Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
In what otherwise appears as an upbeat "you go girl!" opinion editorial, sneaks some more than gentle innuendo that Maddow is after Justice Ginsburg to step down:
Now I've been wrong before. But what I'm reading here in Maddow's article is "look lady, you're old, sick and you just lost your husband. Plus, we're afraid we might not take congress this Fall. And if we don't and you're still there then, the liberal left cannot install another gay activist on the Bench. So please for the love of God, even though we really like how you've voted, we don't want you to die right during a GOP Congress or Administration!"
Proving the political nature of the Justice distribution in SCOTUS. Which is supposed to not be happening. I warned about how damaging the gay militia was to the democratic party and left of center values and platforms. And now we're supposed to remove a Justice in order to forward that agenda? As opposed to Maddow, I actualy support Ginsburg staying on the Bench; even though I'm not thrilled with how she judges all the time.
If it's true that Ginsburg's husband just died, what a smack in the face to this grieving person to ask her to kill her career at the same time? Often a career is the only thing that will get a person through this. And as Justice Ginsburg said, her husband would've wanted her to stay and carry on with her important Role.
Ginsburg appeared to be in good health and good spirits, even with the strain of her husband's death and a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in 2009. She underwent surgery and chemotherapy for the cancer and was hospitalized on two other occasions last year but is maintaining an active travel schedule that is taking her across the country at least twice this summer.
There has been persistent speculation that Ginsburg could retire next year and give Obama his third vacancy to fill in as many years.
Next year probably would be Obama's last chance to get a Supreme Court nominee through the Senate before the 2012 presidential election. There hasn't been an election-year Supreme Court retirement in more than 40 years because, among other things, the opposition party in the Senate is inclined to wait for election results in the hope that it will capture the White House. Ginsburg says no plans to leave Supreme Court - politics - Supreme Court NBC News
Now I've been wrong before. But what I'm reading here in Maddow's article is "look lady, you're old, sick and you just lost your husband. Plus, we're afraid we might not take congress this Fall. And if we don't and you're still there then, the liberal left cannot install another gay activist on the Bench. So please for the love of God, even though we really like how you've voted, we don't want you to die right during a GOP Congress or Administration!"
Proving the political nature of the Justice distribution in SCOTUS. Which is supposed to not be happening. I warned about how damaging the gay militia was to the democratic party and left of center values and platforms. And now we're supposed to remove a Justice in order to forward that agenda? As opposed to Maddow, I actualy support Ginsburg staying on the Bench; even though I'm not thrilled with how she judges all the time.
If it's true that Ginsburg's husband just died, what a smack in the face to this grieving person to ask her to kill her career at the same time? Often a career is the only thing that will get a person through this. And as Justice Ginsburg said, her husband would've wanted her to stay and carry on with her important Role.