Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You merely prefer to appeal to ignorance.
Can you rephrase your question?
The multiplier for uc is 2.0 versus 0.8 for means tested programs.
It would be a simplification of Big Government nanny-Statism; thus, more cost effective. You would think the right-wing would be all over it, external to Socialism threads.He is asking what changes will be made to the Unemployment Compensation program to accommodate your new and improved version.
You know, like the funding, the qualifications, the length of time someone can draw it, the amount available to everyone.
In other words, by improving the funding source it could be more cost effective.
Means Testing is not at will. It really is that expensive due to that Big Government nanny-Statism right-wingers always allege to be Against, in Socialism threads.Show me a link that specifically shows means testing is the reason for the difference.
And do you REALLY think the gov't is going to hand out $2.5 BILLION to people without making them show they need it? There will be means testing, of that you can be sure.
Why? It's very clear. Heck, all of them are. You just don't want to answer or even consider them.You merely prefer to appeal to ignorance.
Can you rephrase your question?
General taxation is always to be preferred when raising money for the general welfare.Unless that funding source is the income of every citizen, thereby lowering the amount of money they have available to spend.
It would be a simplification of Big Government nanny-Statism; thus, more cost effective. You would think the right-wing would be all over it, external to Socialism threads.
General taxation is always to be preferred when raising money for the general welfare.
Means Testing is not at will. It really is that expensive due to that Big Government nanny-Statism right-wingers always allege to be Against, in Socialism threads.
General taxation is always to be preferred when raising money for the general welfare.
I keep repeating it because y'all keep appealing to ignorance of it. The whole point of equal protection of the uc laws is to solve simple poverty to better automatically stabilize our economy.Yes, repeat the same thing. That will stand as proof. lmao
No, it is not preferred. A large portion of the population is living a few weeks or months from being homeless. Taking an ever larger piece of the income THEY earn will reduce their ability to spend.
Then why are you in State court with your lawsuit?? That’s my point! if you have a Constitutional challenge, why aren’t you in Federal Court?I am not sure what you mean?
My position is that it does not matter what the State may proclaim because the State has no authority to abridge, deny or disparage our privileges and immunities through unequal protection of the Law, to begin with. The State hath not the (social) Power.
I was merely using that for simplicity.Then why are you in State court with your lawsuit?? That’s my point! if you have a Constitutional challenge, why aren’t you in Federal Court?
not sure what you mean by (social) power either
So you refuse to answer the question. This is why no one takes you seriously, you continue to speak in ideals and not in reality.It would be a simplification of Big Government nanny-Statism; thus, more cost effective. You would think the right-wing would be all over it, external to Socialism threads.
Show a link? LOL!! We all know that won't happen.Show me a link that specifically shows means testing is the reason for the difference.
And do you REALLY think the gov't is going to hand out $2.5 BILLION to people without making them show they need it? There will be means testing, of that you can be sure.
I keep repeating it because y'all keep appealing to ignorance of it. The whole point of equal protection of the uc laws is to solve simple poverty to better automatically stabilize our economy.
Right-wingers understand nothing and simply make stuff up. It is why they should not be trusted with public office.So you refuse to answer the question. This is why no one takes you seriously, you continue to speak in ideals and not in reality.
Right-wingers are that economically ignorant. Doubling economic activity and improving the efficiency of our economy must accomplish something. And, that is just the economic part not the civil (social) part.Show a link? LOL!! We all know that won't happen.
That is what you do, you are a right winger according to your moronic definition, but I don't, nor does anyone else consider you bright.Right-wingers understand nothing and simply make stuff up. It is why they should not be trusted with public office.
