Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One thing that we can always count on. Denialists lying. So, when they say that they are winning, we, the people, should celebrate.
You know you have a problem when you hear the truth as a lie...but then if you have that problem you wouldn't realize it would you? Trust me....you are the victim of a hoax. You have drank bad kool aid and it is having an adverse effect on your mind.
skookerbil,
What happens if global warming turns out to be true?
Not a lot. The average temperature goes up by a half a degree in the next 80 years.
In the brief time since homo sapiens evolved there have been many temp changes much greater than that. And there will be in the future - from purely natural causes.
I am sure tthat Canadians here present will join us Swedes in thinking that slightly warmer climate would be no bad thing.
You might want to ask the Swedes living on the coast who will see rising sea levels and more storm surge. Or the world's farmers who will see their crops withered from drought or washed away by floods. Or the people who were formerly fed by those farmers crops. Or the billion and a half people on the planet whose drinking water comes from melted snow and ice that'll no longer be present.
In the brief time that homo sapiens has been present, neither CO2 nor temperature have ever risen as fast as they have over the last 150 years. Humans can probably get along with a lot of change - as long as they have the time to adapt and compensate.
Not a lot. The average temperature goes up by a half a degree in the next 80 years.
In the brief time since homo sapiens evolved there have been many temp changes much greater than that. And there will be in the future - from purely natural causes.
I am sure tthat Canadians here present will join us Swedes in thinking that slightly warmer climate would be no bad thing.
You might want to ask the Swedes living on the coast who will see rising sea levels and more storm surge. Or the world's farmers who will see their crops withered from drought or washed away by floods. Or the people who were formerly fed by those farmers crops. Or the billion and a half people on the planet whose drinking water comes from melted snow and ice that'll no longer be present.
In the brief time that homo sapiens has been present, neither CO2 nor temperature have ever risen as fast as they have over the last 150 years. Humans can probably get along with a lot of change - as long as they have the time to adapt and compensate.
Sorry but you have chosen a bad example. Sweden is still RISING by a little under 1 cm a year consequent on the release of pressure from the melting of the 2 km thick ice layer in the last ice age. This land rise is faster than any predicted rise in sea levels. What were good harbours with good access through deep water channels only 2 or 3 hundred years ago are now out of use.
So Swedes living on the coast would benefit from a rise in sea levels - which of course is not happening.
AGW will create winners and losers. More of the latter. It will further our extreme wealth distribution which has shown a correlation with very slow to negative economic growth.
But only for a few hundred years. Once we've adapted to both a new climate and a fuel-less and waste-less energy system good times will come back.
AGW will create winners and losers. More of the latter. It will further our extreme wealth distribution which has shown a correlation with very slow to negative economic growth.
But only for a few hundred years. Once we've adapted to both a new climate and a fuel-less and waste-less energy system good times will come back.
You're just thrilled at the idea of Americans wallowing in grinding poverty, aren't you?
It's interesting to classify the 'tards by their type of retardation. I'll just stick with the current regulars here.
On the bottom layer, you have the megatards. Clueless on logic, science, history, ethics, everything, and incapable of anything except parroting the crazy dogma of their rightwingdingdong political cult. Nobody pays any attention to them, and that really upsets them, since attention is what they crave. Hence, we help them out occasionally by pointing and laughing. In that category, we have:
Skook
Frank
Dave
Toddster
Bripat
A step up from that, you've got the engitards -- engineers or other minor techies who have delusions of being scientists. They have experience in one narrow field, so they assume themselves to be supergeniuses in all fields, leading to much hilarity when they dive into a field they don't have a clue about. They tend to be angry that the world hasn't recognized them as supergeniuses. In that group we have:
SSDD
Westwall
Flac
And a step up from that ... well, if you're brighter than the brighter denialists, you won't be a denialist. So there is no step up for them. There's just "megatard" and "engitard". The commonality between the groups is that all are card carrying members of a 'tard political cult. Unless you've been programmed by the rightwingcrazycult, you can't get nutty enough to fall for all the 'tard conspiracy theories which make up their cult's dogma.
With that said, let's open this week's tard-off. Denialists, put forth your best attempts, as they will be graded. May the best 'tard win!
What's the 'tard category for those who think life on Earth started 500 million years ago, the Carboniferous Period was inhospitable for life and plutonium isn't for reactors?
AGW will create winners and losers. More of the latter. It will further our extreme wealth distribution which has shown a correlation with very slow to negative economic growth.
But only for a few hundred years. Once we've adapted to both a new climate and a fuel-less and waste-less energy system good times will come back.
You're just thrilled at the idea of Americans wallowing in grinding poverty, aren't you?
No. I'm working to minimize what's inevitable. I've never experienced problems solving themselves spontaneously.
What's the 'tard category for those who think life on Earth started 500 million years ago, the Carboniferous Period was inhospitable for life and plutonium isn't for reactors?
A 3 for you, Todd. Try harder. Bitter and whiny is not 'tardish.
New boy rebel gets a 5. Old and unoriginal, but at least it's retarded.
It's interesting to classify the 'tards by their type of retardation. I'll just stick with the current regulars here.
On the bottom layer, you have the megatards. Clueless on logic, science, history, ethics, everything, and incapable of anything except parroting the crazy dogma of their rightwingdingdong political cult. Nobody pays any attention to them, and that really upsets them, since attention is what they crave. Hence, we help them out occasionally by pointing and laughing. In that category, we have:
Skook
Frank
Dave
Toddster
Bripat
A step up from that, you've got the engitards -- engineers or other minor techies who have delusions of being scientists. They have experience in one narrow field, so they assume themselves to be supergeniuses in all fields, leading to much hilarity when they dive into a field they don't have a clue about. They tend to be angry that the world hasn't recognized them as supergeniuses. In that group we have:
SSDD
Westwall
Flac
And a step up from that ... well, if you're brighter than the brighter denialists, you won't be a denialist. So there is no step up for them. There's just "megatard" and "engitard". The commonality between the groups is that all are card carrying members of a 'tard political cult. Unless you've been programmed by the rightwingcrazycult, you can't get nutty enough to fall for all the 'tard conspiracy theories which make up their cult's dogma.
With that said, let's open this week's tard-off. Denialists, put forth your best attempts, as they will be graded. May the best 'tard win!
It's interesting to classify the 'tards by their type of retardation. I'll just stick with the current regulars here.
On the bottom layer, you have the megatards. Clueless on logic, science, history, ethics, everything, and incapable of anything except parroting the crazy dogma of their rightwingdingdong political cult. Nobody pays any attention to them, and that really upsets them, since attention is what they crave. Hence, we help them out occasionally by pointing and laughing. In that category, we have:
Skook
Frank
Dave
Toddster
Bripat
A step up from that, you've got the engitards -- engineers or other minor techies who have delusions of being scientists. They have experience in one narrow field, so they assume themselves to be supergeniuses in all fields, leading to much hilarity when they dive into a field they don't have a clue about. They tend to be angry that the world hasn't recognized them as supergeniuses. In that group we have:
SSDD
Westwall
Flac
And a step up from that ... well, if you're brighter than the brighter denialists, you won't be a denialist. So there is no step up for them. There's just "megatard" and "engitard". The commonality between the groups is that all are card carrying members of a 'tard political cult. Unless you've been programmed by the rightwingcrazycult, you can't get nutty enough to fall for all the 'tard conspiracy theories which make up their cult's dogma.
With that said, let's open this week's tard-off. Denialists, put forth your best attempts, as they will be graded. May the best 'tard win!
LOL.....more k00k losing >>>>
What climate change? Fewer people than EVER believe the world is really warming up
By: Owen Bennett
Published: Thu, September 19, 2013
CLIMATE change scepticism is rapidly increasing in the UK with a FIFTH of people now unconvinced the world's temperature is changing.
A report from the UK Energy Research Centre also shows the number of those who resolutely do not believe in climate change has more than quadrupled since 2005.
The Government funded report shows 19 per cent of people are climate change disbelievers - up from just four per cent in 2005 - while nine per cent did not know.
The report comes as climate change scientists working on a landmark UN report on climate change are struggling to explain why global warming appears to have slowed down in the past 15 years even though greenhouse gas emissions keep rising.
Dr. Roy Spencer, a former NASA scientist and author of Climate Confusion, argues in his influential blog the UN report shows scientists are being forced to "recognise reality".
What climate change? Fewer people than EVER believe the world is really warming up | UK | News | Daily Express
