Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
Dang... another major drop in surface temps... The flip into La Niña is getting to be massive and quick.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NASA: Global Warming Observations Need a Further 19% UPWARD Adjustment
NASA-GISS going full stupid.... Not even hiding that they are now a political activist organization..
The new study also accounted for two other issues. First, the historical data mix air and water temperatures, whereas model results refer to air temperatures only. This quirk also skews the historical record toward the cool side, because water warms less than air. The final issue is that there was considerably more Arctic sea ice when temperature records began in the 1860s, and early observers recorded air temperatures over nearby land areas for the sea-ice-covered regions. As the ice melted, later observers switched to water temperatures instead. That also pushed down the reported temperature change.
Bigger uncertainty equals bigger room to fudge the numbers..NASA: Global Warming Observations Need a Further 19% UPWARD Adjustment
NASA-GISS going full stupid.... Not even hiding that they are now a political activist organization..
The new study also accounted for two other issues. First, the historical data mix air and water temperatures, whereas model results refer to air temperatures only. This quirk also skews the historical record toward the cool side, because water warms less than air. The final issue is that there was considerably more Arctic sea ice when temperature records began in the 1860s, and early observers recorded air temperatures over nearby land areas for the sea-ice-covered regions. As the ice melted, later observers switched to water temperatures instead. That also pushed down the reported temperature change.
Only folks confusing air temps with water temps are NOAA/NASA with their new "bucket" adjustments that take thermometers back to the 19th century.
And what's with the "under"reporting because of water at the N. Pole and not ice? Ice would hold the surface temperatures much more constant than open water would anyway..
We have now passed, for one month, below the pause trend line which means by Nov the pause will officially resume at 19 years 6 months and the cooling trend, starting in 2005, will resume by February next year.. at 0.1 deg C per century..![]()
cause it isn't on the globe?So........why is New York experiencing global cooling since around 2000??
Intellicast - New York City Historic Weather Averages in New York (10025)
![]()
cause it isn't on the globe?So........why is New York experiencing global cooling since around 2000??
Intellicast - New York City Historic Weather Averages in New York (10025)
![]()
cause it isn't on the globe?So........why is New York experiencing global cooling since around 2000??
Intellicast - New York City Historic Weather Averages in New York (10025)
![]()
Doesn't matter JC.......nobody is caring about this stuff..............