it may deem proper.  The word “fraud” or “fraudulent” as used herein shall include any device, scheme or artifice to defraud and any deception, misrepresentation, concealment, suppression, false pretense, false promise or unconscionable contractual provisions.  The term “persistent fraud” or “illegality” as used herein shall include continuance or carrying on of any fraudulent or illegal act or conduct.  The term “repeated” as used herein shall include repetition of any separate and distinct fraudulent or illegal act, or conduct which affects more than one person.  Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, all monies recovered or obtained under this subdivision by a state agency or state official or employee acting in their official capacity shall be subject to subdivision eleven of section four of the state finance law.

 

[bripat9643]

Not the people, who voted for republicans a second time.
Self inflicted ignorance.

The government inflicted it. Are you saying people who want to change the government deserve to be persecuted, eh jackass?

 

[Billiejeens]

Of course.................NOT because he is a criminal.

View attachment 838056



Q-NUTS sure are entertaining.
Delusional but entertaining....................in an Alex Jones kinda way.

You are correct.

 

[Billiejeens]

"No, we didn't have that. That's not how this works. They brought it under Section 63(12), which is a very narrow, not appropriately used section of the law, which is for consumer protection," Habba argued.

Alina Habba Denies Trump’s Failure to Get Jury Was Her Fault: ‘That’s Not How This Works’

Alina Habba rejected the claim that Trump was unable to get a jury trial because she failed to tick a box on a document, calling it a "misconception."

www.mediaite.com

Here it is. Where does it prove the Judge was wrong, or was his lawyer wrong or lying?

https://codes.findlaw.com/ny/executive-law/exc-sect-63/

12. Whenever any person shall engage in repeated fraudulent or illegal acts or otherwise demonstrate persistent fraud or illegality in the carrying on, conducting or transaction of business, the attorney general may apply, in the name of the people of the state of New York, to the supreme court of the state of New York, on notice of five days, for an order enjoining the continuance of such business activity or of any fraudulent or illegal acts, directing restitution and damages and, in an appropriate case, cancelling any certificate filed under and by virtue of the provisions of section four hundred forty of the former penal law   3 or section one hundred thirty of the general business law, and the court may award the relief applied for or so much thereof as it may deem proper.  The word “fraud” or “fraudulent” as used herein shall include any device, scheme or artifice to defraud and any deception, misrepresentation, concealment, suppression, false pretense, false promise or unconscionable contractual provisions.  The term “persistent fraud” or “illegality” as used herein shall include continuance or carrying on of any fraudulent or illegal act or conduct.  The term “repeated” as used herein shall include repetition of any separate and distinct fraudulent or illegal act, or conduct which affects more than one person.  Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, all monies recovered or obtained under this subdivision by a state agency or state official or employee acting in their official capacity shall be subject to subdivision eleven of section four of the state finance law.

I dismiss you.

 

[Billiejeens]

Except, YOU NEVER PROVIDED A LINK, to support your claim that a jury trial for Trump's fraud accusations is automatic, with no choice of trial without jury.... Provide a link to your repeated claim, and we might believe you.....

I don't have a need for you to believe me.

 

[Billiejeens]

It isn't. I'm just amused by the lies and ignorance.

Your own or your buddies?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

The government inflicted it. Are you saying people who want to change the government deserve to be persecuted, eh jackass

"Change government"?
Teabaggers don't want a government.........PERIOD.
That's why they have been obstructing bills and cutting budgets for decades.
THEN, when THEY get in office, hand out lucrative contracts and tax cuts to corporations.
Destroying the deficit and budget.
WHICH, they haven't been reduced or balanced in 43 years.

Been that way since lying Reagan declared war on it 43 years ago.

 

[bripat9643]

"Change government"?
Teabaggers don't want a government.........PERIOD.
That's why they have been obstructing bills and cutting budgets for decades.
THEN, when THEY get in office, hand out lucrative contracts and tax cuts to corporations.
Destroying the deficit and budget.
WHICH, they haven't been reduced or balanced in 43 years.

Been that way since lying Reagan declared war on it 43 years ago.

Then how did the government get 10 times bigger than it was 43 years ago?

Progs live in a fantasyland.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Then how did the government get 10 times bigger than it was 43 years ago?

Progs live in a fantasyland.

Teabaggers live in fantasy land.

Republican years in office, since 1980- 24 years.
Democrats years in office, since 1980- 18 years.

 

[martybegan]

You know Barr threatened just that. He knew they had no evidence. Fraud and election tampering.

Like people who commit fraud will just leave the evidence in a bag for anyone to find.

And it's really "evidence so damning that even people who don't want to see it have to admit it"

The bar for saying Trump did something wrong is 5th party hearsay. The bar for saying a Dem did something wrong is the entire country had to witness it live as it was happening.

 

[martybegan]

People don’t live in a world where you can just say shit is true because you want it to be true.

That’s the fantasy land that you snowflakes created for yourself.

It's called a free society, dickwad.

Something you and your Red Guards want crushed.

 

[martybegan]

Yes, that is both fraudulent and unethical. Remember, these are officers of the government, representatives of US, not the the current holder of the office of President.

But for some reason in this trial not criminal, because they know they get a lower standard of evidence in a civil trial.

 

[BlindBoo]

I dismiss you.

Hahaha so you can't point to the section of the law that prohibits a judge from allowing a jury trial because of the way an AG files their case. Is that not the section Trumpy's lawyer cited? If that's not it, where is it? n I'm more that willing to listen and change my mind but you offer nothing. So.....

 

[Marener]

It's called a free society, dickwad.

Something you and your Red Guards want crushed.

Destruction of the truth was the first project for the soviets.

That’s what you’re trying to accomplish here.

The government is supposed to serve the people, not Trump. The people aren’t served by telling Trump’s lies for his personal electoral benefit. That is some really corrupt shit you’re defending.

But go on and tell me more about how it’s the “deep state” that’s corrupt and not your piece of shit leader.

 

[martybegan]

I don't live in Manhattan. But are you trying to claim the the millions in Manhattan can't be impartial?

Yes.

 

[martybegan]

Destruction of the truth was the first project for the soviets.

That’s what you’re trying to accomplish here.

The government is supposed to serve the people, not Trump. The people aren’t served by telling Trump’s lies for his personal electoral benefit. That is some really corrupt shit you’re defending.

But go on and tell me more about how it’s the “deep state” that’s corrupt and not your piece of shit leader.

Again, who's forums and speeches are being shut down by violent "protesters" on a regular basis?

Bullshit.

Trump was the duly elected representative of the people, based on the rules of electing a President.

 

[Marener]

Trump was the duly elected representative of the people, based on the rules of electing a President.

Yeah; and he lost the election in 2020 based on the rules of electing a President. Rules which he tried to fuck with because he’s a corrupt piece of shit.

The point stands that the deep state pushed back on his corruption but you are still attacking them and defending the piece of shit.

 

[martybegan]

Yeah; and he lost the election in 2020 based on the rules of electing a President. Rules which he tried to fuck with because he’s a corrupt piece of shit.

The point stands that the deep state pushed back on his corruption but you are still attacking them and defending the piece of shit.

And I am still not convinced that there wasn't ballot stuffing or harvesting due to lax absentee/mail in ballot rules in the crucial States, more specifically in the Dem controlled strongholds. I don't go for the E-vote tampering, just the good old fashioned stuff ye olde ballot box tampering.

They pushed back on his policy, something they had ZERO right to do, and should have resigned if they didn't want to execute his policies.

 

[Zincwarrior]

But for some reason in this trial not criminal, because they know they get a lower standard of evidence in a civil trial.

Wrong trial. Those are state and federal felony criminal charges in different courts. I know, its hard to keep up at this point.

 

[martybegan]

Wrong trial. Those are state and federal felony criminal charges in different courts. I know, its hard to keep up at this point.

it's what you get when Progs use the "Throw Spaghetti at the wall" method of political lawfare.