My MAIN and ONLY reason why I'll vote for Hillary Clinton

I very much dislike Clinton...I don't like her ethics, her attitude that she is "entitled" to the presidency, and her cronyism.

Nonetheless, the alternatives are outrageous, so that I will vote for her this November with a clothespin firmly placed on my nose (very few times in my long voting life have I voted FOR someone...usually I've voted AGAINST someone else.)

So, my MAIN reason why I'll vote for Hillary boils down to just one factor:
The selection of THREE Supreme Court Justices.......

You do realize that the wording of your title shows your ignorance, right? "MAIN" and "ONLY" are mutually exclusive terms, the term "main" denotes it's the dominate reason among others, while the term "only" is a singular term, meaning there are no other reasons. Since you've already expressed other reasons the use of the term "only" shows deception. The fact is you're just as regressive as the hildabitch and ethics are inconsequential to your ilk.
 
I very much dislike Clinton...I don't like her ethics, her attitude that she is "entitled" to the presidency, and her cronyism.

Nonetheless, the alternatives are outrageous, so that I will vote for her this November with a clothespin firmly placed on my nose (very few times in my long voting life have I voted FOR someone...usually I've voted AGAINST someone else.)

So, my MAIN reason why I'll vote for Hillary boils down to just one factor:
The selection of THREE Supreme Court Justices.......

So, you want uber liberal justices?

Got it.

Everyone to the left of you looks uber liberal.



......and let us not forget that Obama just nominated a fairly moderate judge for the SCOTUS, which the insane McConnell and company wont even bother to interview him....So, right wingers will "pay the price" with a Hillary in the oval office and a very, very good chance of a democrat majority senate.

And of course the SOB's anti second amendment votes had nothing to do with it, right? The asshole would vote to overturn Heller in a heartbeat.
 
I very much dislike Clinton...I don't like her ethics, her attitude that she is "entitled" to the presidency, and her cronyism.

Nonetheless, the alternatives are outrageous, so that I will vote for her this November with a clothespin firmly placed on my nose (very few times in my long voting life have I voted FOR someone...usually I've voted AGAINST someone else.)

So, my MAIN reason why I'll vote for Hillary boils down to just one factor:
The selection of THREE Supreme Court Justices.......

So, you want uber liberal justices?

Got it.

Everyone to the left of you looks uber liberal.



......and let us not forget that Obama just nominated a fairly moderate judge for the SCOTUS, which the insane McConnell and company wont even bother to interview him....So, right wingers will "pay the price" with a Hillary in the oval office and a very, very good chance of a democrat majority senate.

Or the GOP'er might win and then the Democratic Senate can filibuster his nominees into oblivion,

if those Democrats have the guts.

The nuclear option is always available, and the commiecrats would have no bitch coming since they've already used it.
 
Nader, The USSC and the hanging chad did not cost Al Gore the 2000 general election but the mere fact he lost his home state cost him that election.

So put the blame where it belongs and if someone can not win their home state during a Presidential Election they do not deserve to be President...


Well, you're partially correct.....Gore got about 500,000 MORE in popular votes....and neither Romney nor Ryan were able to carry their respective home states.

But we're arguing history and one does not have to be overly cynical to conclude that the SCOTUS selected or elected GWB.

BS, every independent recount proved Gore lost FL.
 
Nader, The USSC and the hanging chad did not cost Al Gore the 2000 general election but the mere fact he lost his home state cost him that election.

So put the blame where it belongs and if someone can not win their home state during a Presidential Election they do not deserve to be President...


Well, you're partially correct.....Gore got about 500,000 MORE in popular votes....and neither Romney nor Ryan were able to carry their respective home states.

But we're arguing history and one does not have to be overly cynical to conclude that the SCOTUS selected or elected GWB.

Popular vote does not elect the President, so that is a moot subject, and the fact is if Al Gore had won his home state then Bush would have never been President.

If you can not win your home state then you should lose your Presidential Bid...


There's no way the dump will win NY, so what does that say about him?
 
Three LIBERAL Supreme Court justices.

Since you support the selection of three LIBERAL Supreme Court justices, then your claim to be holding your nose while voting for Clinton is one big fucking pretense.


Silly "conclusion" on your part........All I am stating is the appointment of 3 SC justices should NOT be left in the hands of a Trump or [Heaven forbid] a Cruz.
 
suuuuuure.

Reading your posts and believing your drivel are two very different things, natty.


Go on, ask me if I give a crap what right wing nitwits like you "think"....Go on, ask me....LOL
 
You do realize that the wording of your title shows your ignorance, right? "MAIN" and "ONLY" are mutually exclusive terms, the term "main" denotes it's the dominate reason among others, while the term "only" is a singular term, meaning there are no other reasons. Since you've already expressed other reasons the use of the term "only" shows deception. The fact is you're just as regressive as the hildabitch and ethics are inconsequential to your ilk.

You're funny......dumber than a bucket of sputum.......but funny, nonetheless.......:fu:
 
You do realize that the wording of your title shows your ignorance, right? "MAIN" and "ONLY" are mutually exclusive terms, the term "main" denotes it's the dominate reason among others, while the term "only" is a singular term, meaning there are no other reasons. Since you've already expressed other reasons the use of the term "only" shows deception. The fact is you're just as regressive as the hildabitch and ethics are inconsequential to your ilk.

You're funny......dumber than a bucket of sputum.......but funny, nonetheless.......:fu:

Funny and accurate, I'll take that over ignorant any day.
 
I very much dislike Clinton...I don't like her ethics, her attitude that she is "entitled" to the presidency, and her cronyism.

Nonetheless, the alternatives are outrageous, so that I will vote for her this November with a clothespin firmly placed on my nose (very few times in my long voting life have I voted FOR someone...usually I've voted AGAINST someone else.)

So, my MAIN reason why I'll vote for Hillary boils down to just one factor:
The selection of THREE Supreme Court Justices.......

You dislike her ethics, attitude and cronyism yet you're still going to vote for her ? Congratulations you're PART OF THE PROBLEM, the reason the Republic is in such a fucking mess is because we have an electorate that is primarily made up of clueless dickheads like You.

If you had any integrity or principles at all you'd vote 3rd Party or just stay the hell at home.
I believe you would be shocked to discover the amount of Republicans that would and will rather vote for Hillary than Trump or Cruz.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
 
I very much dislike Clinton...I don't like her ethics, her attitude that she is "entitled" to the presidency, and her cronyism.

Nonetheless, the alternatives are outrageous, so that I will vote for her this November with a clothespin firmly placed on my nose (very few times in my long voting life have I voted FOR someone...usually I've voted AGAINST someone else.)

So, my MAIN reason why I'll vote for Hillary boils down to just one factor:
The selection of THREE Supreme Court Justices.......

You dislike her ethics, attitude and cronyism yet you're still going to vote for her ? Congratulations you're PART OF THE PROBLEM, the reason the Republic is in such a fucking mess is because we have an electorate that is primarily made up of clueless dickheads like You.

If you had any integrity or principles at all you'd vote 3rd Party or just stay the hell at home.
I believe you would be shocked to discover the amount of Republicans that would and will rather vote for Hillary than Trump or Cruz.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
Hillary will take at least three red states and all the swing states from Trump
 
Nader, The USSC and the hanging chad did not cost Al Gore the 2000 general election but the mere fact he lost his home state cost him that election.

So put the blame where it belongs and if someone can not win their home state during a Presidential Election they do not deserve to be President...


Well, you're partially correct.....Gore got about 500,000 MORE in popular votes....and neither Romney nor Ryan were able to carry their respective home states.

But we're arguing history and one does not have to be overly cynical to conclude that the SCOTUS selected or elected GWB.

Popular vote does not elect the President, so that is a moot subject, and the fact is if Al Gore had won his home state then Bush would have never been President.

If you can not win your home state then you should lose your Presidential Bid...
California is coming up. Cruz and Fiorina are TOAST!

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
 
BS, every independent recount proved Gore lost FL.

No, they all showed Gore had more legal votes in Florida. And buried that news.

Gore had more legal votes in Florida. Period. The chads were irrelevant. Overvotes with clear voter intent were legal under every version of Florida law. They should have been counted, but were never counted even once. Gore would have won if they had been counted, no matter what the chad standard was. Chads were just the excuse Republicans used to prevent the legal votes from being counted.

Republicans cheated, they won, and they need to get over it. Sorest winners ever.
 
BS, every independent recount proved Gore lost FL.

No, they all showed Gore had more legal votes in Florida. And buried that news.

Gore had more legal votes in Florida. Period. The chads were irrelevant. Overvotes with clear voter intent were legal under every version of Florida law. They should have been counted, but were never counted even once. Gore would have won if they had been counted, no matter what the chad standard was. Chads were just the excuse Republicans used to prevent the legal votes from being counted.

Republicans cheated, they won, and they need to get over it. Sorest winners ever.


Yeah yeah yeah, Gore was, is and always will be a loser, liar and a phony.
 
I very much dislike Clinton...I don't like her ethics, her attitude that she is "entitled" to the presidency, and her cronyism.

Nonetheless, the alternatives are outrageous, so that I will vote for her this November with a clothespin firmly placed on my nose (very few times in my long voting life have I voted FOR someone...usually I've voted AGAINST someone else.)

So, my MAIN reason why I'll vote for Hillary boils down to just one factor:
The selection of THREE Supreme Court Justices.......

You dislike her ethics, attitude and cronyism yet you're still going to vote for her ? Congratulations you're PART OF THE PROBLEM, the reason the Republic is in such a fucking mess is because we have an electorate that is primarily made up of clueless dickheads like You.

If you had any integrity or principles at all you'd vote 3rd Party or just stay the hell at home.
I believe you would be shocked to discover the amount of Republicans that would and will rather vote for Hillary than Trump or Cruz.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk


I'm shocked anyone would vote for any of them...
 
Nader, The USSC and the hanging chad did not cost Al Gore the 2000 general election but the mere fact he lost his home state cost him that election.

Multiple causes can exist, you know.

Gore's margin of loss in Florida was far smaller than the number of Nader votes. Hence, it's delusional to claim that Nader didn't cost Gore the election.

So put the blame where it belongs and if someone can not win their home state during a Presidential Election they do not deserve to be President...

Interesting standard. You seem to be claiming that if Hillary loses Arkansas, as is likely to happen, she doesn't deserve to be president. That doesn't seem very sensible.

But again, the point. Those Nader voters in Florida share a part of the blame for killing several hundred thousand Iraqis, no matter what their good intentions were.

Trump has been very clear about wanting to break all treaties with Iran and start a war there. A moral person will work to prevent that. An immoral person will stand back and do nothing, and then protest that it wasn't their fault. Except it would be their fault, because they could have attempted to stop it, and chose not to.
 
Nader, The USSC and the hanging chad did not cost Al Gore the 2000 general election but the mere fact he lost his home state cost him that election.

Multiple causes can exist, you know.

Gore's margin of loss in Florida was far smaller than the number of Nader votes. Hence, it's delusional to claim that Nader didn't cost Gore the election.

So put the blame where it belongs and if someone can not win their home state during a Presidential Election they do not deserve to be President...

Interesting standard. You seem to be claiming that if Hillary loses Arkansas, as is likely to happen, she doesn't deserve to be president. That doesn't seem very sensible.

But again, the point. Those Nader voters in Florida share a part of the blame for killing several hundred thousand Iraqis, no matter what their good intentions were.

Trump has been very clear about wanting to break all treaties with Iran and start a war there. A moral person will work to prevent that. An immoral person will stand back and do nothing, and then protest that it wasn't their fault. Except it would be their fault, because they could have attempted to stop it, and chose not to.


Hillary loses Arkansas, as is likely to happen, she doesn't deserve to be president.

Hillary was born, and lived, in Chicago until she went to college,

Somehow, I believe she could win Illinois as a write in if she doesn't get the nomination
 

Forum List

Back
Top