flacaltenn
Diamond Member
- Jun 9, 2011
- 67,573
- 22,962
Look flacateen you whites are the ones with the confrontational attitude. You expect to be confrontational and everyone else must kiss your ass. Kings approach was confrontational. He got stabbed. He got beaten. He was put in jail. He ad his family was under constant treat of death and then he was murdered.
Very brave man. That's why there's a National Holiday and memorials for him. But STILL -- what he was saying is NOT as confrontational as telling EVERY WHITE PERSON they need to admit to being racists and have humility. At the time -- it was confrontational to some. They got over it. NOW -- he's the beacon of guidance for racial reconciliation. Which is why you tried to paint him as some kind separatist or radicalized race warrior.
What I suggest to you is that you shut up and stop trying to preach that lie of individualism because that's not what you really want. And I also suggest that you learn to listen to us, because at least we are nice enough to try telling you how blacks feel. Because you shut us up, then you get the blacks who are tired of talking and you get fucked up.
You can't tell me what I want. Lets get that straight. I believe that GROUP identities lead to conflict. That individual experiences and dialogues are the ANTIDOTE to racism. And I just told you a white secret. That it's EASY for us to FIND white racists in OUR midst. They are the animals talking about a white group identities.
I don't mind listening to how you FEEL about whites. But by doing so --- you are using the same underlying tool as white racists with the stereotyping and bigotry. Whites (other than our racist contingient) DON'T FUCKING HAVE a white group identity. We are diverse in every way and only OUR racists are telling us how to think about our race. We fight so much INTERNALLY --- religion, politics, origin, class, sex --- that none of us NEEDS OR WANTS "a racial group identity".
And you ducked my questions in the last thread regarding this including --->
Do YOU have a responsibility to DEFEND every member of your racial group? and
Who SPEAKS for your group?
Can't have dialogues that are NON-confrontational between large groups with everyone speaking for everyone else. Or re-interpreting the MLK message to fit THEIR confrontation style with racist overtones.
Last edited: