More Proof the skeptics are WINNING!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
upload_2016-7-24_12-18-47.png


Dang... another major drop in surface temps... The flip into La Niña is getting to be massive and quick.
 
NASA: Global Warming Observations Need a Further 19% UPWARD Adjustment

NASA-GISS going full stupid.... Not even hiding that they are now a political activist organization..


The new study also accounted for two other issues. First, the historical data mix air and water temperatures, whereas model results refer to air temperatures only. This quirk also skews the historical record toward the cool side, because water warms less than air. The final issue is that there was considerably more Arctic sea ice when temperature records began in the 1860s, and early observers recorded air temperatures over nearby land areas for the sea-ice-covered regions. As the ice melted, later observers switched to water temperatures instead. That also pushed down the reported temperature change.

Only folks confusing air temps with water temps are NOAA/NASA with their new "bucket" adjustments that take thermometers back to the 19th century.

And what's with the "under"reporting because of water at the N. Pole and not ice? Ice would hold the surface temperatures much more constant than open water would anyway..
 
wkteq_xz.gif

Equatorial heat is gone and even at depth of 400-700 meters it has cooled by 4-7 deg C in just three months... And this has happened in BOTH oceans...

As this cold water amount increases and the size of the cold pools in both the northern and southern hemispheres continue to grow the impact of the coming La Niña will grow. Now looking to be a moderate to sever event...

A 1-2 deg C drop in GAT is now expected by this time next year. So much for the alarmists much desired step increase, Its looking like this will result in just the opposite, a step decrease.
 
Last edited:
NASA: Global Warming Observations Need a Further 19% UPWARD Adjustment

NASA-GISS going full stupid.... Not even hiding that they are now a political activist organization..


The new study also accounted for two other issues. First, the historical data mix air and water temperatures, whereas model results refer to air temperatures only. This quirk also skews the historical record toward the cool side, because water warms less than air. The final issue is that there was considerably more Arctic sea ice when temperature records began in the 1860s, and early observers recorded air temperatures over nearby land areas for the sea-ice-covered regions. As the ice melted, later observers switched to water temperatures instead. That also pushed down the reported temperature change.

Only folks confusing air temps with water temps are NOAA/NASA with their new "bucket" adjustments that take thermometers back to the 19th century.

And what's with the "under"reporting because of water at the N. Pole and not ice? Ice would hold the surface temperatures much more constant than open water would anyway..
Bigger uncertainty equals bigger room to fudge the numbers..
 
Laughed at dim wits last night denying science that shows AGW is a fraud.. The anti-science crowd sucking up lies from their leaders... Too stupid to understand simple facts..
 
IDK....call me the asshat but I always cared more about function than form. Nobody knows about the validity of any of these science "theories" anyway..........so why argue? That's the whole point in this forum.........we got nobody who knows dick about what really controls the climate. No degree of any certainty. Anybody who talks about certainty on any of this shit is full of shit.:2up:

Being in the field of behavioral psychology, I gotta see shit have clear measurements.........like the epic amount of posts on this thread. Not debatable that it is historic in this forum. We have sattelites and ocean bouys that display data that doesn't correspond...........which means both are suspect at best.

We need some operational definitions around this crap or its nothing but hooey.:boobies::boobies::coffee:
 
trend
We have now passed, for one month, below the pause trend line which means by Nov the pause will officially resume at 19 years 6 months and the cooling trend, starting in 2005, will resume by February next year.. at 0.1 deg C per century..
 
trend
We have now passed, for one month, below the pause trend line which means by Nov the pause will officially resume at 19 years 6 months and the cooling trend, starting in 2005, will resume by February next year.. at 0.1 deg C per century..


dang Billy............good post.........:rock::rock::rock:. The k00ks are getting horribly pwned.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top