New Evidence of Voter Fraud and California continues to refuse cooperation

[Seawytch]

Seriously, go observe an election office so you won't be so horribly ill informed.

What good would that do, we actually do information verification in TX and we require proof of citizenship to get an ID valid for voting. My question is why all States don't do the same.


.

It would do you good to see how VBM ballots are verified. Two states vote completely by mail. California is poised to be a third. It IS the voting of the 21st Century.

Yep, all solidly blue, makes cheating sooooooo much easier. 10s of millions of ballots floating around in the postal system, filled with commiecrat voters, what could possibly go wrong.


.

Colorado is "solidly blue"? Yeah, don't think so. WA and CO have been exclusively VBM for a while now. Got evidence of anything other than convenience and cost savings?

You mean other than people voting for the dead and ex's that didn't bother to change their address?


.

They have to be pretty good at forging their loved ones signature. Signatures on VBM ballots are checked against the voters registration form.

 

[OKTexas]

What good would that do, we actually do information verification in TX and we require proof of citizenship to get an ID valid for voting. My question is why all States don't do the same.


.

It would do you good to see how VBM ballots are verified. Two states vote completely by mail. California is poised to be a third. It IS the voting of the 21st Century.

Yep, all solidly blue, makes cheating sooooooo much easier. 10s of millions of ballots floating around in the postal system, filled with commiecrat voters, what could possibly go wrong.


.

Colorado is "solidly blue"? Yeah, don't think so. WA and CO have been exclusively VBM for a while now. Got evidence of anything other than convenience and cost savings?

You mean other than people voting for the dead and ex's that didn't bother to change their address?


.

They have to be pretty good at forging their loved ones signature. Signatures on VBM ballots are checked against the voters registration form.

Evidently some weren't that good, they got caught. But I figured out how to write my dads name the same as he does by the time I was 14, it's not that hard.


.

 

[depotoo]

Lol, they just turned it over. And I can post NBC links where their own investigation has proven voter fraud in the couple of counties they only investigated. Want that link,rdean?

Anyone with any common sense at all knows Democrats welcomed millions of illegal votes in 2016 alone.
People who ignore the push to give illegals drivers licenses, the fight against requirements for Voter ID and the hustling of millions of illegals across the border by the Democrats leading up to the Nov 2016 elections are not only in denial and dead wrong, but are openly in agreement with this illegal activity if not blatantly in support of it.

The Administration has been too busy fighting false allegations to get to it but when it does it will open eyes.

Of course, you'll have the morons on forums balk at the suggestion, ridicule to possibility......call it funny etc...those are radical left bent idiots who still believe the Left has their back (fools).

But FACTS show just how much of a fool they are. In Rhode Island alone, where the vote was heavily for Sanders and Clinton, it has been discovered that over 30% of voters who participated did not have a registered Social Security Number nor driver license number. The two primary means with which to identify a voters identity. Without them, it is nearly impossible to determine even the nation of origin of a voter yet in Democrat states, this is the standard operating procedure.

As evidence continues to mount, those mocking the suggestion of widespread voter fraud look more and more like imbeciles. And mounting evidence agrees with those who suggest the vast majority of it took place on the Left.

It is my opinion that the people perpetrating these offenses and those cheering it should all be deported, at the very least. Tried for treason and dealt with accordingly ideally.

Anyway......here's the new report...
New Report Exposes Thousands of Illegal Votes from 2016 Election

Florida turned over personal voter information.

Florida turns over voter-roll data to Trump election commission

And what did they find?

Nothing. What was expected.

 

[Seawytch]

It would do you good to see how VBM ballots are verified. Two states vote completely by mail. California is poised to be a third. It IS the voting of the 21st Century.

Yep, all solidly blue, makes cheating sooooooo much easier. 10s of millions of ballots floating around in the postal system, filled with commiecrat voters, what could possibly go wrong.


.

Colorado is "solidly blue"? Yeah, don't think so. WA and CO have been exclusively VBM for a while now. Got evidence of anything other than convenience and cost savings?

You mean other than people voting for the dead and ex's that didn't bother to change their address?


.

They have to be pretty good at forging their loved ones signature. Signatures on VBM ballots are checked against the voters registration form.

Evidently some weren't that good, they got caught. But I figured out how to write my dads name the same as he does by the time I was 14, it's not that hard.


.

Yes, signature forgery IS that hard or more crooks would do it. VBM is safe, secure, convenient and cost saving.

 

[OKTexas]

Yep, all solidly blue, makes cheating sooooooo much easier. 10s of millions of ballots floating around in the postal system, filled with commiecrat voters, what could possibly go wrong.


.

Colorado is "solidly blue"? Yeah, don't think so. WA and CO have been exclusively VBM for a while now. Got evidence of anything other than convenience and cost savings?

You mean other than people voting for the dead and ex's that didn't bother to change their address?


.

They have to be pretty good at forging their loved ones signature. Signatures on VBM ballots are checked against the voters registration form.

Evidently some weren't that good, they got caught. But I figured out how to write my dads name the same as he does by the time I was 14, it's not that hard.


.

Yes, signature forgery IS that hard or more crooks would do it. VBM is safe, secure, convenient and cost saving.

Or it could be so easy no one in noticing. Now feel free to prove which of us is right without an audit of the election.


.

 

[sartre play]

Will just keep saying it, if we had even 500.00 illegal votes our vote system is finished, & we can never have a major election again till its fixed. happy to say that it is unlikely that we had more than a few hundred, and less than that have been proven.

 

[Faun]

Holyfuckingshit!

No, FrenchFry, Snopes is not owned by a Perfect Privacy, LLC. Perfect Privacy, LLC does not own companies.... Perfect Privacy, LLC provides a service to anyone who purchases a domain name to use Perfect Privacy's info on Whois, to conceal private information that normally appears under Whois. And Snopes isn't even using Perfect Privacy anyway...

Whois snopes.com

About Snopes' ownership...

Transparency: Ownership and Revenue | Snopes.com

Snopes is already exposed by who owns them (Proper Media in liberal San Diego, California), thanks for admitting Clinton and snopes needs to hide who's behind their propaganda sites posing as journalism and that you don't know who owns or is behind your info.

Proper Media owns web properties and
their execs are kept secret as is the web page ownerships through Perfect Privacy.
Isn't this how you tie people to Putin?
Are you just now admitting this connect the dots lunacy is flawed ? ;-)

If you want to connect the dots to snopes then try:
Snopes owner that is Proper Media partners with BlueKai® that is Oracle
and Oracle is a partner of The Nature Conservancy, a liberal and active proponent of cap and trade and a carbon tax, they support planned parenthood and same sex marriage=have a liberal agenda.

No, FrenchFry, I'm admitting you're flawed. There is something seriously wrong with your French fried brain. You make up the dumbest shit and you actually b'lieve the dumb shit you make up.

Snopes is not owned by Perfect Privacy, as you idiotically asserted.

Snopes doesn't even utilize Perfect Privacy.

Hillary doesn't even utilize Perfect Privacy. (Whois clintonemail.com)

Even if Clinton did use Perfect Privacy, I'm reasonably certain she did not personally setup that domain name; but had someone do it for her.

There is no connection between Snopes and Clinton outside of your imagination.

Even had both Snopes and Clinton used Perfect Privacy's services, that still doesn't connect the two together. It would have only meant the used the same service to conceal their domain registration information. What you're idiotically claiming is like saying they both have Internet domains, therefore, Snopes is connected to Hillary Clinton.

Uh you haven readen problemos mama sita?
I responded that I was setting you up to admit that you do not know who runs, finances, and has agendas on these fact check sites and let you admit that fact as you just admited again they keep that info private so you can't find their ties and donations & that you don't know even after I told you who owns Snopes=(Proper Media) in that last post you just replied on.
I also wanted you to bust your own arguments which you did rather well.
You just called your party's connect the dots reasoning convoluded and insane.
*L* Classic!

MAYBE YOU'LL GET A HANG OF MY REFLECTIVE TEACHING STYLE letting
you see "your own standard" of reasoning being flawed and letting you rant and call yourselves names without realizing it.
REPOST IT so now you
can read it carefully and see your error:
I Said:
Snopes is already exposed by who owns them (Proper Media in liberal San Diego, California), thanks for admitting Clinton and snopes needs to hide who's behind their propaganda sites posing as journalism and that you don't know who owns or is behind your info.
Proper Media owns web properties and
their execs are kept secret as is the web page ownerships through Perfect Privacy.
Isn't this how you tie people to Putin?
Are you just now admitting this connect the dots lunacy is flawed ? ;-)
If you want to connect the dots to snopes then try:
Snopes owner that is Proper Media partners with BlueKai® that is Oracle
and Oracle is a partner of The Nature Conservancy, a liberal and active proponent of cap and trade and a carbon tax, they support planned parenthood and same sex marriage=have a liberal agenda.

In other words Faun,
Snopes partners with a very active liberal agenda participant Company=Oracle.

You're deranged.

Proper Media doesn't own Snopes. Barbara Mikkelson sold her half of Snopes to 5 individual members of Proper Media just last year. Meanwhile, David Mikkelson of Snopes, still owns 50%, which is more than any of those other people from Proper Media. That's what they're fighting in court over as the 5 individual members of Proper Media seek to be treated collectively as a 50% stakeholder.

So you're wrong that Proper Media owns Snopes. Furthermore, Proper Media handles many of the technological and advertising services for Snopes, not the editorial review, which is still controlled by Mikkelson.

And there's still no connection to Hillary Clinton.

And the Russian lawyer doesn't own Russia, but that doesn't stop you from inadvertantly calling yourself & your party
quote: "You're deranged. "

That was the worst refutation defending Snopes, because Snopes still partners with Oracle no matter how you ad hominem respond & spin the ownership with your infamous smokescreen fudged numbers & percentages. *L*
You are like the worst leftist Propagandist I've seen in here.
Refutation score=0
Propaganda rating=10.

You're fuckng deranged

Snopes has nothing to do with The Nature Conservancy....

Working with Companies - Companies We Work With | The Nature Conservancy

 

[Faun]

No skin off my back. Everyone here already saw you lied about me posting there was no voter fraud.

like i stated who cares what you think

you and yours are a cancer on society

Spits another cult member of the herd.

Well you obviously care, otherwise, you wouldn't lie about what I say.

like i said who the fuck cares what you think

you and yours are a dying breed

how many seats have you dumb fuckers lost in the last few years

a 1040 or better --LOL

not only is liberalism a mental disorder

it is a blight on the human race that needs to continually eradicated

Great, another imbecile who doesn't understand that government is a pendulum. It swung way to the left in 2006 and 2008, then back to the right since. It's only a matter of time until it swings back to the left. Liberals are not going anywhere. If you want to get away from us, you'll have to leave, cause we're not.

imbecile

stop your projecting

once again who the fuck gives a fuck what you think

i surely dont

If you want to get away from us, you'll have to leave, cause we're not.

you are a laugh the American people have been weeding you slime bags out for several of the past elections

you and your ilk are a dying breed

You obviously care.

That's obvious by how much effort you put in to tell me you don't care.

 

[jon_berzerk]

like i stated who cares what you think

you and yours are a cancer on society

Spits another cult member of the herd.

Well you obviously care, otherwise, you wouldn't lie about what I say.

like i said who the fuck cares what you think

you and yours are a dying breed

how many seats have you dumb fuckers lost in the last few years

a 1040 or better --LOL

not only is liberalism a mental disorder

it is a blight on the human race that needs to continually eradicated

Great, another imbecile who doesn't understand that government is a pendulum. It swung way to the left in 2006 and 2008, then back to the right since. It's only a matter of time until it swings back to the left. Liberals are not going anywhere. If you want to get away from us, you'll have to leave, cause we're not.

imbecile

stop your projecting

once again who the fuck gives a fuck what you think

i surely dont

If you want to get away from us, you'll have to leave, cause we're not.

you are a laugh the American people have been weeding you slime bags out for several of the past elections

you and your ilk are a dying breed

You obviously care.

That's obvious by how much effort you put in to tell me you don't care.

you can have the last word retard

 

[bravoactual]

Anyone with any common sense at all knows Democrats welcomed millions of illegal votes in 2016 alone.
People who ignore the push to give illegals drivers licenses, the fight against requirements for Voter ID and the hustling of millions of illegals across the border by the Democrats leading up to the Nov 2016 elections are not only in denial and dead wrong, but are openly in agreement with this illegal activity if not blatantly in support of it.

The Administration has been too busy fighting false allegations to get to it but when it does it will open eyes.

Of course, you'll have the morons on forums balk at the suggestion, ridicule to possibility......call it funny etc...those are radical left bent idiots who still believe the Left has their back (fools).

But FACTS show just how much of a fool they are. In Rhode Island alone, where the vote was heavily for Sanders and Clinton, it has been discovered that over 30% of voters who participated did not have a registered Social Security Number nor driver license number. The two primary means with which to identify a voters identity. Without them, it is nearly impossible to determine even the nation of origin of a voter yet in Democrat states, this is the standard operating procedure.

As evidence continues to mount, those mocking the suggestion of widespread voter fraud look more and more like imbeciles. And mounting evidence agrees with those who suggest the vast majority of it took place on the Left.

It is my opinion that the people perpetrating these offenses and those cheering it should all be deported, at the very least. Tried for treason and dealt with accordingly ideally.

Anyway......here's the new report...
New Report Exposes Thousands of Illegal Votes from 2016 Election

Try and find a better and shall we say less biased source for this story.

There is little if any real proof and one whole helluva lot of speculation but very little in the way of facts.

Now, I know as Con, you prefer to lied to, you love to lied to and you need to lied to....but give your brain a rest and try thinking for a change.

I live in California, I am a Poll Worker (have been for over 20+Years) and I can say safely that you are full of it.

Epic Fail.

Pants On Fire for Trump's claim about California voter fraud.

Valid voter fraud complaints in California? Dozens, not millions | CALmatters.

In Their Own Words: Officials Refuting False Claims of Voter Fraud.


Donald Trump’s claims of voter fraud in California aren’t factual.

Q&A with California Secretary of State Alex Padilla.

https://www.usnews.com/opinion/thom...oter-fraud-evidence-in-key-2016-jurisdictions.

YOU ARE A LIAR.

YOU ARE LYING LIAR.

YOU ARE A LYING LIAR THAT LIES.

YOU TELL LIES.

YOU.....ARE.....A.....LIAR.

I have facts, you tell lies.

 

[Slyhunter]

Anyone with any common sense at all knows Democrats welcomed millions of illegal votes in 2016 alone.
People who ignore the push to give illegals drivers licenses, the fight against requirements for Voter ID and the hustling of millions of illegals across the border by the Democrats leading up to the Nov 2016 elections are not only in denial and dead wrong, but are openly in agreement with this illegal activity if not blatantly in support of it.

The Administration has been too busy fighting false allegations to get to it but when it does it will open eyes.

Of course, you'll have the morons on forums balk at the suggestion, ridicule to possibility......call it funny etc...those are radical left bent idiots who still believe the Left has their back (fools).

But FACTS show just how much of a fool they are. In Rhode Island alone, where the vote was heavily for Sanders and Clinton, it has been discovered that over 30% of voters who participated did not have a registered Social Security Number nor driver license number. The two primary means with which to identify a voters identity. Without them, it is nearly impossible to determine even the nation of origin of a voter yet in Democrat states, this is the standard operating procedure.

As evidence continues to mount, those mocking the suggestion of widespread voter fraud look more and more like imbeciles. And mounting evidence agrees with those who suggest the vast majority of it took place on the Left.

It is my opinion that the people perpetrating these offenses and those cheering it should all be deported, at the very least. Tried for treason and dealt with accordingly ideally.

Anyway......here's the new report...
New Report Exposes Thousands of Illegal Votes from 2016 Election

Try and find a better and shall we say less biased source for this story.

There is little if any real proof and one whole helluva lot of speculation but very little in the way of facts.

Now, I know as Con, you prefer to lied to, you love to lied to and you need to lied to....but give your brain a rest and try thinking for a change.

I live in California, I am a Poll Worker (have been for over 20+Years) and I can say safely that you are full of it.

Epic Fail.

Only Morons and socialists live in California. Which are you?

 

[HaShev]

Snopes is already exposed by who owns them (Proper Media in liberal San Diego, California), thanks for admitting Clinton and snopes needs to hide who's behind their propaganda sites posing as journalism and that you don't know who owns or is behind your info.

Proper Media owns web properties and
their execs are kept secret as is the web page ownerships through Perfect Privacy.
Isn't this how you tie people to Putin?
Are you just now admitting this connect the dots lunacy is flawed ? ;-)

If you want to connect the dots to snopes then try:
Snopes owner that is Proper Media partners with BlueKai® that is Oracle
and Oracle is a partner of The Nature Conservancy, a liberal and active proponent of cap and trade and a carbon tax, they support planned parenthood and same sex marriage=have a liberal agenda.

No, FrenchFry, I'm admitting you're flawed. There is something seriously wrong with your French fried brain. You make up the dumbest shit and you actually b'lieve the dumb shit you make up.

Snopes is not owned by Perfect Privacy, as you idiotically asserted.

Snopes doesn't even utilize Perfect Privacy.

Hillary doesn't even utilize Perfect Privacy. (Whois clintonemail.com)

Even if Clinton did use Perfect Privacy, I'm reasonably certain she did not personally setup that domain name; but had someone do it for her.

There is no connection between Snopes and Clinton outside of your imagination.

Even had both Snopes and Clinton used Perfect Privacy's services, that still doesn't connect the two together. It would have only meant the used the same service to conceal their domain registration information. What you're idiotically claiming is like saying they both have Internet domains, therefore, Snopes is connected to Hillary Clinton.

Uh you haven readen problemos mama sita?
I responded that I was setting you up to admit that you do not know who runs, finances, and has agendas on these fact check sites and let you admit that fact as you just admited again they keep that info private so you can't find their ties and donations & that you don't know even after I told you who owns Snopes=(Proper Media) in that last post you just replied on.
I also wanted you to bust your own arguments which you did rather well.
You just called your party's connect the dots reasoning convoluded and insane.
*L* Classic!

MAYBE YOU'LL GET A HANG OF MY REFLECTIVE TEACHING STYLE letting
you see "your own standard" of reasoning being flawed and letting you rant and call yourselves names without realizing it.
REPOST IT so now you
can read it carefully and see your error:
I Said:
Snopes is already exposed by who owns them (Proper Media in liberal San Diego, California), thanks for admitting Clinton and snopes needs to hide who's behind their propaganda sites posing as journalism and that you don't know who owns or is behind your info.
Proper Media owns web properties and
their execs are kept secret as is the web page ownerships through Perfect Privacy.
Isn't this how you tie people to Putin?
Are you just now admitting this connect the dots lunacy is flawed ? ;-)
If you want to connect the dots to snopes then try:
Snopes owner that is Proper Media partners with BlueKai® that is Oracle
and Oracle is a partner of The Nature Conservancy, a liberal and active proponent of cap and trade and a carbon tax, they support planned parenthood and same sex marriage=have a liberal agenda.

In other words Faun,
Snopes partners with a very active liberal agenda participant Company=Oracle.

You're deranged.

Proper Media doesn't own Snopes. Barbara Mikkelson sold her half of Snopes to 5 individual members of Proper Media just last year. Meanwhile, David Mikkelson of Snopes, still owns 50%, which is more than any of those other people from Proper Media. That's what they're fighting in court over as the 5 individual members of Proper Media seek to be treated collectively as a 50% stakeholder.

So you're wrong that Proper Media owns Snopes. Furthermore, Proper Media handles many of the technological and advertising services for Snopes, not the editorial review, which is still controlled by Mikkelson.

And there's still no connection to Hillary Clinton.

And the Russian lawyer doesn't own Russia, but that doesn't stop you from inadvertantly calling yourself & your party
quote: "You're deranged. "

That was the worst refutation defending Snopes, because Snopes still partners with Oracle no matter how you ad hominem respond & spin the ownership with your infamous smokescreen fudged numbers & percentages. *L*
You are like the worst leftist Propagandist I've seen in here.
Refutation score=0
Propaganda rating=10.

You're fuckng deranged

Snopes has nothing to do with The Nature Conservancy....

Working with Companies - Companies We Work With | The Nature Conservancy

You are an habitual liar who always needs to distort what people say in order to avoid and smokescreen the discussion.
I said Oracle not Snopes, and Oracle is snope's partner. But thank you for INADVERTANTLY calling your Russia Associations conspiracy as BEING Quote: "deranged". *L*
AND by the way you do not know which individuals might be involved with what activism in Snopes or any other fact check site, which is why you could not back your OPINION -BASED ON NOT KNOWING THE PEOPLE, nor investigating their contacts and donations and activism. You did not know Oracle was active in those liberal issues until I told you, and you did not know Oracle was partnering with Snopes, therefore you spoke in ignorance and your ad hominem rants are a result of being frustrated.
More sore loser coming out of your affiliation pride is making you lash out like your party is doing. A highschool kid loses an election gets over it in a week, a grade school election loser maybe a month, but a progressive Dem is taking over 8 months and is still not over losing=frustrated.
The frail Human Ego= Psychology 101
This is caused by labeling your teams and pitting them against each other. The 2 party system is an old outdated model that doesn't work anymore then seperating religions into teams get along and work.
Todays technology could allow us to vote by individual issues not by voter base across the board since most people are near center & dance on both sides depending on the issue. They didn't have this technology connected opportunity in the formation, but now we do have the ability to impliment a more fair progressed system to create a better democracy that actually functions.

 

[Billo_Really]

Bullshit as usual. illegals have done just as they wish in this country for the last eight years. NO ELECTION MACHINES WERE HACKED in the last election, they are stand alone until they are linked to a dedicated receptor to upload their counts. They are tested for proper operation before the election, and after each upload. Another liberal "shitbitch won" lie.

Apparently, you get your information from one ideological source.

It took DEF CON hackers minutes to pwn these US voting machines​

 

[Faun]

No, FrenchFry, I'm admitting you're flawed. There is something seriously wrong with your French fried brain. You make up the dumbest shit and you actually b'lieve the dumb shit you make up.

Snopes is not owned by Perfect Privacy, as you idiotically asserted.

Snopes doesn't even utilize Perfect Privacy.

Hillary doesn't even utilize Perfect Privacy. (Whois clintonemail.com)

Even if Clinton did use Perfect Privacy, I'm reasonably certain she did not personally setup that domain name; but had someone do it for her.

There is no connection between Snopes and Clinton outside of your imagination.

Even had both Snopes and Clinton used Perfect Privacy's services, that still doesn't connect the two together. It would have only meant the used the same service to conceal their domain registration information. What you're idiotically claiming is like saying they both have Internet domains, therefore, Snopes is connected to Hillary Clinton.

Uh you haven readen problemos mama sita?
I responded that I was setting you up to admit that you do not know who runs, finances, and has agendas on these fact check sites and let you admit that fact as you just admited again they keep that info private so you can't find their ties and donations & that you don't know even after I told you who owns Snopes=(Proper Media) in that last post you just replied on.
I also wanted you to bust your own arguments which you did rather well.
You just called your party's connect the dots reasoning convoluded and insane.
*L* Classic!

MAYBE YOU'LL GET A HANG OF MY REFLECTIVE TEACHING STYLE letting
you see "your own standard" of reasoning being flawed and letting you rant and call yourselves names without realizing it.
REPOST IT so now you
can read it carefully and see your error:
I Said:
Snopes is already exposed by who owns them (Proper Media in liberal San Diego, California), thanks for admitting Clinton and snopes needs to hide who's behind their propaganda sites posing as journalism and that you don't know who owns or is behind your info.
Proper Media owns web properties and
their execs are kept secret as is the web page ownerships through Perfect Privacy.
Isn't this how you tie people to Putin?
Are you just now admitting this connect the dots lunacy is flawed ? ;-)
If you want to connect the dots to snopes then try:
Snopes owner that is Proper Media partners with BlueKai® that is Oracle
and Oracle is a partner of The Nature Conservancy, a liberal and active proponent of cap and trade and a carbon tax, they support planned parenthood and same sex marriage=have a liberal agenda.

In other words Faun,
Snopes partners with a very active liberal agenda participant Company=Oracle.

You're deranged.

Proper Media doesn't own Snopes. Barbara Mikkelson sold her half of Snopes to 5 individual members of Proper Media just last year. Meanwhile, David Mikkelson of Snopes, still owns 50%, which is more than any of those other people from Proper Media. That's what they're fighting in court over as the 5 individual members of Proper Media seek to be treated collectively as a 50% stakeholder.

So you're wrong that Proper Media owns Snopes. Furthermore, Proper Media handles many of the technological and advertising services for Snopes, not the editorial review, which is still controlled by Mikkelson.

And there's still no connection to Hillary Clinton.

And the Russian lawyer doesn't own Russia, but that doesn't stop you from inadvertantly calling yourself & your party
quote: "You're deranged. "

That was the worst refutation defending Snopes, because Snopes still partners with Oracle no matter how you ad hominem respond & spin the ownership with your infamous smokescreen fudged numbers & percentages. *L*
You are like the worst leftist Propagandist I've seen in here.
Refutation score=0
Propaganda rating=10.

You're fuckng deranged

Snopes has nothing to do with The Nature Conservancy....

Working with Companies - Companies We Work With | The Nature Conservancy

You are an habitual liar who always needs to distort what people say in order to avoid and smokescreen the discussion.
I said Oracle not Snopes, and Oracle is snope's partner. But thank you for INADVERTANTLY calling your Russia Associations conspiracy as BEING Quote: "deranged". *L*
AND by the way you do not know which individuals might be involved with what activism in Snopes or any other fact check site, which is why you could not back your OPINION -BASED ON NOT KNOWING THE PEOPLE, nor investigating their contacts and donations and activism. You did not know Oracle was active in those liberal issues until I told you, and you did not know Oracle was partnering with Snopes, therefore you spoke in ignorance and your ad hominem rants are a result of being frustrated.
More sore loser coming out of your affiliation pride is making you lash out like your party is doing. A highschool kid loses an election gets over it in a week, a grade school election loser maybe a month, but a progressive Dem is taking over 8 months and is still not over losing=frustrated.
The frail Human Ego= Psychology 101
This is caused by labeling your teams and pitting them against each other. The 2 party system is an old outdated model that doesn't work anymore then seperating religions into teams get along and work.
Todays technology could allow us to vote by individual issues not by voter base across the board since most people are near center & dance on both sides depending on the issue. They didn't have this technology connected opportunity in the formation, but now we do have the ability to impliment a more fair progressed system to create a better democracy that actually functions.

The forum liar trying to project that on me. How quaint. Regardless, Snopes is not a partner of Oracle. You're truly fucking deranged, gramps. Bluekai is cloud technology which services over 1.5 million websites and which is a service Proper Media offers to their clients as a "first party partnership." According to your dementia, 1.5 million websites are affiliated with Snopes because they use Bluekai.

 

[The Original Tree]

Proof that the ENTIRE LEFT is a FRAUD!

They feign concern over THE INTEGRITY of OUR ELECTIONS!

Yet they Oppose Immigration Law, Support Motor Voter Registrations and Driver's Licenses for Illegals (It's a felony to give an illegal a drivers license btw) and they Oppose Voter ID.

They also are opposing and obstructing all investigations in to election fraud.

 

[The Original Tree]

Bullshit as usual. illegals have done just as they wish in this country for the last eight years. NO ELECTION MACHINES WERE HACKED in the last election, they are stand alone until they are linked to a dedicated receptor to upload their counts. They are tested for proper operation before the election, and after each upload. Another liberal "shitbitch won" lie.

Apparently, you get your information from one ideological source.

It took DEF CON hackers minutes to pwn these US voting machines​

Hey Obama's Ball Gag:

The Obama Administration intentionally tried to hack in to the election systems of all 50 states and numerous counties and failed. They made thousands of attempts and failed every time "according to them!"

And based on that, Obama made his famous statement that Russia nor any other nation could hack our election, because of how dispersed it is.

Also, take note, Dipshit Leftist Fascist.

Exactly how to you HACK a voting machine that is not connected to THE INTERNET? NONE OF THEM ARE.

That is one of the major security features of the Voting Machines.

 

[bravoactual]

Now, ever since the November Election, where HRC won the Popular Vote and lost the Electoral College, all we have heard from the Cons is how Democrats have got to get over losing.

However, it seems the Cons have yet to get over Losing The Popular Vote, by 3,00,000+ Votes they Won.

They offer Fake News Story after Fake News Story about how HRC really did not win the Popular Vote by 3,000,000+Votes, which she of course did.

They never offer any real evidence, any real proof, any real credible evidence to prove that they won the Popular Vote, which they did not.

They offer up Conjecture, Contention, Hearsay, Innuendo and pure Supposition. But never one shred of credible, believable, verifiable proof.

Mainly because they do not have any.

Poor Little RePuBliKlan Snowflakes.

Get It Over It. You Lost The Popular Vote.

 

[bravoactual]

Proof that the ENTIRE LEFT is a FRAUD!

They feign concern over THE INTEGRITY of OUR ELECTIONS!

Yet they Oppose Immigration Law, Support Motor Voter Registrations and Driver's Licenses for Illegals (It's a felony to give an illegal a drivers license btw) and they Oppose Voter ID.

They also are opposing and obstructing all investigations in to election fraud.

I offer facts, you offer really bad animation. Poor Little ConJob Snowflake.

 

[The Original Tree]

Now, ever since the November Election, where HRC won the Popular Vote and lost the Electoral College, all we have heard from the Cons is how Democrats have got to get over losing.

However, it seems the Cons have yet to get over Losing The Popular Vote, by 3,00,000+ Votes they Won.

They offer Fake News Story after Fake News Story about how HRC really did not win the Popular Vote by 3,000,000+Votes, which she of course did.

They never offer any real evidence, any real proof, any real credible evidence to prove that they won the Popular Vote, which they did not.

They offer up Conjecture, Contention, Hearsay, Innuendo and pure Supposition. But never one shred of credible, believable, verifiable proof.

Mainly because they do not have any.

Poor Little RePuBliKlan Snowflakes.

Get It Over It. You Lost The Popular Vote.

The President won 85 % of all of the Counties in The United States.
Hillary Rotten Clit Clinton only won 15%

Get over it!

Well as much as a girly man can get over a slap in the face......
You always have mommy to go home and cry to, before you slink off in to your basement and cry yourself to sleep in the fetal position..

 

[Billo_Really]

Hey Obama's Ball Gag:

The Obama Administration intentionally tried to hack in to the election systems of all 50 states and numerous counties and failed. They made thousands of attempts and failed every time "according to them!"

And based on that, Obama made his famous statement that Russia nor any other nation could hack our election, because of how dispersed it is.

Also, take note, Dipshit Leftist Fascist.

Exactly how to you HACK a voting machine that is not connected to THE INTERNET? NONE OF THEM ARE.

That is one of the major security features of the Voting Machines.

http://www.alternet.org/video/watch-video-def-con-hackers-got-many-voting-machines-and-e-poll-books
Watch the Video: DEF CON Hackers Got Into Many Voting Machines and E-Poll Books