Prosecutors never find anyone innocent.Intent to obstruct? LOL I asked what Trump DID to obstruct Mueller's investigation...and you can't name ANYTHING! Then you turn around and accuse me of slinging shit? Dude that's all you do on this board...24/7! You've been slinging shit at Trump for months now trying desperately to get something...anything...to stick and you've got nada...zilch...nothing!
I'll do you one better...I'll give you 11.
Here are the 11 instances of potential obstruction of justice by Trump outlined in the Mueller report
"Potential obstruction"? Here's a radical concept...why don't you list the ACTUAL obstructions of justice by Trump?
HELLO?
FOR THE THIRD TIME... MUELLER SAID HE WOULD NEVER INDICT A SITTING PRESIDENT. Got it?
Mueller Tells Trump Team He Won’t Indict President: Giuliani
And the goal of the report was NEVER to indict Trump...only to gather information for others to deal with the situation...like Congress.
Mueller is a good 'cop'. And good cops don't decide innocence or guilt..they just collect evidence and present it to the necessary authorities...which is what Mueller did.
For the FOURTH time...MUELLER NEVER WAS GOING TO INDICT OR EVEN DETERMINE IF THERE WAS OBSTRUCTION...JUST COLLECT EVIDENCE.
But he was - like police do - state if he thought there was NO EVIDENCE OF OBSTRUCTION. And he clearly stated that he could not do that.
So let me see how this works...
"Good cop" Bob Mueller does an extensive investigation into Donald Trump and comes up with no evidence of a crime taking place...but you think THAT means that the Congress should "deal with the situation"? How exactly? How does Congress go ahead with indictments when Mueller found no evidence of criminal acts? Wouldn't Mueller have SAID he found evidence of criminal acts but it wasn't in his power to indict a sitting President and therefore the Congress should act?
What the hell are you asking me this for? I don't really care...that's up to Congress to decide.
Again...'Special counsel Robert Mueller explicitly stated in his Russia investigation report that he and his team had not cleared President Donald Trump of accusations of obstruction of justice.
"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state," the report read. "However, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."'
Apparently you do not understand this.
Why...I do not know. It is crystal clear....Mueller would have said 'Trump is innocent' if they found that he was. They could not say that.
The conclusion is STAGGERINGLY obvious. Mueller found evidence that Trump obstructed justice. But he is leaving it up to others to determine if that evidence is sufficient to bring charges.
I have wasted too much time with you.
The details are SIMPLE to understand and have been laid out before you. But you just don;t seem to want to see them.
Fine.
We are done on this (for now). Go and waste someone else's time, please.
Good day.