More Evidence Of Hillary's Responsibility For Benghazi Deaths

[Jackson]

This would explain the deleted emails and made-up story about a video.

Two months before the fatal 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi, then-Ambassador Chris Stevens requested 13 security personnel to help him safely travel around Libya, according to a cable reviewed by Fox News -- but he was turned down.

Ambassador sought security staffing before Benghazi attack, cable shows

When he sought more security (amid attacks on the Consulate), the State Department with all the wisdom they could muster up, took away security they had!

 

[S.J.]

I wouldn't hold yours either.

That doesn't make any sense, as a response. But carry on.

It made as much sense as what you posted, moron.

No, it didn't.

No, not to you. You said "I wouldn't hold your breath". Only an idiot would say that. The correct way to say it would be..."I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you". I was mocking you but you're too stupid to see it. No offense.

Pedantry is a sign of a weak intellect.

It's not pedantry to recognize your stupidity.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

ah... the Obama deranged loons become Hillary deranged loons.

it's going to be an awesome eight years.

and since you're so concerned, why aren't you shrieking about the 50 dead in a dozen attacks when baby bush was president?

Did the 50 dead ask for extra security and was denied?

They weren't Ambassadors either. Jillian is a libtard being a libtard.

 

[Vigilante]

Shouldn't THIS LIE be a criminal offense?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

ah... the Obama deranged loons become Hillary deranged loons.

it's going to be an awesome eight years.

and since you're so concerned, why aren't you shrieking about the 50 dead in a dozen attacks when baby bush was president?

8 more years! 8 more years!

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

This would explain the deleted emails and made-up story about a video.

It explains nothing. It only confirms what a loon you are for posting this kind of nonsense.

This belongs in the Rubber Room or the Conspiracy Forum

Maude!!!!!

 

[S.J.]

ah... the Obama deranged loons become Hillary deranged loons.

it's going to be an awesome eight years.

and since you're so concerned, why aren't you shrieking about the 50 dead in a dozen attacks when baby bush was president?

8 more years! 8 more years!

Dream on! Dream on!

 

[S.J.]

This would explain the deleted emails and made-up story about a video.

It explains nothing. It only confirms what a loon you are for posting this kind of nonsense.

This belongs in the Rubber Room or the Conspiracy Forum

Maude!!!!!

Really? Then show us what is inaccurate about it.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

All of this when the GOP was viciously slashing the funding the State Department needed for Security. The State Dept had to prioritize as did the men on the ground. Why? Slashing of the budget by the GOP

According to a congressional source, a senior State Department security officer in Libya told Senate investigators that, in September 2012, he had to choose between guarding the Tripoli airport -- their lifeline to the outside world -- and sending security with Stevens to Benghazi.


He chose to reinforce the airport.


"The system is not working well. We've seen that, not on one occasion but on many occasions," said Adam Zagorin, with the Project on Government Oversight. "I'm not aware that it's been fixed as we sit here today."

​

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

More Judicial Watch and FOX News blather

Who is their expert Wayne Simmons, who claimed to have worked as a CIA operative for 27 years?

FOX has no credibility

He claimed to be ex-CIA and was quoted as an expert on Fox News. Prosecutors say it was a lie.

 

[S.J.]

All of this when the GOP was viciously slashing the funding the State Department needed for Security. The State Dept had to prioritize as did the men on the ground. Why? Slashing of the budget by the GOP

According to a congressional source, a senior State Department security officer in Libya told Senate investigators that, in September 2012, he had to choose between guarding the Tripoli airport -- their lifeline to the outside world -- and sending security with Stevens to Benghazi.


He chose to reinforce the airport.


"The system is not working well. We've seen that, not on one occasion but on many occasions," said Adam Zagorin, with the Project on Government Oversight. "I'm not aware that it's been fixed as we sit here today."

​

So why did Hillary hide the requests for protection?

 

[Care4all]

I suggest you go back and listen to your video. The vote to cut funding never made it through the Senate.

Bulloney, it made it through the Senate, with just a slight rise in Embassy security money from what the House requested but STILL 270 BILLION DOLLARS shy of what the President said he needed in his budget.

The facts:

According to Democratic House Oversight Committee staff, the amount that the GOP-led House passed for two accounts that pay for embassy security in fiscal 2012 ($2.311 billion) was $330 million less than the Obama administration had requested ($2.641 billion).

A GOP House Appropriations Committee aide confirmed the House bill had less in these accounts than what the administration requested.

However, the final bill, after being worked on by the Democratic-led Senate, put in more money than what had passed in the House. The final bill, which passed with bipartisan support, gave a total of $2.37 billion to these accounts for fiscal 2012 -- about $270 million less than what the administration had requested.

Conclusion: The GOP-led House did initially approve about $330 million less than what the administration requested, but in the final bill, passed with bipartisan support after adjustments by the Senate, put the amount a little closer to the administration's target, (with being $270 million less than what the administration requested).

CNN Fact Check: What about the security in Benghazi? - CNNPolitics.com

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

ah... the Obama deranged loons become Hillary deranged loons.

it's going to be an awesome eight years.

and since you're so concerned, why aren't you shrieking about the 50 dead in a dozen attacks when baby bush was president?

8 more years! 8 more years!

Dream on! Dream on!

8 more years! 8 more years! - 8 more years! 8 more years!-8 more years! 8 more years! -8 more years! 8 more years! -

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Really? Then show us what is inaccurate about it.

He claimed to be ex-CIA and was quoted as an expert on Fox News. Prosecutors say it was a lie.


FOX NEws has NO credibility. No more than you say Dan Rather has

why the double standard?

 

[S.J.]

I suggest you go back and listen to your video. The vote to cut funding never made it through the Senate.

Bulloney, it made it through the Senate, with just a slight rise in Embassy security money from what the House requested but STILL 270 BILLION DOLLARS shy of what the President said he needed in his budget.

The facts:

According to Democratic House Oversight Committee staff, the amount that the GOP-led House passed for two accounts that pay for embassy security in fiscal 2012 ($2.311 billion) was $330 million less than the Obama administration had requested ($2.641 billion).

A GOP House Appropriations Committee aide confirmed the House bill had less in these accounts than what the administration requested.

However, the final bill, after being worked on by the Democratic-led Senate, put in more money than what had passed in the House. The final bill, which passed with bipartisan support, gave a total of $2.37 billion to these accounts for fiscal 2012 -- about $270 million less than what the administration had requested.

Conclusion: The GOP-led House did initially approve about $330 million less than what the administration requested, but in the final bill, passed with bipartisan support after adjustments by the Senate, put the amount a little closer to the administration's target, (with being $270 million less than what the administration requested).

CNN Fact Check: What about the security in Benghazi? - CNNPolitics.com

"Passed with bipartisan support". That means BOTH parties agreed to the amount. You're blaming only Republicans, why? And why were the special forces in Tripoli told to "not board the plane"? They could have saved them and that would not have cost $270 million. Why can't you assign any blame to the ones who were in charge? Oh, never mind, I know the answer. They were Democrats.

 

[Vigilante]

I suggest you go back and listen to your video. The vote to cut funding never made it through the Senate.

Bulloney, it made it through the Senate, with just a slight rise in Embassy security money from what the House requested but STILL 270 BILLION DOLLARS shy of what the President said he needed in his budget.

The facts:

According to Democratic House Oversight Committee staff, the amount that the GOP-led House passed for two accounts that pay for embassy security in fiscal 2012 ($2.311 billion) was $330 million less than the Obama administration had requested ($2.641 billion).

A GOP House Appropriations Committee aide confirmed the House bill had less in these accounts than what the administration requested.

However, the final bill, after being worked on by the Democratic-led Senate, put in more money than what had passed in the House. The final bill, which passed with bipartisan support, gave a total of $2.37 billion to these accounts for fiscal 2012 -- about $270 million less than what the administration had requested.

Conclusion: The GOP-led House did initially approve about $330 million less than what the administration requested, but in the final bill, passed with bipartisan support after adjustments by the Senate, put the amount a little closer to the administration's target, (with being $270 million less than what the administration requested).

CNN Fact Check: What about the security in Benghazi? - CNNPolitics.com

But C4A, we KNOW that the men there CALLED for HELP, and one of them even LITE UP a mortar site for the HOPED FOR Air Force bombing....that never came!.... WHY was that request denied?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

I suggest you go back and listen to your video. The vote to cut funding never made it through the Senate.

Bulloney, it made it through the Senate, with just a slight rise in Embassy security money from what the House requested but STILL 270 BILLION DOLLARS shy of what the President said he needed in his budget.

The facts:

According to Democratic House Oversight Committee staff, the amount that the GOP-led House passed for two accounts that pay for embassy security in fiscal 2012 ($2.311 billion) was $330 million less than the Obama administration had requested ($2.641 billion).

A GOP House Appropriations Committee aide confirmed the House bill had less in these accounts than what the administration requested.

However, the final bill, after being worked on by the Democratic-led Senate, put in more money than what had passed in the House. The final bill, which passed with bipartisan support, gave a total of $2.37 billion to these accounts for fiscal 2012 -- about $270 million less than what the administration had requested.

Conclusion: The GOP-led House did initially approve about $330 million less than what the administration requested, but in the final bill, passed with bipartisan support after adjustments by the Senate, put the amount a little closer to the administration's target, (with being $270 million less than what the administration requested).

CNN Fact Check: What about the security in Benghazi? - CNNPolitics.com

"Passed with bipartisan support". That means BOTH parties agreed to the amount. You're blaming only Republicans, why? And why were the special forces in Tripoli told to "not board the plane"? They could have saved them and that would not have cost $270 million. Why can't you assign any blame to the ones who were in charge? Oh, never mind, I know the answer. They were Democrats.

conclusion: The GOP-led House did initially approve about $330 million less than what the administration requested, but in the final bill, passed with bipartisan support after adjustments by the Senate, put the amount a little closer to the administration's target, (with being $270 million less than what the administration requested).
​

Idiot!!! You can't even figure out what your own cut & pastes mean?

That means one party out of power held out to get MORE money in the budget bill for security.

That is why normal people blame only the GOP who led the fight to slash the State Dept budget that would have paid for extra security

 

[Vigilante]

Really? Then show us what is inaccurate about it.

He claimed to be ex-CIA and was quoted as an expert on Fox News. Prosecutors say it was a lie.


FOX NEws has NO credibility. No more than you say Dan Rather has

why the double standard?

I suggest you go back and listen to your video. The vote to cut funding never made it through the Senate.

Bulloney, it made it through the Senate, with just a slight rise in Embassy security money from what the House requested but STILL 270 BILLION DOLLARS shy of what the President said he needed in his budget.

The facts:

According to Democratic House Oversight Committee staff, the amount that the GOP-led House passed for two accounts that pay for embassy security in fiscal 2012 ($2.311 billion) was $330 million less than the Obama administration had requested ($2.641 billion).

A GOP House Appropriations Committee aide confirmed the House bill had less in these accounts than what the administration requested.

However, the final bill, after being worked on by the Democratic-led Senate, put in more money than what had passed in the House. The final bill, which passed with bipartisan support, gave a total of $2.37 billion to these accounts for fiscal 2012 -- about $270 million less than what the administration had requested.

Conclusion: The GOP-led House did initially approve about $330 million less than what the administration requested, but in the final bill, passed with bipartisan support after adjustments by the Senate, put the amount a little closer to the administration's target, (with being $270 million less than what the administration requested).

CNN Fact Check: What about the security in Benghazi? - CNNPolitics.com

"Passed with bipartisan support". That means BOTH parties agreed to the amount. You're blaming only Republicans, why? And why were the special forces in Tripoli told to "not board the plane"? They could have saved them and that would not have cost $270 million. Why can't you assign any blame to the ones who were in charge? Oh, never mind, I know the answer. They were Democrats.

conclusion: The GOP-led House did initially approve about $330 million less than what the administration requested, but in the final bill, passed with bipartisan support after adjustments by the Senate, put the amount a little closer to the administration's target, (with being $270 million less than what the administration requested).
​

Idiot!!! You can't even figure out what your own cut & pastes mean?

That means one party out of power held out to get MORE money in the budget bill for security.

That is why normal people blame only the GOP who led the fight to slash the State Dept budget that would have paid for extra security

What else was in that Bill, Danteloin, that made more money a GIVE AWAY to DemocRAT donors?

 

[S.J.]

I suggest you go back and listen to your video. The vote to cut funding never made it through the Senate.

Bulloney, it made it through the Senate, with just a slight rise in Embassy security money from what the House requested but STILL 270 BILLION DOLLARS shy of what the President said he needed in his budget.

The facts:

According to Democratic House Oversight Committee staff, the amount that the GOP-led House passed for two accounts that pay for embassy security in fiscal 2012 ($2.311 billion) was $330 million less than the Obama administration had requested ($2.641 billion).

A GOP House Appropriations Committee aide confirmed the House bill had less in these accounts than what the administration requested.

However, the final bill, after being worked on by the Democratic-led Senate, put in more money than what had passed in the House. The final bill, which passed with bipartisan support, gave a total of $2.37 billion to these accounts for fiscal 2012 -- about $270 million less than what the administration had requested.

Conclusion: The GOP-led House did initially approve about $330 million less than what the administration requested, but in the final bill, passed with bipartisan support after adjustments by the Senate, put the amount a little closer to the administration's target, (with being $270 million less than what the administration requested).

CNN Fact Check: What about the security in Benghazi? - CNNPolitics.com

But C4A, we KNOW that the men there CALLED for HELP, and one of them even LITE UP a mortar site for the HOPED FOR Air Force bombing....that never came!.... WHY was that request denied?

Because Obama and Hillary were more concerned about the upcoming election and covering their ass on their incompetence.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

I suggest you go back and listen to your video. The vote to cut funding never made it through the Senate.

Bulloney, it made it through the Senate, with just a slight rise in Embassy security money from what the House requested but STILL 270 BILLION DOLLARS shy of what the President said he needed in his budget.

The facts:

According to Democratic House Oversight Committee staff, the amount that the GOP-led House passed for two accounts that pay for embassy security in fiscal 2012 ($2.311 billion) was $330 million less than the Obama administration had requested ($2.641 billion).

A GOP House Appropriations Committee aide confirmed the House bill had less in these accounts than what the administration requested.

However, the final bill, after being worked on by the Democratic-led Senate, put in more money than what had passed in the House. The final bill, which passed with bipartisan support, gave a total of $2.37 billion to these accounts for fiscal 2012 -- about $270 million less than what the administration had requested.

Conclusion: The GOP-led House did initially approve about $330 million less than what the administration requested, but in the final bill, passed with bipartisan support after adjustments by the Senate, put the amount a little closer to the administration's target, (with being $270 million less than what the administration requested).

CNN Fact Check: What about the security in Benghazi? - CNNPolitics.com

But C4A, we KNOW that the men there CALLED for HELP, and one of them even LITE UP a mortar site for the HOPED FOR Air Force bombing....that never came!.... WHY was that request denied?

Because Obama and Hillary were more concerned about the upcoming election and covering their ass on their incompetence.

Conspiracy theory?