SC Patriot
Diamond Member
- Aug 31, 2020
- 2,990
- 2,442
Untrue. You're thinking of the cult of Trump:Firstly, "accused" means nothing. Anyone can accuse anyone of anything. Secondly, I wonder if the entity would have been accused if Hunter had a different last name?Somehow, you left out the fact that a direct descendant of Joe Biden was a board member of the entity that was accused of corruption..
Accused, by itself, can be meaningless.
BUt, really, the truth is, you don't care whether the Bidens are guilty or not.
Do you?
If you knew for a fact that Biden was guilty of EVERYTHING he was accused of, you would still support him as he will advance your agenda.
Is that not true?
The context of that quote is different than what you are suggesting.
And I note that you did not deny my point.
Even if you knew for a fact that Biden was guilty of EVERYTHING,, you would still support him.
You might want to bone up on your reading comprehension since I did deny your point.
If I knew Biden was a crook I'd never have supported him in the primaries. If I learned after he got the nod, that's more complicated since I'm convinced Trump is a criminal it would be a choice of cancer of polio.
Bullshit. you are not "convinced" Trump is a "criminal", you are "convinced" that he is wacist and phobe and this and that, and ect ect ect.
That is the point of all those hyperbolic and hysterical accusations that your side is constantly making. To keep you people convinced that no matter how bad your dem candidates are, they can still pretend to be better than what the republicans supposedly are.
To be honest, I only suspected Trump was a criminal before the election. It is since serving as Pres that I became convinced. Ask Mueller if you don't believe me.
As for "hyperbolic and hysterical accusations", Trump is king. His 2016 campaign mantra was "lock her up". Has he?
Mueller? The one that couldn't find ANYTHING in his massive investigation? The one that spend millions and came up with, "well, I got a feeling there is bad stuff that wasn't what we were looking for and someone else should do some more looking"?
LOL!!!!
You, you don't still believe in the Steele Dossier do you?
View attachment 430193
You shouldn't be so quick or so proud to show off your ignorance. What Mueller said was there was evidence of obstruction of justice but the rules of the investigation precluded him from saying it outright. Just because the GOP ignored it doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Know your facts.
He said there was evidence of possible obstruction but no way to prove it seeing as obstruction is based on intent and the evidence could not prove intent. It could have just as easily be action with no intent of obstruction.
For example...If I say I love you....one could say it is a term of endearment and another looking for something nefarious can say it was actually an insult because he surely has no reason to love you and he is saying it to thorw you off.
Know your facts.