Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 60,990
- 54,306
- 3,600
30 pages of you making it that way.This thread is now on 30 pages, most of which is people going on about how the Rohinga deserve what is happening to them because they are Muslim.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
30 pages of you making it that way.This thread is now on 30 pages, most of which is people going on about how the Rohinga deserve what is happening to them because they are Muslim.
The ones who agree are the ones I am worried about. The peaceful Muslims are irrelevant, they do 0 to help with the ideology/religion with reform or absolution.Culture has nothing to do with the core beliefs of Islam. Islam has everything to do with culture. Try starting again, you have things ass backwards.OK why don't other religions inspire people to kill people in the present day?No it is not. It is what it says it is, and enough Muslims believe it and more are being taught. Just admit that thanks to Islam there will never be peace. Is that what you wish to defend?
So...every religion "is what it says"?
So Islam is forcing the Buddhists of Myanmar to rape and murder women and children.
Now that is some convoluted thinking.
Yes it is. But apparently if the victims are Muslims they they are also the agressers and thus deserve to be gang raped, decapitated, shot in the back and burned alive according to that twisted thinking.
Culture has a lot to do with it I supposed considering that out of 1.8 billion muslims, most aren't running around killing non muslims. And, in regards to this topic in specific - it's the BUDDHISTS slaughtering the Muslims in what is widely labeled genocide.
Over a billion muslims beg to differ with you.
The ones who agree are the ones I am worried about. The peaceful Muslims are irrelevant.Culture has nothing to do with the core beliefs of Islam. Islam has everything to do with culture. Try starting again, you have things ass backwards.OK why don't other religions inspire people to kill people in the present day?So...every religion "is what it says"?
Yes it is. But apparently if the victims are Muslims they they are also the agressers and thus deserve to be gang raped, decapitated, shot in the back and burned alive according to that twisted thinking.
Culture has a lot to do with it I supposed considering that out of 1.8 billion muslims, most aren't running around killing non muslims. And, in regards to this topic in specific - it's the BUDDHISTS slaughtering the Muslims in what is widely labeled genocide.
Over a billion muslims beg to differ with you.
I see, Islamic terror is OK with you? That is nice to know.The ones who agree are the ones I am worried about. The peaceful Muslims are irrelevant.Culture has nothing to do with the core beliefs of Islam. Islam has everything to do with culture. Try starting again, you have things ass backwards.OK why don't other religions inspire people to kill people in the present day?
Culture has a lot to do with it I supposed considering that out of 1.8 billion muslims, most aren't running around killing non muslims. And, in regards to this topic in specific - it's the BUDDHISTS slaughtering the Muslims in what is widely labeled genocide.
Over a billion muslims beg to differ with you.
The vast majority are peaceful. Including most of the Rohinga.
This thread is now on 30 pages, most of which is people going on about how the Rohinga deserve what is happening to them because they are Muslim.
Culture has nothing to do with the core beliefs of Islam. Islam has everything to do with culture. Try starting again, you have things ass backwards.OK why don't other religions inspire people to kill people in the present day?No it is not. It is what it says it is, and enough Muslims believe it and more are being taught. Just admit that thanks to Islam there will never be peace. Is that what you wish to defend?
So...every religion "is what it says"?
So Islam is forcing the Buddhists of Myanmar to rape and murder women and children.
Now that is some convoluted thinking.
Yes it is. But apparently if the victims are Muslims they they are also the agressers and thus deserve to be gang raped, decapitated, shot in the back and burned alive according to that twisted thinking.
Culture has a lot to do with it I supposed considering that out of 1.8 billion muslims, most aren't running around killing non muslims. And, in regards to this topic in specific - it's the BUDDHISTS slaughtering the Muslims in what is widely labeled genocide.
Over a billion muslims beg to differ with you.
You don’t have the guts to condemn genocide in Myanmar. Because the victims are Muslim. You support a states right to act this way but only against Muslims.Why would you say that? It is not funny, it is true. You do not have the guts to stand up and tell Islam this is unacceptable. And that what it says should offend you, the fact that it doesn't is something you should think about. That, in essence, it what it boils down to.
It boils down to an entitlement to invoke self defense against fictional ishmaelism and that qurayshism would not apply outside of hejaz .You don’t have the guts to condemn genocide in Myanmar. Because the victims are Muslim. You support a states right to act this way but only against Muslims.
The fact that this genocide doesn’t bother you should worry you. The last time we saw this level of excuse making and looking away and blaming the victim was with the Nazis.
That is what it boils down to.
9:28 O you who have believed, indeed the polytheists are unclean, so let them not approach al-Masjid al-Harām after this, their [final] year. and if you fear privation, God will enrich you from His bounty if He wills. Indeed, God is Knowing and Wise.
9:29 Fight those who do not believe in God or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what God and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth [i.e., Islām] from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah429 willingly while they are humbled.
In Bangladesh, the persecution of the indigenous tribes of the Chittagong Hill Tracts such as the Chakma, Marma, Tripura and others who are mainly Buddhists, Hindus, Christians, and Animists, has beendescribed as genocidal.[86][87][88][89][90] The Chittagong Hill Tracts are located bordering India, Myanmar and the Bay of Bengal, and is the home to 500,000 indigenous people. The perpetrators of are the Bangladeshi military and the Bengali Muslim settlers, who together have burned down Buddhist and Hindu temples, killed many Chakmas, and carried out a policy of gang-rape against the indigenous people. There are also accusations of Chakmas being forced to convert to Islam, many of them children who have been abducted for this purpose.The conflict started soon after Bangladeshi independence in 1972 when the Constitution imposed Bengali as the sole official language, Islam as the state religion - with no cultural or linguistic rights to minority populations. Subsequently, the government encouraged and sponsored massive settlement by Bangladeshis in region, which changed the demographics from 98 percent indigenous in 1971 to fifty percent by 2000.
The government allocated a full third of the Bangladeshi military to the region to support the settlers, sparking a protracted guerilla war between Hill tribes and the military.[87] During this conflict which officially ended in 1997, and in the subsequent period, a large number of human rights violations against the indigenous peoples have been reported, with violence against indigenous women being particularly extreme.[91][92]
The earliest documented religious wars in India are from the 8th century, when Islamic armies attacked the Hindu and Buddhist kingdoms in the northwest parts of Indian subcontinent, now modern Pakistan and parts of Indian states of Gujarat, Rajasthan and Punjab in the early 8th century. Muhammad bin Qasim and his army, assaulted numerous towns, plundered them for wealth, enslaved Buddhists and Hindus, and destroyed temples and monasteries.[28]
The total number of deaths of this period, are usually attributed to the figure by Prof. K.S. Lal, who estimated that between the years 1000 AD and 1500 AD the population of Hindus decreased by 80 million.[20][21][22]
Aurangzeb (1658–1707)
The reign of Aurangzeb that followed, witnessed one of the strongest campaign of religious violence in Mughal Empire's history, with an estimated 4.6 million people killed.[96]
Why would you say that? It is not funny, it is true. You do not have the guts to stand up and tell Islam this is unacceptable. And that what it says should offend you, the fact that it doesn't is something you should think about. That, in essence, it what it boils down to.
It isn't genocide if there are billions more where they come from.You don’t have the guts to condemn genocide in Myanmar. Because the victims are Muslim. You support a states right to act this way but only against Muslims.Why would you say that? It is not funny, it is true. You do not have the guts to stand up and tell Islam this is unacceptable. And that what it says should offend you, the fact that it doesn't is something you should think about. That, in essence, it what it boils down to.
The fact that this genocide doesn’t bother you should worry you. The last time we saw this level of excuse making and looking away and blaming the victim was with the Nazis.
That is what it boils down to.
It isn't genocide if there are billions more where they come from.You don’t have the guts to condemn genocide in Myanmar. Because the victims are Muslim. You support a states right to act this way but only against Muslims.Why would you say that? It is not funny, it is true. You do not have the guts to stand up and tell Islam this is unacceptable. And that what it says should offend you, the fact that it doesn't is something you should think about. That, in essence, it what it boils down to.
The fact that this genocide doesn’t bother you should worry you. The last time we saw this level of excuse making and looking away and blaming the victim was with the Nazis.
That is what it boils down to.
Otherwise we wouldn't be able to kill any group of people without calling it genocide.
I have never before seen such a collection of genocide supporters and apologists outside the usual collection of holocaust deniers. Congratulations on meeting this incredibly low bar.
How about killing every Mosquito in the Everglades. Would that be Genocide?It isn't genocide if there are billions more where they come from.You don’t have the guts to condemn genocide in Myanmar. Because the victims are Muslim. You support a states right to act this way but only against Muslims.Why would you say that? It is not funny, it is true. You do not have the guts to stand up and tell Islam this is unacceptable. And that what it says should offend you, the fact that it doesn't is something you should think about. That, in essence, it what it boils down to.
The fact that this genocide doesn’t bother you should worry you. The last time we saw this level of excuse making and looking away and blaming the victim was with the Nazis.
That is what it boils down to.
Otherwise we wouldn't be able to kill any group of people without calling it genocide.
I would not go so far to say that UNLESS YOU KILL ALL THE PEOPLE OF
A GIVEN GROUP IN THE WORLD_---of a given group that you cannot call it
GENOCIDE. If the objective of the MYANMAR government was to kill
EVERY MUSLIM IN MYANMAR BY SIEGE STARVATION and PREVENT THEIR
MIGRATION to muslim friendly nations----THAT IS GENOCIDE----and obviously NOT what the MYANMAR GOVERNMENT HAS IN MIND. The decimation of non muslims and the ENSLAVEMENT of the survivors is the Islamic form----also
GENOCIDE because under the stink and filth of islam-----even ESCAPE IS ILLEGAL -------same was true under the Nazi form. There is no doubt in
my mind that the MAYANMAR government wants to get rid of SEPARATIST
AND VIOLENT MUSLIMS------of the shariah shit kind----and would happily LET THEM GO <<<< not genocide
How about killing every Mosquito in the Everglades. Would that be Genocide?It isn't genocide if there are billions more where they come from.You don’t have the guts to condemn genocide in Myanmar. Because the victims are Muslim. You support a states right to act this way but only against Muslims.Why would you say that? It is not funny, it is true. You do not have the guts to stand up and tell Islam this is unacceptable. And that what it says should offend you, the fact that it doesn't is something you should think about. That, in essence, it what it boils down to.
The fact that this genocide doesn’t bother you should worry you. The last time we saw this level of excuse making and looking away and blaming the victim was with the Nazis.
That is what it boils down to.
Otherwise we wouldn't be able to kill any group of people without calling it genocide.
I would not go so far to say that UNLESS YOU KILL ALL THE PEOPLE OF
A GIVEN GROUP IN THE WORLD_---of a given group that you cannot call it
GENOCIDE. If the objective of the MYANMAR government was to kill
EVERY MUSLIM IN MYANMAR BY SIEGE STARVATION and PREVENT THEIR
MIGRATION to muslim friendly nations----THAT IS GENOCIDE----and obviously NOT what the MYANMAR GOVERNMENT HAS IN MIND. The decimation of non muslims and the ENSLAVEMENT of the survivors is the Islamic form----also
GENOCIDE because under the stink and filth of islam-----even ESCAPE IS ILLEGAL -------same was true under the Nazi form. There is no doubt in
my mind that the MAYANMAR government wants to get rid of SEPARATIST
AND VIOLENT MUSLIMS------of the shariah shit kind----and would happily LET THEM GO <<<< not genocide
Special Report: Buddhist monks incite Muslim killings in Myanmar
Reuters) - The Buddhist monk grabbed a young Muslim girl and put a knife to her neck.
"If you follow us, I'll kill her," the monk taunted police, according to a witness, as a Buddhist mob armed with machetes and swords chased nearly 100 Muslims in this city in central Myanmar.
It was Thursday, March 21. Within hours, up to 25 Muslims had been killed. The Buddhist mob dragged their bloodied bodies up a hill in a neighborhood called Mingalarzay Yone and set the corpses on fire. Some were found butchered in a reedy swamp. A Reuters cameraman saw the charred remains of two children, aged 10 or younger.
You don’t have the guts to condemn genocide in Myanmar. Because the victims are Muslim. You support a states right to act this way but only against Muslims.Why would you say that? It is not funny, it is true. You do not have the guts to stand up and tell Islam this is unacceptable. And that what it says should offend you, the fact that it doesn't is something you should think about. That, in essence, it what it boils down to.
The fact that this genocide doesn’t bother you should worry you. The last time we saw this level of excuse making and looking away and blaming the victim was with the Nazis.
That is what it boils down to.