More Proof the skeptics are WINNING!!

[Toddsterpatriot]

Do you ask this question seriously? You believe there is a chance that a photon could be made of protons and neutrons but that if it is not, it is made of protons only?

All matter contains electrons but that does NOT mean all matter has a charge. Matter that has an imbalance in the numbers of protons and electrons has a charge. Unless an atom has a charge, magnetic fields will have NO effect on it. I would not be exaggerating to say you could get this information from most 7th graders. And what were you thinking the periodic table was going to convey? Did you think photons were listed there somewhere? Photons are NOT made of protons or neutrons or any combination thereof. Electromagnetic radiation propagates as orthogonal electric and magnetic fields. It's energy exists in indivisible units called quanta. One photon is one quantum of EM radiation.

I'd like to know where you found this statement. Because my Google search for a definition of "electrostasis" went, in every single instance, to "electrostatic", a non-moving electric charge. Static charges are attracted to other matter, if and only if it possesses the opposite electric charge.

This is extraordinarily wrong. You are correct that the gravity affects photons but neither side of that interaction involves electric charge. This is really basic stuff. I had no idea you were...

Your a pathetic piece of shit who would not know science if it bit you in the ass.. So now to see just how pathetic you really are, tell us how a photon, which is a particle and has mass, affects a warmer body than its radiated temperature.

Ill wait for this pathetic lie you will now have to concoct. BE sure and show your work..

tell us how a photon, which is a particle and has mass,

How many photons in a gram?

First you answer how matter that is radiating at a colder temperature can warm a warmer mass..

First you answer how matter that is radiating at a colder temperature can warm a warmer mass.

According to Stefan-Boltzmann, the warmer object is radiating more than it is absorbing. So it cools.

Now you're free to admit you were talking out of your ass.
Photons have no mass and are not magnetic.

Go on, admit it.

All you have is shuck and jive.. Nice... Come on big boy pony up..

You made the stupid claims, prove them.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Your a pathetic piece of shit who would not know science if it bit you in the ass.. So now to see just how pathetic you really are, tell us how a photon, which is a particle and has mass, affects a warmer body than its radiated temperature.

Ill wait for this pathetic lie you will now have to concoct. BE sure and show your work..

tell us how a photon, which is a particle and has mass,

How many photons in a gram?

First you answer how matter that is radiating at a colder temperature can warm a warmer mass..

First you answer how matter that is radiating at a colder temperature can warm a warmer mass.

According to Stefan-Boltzmann, the warmer object is radiating more than it is absorbing. So it cools.

Now you're free to admit you were talking out of your ass.
Photons have no mass and are not magnetic.

Go on, admit it.

All you have is shuck and jive.. Nice... Come on big boy pony up..

You made the stupid claims, prove them.

"According to Stefan-Boltzmann, the warmer object is radiating more than it is absorbing. So it cools."

You refute your own stance... Now you seem to agree that a mass bombarded with photons, emitted at -80 Deg C, will cool an object?

I refuse to debate QM with people who have no grasp of the basic concepts.

 

[IanC]

I refuse to debate QM with people who have no grasp of the basic concepts

Hahahahaha.......

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

tell us how a photon, which is a particle and has mass,

How many photons in a gram?

First you answer how matter that is radiating at a colder temperature can warm a warmer mass..

First you answer how matter that is radiating at a colder temperature can warm a warmer mass.

According to Stefan-Boltzmann, the warmer object is radiating more than it is absorbing. So it cools.

Now you're free to admit you were talking out of your ass.
Photons have no mass and are not magnetic.

Go on, admit it.

All you have is shuck and jive.. Nice... Come on big boy pony up..

You made the stupid claims, prove them.

"According to Stefan-Boltzmann, the warmer object is radiating more than it is absorbing. So it cools."

You refute your own stance... Now you seem to agree that a mass bombarded with photons, emitted at -80 Deg C, will cool an object?

I refuse to debate QM with people who have no grasp of the basic concepts.

You refute your own stance...

Where? Be specific.

Now you seem to agree that a mass bombarded with photons, emitted at -80 Deg C, will cool an object?

Why would photons ever cool an object?

I refuse to debate QM with people

Your moronic, unsupported claims were an attempt at debate? That's funny!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I refuse to debate QM with people who have no grasp of the basic concepts

Hahahahaha.......

Where does QM say photons have mass or are magnetic?

 

[IanC]

I refuse to debate QM with people who have no grasp of the basic concepts

Hahahahaha.......

Where does QM say photons have mass or are magnetic?

BillyBoob is confused by physics. It makes no sense to him. So he makes up shit that he thinks sounds sciency. And after he has repeated it enough times he starts to think it is true.

Light has symptoms of being both a particle and a wave, therefore it is neither.

BillyBoob read an article on QM that discussed the fuzziness of light and matter at the very edge of our understanding, so he jumped to the conclusion that light can be matter.

A stream of photons can be polarized by a strong magnet. Hmmm..... But after further investigation it turns out that the polarization only happens if the magnet is close to the matter of either the light source or detector. Double hmmm....

 

[SSDD]

I refuse to debate QM with people who have no grasp of the basic concepts

Hahahahaha.......

Where does QM say photons have mass or are magnetic?

BillyBoob is confused by physics. It makes no sense to him. So he makes up shit that he thinks sounds sciency. And after he has repeated it enough times he starts to think it is true.

Light has symptoms of being both a particle and a wave, therefore it is neither.

BillyBoob read an article on QM that discussed the fuzziness of light and matter at the very edge of our understanding, so he jumped to the conclusion that light can be matter.

A stream of photons can be polarized by a strong magnet. Hmmm..... But after further investigation it turns out that the polarization only happens if the magnet is close to the matter of either the light source or detector. Double hmmm....

I provided several sources that discuss just that...the key point is that the "fuzzy edge" of our understanding is much closer to us than you seem to believe...we are infants just beginning to scratch the surface...you are living under the delusion that science knows all. At this point, we don't even know what we don't know....

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I refuse to debate QM with people who have no grasp of the basic concepts

Hahahahaha.......

Where does QM say photons have mass or are magnetic?

BillyBoob is confused by physics. It makes no sense to him. So he makes up shit that he thinks sounds sciency. And after he has repeated it enough times he starts to think it is true.

Light has symptoms of being both a particle and a wave, therefore it is neither.

BillyBoob read an article on QM that discussed the fuzziness of light and matter at the very edge of our understanding, so he jumped to the conclusion that light can be matter.

A stream of photons can be polarized by a strong magnet. Hmmm..... But after further investigation it turns out that the polarization only happens if the magnet is close to the matter of either the light source or detector. Double hmmm....

Did you see his post where he said the cold causes "contraction of molecules"?

Maybe he's really a Psych major, interested in reactions to completely moronic statements?
Anyone with any type of science background can't be as stupid as he's acting, right?

 

[skookerasbil]

JC.....hey man....see any balls rolling around the streets today? Holy fucking shit....gotta figure this is st00pid cold even for you!

If you have any personal observations you've seen.....love to hear them. Try the hot water trick?

 

[Billy_Bob]

I am amazed at the number of people here who think their 'science' is the only answer. It was error to think any of you would use reason or go beyond your extremely limited understandings.

Good luck.... Your going to need it.. You are all setting yourselves up for servitude and global slavery to your master, AGW... Your God.. Enjoy your choice...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Compared to your "science", you're damn right my science is the only answer.
Now run away, silly twat.

 

[jc456]

JC.....hey man....see any balls rolling around the streets today? Holy fucking shit....gotta figure this is st00pid cold even for you!

If you have any personal observations you've seen.....love to hear them. Try the hot water trick?

grandson did the hot water trick this morning. funny shit. turns into snow immediately when it hits the air.

High right now is -17F. record high was -11 from 1983, wind chill is -39F. I think tonight it's supposed to get down to -29F and -60F windchill. Both records I believe. I believe the record is -27F for the low from 1985, wind chill I don't know at the moment.

I have two dogs, I won't let them go out for longer than five minutes. out, do their business and right back in. My nuts would freeze off.

 

[jc456]

Compared to your "science", you're damn right my science is the only answer.
Now run away, silly twat.

dude, your science is all fked up. I laugh at you.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Compared to your "science", you're damn right my science is the only answer.
Now run away, silly twat.

dude, your science is all fked up. I laugh at you.

Here is a partial list of records for Minnesota..

 

[jc456]

Compared to your "science", you're damn right my science is the only answer.
Now run away, silly twat.

dude, your science is all fked up. I laugh at you.

Here is a partial list of records for Minnesota..

View attachment 243072

my wife has a school friend who lives in Bemidji. Knew they were colder. Also figured most cities in Minnesota would be colder. Got to get here from there.

 

[Billy_Bob]

International Falls smashed its records by 5 deg F..

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Compared to your "science", you're damn right my science is the only answer.
Now run away, silly twat.

dude, your science is all fked up. I laugh at you.

Because you're an idiot.

 

[jc456]

Compared to your "science", you're damn right my science is the only answer.
Now run away, silly twat.

dude, your science is all fked up. I laugh at you.

Because you're an idiot.

not as big of one as you!!

 

[Billy_Bob]

Even in the face of historic cooling the Meteorological society headed by CBS and its lead goon are trying to shift the narrative AGAIN... One more try by changing the terminology and running from the need for empirical evidence or proof......

Climate Change Gets a New Language… Again

Just like every other socialist control plot, when you've been found out, you change the terms to keep people confused. They are now running from empirical evidence and the need to show the science.

 

[InstantOn]

Gaia doesn't care what skeptics or believers in climate change believe, but she will respond to what they do.