Mueller explicitly says he can't clear Trump of obstruction of justice

[beagle9]

Tell us about some and throw in some proof, not opinion.

Mueller sighted at least 10 instances of attempts by Trump to obstruct. It's in the report.
I'm not reading it for you, or for anyone else.
It's like home work in school; do your own.

You didn't finish the sentence of Mueller's thought. Attempt? No, he mentioned things to his advisers which they went against. He took their advice, and that was not impeachable at all. Everyone has thoughts when they're not understanding what the opponent is pulling. It's human to think bad thoughts and not act on them PRESIDENT TRUMP DID NOT ACT ON HIS THOUGHTS. He acted on good advice to do nothing that would get him in trouble.

You don't give a damn that he did the right thing. YOU want things to be judged by what people THINK before counsel. That makes you one of the most absurd people online, all 200 million of people online. IOW you are disconnected from the real world. Better get some help. TDS is eating you alive, and you're letting it.

In his report Mueller demonstrated 10 attempts by Trump to direct his staff to to obstruct the investigation. Subordinates refused Trump's orders to obstruct the investigation. This clearly demonstrates Trump's attempts & intent at obstructing the investigation. Mueller passed this issue to The US Congress with his words that Congress is responsible for the checks & balances concerning the POTUS attempts at obstruction. So the issue is in the hand of Congress to further investigate, if they so choose to do so.

That has nothing to do with your bullshit rant, or TDS.

Wouldn't you ask your staff or suggest to them not to get involved with any questioning coming from a witch hunt or false investigation (if you knew you were an innocent man), not guilty of the politically motivated charges that were being brought against you ???? Yes you would.

Mueller's investigation was a scipe hunt in hopes of exacting political retribution for his friend Comey's firing, and because he himself didn't like the outcome of the election based upon the insurance policy fails that his comrads had going in which he later had to depart from them before they were exposed.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about; Trump DID ORDER staff to obstruct the invetsigation.
You also clearly have not read the report.

The below is taken from Mueller's report.

"On June 17, 2017, the President called McGahn at home and directed him to call the Acting Attorney General and say that the Special Counsel had conflicts of interest and must be removed. McGahn did not carry out the direction, however, deciding that he would resign rather than trigger what he regarded as a potential Saturday Night Massacre."

"The President then met with McGahn in the Oval Office and again pressured him to deny the reports. In the same meeting, the President also asked McGahn why he had told the Special Counsel about the President's effort to remove the Special Counsel and why McGahn took notes of his conversations with the President. McGahn refused to back away from what he remembered happening and perceived the President to be testing his mettle."

There are TWO instances in which Trump ordered Don McGahn to obstruct the investigation. That clearly demonstrates Trump's intent to obstruct the justice process.

You really just need to STFU if you don't know what you are talking about because all you are doing is blowing hot air up your own ass.

You are one crazy leftist.... Want to go back and read carefully the words you highlighted in my post ???? Do it real slow and carefully now.... Slow and very slowly even more so if needed, and then respond if you will. Comprehension your problem or is it more like apprehension ??

 

[Leo123]

Tell us about some and throw in some proof, not opinion.

Mueller sighted at least 10 instances of attempts by Trump to obstruct. It's in the report.
I'm not reading it for you, or for anyone else.
It's like home work in school; do your own.

You didn't finish the sentence of Mueller's thought. Attempt? No, he mentioned things to his advisers which they went against. He took their advice, and that was not impeachable at all. Everyone has thoughts when they're not understanding what the opponent is pulling. It's human to think bad thoughts and not act on them PRESIDENT TRUMP DID NOT ACT ON HIS THOUGHTS. He acted on good advice to do nothing that would get him in trouble.

You don't give a damn that he did the right thing. YOU want things to be judged by what people THINK before counsel. That makes you one of the most absurd people online, all 200 million of people online. IOW you are disconnected from the real world. Better get some help. TDS is eating you alive, and you're letting it.

In his report Mueller demonstrated 10 attempts by Trump to direct his staff to to obstruct the investigation. Subordinates refused Trump's orders to obstruct the investigation. This clearly demonstrates Trump's attempts & intent at obstructing the investigation. Mueller passed this issue to The US Congress with his words that Congress is responsible for the checks & balances concerning the POTUS attempts at obstruction. So the issue is in the hand of Congress to further investigate, if they so choose to do so.

That has nothing to do with your bullshit rant, or TDS.

Wouldn't you ask your staff or suggest to them not to get involved with any questioning coming from a witch hunt or false investigation (if you knew you were an innocent man), not guilty of the politically motivated charges that were being brought against you ???? Yes you would.

Mueller's investigation was a scipe hunt in hopes of exacting political retribution for his friend Comey's firing, and because he himself didn't like the outcome of the election based upon the insurance policy fails that his comrads had going in which he later had to depart from them before they were exposed.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about; Trump DID ORDER staff to obstruct the invetsigation.
You also clearly have not read the report.

The below is taken from Mueller's report.

"On June 17, 2017, the President called McGahn at home and directed him to call the Acting Attorney General and say that the Special Counsel had conflicts of interest and must be removed. McGahn did not carry out the direction, however, deciding that he would resign rather than trigger what he regarded as a potential Saturday Night Massacre."

"The President then met with McGahn in the Oval Office and again pressured him to deny the reports. In the same meeting, the President also asked McGahn why he had told the Special Counsel about the President's effort to remove the Special Counsel and why McGahn took notes of his conversations with the President. McGahn refused to back away from what he remembered happening and perceived the President to be testing his mettle."

There are TWO instances in which Trump ordered Don McGahn to obstruct the investigation. That clearly demonstrates Trump's intent to obstruct the justice process.

You really just need to STFU if you don't know what you are talking about because all you are doing is blowing hot air up your own ass.

So Democrats went from 'Collusion for sure' to 'intent maybe.....'

 

[Weatherman2020]

If that's the best thing you morons got out of this report, you have nothing.

He could have might have thought and talked about maybe trying to possibly do something or nothing about the investigation.

So, you obviously are OK with any POTUS making massive attempts to obstruct SC investigations.

Not surprised .......

So, you obviously are OK with any POTUS making massive attempts to obstruct SC investigations.

Tell us about some and throw in some proof, not opinion.

Mueller sighted at least 10 instances of attempts by Trump to obstruct. It's in the report.
I'm not reading it for you, or for anyone else.
It's like home work in school; do your own.

You didn't finish the sentence of Mueller's thought. Attempt? No, he mentioned things to his advisers which they went against. He took their advice, and that was not impeachable at all. Everyone has thoughts when they're not understanding what the opponent is pulling. It's human to think bad thoughts and not act on them PRESIDENT TRUMP DID NOT ACT ON HIS THOUGHTS. He acted on good advice to do nothing that would get him in trouble.

You don't give a damn that he did the right thing. YOU want things to be judged by what people THINK before counsel. That makes you one of the most absurd people online, all 200 million of people online. IOW you are disconnected from the real world. Better get some help. TDS is eating you alive, and you're letting it.

In his report Mueller demonstrated 10 attempts by Trump to direct his staff to to obstruct the investigation. Subordinates refused Trump's orders to obstruct the investigation. This clearly demonstrates Trump's attempts & intent at obstructing the investigation. Mueller passed this issue to The US Congress with his words that Congress is responsible for the checks & balances concerning the POTUS attempts at obstruction. So the issue is in the hand of Congress to further investigate, if they so choose to do so.

That has nothing to do with your bullshit rant, or TDS.

WHY is PELOSI protecting TRUMP? She is the ONLY thing preventing JUSTICE.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

 

[beagle9]

Tell us about some and throw in some proof, not opinion.

Mueller sighted at least 10 instances of attempts by Trump to obstruct. It's in the report.
I'm not reading it for you, or for anyone else.
It's like home work in school; do your own.

You didn't finish the sentence of Mueller's thought. Attempt? No, he mentioned things to his advisers which they went against. He took their advice, and that was not impeachable at all. Everyone has thoughts when they're not understanding what the opponent is pulling. It's human to think bad thoughts and not act on them PRESIDENT TRUMP DID NOT ACT ON HIS THOUGHTS. He acted on good advice to do nothing that would get him in trouble.

You don't give a damn that he did the right thing. YOU want things to be judged by what people THINK before counsel. That makes you one of the most absurd people online, all 200 million of people online. IOW you are disconnected from the real world. Better get some help. TDS is eating you alive, and you're letting it.

In his report Mueller demonstrated 10 attempts by Trump to direct his staff to to obstruct the investigation. Subordinates refused Trump's orders to obstruct the investigation. This clearly demonstrates Trump's attempts & intent at obstructing the investigation. Mueller passed this issue to The US Congress with his words that Congress is responsible for the checks & balances concerning the POTUS attempts at obstruction. So the issue is in the hand of Congress to further investigate, if they so choose to do so.

That has nothing to do with your bullshit rant, or TDS.

Wouldn't you ask your staff or suggest to them not to get involved with any questioning coming from a witch hunt or false investigation (if you knew you were an innocent man), not guilty of the politically motivated charges that were being brought against you ???? Yes you would.

Mueller's investigation was a scipe hunt in hopes of exacting political retribution for his friend Comey's firing, and because he himself didn't like the outcome of the election based upon the insurance policy fails that his comrads had going in which he later had to depart from them before they were exposed.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about; Trump DID ORDER staff to obstruct the invetsigation.
You also clearly have not read the report.

The below is taken from Mueller's report.

"On June 17, 2017, the President called McGahn at home and directed him to call the Acting Attorney General and say that the Special Counsel had conflicts of interest and must be removed. McGahn did not carry out the direction, however, deciding that he would resign rather than trigger what he regarded as a potential Saturday Night Massacre."

"The President then met with McGahn in the Oval Office and again pressured him to deny the reports. In the same meeting, the President also asked McGahn why he had told the Special Counsel about the President's effort to remove the Special Counsel and why McGahn took notes of his conversations with the President. McGahn refused to back away from what he remembered happening and perceived the President to be testing his mettle."

There are TWO instances in which Trump ordered Don McGahn to obstruct the investigation. That clearly demonstrates Trump's intent to obstruct the justice process.

You really just need to STFU if you don't know what you are talking about because all you are doing is blowing hot air up your own ass.

Telling anyone not to cooperate with a witch hunt, and a bogus investigation conducted by the butt hurt Demon-crats ala their chosen one Mueller isn't obstructing justice at all, but it was more like refusing to be framed by a hostile political party that see's all republicans as their sworn enemy now.

 

[beagle9]

Mueller sighted at least 10 instances of attempts by Trump to obstruct. It's in the report.
I'm not reading it for you, or for anyone else.
It's like home work in school; do your own.

You didn't finish the sentence of Mueller's thought. Attempt? No, he mentioned things to his advisers which they went against. He took their advice, and that was not impeachable at all. Everyone has thoughts when they're not understanding what the opponent is pulling. It's human to think bad thoughts and not act on them PRESIDENT TRUMP DID NOT ACT ON HIS THOUGHTS. He acted on good advice to do nothing that would get him in trouble.

You don't give a damn that he did the right thing. YOU want things to be judged by what people THINK before counsel. That makes you one of the most absurd people online, all 200 million of people online. IOW you are disconnected from the real world. Better get some help. TDS is eating you alive, and you're letting it.

In his report Mueller demonstrated 10 attempts by Trump to direct his staff to to obstruct the investigation. Subordinates refused Trump's orders to obstruct the investigation. This clearly demonstrates Trump's attempts & intent at obstructing the investigation. Mueller passed this issue to The US Congress with his words that Congress is responsible for the checks & balances concerning the POTUS attempts at obstruction. So the issue is in the hand of Congress to further investigate, if they so choose to do so.

That has nothing to do with your bullshit rant, or TDS.

Wouldn't you ask your staff or suggest to them not to get involved with any questioning coming from a witch hunt or false investigation (if you knew you were an innocent man), not guilty of the politically motivated charges that were being brought against you ???? Yes you would.

Mueller's investigation was a scipe hunt in hopes of exacting political retribution for his friend Comey's firing, and because he himself didn't like the outcome of the election based upon the insurance policy fails that his comrads had going in which he later had to depart from them before they were exposed.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about; Trump DID ORDER staff to obstruct the invetsigation.
You also clearly have not read the report.

The below is taken from Mueller's report.

"On June 17, 2017, the President called McGahn at home and directed him to call the Acting Attorney General and say that the Special Counsel had conflicts of interest and must be removed. McGahn did not carry out the direction, however, deciding that he would resign rather than trigger what he regarded as a potential Saturday Night Massacre."

"The President then met with McGahn in the Oval Office and again pressured him to deny the reports. In the same meeting, the President also asked McGahn why he had told the Special Counsel about the President's effort to remove the Special Counsel and why McGahn took notes of his conversations with the President. McGahn refused to back away from what he remembered happening and perceived the President to be testing his mettle."

There are TWO instances in which Trump ordered Don McGahn to obstruct the investigation. That clearly demonstrates Trump's intent to obstruct the justice process.

You really just need to STFU if you don't know what you are talking about because all you are doing is blowing hot air up your own ass.

So Democrats went from 'Collusion for sure' to 'intent maybe.....'

It's all they got left.

 

[bripat9643]

'Special counsel Robert Mueller explicitly stated in his Russia investigation report that he and his team had not cleared President Donald Trump of accusations of obstruction of justice.

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state," the report read. "However, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."'

Mueller explicitly says he can't clear Trump of obstruction of justice


If Trump and his Trumpbots think the Mueller report cleared the former of obstruction of justice?

They are 100% wrong.

"Exoneration" isn't what prosecutors do. They either indict or they don't. Mueller didn't indict on collusion or on obstruction of justice. End of story.

Yupp!
This is the political part of the report and not a prosecutorial legal determination!

It's all a great big political pile of shit since Mueller knew after the 2nd month that there was no evidence of collusion.

 

[bripat9643]

If that's the best thing you morons got out of this report, you have nothing.

He could have might have thought and talked about maybe trying to possibly do something or nothing about the investigation.

So, you obviously are OK with any POTUS making massive attempts to obstruct SC investigations.

Not surprised .......

Don't assume anything, you commie hack.

He turned over documents, allowed staffers to testify without needing warrants issued.

If he ranted or thought about trying to stop the smear job against him, how is that criminal?

"Massive", lol.

The report came out, people were interviewed, documents turned over, and the best you got is a press secretary making up something pointless, and a President mad at the attempted coup started against him.

Fuck off.

I said not a goddamn thing about any, "press secretary."

You are the second asshole in here to accuse me of discussing something I have not mentioned.

I will assume you don't know how to fucking read.

I was talking about the report in general, and the complete lack of actual events or crimes against Trump and others that resulted.

I am generalizing about your TDS, and the TDS of others you dime store hack.

Sorry man...but you clearly have NO IDEA what TDS actually is:

''Trump Derangement Syndrome
The latest attempt by the alt-right to demonise anybody who thinks that maybe putting a reality TV star who's declared bankruptcy six times in charge of the country might not have been the best idea.
"So what if Trump only told the complete truth throughout 4% of his campaign, and had to settle out of court for that fraud trial, and that he reacts like a spoilt brat on Twitter to any kind of criticism? Geez, you libtard SJW snowflakes just have accept democracy won and stop exercising your right to free speech! You're so negative with your Trump Derangement Syndrome!"'

No need to thank me for the education...my pleasure.


Have a nice day.

We've seen these personal attacks against Trump 1000 times already.

<YAWN!>

 

[Uncensored2008]

'Special counsel Robert Mueller explicitly stated in his Russia investigation report that he and his team had not cleared President Donald Trump of accusations of obstruction of justice.

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state," the report read. "However, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."'

Mueller explicitly says he can't clear Trump of obstruction of justice


If Trump and his Trumpbots think the Mueller report cleared the former of obstruction of justice?

They are 100% wrong.

Mewler can prosecute, or not prosecute.

That is ALL he can do.

His little stink bombs to make his Stalinist buddies happy are irrelevant.

By not charging Trump, he cleared him.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Its pretty sloppy work to release dirt on someone that you don't choose to indict. I'd say thats a borderline slander lawsuit. Ethics says that a prosecutors job is to either charge or not, not to go to the media and smear the guys reputation but say "Oh, I don't have enough to charge him with anything."

Well then sit down and shut the fuck up.

 

[beautress]

Even though facts say otherwise Mueller did cater to liberal feelings a little.

He wants more work. The $25 - $40 millions he had at his disposal to spend was fun.

 

[beautress]

The Congress is willing to spend millions and millions of dollars to get tTrump. The first salvo didn't work at $25 million - $40 millions spent already (Have heard reports from several forces, and when it comes to government expenses, it's never the low estimate).

Now, Nadler wants to spend more millions and millions and millions more of your money on getting Trump on anything else. It's more get Trump, more get Trump, and more get Trump. Their wantonness to spend more taxpayer money on getting Trump is not revenge the American people can afford them. $25 million got them nothing, and pushing that to $100 million more isn't going to get it either. Trump did not collude, he did not spy, he did not steal, he did not try to hide, he did not obstruct, and chances are that with all his accountants behind him, the best in the business, he did not cheat on his taxes nor defraud anybody, either.

The Congress is not willing to appropriate sufficient funds of any kind to support the states that are being hurt by swarms of illegal aliens at the border, and now their sanctuary cities don't want any more immigrants sent to them at all.

How damn screwed up are the Democrats going to be forever and ever and ever?

When is enough enough?

Unseat the Democrats. Vote Republican.

 

[mikegriffith1]

That's a backhanded way of saying he found no evidence of obstruction of justice. Talking about exercising your constitutional right to fire a special counsel is not obstruction of justice. Expressing concern about the special counsel is not obstruction of justice. Telling an attorney to lie to the public about a leak is not obstruction of justice, IF in fact Trump did so (many of these reported statements are now being disputed by others in the White House). Firing the lying, corrupt James Comey was not obstruction of justice. Etc., etc., etc.

 

[beautress]

That's a backhanded way of saying he found no evidence of obstruction of justice. Talking about exercising your constitutional right to fire a special counsel is not obstruction of justice. Expressing concern about the special counsel is not obstruction of justice. Telling an attorney to lie to the public about a leak is not obstruction of justice, IF in fact Trump did so (many of these reported statements are now being disputed by others in the White House). Firing the lying, corrupt James Comey was not obstruction of justice. Etc., etc., etc.

You're so right, MikeGriffith1.

The First Mueller Report cited NO OBSTRUCTION.
The House Report cited NO OBSTRUCTION.
The Senate Report cited NO OBSTRUCTION.

It would be mentally ill to go for this stupid Impeach Trump garbage with a 3-counts and you're out on obstruction of justice charges, because no obstruction of justice was found, and Trump himself knows he did not commit one single item of obstruction of justice. He didn't collude with Russia, he did nothing to obstruct justice, and he has done no wrong.

Wrongs have been done to him, and Nadler is going to continue to ankle bite the President into oblivion, while Nadler isn't going to help America resolve its problems at the border nor do any other American help. He just wants to get Trump. Let's send him to an asylum where he can talk to some nice people who understand him, give him meds so he can get some good sleep at night, and the rest of America doesn't have to listen to his never assuaged hatred for President Trump.

Good God, that man is so sick.

 

[beagle9]

Tell us about some and throw in some proof, not opinion.

Mueller sighted at least 10 instances of attempts by Trump to obstruct. It's in the report.
I'm not reading it for you, or for anyone else.
It's like home work in school; do your own.

You didn't finish the sentence of Mueller's thought. Attempt? No, he mentioned things to his advisers which they went against. He took their advice, and that was not impeachable at all. Everyone has thoughts when they're not understanding what the opponent is pulling. It's human to think bad thoughts and not act on them PRESIDENT TRUMP DID NOT ACT ON HIS THOUGHTS. He acted on good advice to do nothing that would get him in trouble.

You don't give a damn that he did the right thing. YOU want things to be judged by what people THINK before counsel. That makes you one of the most absurd people online, all 200 million of people online. IOW you are disconnected from the real world. Better get some help. TDS is eating you alive, and you're letting it.

In his report Mueller demonstrated 10 attempts by Trump to direct his staff to to obstruct the investigation. Subordinates refused Trump's orders to obstruct the investigation. This clearly demonstrates Trump's attempts & intent at obstructing the investigation. Mueller passed this issue to The US Congress with his words that Congress is responsible for the checks & balances concerning the POTUS attempts at obstruction. So the issue is in the hand of Congress to further investigate, if they so choose to do so.

That has nothing to do with your bullshit rant, or TDS.

WHY is PELOSI protecting TRUMP? She is the ONLY thing preventing JUSTICE.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

I'm going to make you shell out the next $25 million on your own little get-even-with-Trump schema. You have a big mouth when it comes to spending other people's money. Now put your money where your motor mouth is.

I think he was being facetious toward another poster, I think. LOL

 

[beautress]

Mueller sighted at least 10 instances of attempts by Trump to obstruct. It's in the report.
I'm not reading it for you, or for anyone else.
It's like home work in school; do your own.

You didn't finish the sentence of Mueller's thought. Attempt? No, he mentioned things to his advisers which they went against. He took their advice, and that was not impeachable at all. Everyone has thoughts when they're not understanding what the opponent is pulling. It's human to think bad thoughts and not act on them PRESIDENT TRUMP DID NOT ACT ON HIS THOUGHTS. He acted on good advice to do nothing that would get him in trouble.

You don't give a damn that he did the right thing. YOU want things to be judged by what people THINK before counsel. That makes you one of the most absurd people online, all 200 million of people online. IOW you are disconnected from the real world. Better get some help. TDS is eating you alive, and you're letting it.

In his report Mueller demonstrated 10 attempts by Trump to direct his staff to to obstruct the investigation. Subordinates refused Trump's orders to obstruct the investigation. This clearly demonstrates Trump's attempts & intent at obstructing the investigation. Mueller passed this issue to The US Congress with his words that Congress is responsible for the checks & balances concerning the POTUS attempts at obstruction. So the issue is in the hand of Congress to further investigate, if they so choose to do so.

That has nothing to do with your bullshit rant, or TDS.

WHY is PELOSI protecting TRUMP? She is the ONLY thing preventing JUSTICE.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

I'm going to make you shell out the next $25 million on your own little get-even-with-Trump schema. You have a big mouth when it comes to spending other people's money. Now put your money where your motor mouth is.

I think he was being facetious toward another poster, I think. LOL

Thanks. I just caught that and deleted the offending post after rereading the page. Thanks, Beagle9.

 

[OKTexas]

'Special counsel Robert Mueller explicitly stated in his Russia investigation report that he and his team had not cleared President Donald Trump of accusations of obstruction of justice.

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state," the report read. "However, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."'

Mueller explicitly says he can't clear Trump of obstruction of justice


If Trump and his Trumpbots think the Mueller report cleared the former of obstruction of justice?

They are 100% wrong.

That's OK, Mueller's two bosses did.

.

 

[beautress]

'Special counsel Robert Mueller explicitly stated in his Russia investigation report that he and his team had not cleared President Donald Trump of accusations of obstruction of justice.

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state," the report read. "However, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."'

Mueller explicitly says he can't clear Trump of obstruction of justice


If Trump and his Trumpbots think the Mueller report cleared the former of obstruction of justice?

They are 100% wrong.

That's OK, Mueller's two bosses did.

.

They sure did!!!

Now, they need to give Mueller early retirement. Oh, wait, he's already 74, they can just finalize his service with a gold watch or something.

 

[beagle9]

You didn't finish the sentence of Mueller's thought. Attempt? No, he mentioned things to his advisers which they went against. He took their advice, and that was not impeachable at all. Everyone has thoughts when they're not understanding what the opponent is pulling. It's human to think bad thoughts and not act on them PRESIDENT TRUMP DID NOT ACT ON HIS THOUGHTS. He acted on good advice to do nothing that would get him in trouble.

You don't give a damn that he did the right thing. YOU want things to be judged by what people THINK before counsel. That makes you one of the most absurd people online, all 200 million of people online. IOW you are disconnected from the real world. Better get some help. TDS is eating you alive, and you're letting it.

In his report Mueller demonstrated 10 attempts by Trump to direct his staff to to obstruct the investigation. Subordinates refused Trump's orders to obstruct the investigation. This clearly demonstrates Trump's attempts & intent at obstructing the investigation. Mueller passed this issue to The US Congress with his words that Congress is responsible for the checks & balances concerning the POTUS attempts at obstruction. So the issue is in the hand of Congress to further investigate, if they so choose to do so.

That has nothing to do with your bullshit rant, or TDS.

WHY is PELOSI protecting TRUMP? She is the ONLY thing preventing JUSTICE.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

I'm going to make you shell out the next $25 million on your own little get-even-with-Trump schema. You have a big mouth when it comes to spending other people's money. Now put your money where your motor mouth is.

I think he was being facetious toward another poster, I think. LOL

Thanks. I just caught that and deleted the offending post after rereading the page. Thanks, Beagle9.

Welcome

 

[Leo123]

You didn't finish the sentence of Mueller's thought. Attempt? No, he mentioned things to his advisers which they went against. He took their advice, and that was not impeachable at all. Everyone has thoughts when they're not understanding what the opponent is pulling. It's human to think bad thoughts and not act on them PRESIDENT TRUMP DID NOT ACT ON HIS THOUGHTS. He acted on good advice to do nothing that would get him in trouble.

You don't give a damn that he did the right thing. YOU want things to be judged by what people THINK before counsel. That makes you one of the most absurd people online, all 200 million of people online. IOW you are disconnected from the real world. Better get some help. TDS is eating you alive, and you're letting it.

In his report Mueller demonstrated 10 attempts by Trump to direct his staff to to obstruct the investigation. Subordinates refused Trump's orders to obstruct the investigation. This clearly demonstrates Trump's attempts & intent at obstructing the investigation. Mueller passed this issue to The US Congress with his words that Congress is responsible for the checks & balances concerning the POTUS attempts at obstruction. So the issue is in the hand of Congress to further investigate, if they so choose to do so.

That has nothing to do with your bullshit rant, or TDS.

Wouldn't you ask your staff or suggest to them not to get involved with any questioning coming from a witch hunt or false investigation (if you knew you were an innocent man), not guilty of the politically motivated charges that were being brought against you ???? Yes you would.

Mueller's investigation was a scipe hunt in hopes of exacting political retribution for his friend Comey's firing, and because he himself didn't like the outcome of the election based upon the insurance policy fails that his comrads had going in which he later had to depart from them before they were exposed.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about; Trump DID ORDER staff to obstruct the invetsigation.
You also clearly have not read the report.

The below is taken from Mueller's report.

"On June 17, 2017, the President called McGahn at home and directed him to call the Acting Attorney General and say that the Special Counsel had conflicts of interest and must be removed. McGahn did not carry out the direction, however, deciding that he would resign rather than trigger what he regarded as a potential Saturday Night Massacre."

"The President then met with McGahn in the Oval Office and again pressured him to deny the reports. In the same meeting, the President also asked McGahn why he had told the Special Counsel about the President's effort to remove the Special Counsel and why McGahn took notes of his conversations with the President. McGahn refused to back away from what he remembered happening and perceived the President to be testing his mettle."

There are TWO instances in which Trump ordered Don McGahn to obstruct the investigation. That clearly demonstrates Trump's intent to obstruct the justice process.

You really just need to STFU if you don't know what you are talking about because all you are doing is blowing hot air up your own ass.

Yet there was no actual obstruction.

I didn't say there was; there were numerous attempts. That alone demonstrates intent to obstruct. You're welcome.

Oh so now it's 'intent?' Bullshit. Trump won't be charged or be impeached because there is no evidence other than hearsay. Mueller knew this but he threw some red meat to the feral-dog TDS Democrats. Never happen.....Get used to 4 more years of Trump.

 

[whitehall]

Maybe the left needs to accept the fact (like Mueller did) that the President was cleared of the charge of collusion so the mob needs to put away their pitchforks and douse their torches because no crime equals no obstruction.