Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A fetus is not a person, It's a very slippery slope to grant personhood to a non-viable entity. Since that creates a whole new can of worms.
Take for instance a pregnant woman, and conjoined twins, when only one of them is guilty.
There is a difference between life and viable human life. Defining what makes a human a human.fetus is a stage of development just like toddler and infant,,
every bit of science we currently have says life begins at conception,, only blood thirsty science denying baby killers say different
a new born isnt viable,, they still need help to survive,,There is a difference between life and viable human life. Defining what makes a human a human.
Then we have a problem with invitro fertilization. Who gets to decide which one lives and which one dies?every bit of science we currently have says life begins at conception,, only blood thirsty science denying baby killers say different
thats another deflection from the real discussion,,Then we have a problem with invitro fertilization. Who gets to decide which one lives and which one dies?
Viability isn't defined as independent, it's whether or not survival with normal care and feeding is achieveable.a new born isnt viable,, they still need help to survive,,
opinions vary,, and since your goal is to keep allowing the murder of innocent children your opinion doesnt mean shit,,Viability isn't defined as independent, it's whether or not survival with normal care and feeding is achieveable.
Medical intervention can basically keep anything technically alive on a respirator/heart lung machine, and all the other interventions from IV feeding to dialisis.
But that doesn't define a viable human unless somebody they can be discharged into society.
No deflectgion. If life begins at conception, then what happens to the invitro fertilized zygotes. Normally only one is chosen to survive, with the others on deck in case that one strikes out.thats another deflection from the real discussion,,
howabout we deal with abortion on demand first and then discuss that??
youre one sick mother fucker,,,No deflectgion. If life begins at conception, then what happens to the invitro fertilized zygotes. Normally only one is chosen to survive, with the others on deck in case that one strikes out.
But bottom line is if the first succeeds, all the rest are never given the opportunity to go beyond a small clump of cells.
Of course you could force the woman to have half a dozen zygotes implanted, but that would be fatal to at least half of them.
I'm against the murder of innocent children, like is happening in Ukraine. But abortion involves a fetus, and not a child.opinions vary,, and since your goal is to keep allowing the murder of innocent children your opinion doesnt mean shit,,
a fetus is a child you sick fuck,,,I'm against the murder of innocent children, like is happening in Ukraine. But abortion involves a fetus, and not a child.
Read a biology book. Invitro fertilization puts the horns on ascribing personhood, and life begins at conception.youre one sick mother fucker,,,
A fetus is a stage between ovum and adult.a fetus is a child you sick fuck,,,
of a human being,,,A fetus is a stage between ovum and adult.
A fetus is a stage between ovum and adult.
therightscoop.com
The problem is your article doesn't quote Warren as saying there should be no limits on abortion. That's just spin on what she actually said, which was:Elizabeth Warren says there should be NO limits on abortion when asked by CBS
Radical socialist Elizabeth Warren, who’s apparently ‘mad as hell’ over the leaked Roe v Wade decision, was asked on CBS This Morning whether there should be any limits on abortio…
so you dont think the state should stop people from killing another person??The problem is your article doesn't quote Warren as saying there should be no limits on abortion. That's just spin on what she actually said, which was:
“In a pregnancy, I don’t believe that it is the state that should intervene with its heavy hand and make the decision.”
That's not what Elizabeth Warren said,.so you dont think the state should stop people from killing another person??
remember an abortion can only happen after the choice to get prego has been made,,
thats what she implied,,That's not what Elizabeth Warren said,.
And once the fetus becomes a person, it's protected under federal law,.
