roudy----saigon is very confused and ---the INTERPRETATIONS of
history by ---sands ----are the desperate dabblings of a failed
"professor" I grew up in the USA---in a land once heavily populated
a KNOWN nation of american indians----the river beds are chock full of
arrow heads---- if one were to credit the conclusions of sands and saigon--
there is no question but that I am a LENNILENAPE INDIAN
the area of the world in which Israel is located was one of intensive
population flux----and WARS in which various forces clashed incessantly ---
it is where the huge populations of the two river valleys ENGAGED each other
----the kingdoms of the nile valley and the kingdoms of mesopotamia---and also an area of wide swings in economics-----
Both Sands and Saigon ----in order to support THEIR theories depend
on the idea that populations STAY PUT ----as if "palestine" were an island---
genetically ISOLATED like GALAPAGOS where whatever species was there
10,000 years ago ----stayed put and "evolved" In fact---in a place
like "palestine" they only "cultures" that remain are those that
KEEP WRITTEN RECORDS ---and are motivated to SURVIVE AS CULTURES and
nations------because of the intensive SHIFTS of population. In palestine---and CANAAN----the only culture and nation that did do that were jews.
Even though some of the other nations were LITERATE----they are no longer
extant as NATIONS -----that some of their DNA got into the system is
a point of biology ----NOT NATIONHOOD. To understand saigon and sands---
you need a bit of population genetics and---a touch of anthropology---
Saigon has neither --and sands is hopeless
history by ---sands ----are the desperate dabblings of a failed
"professor" I grew up in the USA---in a land once heavily populated
a KNOWN nation of american indians----the river beds are chock full of
arrow heads---- if one were to credit the conclusions of sands and saigon--
there is no question but that I am a LENNILENAPE INDIAN
the area of the world in which Israel is located was one of intensive
population flux----and WARS in which various forces clashed incessantly ---
it is where the huge populations of the two river valleys ENGAGED each other
----the kingdoms of the nile valley and the kingdoms of mesopotamia---and also an area of wide swings in economics-----
Both Sands and Saigon ----in order to support THEIR theories depend
on the idea that populations STAY PUT ----as if "palestine" were an island---
genetically ISOLATED like GALAPAGOS where whatever species was there
10,000 years ago ----stayed put and "evolved" In fact---in a place
like "palestine" they only "cultures" that remain are those that
KEEP WRITTEN RECORDS ---and are motivated to SURVIVE AS CULTURES and
nations------because of the intensive SHIFTS of population. In palestine---and CANAAN----the only culture and nation that did do that were jews.
Even though some of the other nations were LITERATE----they are no longer
extant as NATIONS -----that some of their DNA got into the system is
a point of biology ----NOT NATIONHOOD. To understand saigon and sands---
you need a bit of population genetics and---a touch of anthropology---
Saigon has neither --and sands is hopeless