martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 83,353
- 34,479
- 2,300
Wang Mang of the Xin Dynasty 9-12AD banned slavery.
You do realize that most Chinese were no better than serfs, right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wang Mang of the Xin Dynasty 9-12AD banned slavery.
Monticello is privately owned, so I have no control over what they do.So what do you want to do with the Jefferson Memorial and Monticello?
Would you be in favor of removing the statue in Washington and replacing it with a statue of Freddie Gay or Eric Garner?
But for that short 3 year time span, they were no longer slaves. So a guy 1750 years before Jefferson had the guts to ban slavery. It isnt about what time a person lived in....it's about a person's character. And it should be pretty obvious that while Jefferson did help to create America, he was a failed, gutless leader.You do realize that most Chinese were no better than serfs, right?
Calypso Jones said:Oh...and who might those white racists be? and how did you make that determination? WHO gets to make that deterimination if ever you get your way?
you know what buddy....your soul is black.
Monticello is privately owned, so I have no control over what they do.
As far as the Jefferson Memorial goes, that does present an interesting dilemma. The Jefferson Memorial's intent is not to celebrate the defense of slavery like these other statues that are being removed. What I would do is leave the Jefferson Memorial, but also include a history of Jeffersons's stance and history on slavery.
Now if NYC wants to take out a Jefferson statue, that would be their decision and I have no problem with that either.
Cuck boys like you act like you'll die if you don't get to venerate slavers and you know what? I'm ok with that.How do you know that the purpose of a statue of Robert E Lee is to celebrate slavery- instead of just honoring the memories of the ancestors of the Southern Honky?
BTW, do you think that the WWE should be forced to remove the Fabulous Freebird from the Hall of Fame after this publicity photo?
View attachment 575241
WWE is a private company. If this is what they want to be known for, so be it.How do you know that the purpose of a statue of Robert E Lee is to celebrate slavery- instead of just honoring the memories of the ancestors of the Southern Honky?
BTW, do you think that the WWE should be forced to remove the Fabulous Freebird from the Hall of Fame after this publicity photo?
View attachment 575241
Or you could just remove the statue that shouldn't have been there in the first place.If the people felt uncomfortable about that, why didn't they just pay their taxes electronically, call in their card numbers or even mail in a check ? No need to ever look at the statue.
That is why the Jefferson Memorial is a tough call in my opinion. It wasnt erected to celebrate slavery, but at the same time it honors a man that was a pretty horrible person in regards to slavery. My idea was to keep the statue, but explain his horrific stance on slavery, how he wanted an all white America, etc at the statue site. What do you think? I mean the statue wasnt put up until the 1940's, so it's not like it's been there all that long. Tough call IMO.Or you could just remove the statue that shouldn't have been there in the first place.
Or you could just remove the statue that shouldn't have been there in the first place.
Most of the taxpayers back then were also racists. Most taxpayers today are not racists (or so I'd like to think). Times change. History evolves. Why should people be commemorated and honored who died in defense of keeping people enslaved? Seems pretty repugnant to me. Then again I"m not a deplorable.Most of the taxpayers thought it was appropriate to commemorate those who died in the War of Northern Aggression.
Some of my relatives, including one of my brothers, live in the Southlands of America.
You mean during Jim Crow segregation.That is why the Jefferson Memorial is a tough call in my opinion. It wasnt erected to celebrate slavery, but at the same time it honors a man that was a pretty horrible person in regards to slavery. My idea was to keep the statue, but explain his horrific stance on slavery, how he wanted an all white America, etc at the statue site. What do you think? I mean the statue wasnt put up until the 1940's, so it's not like it's been there all that long. Tough call IMO.
Most folks in the South were racist or turned a blind eye to the racism that was going on.. I doubt many of the black taxpayers signed on to that bullshit.Most of the taxpayers thought it was appropriate to commemorate those who died in the War of Northern Aggression.
Some of my relatives, including one of my brothers, live in the Southlands of America.
But for that short 3 year time span, they were no longer slaves. So a guy 1750 years before Jefferson had the guts to ban slavery. It isnt about what time a person lived in....it's about a person's character. And it should be pretty obvious that while Jefferson did help to create America, he was a failed, gutless leader.
What would have happened if Jefferson freed all the slaves his wife inherited? IN VIRGINIA?You are not going to make a valid point here.
What would have happened if Jefferson freed all the slaves his wife inherited? IN VIRGINIA?
If you don't get the point, you're dumb.
Who was the first president to do something about the African slave trade?
FDR pushed to have the memorial built. Not sure about his history of being pro segregation.You mean during Jim Crow segregation.
I certainly did make a point. Would you like to talk about all the other leaders who banned slavery before Jefferson?And it didn't keep, and the Chinese emperors practiced polygamy and used Eunuchs.
The peasants at the time were no better than slaves, but you think you made a point. LOL.
Here. Read up on Washington and his slaves.I'm assuming the same thing that happened to Washington's slaves IN VIRGINIA.
I have no idea what you are chasing nor does it matter.