Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
all the male has to do is control his sperm...sadly men dont care for this answer......when you release your sperm to a woman ..she now owns it...why dont men take responsibility for their sperm?
If she owns it why is the man then responsible for child support if the woman wants to keep the baby an the guy doesn't?
Because his responsibilty is to the child. Not the mother. If the child exists, the obligation to the child exists.
With that obligation for mother and father always being equal. Either they both of that obligation, nor neither do.
all the male has to do is control his sperm...sadly men dont care for this answer......when you release your sperm to a woman ..she now owns it...why dont men take responsibility for their sperm?
If she owns it why is the man then responsible for child support if the woman wants to keep the baby an the guy doesn't?
Because his responsibilty is to the child. Not the mother. If the child exists, the obligation to the child exists.
With that obligation for mother and father always being equal. Either they both of that obligation, nor neither do.
The mother can decide to not be responsible for the child, via the abortion.
Again, if true equality between the sexes is desired, why does a woman have that ability, and not a man?
Do women need some sort of special protection?
all the male has to do is control his sperm...sadly men dont care for this answer......when you release your sperm to a woman ..she now owns it...why dont men take responsibility for their sperm?
If she owns it why is the man then responsible for child support if the woman wants to keep the baby an the guy doesn't?
Because his responsibilty is to the child. Not the mother. If the child exists, the obligation to the child exists.
With that obligation for mother and father always being equal. Either they both of that obligation, nor neither do.
The mother can decide to not be responsible for the child, via the abortion.
Again, if true equality between the sexes is desired, why does a woman have that ability, and not a man?
Do women need some sort of special protection?
^^^^^^^ yes. Biologically and Socially based on the realities of each
all the male has to do is control his sperm...sadly men dont care for this answer......when you release your sperm to a woman ..she now owns it...why dont men take responsibility for their sperm?
If she owns it why is the man then responsible for child support if the woman wants to keep the baby an the guy doesn't?
Because his responsibilty is to the child. Not the mother. If the child exists, the obligation to the child exists.
With that obligation for mother and father always being equal. Either they both of that obligation, nor neither do.
The mother can decide to not be responsible for the child, via the abortion.
Again, if true equality between the sexes is desired, why does a woman have that ability, and not a man?
Do women need some sort of special protection?
^^^^^^^ yes. Biologically and Socially based on the realities of each
Then how can both be truly equal if one requires special protections?
Do you have the right to tell him to cut off the other ball?My husband had every right concerning his children...fug off and relax on your tirade over abortion. You look like a tool
Do you have the right to tell him to cut off the other ballMy husband had every right concerning his children...fug off and relax on your tirade over abortion. You look like a tool
which is "the other"?
As if heaven exists anyway.
This is the point, isn't it? We don't know what's "after", so we might as well get through this life in the happiest way possible.
As if heaven exists anyway.
This is the point, isn't it? We don't know what's "after", so we might as well get through this life in the happiest way possible.
I have seen and experienced enough in this life to make me believe there is a Higher Power and something waiting for us beyond this life. I understand not everyone agrees with that belief, but I do.
If there is nothing beyond this, then I should have killed myself when I was 6 or 7 years old and saved myself the trouble of the last 35+ years.
And most of what you've experienced and believe is what you wanted to see because so many people have told you that this is so.
If she owns it why is the man then responsible for child support if the woman wants to keep the baby an the guy doesn't?
Because his responsibilty is to the child. Not the mother. If the child exists, the obligation to the child exists.
With that obligation for mother and father always being equal. Either they both of that obligation, nor neither do.
The mother can decide to not be responsible for the child, via the abortion.
Again, if true equality between the sexes is desired, why does a woman have that ability, and not a man?
Do women need some sort of special protection?
^^^^^^^ yes. Biologically and Socially based on the realities of each
Then how can both be truly equal if one requires special protections?
equal rights does not require equal physiology. There are REALITIES ---both social and physiological
Because his responsibilty is to the child. Not the mother. If the child exists, the obligation to the child exists.
With that obligation for mother and father always being equal. Either they both of that obligation, nor neither do.
The mother can decide to not be responsible for the child, via the abortion.
Again, if true equality between the sexes is desired, why does a woman have that ability, and not a man?
Do women need some sort of special protection?
^^^^^^^ yes. Biologically and Socially based on the realities of each
Then how can both be truly equal if one requires special protections?
equal rights does not require equal physiology. There are REALITIES ---both social and physiological
The thing is true equal rights would have to IGNORE physiology unless a carve out in any amendment made to achieve it is included.
The mother can decide to not be responsible for the child, via the abortion.
Again, if true equality between the sexes is desired, why does a woman have that ability, and not a man?
Do women need some sort of special protection?
^^^^^^^ yes. Biologically and Socially based on the realities of each
Then how can both be truly equal if one requires special protections?
equal rights does not require equal physiology. There are REALITIES ---both social and physiological
The thing is true equal rights would have to IGNORE physiology unless a carve out in any amendment made to achieve it is included.
nope------the only issue is how to WORD the law
^^^^^^^ yes. Biologically and Socially based on the realities of each
Then how can both be truly equal if one requires special protections?
equal rights does not require equal physiology. There are REALITIES ---both social and physiological
The thing is true equal rights would have to IGNORE physiology unless a carve out in any amendment made to achieve it is included.
nope------the only issue is how to WORD the law
By wording the law to allow exceptions you give lie to the idea of true equality.
Mind you I am arguing theoreticals here.
Then how can both be truly equal if one requires special protections?
equal rights does not require equal physiology. There are REALITIES ---both social and physiological
The thing is true equal rights would have to IGNORE physiology unless a carve out in any amendment made to achieve it is included.
nope------the only issue is how to WORD the law
By wording the law to allow exceptions you give lie to the idea of true equality.
Mind you I am arguing theoreticals here.
law is a matter of "words" An equal rights law -----any one---male or female
can terminate a pregnancy of his body
equal rights does not require equal physiology. There are REALITIES ---both social and physiological
The thing is true equal rights would have to IGNORE physiology unless a carve out in any amendment made to achieve it is included.
nope------the only issue is how to WORD the law
By wording the law to allow exceptions you give lie to the idea of true equality.
Mind you I am arguing theoreticals here.
law is a matter of "words" An equal rights law -----any one---male or female
can terminate a pregnancy of his body
That's trying to be cute, and it doesn't work with me.
If sex is removed from the concept of law, then it doesn't matter who possesses the fetus, by logic, both parents should be "legally" able to terminate a pregnancy.
The thing is true equal rights would have to IGNORE physiology unless a carve out in any amendment made to achieve it is included.
nope------the only issue is how to WORD the law
By wording the law to allow exceptions you give lie to the idea of true equality.
Mind you I am arguing theoreticals here.
law is a matter of "words" An equal rights law -----any one---male or female
can terminate a pregnancy of his body
That's trying to be cute, and it doesn't work with me.
If sex is removed from the concept of law, then it doesn't matter who possesses the fetus, by logic, both parents should be "legally" able to terminate a pregnancy.
your sick logic------by your sick logic-----wives should be legally able to
arrange a vasectomy for hubby
It’s way less than going to the trauma of having an unwanted child.nope------the only issue is how to WORD the law
By wording the law to allow exceptions you give lie to the idea of true equality.
Mind you I am arguing theoreticals here.
law is a matter of "words" An equal rights law -----any one---male or female
can terminate a pregnancy of his body
That's trying to be cute, and it doesn't work with me.
If sex is removed from the concept of law, then it doesn't matter who possesses the fetus, by logic, both parents should be "legally" able to terminate a pregnancy.
your sick logic------by your sick logic-----wives should be legally able to
arrange a vasectomy for hubby
No, that isn't the case.
In a legal sense if you remove sex from the equation, both parties should be able to legally "abort" the child.
Forcing surgery on someone isn't the same thing.
It’s way less than going to the trauma of having an unwanted child.By wording the law to allow exceptions you give lie to the idea of true equality.
Mind you I am arguing theoreticals here.
law is a matter of "words" An equal rights law -----any one---male or female
can terminate a pregnancy of his body
That's trying to be cute, and it doesn't work with me.
If sex is removed from the concept of law, then it doesn't matter who possesses the fetus, by logic, both parents should be "legally" able to terminate a pregnancy.
your sick logic------by your sick logic-----wives should be legally able to
arrange a vasectomy for hubby
No, that isn't the case.
In a legal sense if you remove sex from the equation, both parties should be able to legally "abort" the child.
Forcing surgery on someone isn't the same thing.
It’s always hilarious to me that Republicans believe they are the honor guard of Americas morals.
And then look what they elected president.
