NC Newspaper: Young Girls Must Overcome “Discomfort” of Seeing Naked Male Genitalia in Locker Rooms

[BuckToothMoron]

And there it is. They just admitted what they know they are subjecting people to.

Charlotte Observer: Girls must try ‘overcoming discomfort’ of seeing ‘male genitalia’ in bathrooms

Charlotte Observer: Young Girls Must Overcome the "Discomfort" of Seeing Naked Male Genitalia in Locker Room

I'm confused. Girls's bathrooms have separate areas for peeing. Girls probably don't see other girls's vaginas, so why would they see penises in a girls bathroom?

Your reading comprehension is a little off. Read it again.

All he needs to read is the fricken headline!

 

[Katzndogz]

And there it is. They just admitted what they know they are subjecting people to.

Charlotte Observer: Girls must try ‘overcoming discomfort’ of seeing ‘male genitalia’ in bathrooms

Charlotte Observer: Young Girls Must Overcome the "Discomfort" of Seeing Naked Male Genitalia in Locker Room

I'm confused. Girls's bathrooms have separate areas for peeing. Girls probably don't see other girls's vaginas, so why would they see penises in a girls bathroom?

Your reading comprehension is a little off. Read it again.

No, my reading comprehension isn't off.

I just made a point, that is a perfectly valid point. Go on, why don't you have a try answering it?

Weenie waggers will wander around bathrooms and locker rooms because that's what weenie waggers do.

Excuse me I didn't mean to bump you with my erection is something 8 year old girls will have to get used to. That's what weenie waggers do. Telling someone that they felt like a woman is nothing for a weenie wagger. They lie anyway.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

And there it is. They just admitted what they know they are subjecting people to.

Charlotte Observer: Girls must try ‘overcoming discomfort’ of seeing ‘male genitalia’ in bathrooms

Charlotte Observer: Young Girls Must Overcome the "Discomfort" of Seeing Naked Male Genitalia in Locker Room

I'm confused. Girls's bathrooms have separate areas for peeing. Girls probably don't see other girls's vaginas, so why would they see penises in a girls bathroom?

They're going to have to build stalls for pre-ops in the Ladies Room, you dipshit.

Did you really think that was an intelligent question?

Wow, an insult.....

Your question was only worthy of mockery. You leftists have an underdeveloped amygdala, I know you folks think that is the fear center, and yes that's part of it,

And there it is. They just admitted what they know they are subjecting people to.

Charlotte Observer: Girls must try ‘overcoming discomfort’ of seeing ‘male genitalia’ in bathrooms

Charlotte Observer: Young Girls Must Overcome the "Discomfort" of Seeing Naked Male Genitalia in Locker Room

I'm confused. Girls's bathrooms have separate areas for peeing. Girls probably don't see other girls's vaginas, so why would they see penises in a girls bathroom?

Your reading comprehension is a little off. Read it again.

No, my reading comprehension isn't off.

I just made a point, that is a perfectly valid point. Go on, why don't you have a try answering it?

The point of the editorial frigidweirdo is that girls need to get used to seeing male junk in the bathroom. They have already torn down the stalls, so to speak.

Aaaaand the author of the editorial article can go fuck herself.

 

[JimBowie1958]

And there it is. They just admitted what they know they are subjecting people to.

Charlotte Observer: Girls must try ‘overcoming discomfort’ of seeing ‘male genitalia’ in bathrooms

Charlotte Observer: Young Girls Must Overcome the "Discomfort" of Seeing Naked Male Genitalia in Locker Room

They are journos, so they are liberals, so they are perverted, demented and stupid.

What do you want, for liberals to ever face Reality?

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Are you kidding me?? wtf? Screw these nutbars. No, just NO. People need to push back hard and refuse to go along with this insane bullshit.

Absolutely. It's time the sane people took control of the asylum. NORMAL people need to assert their "rights". Screw that .01% (estimated) of the population who are deluded and like to pretend to be their mothers, sisters, brothers, fathers, grandmothers...or what the hell ever. You go to the facilities that your natural-born, biological plumbing entitles you to. Uncomfortable? Feeling picked on? Grab the pair you're given, "man" up and stand up for yourself. Quite making the real women and girls feel uncomfortable. Freaks!

I haven't read enough of your posts, was that sincere or sarcastic?

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

And there it is. They just admitted what they know they are subjecting people to.

Charlotte Observer: Girls must try ‘overcoming discomfort’ of seeing ‘male genitalia’ in bathrooms

Charlotte Observer: Young Girls Must Overcome the "Discomfort" of Seeing Naked Male Genitalia in Locker Room

I'm confused. Girls's bathrooms have separate areas for peeing. Girls probably don't see other girls's vaginas, so why would they see penises in a girls bathroom?

Your reading comprehension is a little off. Read it again.

No, my reading comprehension isn't off.

I just made a point, that is a perfectly valid point. Go on, why don't you have a try answering it?

Weenie waggers will wander around bathrooms and locker rooms because that's what weenie waggers do.

Excuse me I didn't mean to bump you with my erection is something 8 year old girls will have to get used to. That's what weenie waggers do. Telling someone that they felt like a woman is nothing for a weenie wagger. They lie anyway.

Can't believe we have let the perverted deviant scum get away with claiming their vile behaviors are 'civil rights'. A nation slept and woke up in the Twilight Zone.

 

[frigidweirdo]

And there it is. They just admitted what they know they are subjecting people to.

Charlotte Observer: Girls must try ‘overcoming discomfort’ of seeing ‘male genitalia’ in bathrooms

Charlotte Observer: Young Girls Must Overcome the "Discomfort" of Seeing Naked Male Genitalia in Locker Room

I'm confused. Girls's bathrooms have separate areas for peeing. Girls probably don't see other girls's vaginas, so why would they see penises in a girls bathroom?

Your reading comprehension is a little off. Read it again.

No, my reading comprehension isn't off.

I just made a point, that is a perfectly valid point. Go on, why don't you have a try answering it?

The point of the editorial frigidweirdo is that girls need to get used to seeing male junk in the bathroom. They have already torn down the stalls, so to speak.

But why would they see male "junk" in the bathroom? The point I'm making (and I'm not the editorial) is that they wouldn't anyway. They could have mixed bathrooms and they still wouldn't see penises.

 

[Katzndogz]

Fuck these people. Bring on the Right Wing Death Squads!

That's pretty funny, but I do understand the outrage. The thing that bothers me most, the federal government should butt the hell out of It, let each state decide how they want to deal with the issue. Instead they use financial coercion to force their agenda. Hey, that maybe fine when you agree with them, but every buddy gets a turn to get shit on by the government, so cheer the lost rights of others one day, but be prepared to cry when yours vanish the next. I think boys and girls should have different bathrooms.

We need a different president that won't be obastards third term.

 

[Katzndogz]

And there it is. They just admitted what they know they are subjecting people to.

Charlotte Observer: Girls must try ‘overcoming discomfort’ of seeing ‘male genitalia’ in bathrooms

Charlotte Observer: Young Girls Must Overcome the "Discomfort" of Seeing Naked Male Genitalia in Locker Room

I'm confused. Girls's bathrooms have separate areas for peeing. Girls probably don't see other girls's vaginas, so why would they see penises in a girls bathroom?

Your reading comprehension is a little off. Read it again.

No, my reading comprehension isn't off.

I just made a point, that is a perfectly valid point. Go on, why don't you have a try answering it?

The point of the editorial frigidweirdo is that girls need to get used to seeing male junk in the bathroom. They have already torn down the stalls, so to speak.

But why would they see male "junk" in the bathroom? The point I'm making (and I'm not the editorial) is that they wouldn't anyway. They could have mixed bathrooms and they still wouldn't see penises.

They will when a perv backs some ten year old up against a wall and rubs up against her.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

And there it is. They just admitted what they know they are subjecting people to.

Charlotte Observer: Girls must try ‘overcoming discomfort’ of seeing ‘male genitalia’ in bathrooms

Charlotte Observer: Young Girls Must Overcome the "Discomfort" of Seeing Naked Male Genitalia in Locker Room

I'm confused. Girls's bathrooms have separate areas for peeing. Girls probably don't see other girls's vaginas, so why would they see penises in a girls bathroom?

They're going to have to build stalls for pre-ops in the Ladies Room, you dipshit.

Did you really think that was an intelligent question?

Wow, an insult.....

Your question was only worthy of mockery. You leftists have an underdeveloped amygdala, I know you folks think that is the fear center, and yes that's part of it,

And there it is. They just admitted what they know they are subjecting people to.

Charlotte Observer: Girls must try ‘overcoming discomfort’ of seeing ‘male genitalia’ in bathrooms

Charlotte Observer: Young Girls Must Overcome the "Discomfort" of Seeing Naked Male Genitalia in Locker Room

I'm confused. Girls's bathrooms have separate areas for peeing. Girls probably don't see other girls's vaginas, so why would they see penises in a girls bathroom?

Your reading comprehension is a little off. Read it again.

No, my reading comprehension isn't off.

I just made a point, that is a perfectly valid point. Go on, why don't you have a try answering it?

The point of the editorial frigidweirdo is that girls need to get used to seeing male junk in the bathroom. They have already torn down the stalls, so to speak.

Aaaaand the author of the editorial article can go fuck herself.

With enough surgery, fucking herself could be made possible today. And then she can pee wherever she feels like, and marry herself as well. AMERICA- where progress in technology collides with Progresivism.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

And there it is. They just admitted what they know they are subjecting people to.

Charlotte Observer: Girls must try ‘overcoming discomfort’ of seeing ‘male genitalia’ in bathrooms

Charlotte Observer: Young Girls Must Overcome the "Discomfort" of Seeing Naked Male Genitalia in Locker Room

I'm confused. Girls's bathrooms have separate areas for peeing. Girls probably don't see other girls's vaginas, so why would they see penises in a girls bathroom?

Your reading comprehension is a little off. Read it again.

No, my reading comprehension isn't off.

I just made a point, that is a perfectly valid point. Go on, why don't you have a try answering it?

The point of the editorial frigidweirdo is that girls need to get used to seeing male junk in the bathroom. They have already torn down the stalls, so to speak.

But why would they see male "junk" in the bathroom? The point I'm making (and I'm not the editorial) is that they wouldn't anyway. They could have mixed bathrooms and they still wouldn't see penises.

They're not going to want stalls. Oh no no no sithster!

They want open-area, let's hang out in the girl's room, jailhouse style bathrooms, girlfriend!

And you're just a BIGOT if you try to STOP THEM!

 

[frigidweirdo]

I'm confused. Girls's bathrooms have separate areas for peeing. Girls probably don't see other girls's vaginas, so why would they see penises in a girls bathroom?

Your reading comprehension is a little off. Read it again.

No, my reading comprehension isn't off.

I just made a point, that is a perfectly valid point. Go on, why don't you have a try answering it?

The point of the editorial frigidweirdo is that girls need to get used to seeing male junk in the bathroom. They have already torn down the stalls, so to speak.

But why would they see male "junk" in the bathroom? The point I'm making (and I'm not the editorial) is that they wouldn't anyway. They could have mixed bathrooms and they still wouldn't see penises.

They will when a perv backs some ten year old up against a wall and rubs up against her.

Okay, boys can go into a bathroom where there are urinals. Gay men can go into a bathroom where there are urinals. Male pedophiles can go into a bathroom where there are urinals.

Little boys, gay men, pedophiles, straight men etc etc can all whip their penis out and pee into a urinal.

Now, if you have a problem with a situation where a person with a penis can enter a bathroom that DOES NOT HAVE URINALS, and where everyone pees in an enclosed space where no one can see them, except maybe their feet, then why don't you have a problem with bathrooms with URINALS and with kids whipping out their penises and peeing in a non-enclosed space.

Because, really, I'm having a hard time trying to understand some people's idea on this one right now.

 

[Katzndogz]

No young girl will go to the bathroom or locker room without an escort. Forget showers. Wait until they get home. Every bathroom will be like a restroom at the park.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Your reading comprehension is a little off. Read it again.

No, my reading comprehension isn't off.

I just made a point, that is a perfectly valid point. Go on, why don't you have a try answering it?

The point of the editorial frigidweirdo is that girls need to get used to seeing male junk in the bathroom. They have already torn down the stalls, so to speak.

But why would they see male "junk" in the bathroom? The point I'm making (and I'm not the editorial) is that they wouldn't anyway. They could have mixed bathrooms and they still wouldn't see penises.

They will when a perv backs some ten year old up against a wall and rubs up against her.

Okay, boys can go into a bathroom where there are urinals. Gay men can go into a bathroom where there are urinals. Male pedophiles can go into a bathroom where there are urinals.

Little boys, gay men, pedophiles, straight men etc etc can all whip their penis out and pee into a urinal.

Now, if you have a problem with a situation where a person with a penis can enter a bathroom that DOES NOT HAVE URINALS, and where everyone pees in an enclosed space where no one can see them, except maybe their feet, then why don't you have a problem with bathrooms with URINALS and with kids whipping out their penises and peeing in a non-enclosed space.

Because, really, I'm having a hard time trying to understand some people's idea on this one right now.

How about they just use the men's room, like a man's supposed to?

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

No young girl will go to the bathroom or locker room without an escort. Forget showers. Wait until they get home. Every bathroom will be like a restroom at the park.

They're going to turn all public restrooms across the country into San Francisco style, perv hang outs.

Only an idiot doesn't get it by now, they will not stop. You have to stomp this shit out immediately.

 

[Katzndogz]

Your reading comprehension is a little off. Read it again.

No, my reading comprehension isn't off.

I just made a point, that is a perfectly valid point. Go on, why don't you have a try answering it?

The point of the editorial frigidweirdo is that girls need to get used to seeing male junk in the bathroom. They have already torn down the stalls, so to speak.

But why would they see male "junk" in the bathroom? The point I'm making (and I'm not the editorial) is that they wouldn't anyway. They could have mixed bathrooms and they still wouldn't see penises.

They will when a perv backs some ten year old up against a wall and rubs up against her.

Okay, boys can go into a bathroom where there are urinals. Gay men can go into a bathroom where there are urinals. Male pedophiles can go into a bathroom where there are urinals.

Little boys, gay men, pedophiles, straight men etc etc can all whip their penis out and pee into a urinal.

Now, if you have a problem with a situation where a person with a penis can enter a bathroom that DOES NOT HAVE URINALS, and where everyone pees in an enclosed space where no one can see them, except maybe their feet, then why don't you have a problem with bathrooms with URINALS and with kids whipping out their penises and peeing in a non-enclosed space.

Because, really, I'm having a hard time trying to understand some people's idea on this one right now.

Pervs won't be peeing. They will be hanging out like the perv at Moorpark high school. Just get naked and be a weenie wagger.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

No, my reading comprehension isn't off.

I just made a point, that is a perfectly valid point. Go on, why don't you have a try answering it?

The point of the editorial frigidweirdo is that girls need to get used to seeing male junk in the bathroom. They have already torn down the stalls, so to speak.

But why would they see male "junk" in the bathroom? The point I'm making (and I'm not the editorial) is that they wouldn't anyway. They could have mixed bathrooms and they still wouldn't see penises.

They will when a perv backs some ten year old up against a wall and rubs up against her.

Okay, boys can go into a bathroom where there are urinals. Gay men can go into a bathroom where there are urinals. Male pedophiles can go into a bathroom where there are urinals.

Little boys, gay men, pedophiles, straight men etc etc can all whip their penis out and pee into a urinal.

Now, if you have a problem with a situation where a person with a penis can enter a bathroom that DOES NOT HAVE URINALS, and where everyone pees in an enclosed space where no one can see them, except maybe their feet, then why don't you have a problem with bathrooms with URINALS and with kids whipping out their penises and peeing in a non-enclosed space.

Because, really, I'm having a hard time trying to understand some people's idea on this one right now.

Pervs won't be peeing. They will be hanging out like the perv at Moorpark high school. Just get naked and be a weenie wagger.

This Frigid guy or gal or thing....whatever...is playing dumb. You can't really be this gullible and clueless? Can you?

 

[Blackrook]

I predicted this at least a year ago and all the liberals were denying it, but I knew their denials were a lie.

The next item on the agenda is to prosecute men for "pressuring" their wives/girlfriends into having children. Every father will know that all they have to do is piss off the mother of their child and she can denounce him to the police and have him prosecuted for this all new "crime."

Dhara is the one who gave me the heads up on this, so ask her for the sordid details of what they plan to do to discredit the institution of fatherhood.

The goal is to make it so that fathers are no longer heroes in the eyes of society, but villains for the crime of wanting to have children.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

I predicted this at least a year ago and all the liberals were denying it, but I knew their denials were a lie.

The next item on the agenda is to prosecute men for "pressuring" their wives/girlfriends into having children. Every father will know that all they have to do is piss off the mother of their child and she can denounce him to the police and have him prosecuted for this all new "crime."

Dhara is the one who gave me the heads up on this, so ask her for the sordid details of what they plan to do to discredit the institution of fatherhood.

The goal is to make it so that fathers are no longer heroes in the eyes of society, but villains for the crime of wanting to have children.

The old Frankfurt School way.

" What was the Frankfurt School? Well, in the days following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, it was believed that workers’ revolution would sweep into Europe and, eventually, into the United States. But it did not do so. Towards the end of 1922 the Communist International (Comintern) began to consider what were the reasons. On Lenin’s initiative a meeting was organised at the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow.

The aim of the meeting was to clarify the concept of, and give concrete effect to, a Marxist cultural revolution. Amongst those present were Georg Lukacs (a Hungarian aristocrat, son of a banker, who had become a Communist during World War I ; a good Marxist theoretician he developed the idea of ‘Revolution and Eros’ - sexual instinct used as an instrument of destruction) and Willi Munzenberg (whose proposed solution was to ‘organise the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilisation stink. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat’) ‘It was’, said Ralph de Toledano (1916-2007) the conservative author and co-founder of the ‘National Review’, a meeting ‘perhaps more harmful to Western civilization than the Bolshevik Revolution itself.'

Lenin died in 1924. By this time, however, Stalin was beginning to look on Munzenberg, Lukacs and like-thinkers as ‘revisionists’. In June 1940, Münzenberg fled to the south of France where, on Stalin’s orders, a NKVD assassination squad caught up with him and hanged him from a tree.

In the summer of 1924, after being attacked for his writings by the 5th Comintern Congress, Lukacs moved to Germany, where he chaired the first meeting of a group of Communist-oriented sociologists, a gathering that was to lead to the foundation of the Frankfurt School.

This ‘School’ (designed to put flesh on their revolutionary programme) was started at the University of Frankfurt in the Institut für Sozialforschung. To begin with school and institute were indistinguishable. In 1923 the Institute was officially established, and funded by Felix Weil (1898-1975). Weil was born in Argentina and at the age of nine was sent to attend school in Germany. He attended the universities in Tübingen and Frankfurt, where he graduated with a doctoral degree in political science. While at these universities he became increasingly interested in socialism and Marxism. According to the intellectual historian Martin Jay, the topic of his dissertation was ‘the practical problems of implementing socialism.'

Carl Grünberg, the Institute’s director from 1923-1929, was an avowed Marxist, although the Institute did not have any official party affiliations. But in 1930 Max Horkheimer assumed control and he believed that Marx’s theory should be the basis of the Institute’s research. When Hitler came to power, the Institut was closed and its members, by various routes, fled to the United States and migrated to major US universities—Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and California at Berkeley.

The School included among its members the 1960s guru of the New Left Herbert Marcuse (denounced by Pope Paul VI for his theory of liberation which ‘opens the way for licence cloaked as liberty’), Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, the popular writer Erich Fromm, Leo Lowenthal, and Jurgen Habermas - possibly the School’s most influential representative.

Basically, the Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief - or even the hope of belief - that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution. Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the ‘oppressive’ order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus—‘continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means’ as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution - but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future - the School recommended (among other things):

1. The creation of racism offences.
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pansexualism’ - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:

• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
• abolish all forms of male dominance - hence the presence of women in the armed forces
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’
Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus: ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.'

The School believed there were two types of revolution: (a) political and (b) cultural. Cultural revolution demolishes from within. ‘Modern forms of subjection are marked by mildness’. They saw it as a long-term project and kept their sights clearly focused on the family, education, media, sex and popular culture.

The Family

The School’s ‘Critical Theory’ preached that the ‘authoritarian personality’ is a product of the patriarchal family - an idea directly linked to Engels’ Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State, which promoted matriarchy. Already Karl Marx had written, in the “Communist Manifesto”, about the radical notion of a ‘community of women’ and in The German Ideology of 1845, written disparagingly about the idea of the family as the basic unit of society. This was one of the basic tenets of the ‘Critical Theory’ : the necessity of breaking down the contemporary family. The Institute scholars preached that ‘Even a partial breakdown of parental authority in the family might tend to increase the readiness of a coming generation to accept social change.’

Following Karl Marx, the School stressed how the ‘authoritarian personality’ is a product of the patriarchal family—it was Marx who wrote so disparagingly about the idea of the family being the basic unit of society. All this prepared the way for the warfare against the masculine gender promoted by Marcuse under the guise of ‘women’s liberation’ and by the New Left movement in the 1960s.

They proposed transforming our culture into a female-dominated one. In 1933, Wilhelm Reich, one of their members, wrote in The Mass Psychology of Fascism that matriarchy was the only genuine family type of ‘natural society.’ Eric Fromm was also an active advocate of matriarchal theory. Masculinity and femininity, he claimed, were not reflections of ‘essential’ sexual differences, as the Romantics had thought but were derived instead from differences in life functions, which were in part socially determined.’ His dogma was the precedent for the radical feminist pronouncements that, today, appear in nearly every major newspaper and television programme.

The revolutionaries knew exactly what they wanted to do and how to do it. They have succeeded."

And these leftist morons think this is all about "peace" "equality" & "tolerance".

They have absolutely no clue, that these beasts on the left just want to tear down everything that has worked well and kept society stable for western civilization and turn us into a bunch of slaves to the state.

I can't lie, I hate the left. They've gone too far.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

This Frigid guy or gal or thing....whatever...is playing dumb. You can't really be this gullible and clueless? Can you?

It is a common mistake to underestimate the stupidity and/or madness of a wrong-winger.