MAGA—More Are Getting Arrested.

[freyasman]

And @Correll is exactly right; you all are trying to say this incident, even if it does qualify as a "riot", is somehow different and deserves to be treated differently than any of the other riots or protests over the last several years.

Well, bullshit.

Just off the top of my head, I remember protestors who tried like hell to stop Kavanaugh from getting on the SC, and rioters who took over a police station in MN and set it on fire...... how many of either of those groups were shot to death?

It does deserve to be treated differently because, get this, it is different. None of you want to address the very real differences and brush them aside without ever addressing it.

The protestors who tried to stop Kavanaugh weren't beating up police, breaking into office and forcing Congress to be evacuated. They were disruptive but they weren't violent.

You want to treat them differently because they oppose you, and all your denials don't change a thing.


Fucking hypocrite.

 

[freyasman]

No, I know that ghetto blacks commit the majority of crime (especially violent crime) because I study crime; I'm a security consultant and I teach courses in how to avoid being a victim of violent crime.

The kind of implicit bias against black people is exhibited in your comment. A black person is seen as ghetto, a white person isn't. A black person needs to be sentenced harsher to be taught a lesson before they become a thug. A white person is just a good kid who made a mistake and needs a second chance. These are the biases that pervade our justice system. Society doesn't see black people and white people the same. You want to ignore this because it makes you uncomfortable but it's real.

Report to the United Nations on Racial Disparities in the U.S. Criminal Justice System – The Sentencing Project

Report to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance

www.sentencingproject.org

No, stupid..... half my family is black but none of them are ghetto, and any of them acting that way would get the shit stomped out them quick, white or black.

We don't tolerate that trashy shit.

 

[colfax_m]

Bullshit.

Great argument there.

 

[colfax_m]

You want to treat them differently because they oppose you, and all your denials don't change a thing.

They oppose the basic function of government.

 

[freyasman]

And @Correll is exactly right; you all are trying to say this incident, even if it does qualify as a "riot", is somehow different and deserves to be treated differently than any of the other riots or protests over the last several years.

Well, bullshit.

Just off the top of my head, I remember protestors who tried like hell to stop Kavanaugh from getting on the SC, and rioters who took over a police station in MN and set it on fire...... how many of either of those groups were shot to death?

It does deserve to be treated differently because, get this, it is different. None of you want to address the very real differences and brush them aside without ever addressing it.

The protestors who tried to stop Kavanaugh weren't beating up police, breaking into office and forcing Congress to be evacuated. They were disruptive but they weren't violent.

And don't think I didn't notice how you ducked the part about the rioters who took over and set fire to a police station, either.


Bitch move right there.

 

[freyasman]

Bullshit.

Great argument there.

It's not like you made a good argument or any points that needed refuting.

You just lied your ass off, plain and simple.

 

[freyasman]

You want to treat them differently because they oppose you, and all your denials don't change a thing.

They oppose the basic function of government.

Fraud and corruption is a "basic function of government", now?

 

[colfax_m]

Fraud and corruption is a "basic function of government", now?

Peaceful transfer of governance is a basic function of government you asshole.

 

[colfax_m]

It's not like you made a good argument or any points that needed refuting.

You just lied your ass off, plain and simple.

If you say so, chief.

 

[freyasman]

Fraud and corruption is a "basic function of government", now?

Peaceful transfer of governance is a basic function of government you asshole.

So it's wrong to object to being defrauded and lied to?
It's now wrong to seek redress of grievances when an election is blatantly stolen?










Bullshit.

 

[freyasman]

It's not like you made a good argument or any points that needed refuting.

You just lied your ass off, plain and simple.

If you say so, chief.

To be fair, I don't know any way you could pretty up that total hypocrisy of yours.
It's shitty no matter how you look at it.




You really should be ashamed of yourself....... I'm pretty sure your grandkids will be.

 

[colfax_m]

So it's wrong to object to being defrauded and lied to?
It's now wrong to seek redress of grievances when an election is blatantly stolen?

It's a little early to be completely rewriting history, don't you think?

You lost. You petitioned government for redress of grievances. You lost again.

When your fantasy about having had an election stolen failed to align with reality, the result was a violent attempt to stop the function of government. That's what's being prosecuted.

(I'm using "you" in the collective sense before you get all huffy about personal accusation)

 

[colfax_m]

To be fair, I don't know any way you could pretty up that total hypocrisy of yours.
It's shitty no matter how you look at it.

Looks like you ran out of argument there, chief.

 

[freyasman]

So it's wrong to object to being defrauded and lied to?
It's now wrong to seek redress of grievances when an election is blatantly stolen?

It's a little early to be completely rewriting history, don't you think?

You lost. You petitioned government for redress of grievances. You lost again.

When your fantasy about having had an election stolen failed to align with reality, the result was a violent attempt to stop the function of government. That's what's being prosecuted.

(I'm using "you" in the collective sense before you get all huffy about personal accusation)

See what I mean?
Bullshit.



Ignoring the crime committed doesn't erase the crime.

 

[colfax_m]

Ignoring the crime committed doesn't erase the crime.

It wasn't ignored. It was adjudicated according to our constitutional principles.

But you couldn't accept that so you had to resort to violence.

 

[freyasman]

To be fair, I don't know any way you could pretty up that total hypocrisy of yours.
It's shitty no matter how you look at it.

Looks like you ran out of argument there, chief.

LOL, how so?

You have no argument, you have nothing but lies and bullshit and you attack anyone who points that out.
The government failed to do it's job, the people who own that government objected to that failure and are now being vilified, persecuted, and prosecuted all out of proportion to any wrongs they may have done, while the largest case of election fraud in American history gets a pass.

And you're not only okay with that, you support it.


Dude, that's some sorry shit right there....... I'm a pretty bad guy, but if I was as shitty a person as you I'd kill myself.

 

[freyasman]

Ignoring the crime committed doesn't erase the crime.

It wasn't ignored. It was adjudicated according to our constitutional principles.

But you couldn't accept that so you had to resort to violence.

No it wasn't.

 

[colfax_m]

You have no argument, you have nothing but lies and bullshit and you attack anyone who points that out.

"Bullshit" isn't exactly a way to prove that I'm lying, but if that works for you, go ahead and think so.

The government didn't fail it's job. You just don't like that everyone else doesn't live in the same fantasy world you've created for yourself.

The government doesn't share your delusions. It shouldn't. The people who have those delusions don't get to justify violence on that government. You don't "own" the government any more than the rest of us.

 

[bripat9643]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

I lose track of it . What anniversary of you guys promising a civil war is it ? 15th, 20th? Are you guys registered anywhere?

Funny, this thread is based on the premise that the 1/6 riot was a serious and real threat to our democracy, because it delayed the formal recognition of the count, by HOURS.

Yet, here you are, acting as though, any talk of civil war from US, is laughable.


Why do you support the extra aggressive prosecution of the 1/6 rioters if it was not a serious insurrection?


lol. All these questions are rhetorical. We both know that you will not give serious or honest answers to ANY of them.


I am constantly amazed at the way you libs can hold completely contradictory ideas AT THE SAME TIME, without a hint of self awareness, no matter how much it is rubbed in your face.

Their goal wasn't to delay it, it was to "stop the steal." You're literally giving them credit for failing to pull off their coup.

Wow. Did you just become aware that intents and actual outcomes are sometimes different? What a big day for you.

Run along retard.

No worries, keep defending sedition. Be even louder about that during election season next year.

Who has been charged with sedition, shit for brains?

Who said they've been charged with sedition yet, fucking moron?

Their actions violate the sedition conspiracy law.

And Chaz didn't? And the Autonomous Zone didn't? And ordering the cops to not protect ICE so the rioters could attack the building didn't?

You are supporting a massive violation of civil rights of your enemies. Those that are convicted will be political prisoners.

View attachment 490040

Sure skippy...bring it on.

I hope you enjoy the results of your labors. I hope I am still here, when you are here whining like a fag, because of how it is blowing up in your face.

Sure thing skippy. In 10 years two things will still be true. There would have been no civil war and you guys will still be threatening to start one.

Do me a favor. State your position on the 1/6 "insurrection, how bad it was, in a compound sentence, with your position that there is nothing to fear from the Right re: "Civil War".


I want to see your two positions side by side. It should be GREAT.

There is nothing to fear from the right (or the left) on a civil war.

Your attempted insurrection is a different topic, junior.

Whatever your child-like hoping for a war because you have some bizarre fantasy about how cool it would be...just know 2 things... If you INCELs ever tried it, you'd be slaughtered....and....you INCELs will never try it. Because you are a coward.

Hence your continued threats with absolutely no follow up.

So, you don't care about the people supposedly killed by the mob on 1/6? People dying is "nothing to fear"?


Are you longing for the sweet release that Death will bring?


I do not want Civil War, I am warning where you hatred and oppression and keeping of political prisoners could lead this once great nation.

Your hatred is based on abject ignorance. Aside from the reality that any such uprising will be utterly squashed by a military sworn to protect the Constitution, you won't gain much support from a country because your civil war will be based upon hate, not principle.

I doubt it will be based on hate. It will be based on their simply being a failure in life and trying to bring everyone else down to their level.

You are supporting a violation of civil rights. You are the hater here, not me.

Where, whiner?

Federal Civil Rights Statutes | Federal Bureau of Investigation

The FBI is able to investigate civil rights violations based on a series of federal laws.

www.fbi.gov

Unequal application of justice, you faggot.

Uh oh, I touched a nerve with the whiner. Had to break out the F word. Good luck proving that when so many of the white Trump mob are being released...after being allowed to riot, go home, and roam free for weeks. The guy that, with premeditated intent, brought a 950,000 watt stun gun into the Speaker's office? Some Arkansas judge tried to let him go.

Judge blocks release of man pictured with feet on desk in Pelosi's office

Richard Barnett won permission from a judge in Arkansas to return home to await trial, but a judge in D.C. blocked that decision.

www.politico.com

People being released on bail, is not the same as not being looked for or having charges dropped.

You are supporting a gross violation of the human rights of hundreds of people based on political reasons.


You are supporting the policy of holding political prisoners here in the United States of America.


Your obsession with race, sounds somewhat racist too.

Show me an article that says he was released on bail. None of them say that, they all just say he was released. I'm sure a BLM protester that walked into, say Kevin McCarthy's office carrying a 950,000 watt stun gun would just be let go to await trial. Puhleese!

Lot's of women carry stun guns in their purses, moron. It's not illegal.

Is it a weapon or not? You apologists keep making the incorrect claim that Trump’s mob wasn’t armed. They were.

The key to your car can be a weapon. You obviously have a very narrow understanding of reality.

A 950,000 volt walking stick designed to stop a wild animal isn’t a key in your purse, princess.

Wow. 400 storm the capitol in a supposed coup attempt and you got a TAZER as the star example of how dangerously armed they were?

LOL!!!!

It was 800.

Prove it, asshole

I don't have to. The FBI is on it. They have 15,000 hours of video, and they've received something like 200,000+ tips from patriotic citizens. I hope they televise some of the trials and put the video evidence right up on the screen for all to see. Then let's see conservatives say it was a peaceful protest or that it was like a regular day of tourists showing up.

if they don't do that with Antifa and BLM trials, then this will be a political prosecution and anyone convicted with be political prisoners.

That's what conservatives always say when they get prosecuted for crimes. It doesn't even matter what the crime is.

As you people become more and more abusive and tyrannical, it might become fairly commonplace.


My point stands. The 1/6 riots are being targeted for extra aggressive investigation and prosecution for political reasons.


That is a violation of their Right to Equal Application of Justice.

Would you like a little cheese with that whine?

Conservatives are SUCH big babies. You cry about justice, but you don't want justice; you want preferential treatment. And when some legal entity actually holds you to account, you throw a fit.

What happened to our Capitol on 1/6 hasn't happened in over 200 years, and when it was done then, it was done by a foreign power, not by our fellow citizens who were trying to overturn a free and fair election. That's what I call political.

Most Americans don't give a damn if you don't like the prosecutions. Hell, they're all getting off pretty easy from everything I can tell because in some other countries, they'd be rounded up and summarily shot.

Wrong YOU asshats want preferential treatment for your favored black criminals and rioters. Gee, when Americans try to hold you leftards accountable for your murder of cops, attempted mass murder in Portland, robbing of businesses and hundreds of cases of arson, you whine and cry “wacist!!”. News flash: nobody gives a shit about your whining.

I'm fine with prosecuting people who commit crimes, regardless of who they are. But, like I said, conservatives want preferential treatment. That's not fine with me.

And yet here you are defending actual libtards rioting to this day in Portland and having at least twice attempted mass murder, yet calling for death for the Capitol peaceful protesters (per your side’s definition). Hypocrite. Preferential treatments. Fuck off with that bullshit asshole.

I've never defended rioting.

Bullshit. You’ve been defending leftist rioters this whole thread hypocrite. Fuck off with your bullshit.

You don't know what you're talking about, and I'm not surprised by that in the least.

You are a fucking liar asshole. That’s all anybody needs to know. People can read the shit you’ve posted dimbulb. Not surprised you’re still a lying asshole.

What's the problem? Not getting enough fiber in your diet?

No, i just don’t try take to obvious fucking liars you asshole. Dodging the point (more likely you can’t understand it) and trying to deflect lie some more. Your desire for no punishment for leftard attempted murderers is noted.

I see. Too much of the barley beverage? Got an edge and an attitude now? Go sleep it off.

More deflection and projections to cover your lack of any argument. You’re throwing a bitch fit because you’re being called out as the lying asshole you are.

I don't worry about guys like you on message boards. That's because guys like you can't make a cogent argument, so you engage in name calling and swearing. It reminds me of some of the comics of the 1970s who didn't have funny material, so they used the F word repeatedly in an effort to get laughs. LaWanda Page was one of the worst offenders.

Patriotic Americans protesting is a good thing.

Agreed!

Too bad the Trump rioters didn't protest protest like patriotic American but like violent thugs.

So, by that you are saying the BLM and Antifa are not patriotic Americans. They are just violent thugs.

 

[colfax_m]

Ignoring the crime committed doesn't erase the crime.

It wasn't ignored. It was adjudicated according to our constitutional principles.

But you couldn't accept that so you had to resort to violence.

No it wasn't.

Of course it was. You were lied to.