More than 99.9% of peer reviewed studies show that humans are the primary cause of global warming

[Manonthestreet]

 

[otto105]

He wants the count of 10 billion to be done one crab at a time. That is an enormous number of crabs. Also the industry supplying snow crabs does not speak of any dead crabs nor a shortage of them.

Geeszuz man, stop with the stupid.

Second snow crab season canceled as researchers pinpoint cause of decline

 

[jc456]

The problem that exists is that a huge amount of solar energy is constantly hitting the planet earth, and once it hits the planet, it can only leave the planet by photonic infrared radiation.
But carbon in the upper atmosphere will absorb infrared radiation and turn it into vibratory heat, which then can not leave the planet. That is because space if a vacuum, and can not conduct heat.

You didn’t state the problem, you identified nature.

 

[otto105]

No this is also peer reviewed.

Peer-reviewed papers by climate skeptics

Examines the science and arguments of global warming skepticism. Common objections like 'global warming is caused by the sun', 'temperature has changed naturally in the past' or 'other planets are warming too' are examined to see what the science really says.

skepticalscience.com

Hilariousw

A geologist.

 

[otto105]

"We" don't need anything, kid. You sound like you want to be king or dictator. Tough shit.
If you want to cut down on your CO2 production, have at it. In the meantime, I will continue living an unparanoid and productive life. You have no say in it.

When are you going to offer a scientific organization which backs your denial position?

 

[Robert W]

Hilariousw

A geologist.

Now you understand how you are viewed when you shoot off your mouth about science.

 

[Robert W]

Geeszuz man, stop with the stupid.

Second snow crab season canceled as researchers pinpoint cause of decline

Do you know why that is pure bullshit? Did you notice the amount of those crabs in 1977/78?

Now look at 1991. See the record high amounts? Did Fossil Fuels cause the dramatic increase of snow crabs?

 

[ding]

No silly, the opposite of that.

Actually it's not. You are too stupid to see it.

 

[ding]

The problem that exists is that a huge amount of solar energy is constantly hitting the planet earth, and once it hits the planet, it can only leave the planet by photonic infrared radiation.
But carbon in the upper atmosphere will absorb infrared radiation and turn it into vibratory heat, which then can not leave the planet. That is because space if a vacuum, and can not conduct heat.

Why do you believe that man's CO2 emissions are 500% efficient when all the GHG's in the atmosphere are only 44% at trapping heat?

 

[Crick]

Do you know why that is pure bullshit? Did you notice the amount of those crabs in 1977/78?

Now look at 1991. See the record high amounts? Did Fossil Fuels cause the dramatic increase of snow crabs?

That isn't a graph of crab populations, its a graph of crabs harvested. Not the same thing.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Nuclear energy and Thorium reactors

You and your windmills oy vey!

Easy to say.

Not so easy to do.

Obama offered 4 guaranteed loans for companies to build nuclear power plants. Nobody took the offer.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Actually it's not. You are too stupid to see it.

No, that was your low IQ trolling attempt. One in a long series, in this thread.

Your God of the gaps is all yours, shaman.

 

[Mac-7]

Easy to say.

Not so easy to do.

Obama offered 4 guaranteed loans for companies to build nuclear power plants. Nobody took the offer.

Easy to say.

Not so easy to do.

Obama offered 4 guaranteed loans for companies to build nuclear power plants. Nobody took the offer.

yes they did

Plant Vogtle

www.georgiapower.com

And the first gay muslim president deserves some credit for that

 

[ding]

No, that was your low IQ trolling attempt. One in a long series, in this thread.

Your God of the gaps is all yours, shaman.

Arguing that shortcomings in technology today will be solved by technology in the future is effectively a god of gaps argument. You just can't see it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Arguing that shortcomings in technology today will be solved by technology in the future is effectively a god of gaps argument.

No, thats wrong. And what I argued for was the effort, anyway. .

 

[Orangecat]

When are you going to offer a scientific organization which backs your denial position?

When are you going to stop asking stupid questions?

 

[Markle]

Easy to say.

Not so easy to do.

Obama offered 4 guaranteed loans for companies to build nuclear power plants. Nobody took the offer.

Window dressing.

Why would anyone try to wade through miles of red tape, approvals, etc, etc, etc, and attempt to build a nuclear plant in the US? Further, how would they know they could finish the project based on the winds in Washington? See the Keystone Pipeline and our Southern Border.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Window dressing.

Is 4 more than zero? Yes.

Why would anyone try to wade through miles of red tape, approvals, etc, etc, etc, and attempt to build a nuclear plant in the US?

To make profit, as all nuclear power plants do. I don't have to account for your fantasies.

 

[ding]

No, thats wrong. And what I argued for was the effort, anyway. .

It's not wrong. The shortcomings are numerous and that's what prompted your god of the gaps argument that future technology will fill in the gaps.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It's not wrong. The shortcomings are numerous and that's what prompted your god of the gaps argument that future technology will fill in the gaps.

It's wrong. And I have no use for something so stupid. Go peddle it to someone else.