Manonthestreet
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2014
- 35,288
- 23,800
- 1,945
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is Ms. America a female, or a chick with a cock?and has the degree to back it up.
MSN
www.msn.com
Real deal....Is Ms. America a female, or a chick with a cock?
Without reading the article, she sounds a lot more intelligent than German leaders, who have decided to deprecate / sunset their nuclear energy and utilize coal instead.Real deal....
Is Ms. America a female, or a chick with a cock?
Wow .. an actual, attractive female ... it's 2023 .. surprised.
The future of nuclear energy is in small scale nuclear reactors, if we have any common sense at all.Nuclear power creates "brown sites" and we have a very difficult time getting rid of spent rods. There are pools and pools of spent rods at every nuclear power plant that are waiting for a place to send them....meanwhile these spent rods are targets for every terrorist and wannabe on the planet looking to make a dirty bomb. (Nobody wants nuclear waste material in their land or near their land)
We have a hard enough time trying to keep up with old dental X-ray machines. (Full of radioactive material) These are often sold to second world countries inexpensively....(much cheaper than trying to dispose of them)
Or my secret water converter . With added vodka for the Turbo Charge model .The future of nuclear energy is in small scale nuclear reactors, if we have any common sense at all.
Or my secret water converter . With added vodka for the Turbo Charge model .
Mostly anti-nuke nonsense.Nuclear power creates "brown sites" and we have a very difficult time getting rid of spent rods. There are pools and pools of spent rods at every nuclear power plant that are waiting for a place to send them....meanwhile these spent rods are targets for every terrorist and wannabe on the planet looking to make a dirty bomb. (Nobody wants nuclear waste material in their land or near their land)
We have a hard enough time trying to keep up with old dental X-ray machines. (Full of radioactive material) These are often sold to second world countries inexpensively....(much cheaper than trying to dispose of them)
Nuclear power creates "brown sites" and we have a very difficult time getting rid of spent rods. There are pools and pools of spent rods at every nuclear power plant that are waiting for a place to send them....meanwhile these spent rods are targets for every terrorist and wannabe on the planet looking to make a dirty bomb. (Nobody wants nuclear waste material in their land or near their land)
We have a hard enough time trying to keep up with old dental X-ray machines. (Full of radioactive material) These are often sold to second world countries inexpensively....(much cheaper than trying to dispose of them)
Mostly anti-nuke nonsense.
"We" have the easy ability to store all the spent fuel from every commercial nuclear power plant in the country, times ten. Look up WIPP. It is a giant salt deposit that is impervious to everything, and the "locals" are fine with storing the spent fuel there. (U.S. Department of Energy's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - WIPP Site)
Of course the spent fuel can be re-processed and used again; the technology has been around for decades, but we CHOOSE not to do so. A political decision, if you must know, not a technologically-driven decision.
The reason why the spent fuel is not taken to WIPP (New Mexico) is because of the neurotic hysteria that would arise in every fucking podunk town that the trucks would roll through on their way to WIPP. That and the Democrats don't want to do anything that would have the effect of promoting nuclear power. They much prefer crippling the economy and impoverishing working class Americans by incrementally shutting down power plants that burn carbon.
Parenthetically speaking, since every knowledgeable person in America knows that Nuclear power is the single most promising strategy for reducing our collective carbon footprint, one needs to ponder why we are not pursuing that stratagem. It is ALL Leftist obstructionism, from the NRC to Congress, they simply do not want the most viable solutions, because they trade in frightening people with fears of "climate change" disasters.
Miss. It is MISS America. Ms. is a Feminazi term.Is Ms. America a female, or a chick with a cock?
Shoot 'em into the sun.Nuclear power creates "brown sites" and we have a very difficult time getting rid of spent rods. There are pools and pools of spent rods at every nuclear power plant that are waiting for a place to send them....meanwhile these spent rods are targets for every terrorist and wannabe on the planet looking to make a dirty bomb. (Nobody wants nuclear waste material in their land or near their land)
We have a hard enough time trying to keep up with old dental X-ray machines. (Full of radioactive material) These are often sold to second world countries inexpensively....(much cheaper than trying to dispose of them)
If we are going all-electric (by gubmint mandate), we'll need many more nuke power plants, so I guess the gubmint will have to subsidize them.So are conservatives advocating for gubmint subsidies for nuke plants? That is, massive socialism?
Because that's the only way they'd get built. The free market has decided they're too expensive.
She's clearly a bright individual. I just watched this interview and am very impressed by her poise, knowledge, and "progressive" in the very real and good sense of the word.and has the degree to back it up.
MSN
www.msn.com