meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 21,909
- 18,114
The banks didn't know they were defrauded.No it wasn't.
The bank didn't lose any money. They didn't charge Trump with fraud.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
The banks didn't know they were defrauded.No it wasn't.
The bank didn't lose any money. They didn't charge Trump with fraud.
That's the allegation. And that's why there will be fines sought.The banks were defrauded.
ROFL! Says one of the biggest liars in the forum.Not to you. You are a bad faith and dishonest poster.
Sure they did. Are you saying bankers are stupid?The banks didn't know they were defrauded.
This is like the case where a dentist would molest female patients while under general anesthesia for their dental work. Most of the women didn't know, and hence, never complained.That's the allegation. And that's why there will be fines sought.
The banks didn't know they were defrauded.
NaiveSure they did. Are you saying bankers are stupid?
It's nothing like that.This is like the case where a dentist would molest female patients while under general anesthesia for their dental work. Most of the women didn't know, and hence, never complained.
ROFL! Bankers are trusting? Naive? Than banks knew exactly what the property was worth. That's why it's such a ridiculous charge?Naive
Trusting
They aren't naive. They just have to conduct business. So they rely on laws against Trump's behaviors to protect them.Naive
Trusting
It's like most "confidence" cases. The victim doesn't know they were defrauded, and don't complain.It's nothing like that.
No they don't rely on any such laws.They aren't naive. They just have to conduct business. So they rely on laws against Trump's behaviors to protect them.
Well that's the dumbest thing we will read all day.No they don't rely on any such laws.
Once they learned Madoff was screwing them, they all filed.It's like most "confidence" cases. The victim doesn't know they were defrauded, and don't complain.
Look at all the people defrauded by Bernie Maddoff. How many filed fraud charges?
Trump added a 30% premium for brand value, while putting in his financial disclosure that brand value had not been added to the properties valuation.ROFL! Bankers are trusting? Naive? Than banks knew exactly what the property was worth. That's why it's such a ridiculous charge?
Where's the fraud?Trump added a 30% premium for brand value, while putting in his financial disclosure that brand value had not been added to the properties valuation.
That's just the fraud that was proven yesterday in court
Exactly right. It's no different than when someone buys a firearm, and they fill out the ATF form. The guy at the gun store assumes the person put down truthful information, because lying on the form carries a 20 year maximum penalty.They aren't naive. They just have to conduct business. So they rely on laws against Trump's behaviors to protect them.
The squealing cultis in this thread Would have you believe the gun Seller should be penalized for having trusted hunter Biden.Exactly right. It's no different than when someone buys a firearm, and they fill out the ATF form. The guy at the gun store assumes the person put down truthful information, because lying on the form carries a 20 year maximum penalty.
Everybody relies on such laws.Well that's the dumbest thing we will read all day.
Exactly right. It's no different than when someone buys a firearm, and they fill out the ATF form. The guy at the gun store assumes the person put down truthful information, because lying on the form carries a 20 year maximum penalty.
So thousands and thousands of satisfied customers, who never filed fraud charges, even though they were being ripped off.Once they learned Madoff was screwing them, they all filed.