MAGA—More Are Getting Arrested.

[bripat9643]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

My understanding is that there were other cops right there. The cop that fired was NOT the last defender, being overwhelmed by the mob.

I am not cherry picking. I am comparing the one large scale right leaning riot, vs the NORM established by you people over the last 4 years.

Your understanding is incorrect.

Or yours is.

Nope, mine is based on video that shows there was actually only one cop on the insurgents side of the doors and that one cop was out of position to deal with Ashli Targetpractice. The cop who shot her was the closest to her and had the best vantage point to stop her from entering the Speaker's Lobby without risking others.

Link.

Starting at 38:20

Patriots Storm Congress Raw Footage Includes Execution of Ashli Babbitt

Raw footage from the historic day Jan 6th 2021

theresistance.video

I cannot see how many cops were on the other side of hte door.

My point stands.

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Again, none of the events you're crying over involved harming members of our government to reverse an election. You're the only holding the apples and oranges.

Neither does the Babbit murder, NAZI.

LOL

Even the Department of Justice thinks you're a fucking moron.

The DOJ is infested with deep state traitors. You lend your argument no credibility by citing them.

 

[Faun]

Again, none of the events you're crying over involved harming members of our government to reverse an election. You're the only holding the apples and oranges.

Don't you get it? Smashing through police barricades to reach within feet of elected officials you're threatening is just the same as burning down an empty Tires Plus.

These morons don't realize it but their attempts to conflate an attack on our government to reverse an election ... with riots in various cities ... which is a bullshit comparison, only serves to expose even they know their side was wrong but they lack the character to admit it.

 

[Faun]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

My understanding is that there were other cops right there. The cop that fired was NOT the last defender, being overwhelmed by the mob.

I am not cherry picking. I am comparing the one large scale right leaning riot, vs the NORM established by you people over the last 4 years.

Your understanding is incorrect.

Or yours is.

Nope, mine is based on video that shows there was actually only one cop on the insurgents side of the doors and that one cop was out of position to deal with Ashli Targetpractice. The cop who shot her was the closest to her and had the best vantage point to stop her from entering the Speaker's Lobby without risking others.

Link.

Starting at 38:20

Patriots Storm Congress Raw Footage Includes Execution of Ashli Babbitt

Raw footage from the historic day Jan 6th 2021

theresistance.video

I cannot see how many cops were on the other side of hte door.

My point stands.

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Again, none of the events you're crying over involved harming members of our government to reverse an election. You're the only holding the apples and oranges.

Neither does the Babbit murder, NAZI.

LOL

Even the Department of Justice thinks you're a fucking moron.

The DOJ is infested with deep state traitors. You lend your argument no credibility by citing them.

LOL

Poor baby.

 

[bripat9643]

Again, none of the events you're crying over involved harming members of our government to reverse an election. You're the only holding the apples and oranges.

Don't you get it? Smashing through police barricades to reach within feet of elected officials you're threatening is just the same as burning down an empty Tires Plus.

These morons don't realize it but their attempts to conflate an attack on our government to reverse an election ... with riots in various cities ... which is a bullshit comparison, only serves to expose even they know their side was wrong but they lack the character to admit it.

It was nothing more than a riot, and your failure to admit it makes you look like a desperate NAZI fool.

 

[Faun]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

Based on the norms set by you fucktards over the last 4 years, it would be completely understandable, how she could have though that breaking and entering would have been acceptable behavior, perhaps with some minor judicial implications.

Who over the last four years threatened to attack members of Congress and got feet away from them?

Your moral compass is broken and unrepairable.

Are you pretending to not be aware of the massive wave of riots that have been raging unchecked for years in this country, or are you actually retarded?

You didn't answer ... who among them threatened to attack members of Congress and got within feet of them?

I did answer. I am rejecting your excuses for NOT comparing this one riot to all the other riots of the last four years.


You are inventing bullshit justifications for your politically targeting of your enemies.


We are not fooled. We know what you are doing.

Because there is no comparison. There is no other example of any mob on the left attacking Congress to flip an election.

You can ignore that all you want but that only leaves you frustrated and not understanding why Insurrection Day is being treated differently than other events.

If you add enough conditions, then you can claim any incident is unique. That's the handywork of a demagogue.

Sadly for you, removed yourself from the discussion due to your abject ignorance and constant lying.

 

[Faun]

Again, none of the events you're crying over involved harming members of our government to reverse an election. You're the only holding the apples and oranges.

Don't you get it? Smashing through police barricades to reach within feet of elected officials you're threatening is just the same as burning down an empty Tires Plus.

These morons don't realize it but their attempts to conflate an attack on our government to reverse an election ... with riots in various cities ... which is a bullshit comparison, only serves to expose even they know their side was wrong but they lack the character to admit it.

It was nothing more than a riot, and your failure to admit it makes you look like a desperate NAZI fool.

Poor baby, you're so frustrated.

 

[bripat9643]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

Based on the norms set by you fucktards over the last 4 years, it would be completely understandable, how she could have though that breaking and entering would have been acceptable behavior, perhaps with some minor judicial implications.

Who over the last four years threatened to attack members of Congress and got feet away from them?

Your moral compass is broken and unrepairable.

Are you pretending to not be aware of the massive wave of riots that have been raging unchecked for years in this country, or are you actually retarded?

You didn't answer ... who among them threatened to attack members of Congress and got within feet of them?

I did answer. I am rejecting your excuses for NOT comparing this one riot to all the other riots of the last four years.


You are inventing bullshit justifications for your politically targeting of your enemies.


We are not fooled. We know what you are doing.

Because there is no comparison. There is no other example of any mob on the left attacking Congress to flip an election.

You can ignore that all you want but that only leaves you frustrated and not understanding why Insurrection Day is being treated differently than other events.

If you add enough conditions, then you can claim any incident is unique. That's the handywork of a demagogue.

Sadly for you, removed yourself from the discussion due to your abject ignorance and constant lying.

You're still talking to me, moron.

 

[Faun]

There have been plenty of riots over the last 4 years and they have not been investigated or prosecuted like this.

That's because none of them were storming our Capitol in an attempt to illegally flip an election to the losing candidate.

Bullshit. It is because they were right leaning rioters and you people are lefties.

Nope, not bullshit.

The BLM/Antifa riots did not threaten the fabric of this nation.

The insurrection did.

It was not an insurrection. Your excuse for the political targeting of these people, will not change the fact that they will be political prisoners.

You are supporting tyranny and oppression.

You're fucked in the head con. That mob stormed the Capitol to revolt against Biden being the certified winner of the election he won. That's the very definition an insurrection.

an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government.​

Insurrection Day was the epitome of tyranny and oppression and you support that, so again, fuck you.

They didn't "storm the capitol" NAZI. Your terms are deliberately designed to frame the issue to make them look guilty. You're a propagandist.

Fucking moron, the insurgents themselves say they stormed the Capitol.

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever??

A few hot heads may have said that, but that doesn't make it a fact.

You're done, fucking moron. No one cares what you think when the insurgents have told us what they think.

In other words, I made my point.

Ok, fucking moron, you made your point. Of course, you're point is you have no clue what occurred there.

 

[bripat9643]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

Based on the norms set by you fucktards over the last 4 years, it would be completely understandable, how she could have though that breaking and entering would have been acceptable behavior, perhaps with some minor judicial implications.

Who over the last four years threatened to attack members of Congress and got feet away from them?

Your moral compass is broken and unrepairable.

Are you pretending to not be aware of the massive wave of riots that have been raging unchecked for years in this country, or are you actually retarded?

You didn't answer ... who among them threatened to attack members of Congress and got within feet of them?

They firebombed a federal courthouse while people were inside of it, you fucking NAZI.

 

[Faun]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

Based on the norms set by you fucktards over the last 4 years, it would be completely understandable, how she could have though that breaking and entering would have been acceptable behavior, perhaps with some minor judicial implications.

Who over the last four years threatened to attack members of Congress and got feet away from them?

Your moral compass is broken and unrepairable.

There were no members of Congress within 1000 yards of Ashley Babbit when she was shot down in cold blood.

You're fucking deranged, fucking moron. The window she was climbing through is maybe 5 feet away from the House chamber. And there were members of Congress still inside there.

But thanks for eliminating yourself from the debate by demonstrating how clueless you are.

Were there? Where is "there?" Do you have any evidence a member of Congress was within 1000 feet of the doorway? I haven't seen any.

I do have such evidence but you've already removed yourself from the discussion due to your abject ignorance and constant lying. So there's that.

If I removed myself from the discussion, then why are you still posting to me?

If you had such evidence you would have posted it.

I'm not posting to you about the insurgency. That is what you removed yourself from when you demonstrated abject ignorance of the events that day. You showed everyone here you have no clue what occurred.

 

[Faun]

Again, none of the events you're crying over involved harming members of our government to reverse an election. You're the only holding the apples and oranges.

Don't you get it? Smashing through police barricades to reach within feet of elected officials you're threatening is just the same as burning down an empty Tires Plus.

These morons don't realize it but their attempts to conflate an attack on our government to reverse an election ... with riots in various cities ... which is a bullshit comparison, only serves to expose even they know their side was wrong but they lack the character to admit it.

It was nothing more than a riot, and your failure to admit it makes you look like a desperate NAZI fool.

Ok, fucking moron.

 

[Faun]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

Based on the norms set by you fucktards over the last 4 years, it would be completely understandable, how she could have though that breaking and entering would have been acceptable behavior, perhaps with some minor judicial implications.

Who over the last four years threatened to attack members of Congress and got feet away from them?

Your moral compass is broken and unrepairable.

Are you pretending to not be aware of the massive wave of riots that have been raging unchecked for years in this country, or are you actually retarded?

You didn't answer ... who among them threatened to attack members of Congress and got within feet of them?

They firebombed a federal courthouse while people were inside of it, you fucking NAZI.

Show the cop standing there who did nothing...

 

[bripat9643]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

She didn't put herself into a lethal situation according to any police department policy that I've ever heard of. Police aren't normally allowed to shoot people simply because they aren't complying with police instructions.

Slobbers a fucking moron.

That entire mob became an immediate threat to the safety of lawmakers still holed up inside the chamber. She was the tip of the spear.

The "entire mob?" What does that mean, every protester in DC? Does that mean the police were entitled to shoot whomever they wished to?

Every time you post you add more proof to the case that you're a fucking NAZI.

 

[Faun]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

She didn't put herself into a lethal situation according to any police department policy that I've ever heard of. Police aren't normally allowed to shoot people simply because they aren't complying with police instructions.

Slobbers a fucking moron.

That entire mob became an immediate threat to the safety of lawmakers still holed up inside the chamber. She was the tip of the spear.

The "entire mob?" What does that mean, every protester on DC? Does that mean the police were entitled to shoot whomever they wished to?

Every time you post you add more proof to the case that you're a fucking NAZI.

Sadly, you've already removed yourself from this discussion by showing everyone here how clueless you are on the events of Insurrection Day.

My advice to you is to do the research necessary to know what occurred that day and then try discussing it again.

 

[bripat9643]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

Based on the norms set by you fucktards over the last 4 years, it would be completely understandable, how she could have though that breaking and entering would have been acceptable behavior, perhaps with some minor judicial implications.

Who over the last four years threatened to attack members of Congress and got feet away from them?

Your moral compass is broken and unrepairable.

Are you pretending to not be aware of the massive wave of riots that have been raging unchecked for years in this country, or are you actually retarded?

You didn't answer ... who among them threatened to attack members of Congress and got within feet of them?

They firebombed a federal courthouse while people were inside of it, you fucking NAZI.

Show the cop standing there who did nothing...

Police near the courthouse doing nothing while it's being firebombed:

 

[bripat9643]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

She didn't put herself into a lethal situation according to any police department policy that I've ever heard of. Police aren't normally allowed to shoot people simply because they aren't complying with police instructions.

Slobbers a fucking moron.

That entire mob became an immediate threat to the safety of lawmakers still holed up inside the chamber. She was the tip of the spear.

The "entire mob?" What does that mean, every protester on DC? Does that mean the police were entitled to shoot whomever they wished to?

Every time you post you add more proof to the case that you're a fucking NAZI.

Sadly, you've already removed yourself from this discussion by showing everyone here how clueless you are on the events of Insurrection Day.

My advice to you is to do the research necessary to know what occurred that day and then try discussing it again.

You're still talking to me, moron.

Should I research the activities of AP before I cite them as a "legitimate source?"

 

[bripat9643]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

My understanding is that there were other cops right there. The cop that fired was NOT the last defender, being overwhelmed by the mob.

I am not cherry picking. I am comparing the one large scale right leaning riot, vs the NORM established by you people over the last 4 years.

Your understanding is incorrect.

Or yours is.

Nope, mine is based on video that shows there was actually only one cop on the insurgents side of the doors and that one cop was out of position to deal with Ashli Targetpractice. The cop who shot her was the closest to her and had the best vantage point to stop her from entering the Speaker's Lobby without risking others.

Link.

Starting at 38:20

Patriots Storm Congress Raw Footage Includes Execution of Ashli Babbitt

Raw footage from the historic day Jan 6th 2021

theresistance.video

I cannot see how many cops were on the other side of hte door.

My point stands.

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Again, none of the events you're crying over involved harming members of our government to reverse an election. You're the only holding the apples and oranges.

Neither does the Babbit murder, NAZI.

LOL

Even the Department of Justice thinks you're a fucking moron.

The DOJ is infested with deep state traitors. You lend your argument no credibility by citing them.

LOL

Poor baby.

I realize the knowledge that your government is run by traitors warms you heart.

 

[dudmuck]

There have been plenty of riots over the last 4 years and they have not been investigated or prosecuted like this.

That's because none of them were storming our Capitol in an attempt to illegally flip an election to the losing candidate.

Bullshit. It is because they were right leaning rioters and you people are lefties.

Nope, not bullshit.

The BLM/Antifa riots did not threaten the fabric of this nation.

The insurrection did.

It was not an insurrection. Your excuse for the political targeting of these people, will not change the fact that they will be political prisoners.

You are supporting tyranny and oppression.

That would have been a good comeback if I was denying that it was a riot.


As it is, you look like a fucking retard.

You denied it was an insurrection, which is worse.

 

[Faun]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

Based on the norms set by you fucktards over the last 4 years, it would be completely understandable, how she could have though that breaking and entering would have been acceptable behavior, perhaps with some minor judicial implications.

Who over the last four years threatened to attack members of Congress and got feet away from them?

Your moral compass is broken and unrepairable.

Are you pretending to not be aware of the massive wave of riots that have been raging unchecked for years in this country, or are you actually retarded?

You didn't answer ... who among them threatened to attack members of Congress and got within feet of them?

They firebombed a federal courthouse while people were inside of it, you fucking NAZI.

Show the cop standing there who did nothing...

Police near the courthouse doing nothing while it's being firebombed:

With no one inside the building, fucking moron.

 

[bripat9643]

There have been plenty of riots over the last 4 years and they have not been investigated or prosecuted like this.

That's because none of them were storming our Capitol in an attempt to illegally flip an election to the losing candidate.

Bullshit. It is because they were right leaning rioters and you people are lefties.

Nope, not bullshit.

The BLM/Antifa riots did not threaten the fabric of this nation.

The insurrection did.

It was not an insurrection. Your excuse for the political targeting of these people, will not change the fact that they will be political prisoners.

You are supporting tyranny and oppression.

That would have been a good comeback if I was denying that it was a riot.


As it is, you look like a fucking retard.

You denied it was an insurrection, which is worse.

Posting the big lie is worse. That's what you just did.