Nazi slag will likely die in jail.

Is he quibbling over the number of dead or denying it ever happened at all?
Münter added: “And the matter of the Jews that is attributed to (Hitler)... be careful.

“There weren't millions of Jews (in Germany) at the time, that's already been disproved. This number - six million - is not correct.”
We can perhaps forgive him for that? However, no one said the whole six million were "German" Jews.
I find it difficult to forgive him anything.
I think we'd have to see what sort of demeanour he holds and then decide.
He was a 21-year-old member of the 12 SS Panzer Division "Hitler Youth" when a train carrying some 50 soldiers of the division was derailed by an explosion on April 1, 1944.

As revenge for the act of sabotage by the Resistance, men and boys ranging from ages 15 to 75 were dragged on to the railway tracks, lined up and shot.

Nazis claimed the victims were “terrorists” to justify the slaying.

Fuck him. Unrepentent nazi trash.

I agree he is worse than trash, deserves the death penalty and I can't figure why they let him out. They latest charge, as an American is wrong as I believe the worst of the worst (and he is) have a right to spew their hate.
 
It's Germany. As an American of course I don't agree with their law curtailing the freedom of speech.
Does your disagreement apply to Julian Assage?

I don't think freedom of speech extends to publishing Classified military documents that reveal sensitive real time missions and endanger our soldiers and get our allies killed, even if I disagree with their mission. Publishing some dumbfucks emails cause he was stupid enough to get hooked? Hahahahaha......
 
It's Germany. As an American of course I don't agree with their law curtailing the freedom of speech.
Does your disagreement apply to Julian Assage?

I don't think freedom of speech extends to publishing Classified military documents that reveal sensitive real time missions and endanger our soldiers and get our allies killed, even if I disagree with their mission. Publishing some dumbfucks emails cause he was stupid enough to get hooked? Hahahahaha......
So there are limits to free speech ?
Just depends what it is.
 
It's Germany. As an American of course I don't agree with their law curtailing the freedom of speech.
Does your disagreement apply to Julian Assage?

I don't think freedom of speech extends to publishing Classified military documents that reveal sensitive real time missions and endanger our soldiers and get our allies killed, even if I disagree with their mission. Publishing some dumbfucks emails cause he was stupid enough to get hooked? Hahahahaha......
So there are limits to free speech ?
Just depends what it is.

Yes.
 
It's Germany. As an American of course I don't agree with their law curtailing the freedom of speech.

Germany hasn't the freedom of speech, it is a socialist dictatorship where dissents either go to prison or get killed by Antifa

I believe they are a Constitutional Republic but they don't have a First Amendment protection like we do.
 
It's Germany. As an American of course I don't agree with their law curtailing the freedom of speech.
Does your disagreement apply to Julian Assage?

I don't think freedom of speech extends to publishing Classified military documents that reveal sensitive real time missions and endanger our soldiers and get our allies killed, even if I disagree with their mission. Publishing some dumbfucks emails cause he was stupid enough to get hooked? Hahahahaha......
Can you point to a single case where this has happened? No, you cannot. Assange doesn't print EVERYTHING that comes his way.
 
It's Germany. As an American of course I don't agree with their law curtailing the freedom of speech.
Does your disagreement apply to Julian Assage?

I don't think freedom of speech extends to publishing Classified military documents that reveal sensitive real time missions and endanger our soldiers and get our allies killed, even if I disagree with their mission. Publishing some dumbfucks emails cause he was stupid enough to get hooked? Hahahahaha......
Can you point to a single case where this has happened? No, you cannot. Assange doesn't print EVERYTHING that comes his way.

When they did the dump that included the helicopter assault there was also a large dump of classified data that revealed our spies and sources of data in Iraq and Afghanistan.

How Much Did WikiLeaks Damage U.S. National Security?
 
I don't think freedom of speech extends to publishing Classified military documents that reveal sensitive real time missions and endanger our soldiers and get our allies killed, even if I disagree with their mission. Publishing some dumbfucks emails cause he was stupid enough to get hooked? Hahahahaha......
Can you point to a single case where this has happened? No, you cannot. Assange doesn't print EVERYTHING that comes his way.

When they did the dump that included the helicopter assault there was also a large dump of classified data that revealed our spies and sources of data in Iraq and Afghanistan.
There is not a single case of loss of life as a consequence of Wikileaks' activities. This is due to Wikileaks hard and long scrutiny of every bit of information that comes their way ......... to prevent that very thing from happening. Info that can have such a consequence is intentionally left out of their "leaks".

NOTE:
* Thousands upon thousands of civilians have been killed because of American "collateral damage". You take that in stride.
* Approximately half of all the British soldiers who died in the First Gulf War were killed by American "friendly fire". You accept that as a fact of war.
* But the "theoretical loss" of one life due to Wikileaks' work upsets you even before it happens.

How Much Did WikiLeaks Damage U.S. National Security?

No idea but I am sure it wasn't enough. What Wikileaks is doing is paramount to increasing world security. Screw the U.S. that doesn't give two pins for the security of mankind and is indeed is doing everything possible to destroy it.
 
Last edited:
NOTE:
* Thousands upon thousands of civilians have been killed because of American "collateral damage". You take that in stride.
* Approximately half of all the British soldiers who died in the First Gulf War were killed by American "friendly fire". You accept that as a fact of war.
* But the "theoretical loss" of one life due to Wikileaks' work upsets you even before it happens.

Why do you presume to know my position on American interventionism?
I just stated my opinion on the classified documents he released. Looks like he will have his day in court too. However I do think exposing war for what it is and for the world to see again, might serve a useful purpose in the anti-war circles.

No idea but I am sure it wasn't enough. What Wikileaks is doing is paramount to increasing world security. Screw the U.S. that doesn't give two pins for the security of mankind and is indeed is doing everything possible to destroy it.

Thank you for your opinion World Citizen.
 
If the US doesn’t want it’s secrets told; it should keep a better lid on them. Period. Assange was just publishing journalism. A rare feat these days...
 
Why do you presume to know my position on American interventionism?
By way of what you've said so far.
I just stated my opinion on the classified documents he released. Looks like he will have his day in court too.
I hope not. I can offer several reasons for that.
However I do think exposing war for what it is and for the world to see again, might serve a useful purpose in the anti-war circles.
You don't include yourself in that circle?
No idea but I am sure it wasn't enough. What Wikileaks is doing is paramount to increasing world security. Screw the U.S. that doesn't give two pins for the security of mankind and is indeed is doing everything possible to destroy it.
Thank you for your opinion World Citizen.
You are very welcome.
 
If the US doesn’t want it’s secrets told; it should keep a better lid on them. Period. Assange was just publishing journalism. A rare feat these days...
Even Manning. He did the right thing. And considering it was impossible for him to go through the chain of command, he did the only thing he could have done.
 
Ex Nazi soldier, 96, faces jail for denying Holocaust and blaming victims

A FORMER Nazi soldier and convicted war criminal is facing five years in jail after denying that six million Jews died in the Holocaust

Karl Münter, who is now 96, was convicted and originally sentenced to death for his role in the massacre of 86 people in the French village of Ascq, when he was a member of the SS.

Prosecutors in Germany have now reportedly filed charges against him after he made the comments in an interview with German channel ARD last November.

They didn’t name him directly in the charges but it is widely understood they refer to Münter, the New York Post reported.

During the interview he said that the Ascq victims deserved to be shot and that he doesn’t regret participating in the war crimes.

Im not sure how this bastard is even free.
Cheering the criminalization of people who have wrong opinions.


This is exactly why our ancestors threw you assholes out of this country in the 18th century.


The problem isnt the opinion of someone, but if he actually did take part in executing civilians then that is something else.
 
Or Hiroshima, or Nagasaki? When were they tried for knowingly killing civilians?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top