Nielsen was refusing to follow specific orders from her boss.

...Nope there is no such thing as going to far...
"Your Honor... the Prosecution rests."

gettyimages-515586328-2.jpg


My condolences.

=====================

I'm about as anti-Illegal Aliens as you can get, but even most hardliners will not condone the shooting of women and children.

The fact that you would support shooting border crossers indiscriminately as a demonstration speaks volumes about you.
Yes it does speak volumes,that NOTHING even women and children invaders come before defending my people and my country.

Refugees are not invaders. The Jews who fled Nazi Germany were turned away by every western country in the world, including the USA. Every first world country said "never again" would decent people turn away those running in fear for their lives.

Many of the men, women and children who are refused asylum, and were deported, are now dead. These refugees were murdered in their home countries American courts refused to believe were a threat to them.
 
Refusing to follow illegal orders is not a bad thing. It has also been reported Trump was always bugging her at home with unreasonable demands. That's a dick move even for someone like Trump.
it is illegal to house children with adults
What did you say? I couldn't hear you over the loud sucking sound coming from the White House.
why do democrats want to break the law?
Why republicans think the answer to every problem involves treating someone like garbage?

You spelled Democrats wrong!

We just had an investigation for over two years about Democrats treating a large number of people like garbage.
 
If your boss tells you to do something and you say no, you typically get fired.

Depends. If you are in the military, and someone gives you an order that you know to be unlawful, not only do they have the right to refuse to follow it, they also have the duty to refuse the order and report it.
DHS isn't the military, shit for brains.

You are right, DHS isn't the military, but apparently, from your post, you support people breaking the law as long as it suits the current president.
 
Amazing how CONservatives object to Judicial Activism only when it conflicts with their racist standpoint. They only support state's right when it doesn't conflict with their racists standpoint.

Otherwise they would be objecting to the gargantuan usurpation which occurred in the Chinese Exclusion Case wherein a racist SCOTUS USURPED the authority which the states' retained of controlling immigration within their borders.


.
Why is everything left-tards oppose "racist?"


Have you read the Chinese Exclusion Case wherein SCOTUS USURPED the authority to detain and deport?

The alleged "emergency" that existed in 1899 was that the Chinese wanted to work in the California Gold Mines and employers preferred to hire them instead white Europeans.

It wasn't because the Chinese were on Welfare, or abusing Obama Hellcare or creating Chinese gangs such as MS13., or because they were pedophiles.......ad nauseam

WHY DO REPUG-TARDS want to pretend that racism wasn't the issue?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

/
The date is 2019, not 1899. The fact that they were Chinese was only an issue because they were willing to work for half the wage as Americans.

Everything revolves around race, for dumbass leftists. In the real world, pay checks are the bottom line.


Yo Dingle Berry. in 1898 Puerto Rico was annexed as a territory.

Congresscritters immediately made sure that it was understood that Puerto Rico was considered an UNICORPORATED TERRITORY which could not become a state. They referred to us a jungle bunnies, stump jumpers who liked to racially intermarry

We recently requested equal treatment under the law - the date is 2019 - not 1898 - the Congresscritters immediately took a shit on the petition . What REPUG-TARD adjective do you want to use?


.

.
Of what relevance is any of that? 1899 was still 120 years ago. Things have changed since then.

You are right, things have definitely changed since then. So, since you admit that, why are you still trying to say that Republicans are the same as they were under Lincoln?
 
...Refugees are not invaders...
Yes they are, when they're all scamming the system by claiming 'refugee' (asylum-seeker) status.

...The Jews who fled Nazi Germany were turned away by every western country in the world, including the USA...
Yep.

...Every first world country said "never again" would decent people turn away those running in fear for their lives...
The problem comes-in, when, for every legitimate asylum seeker, you have a thousand phony ones.

...Many of the men, women and children who are refused asylum, and were deported, are now dead...
Link to hard, reliable, statistically significant numbers, please?

..These refugees were murdered in their home countries American courts refused to believe were a threat to them.
Link to hard, reliable, statistically significant numbers, please?

----------

And why is it that WE must take all these in?

What about Mexico?

What about Canada?

What about other countries in the Western Hemisphere that are doing well?

What about packing a few boatloads of them off to other countries across the oceans... let others do their fair share, as well.

What about sending the countries-of-origin a running "tab" - a bill or invoice - for our care of their people - per capita?

When do we send them back to their countries of origin, once conditions change there?

When do we establish long-term Refugee Camps to hold them until those conditions change?

Who pays for that?

Vast legions of Central and South Americans have been gaming our system and playing us for decades.

On November 8, 2016, Americans sent a very clear message, that they've had a bellyful of this $hit.

Enough is enough.

Everything else is a difference of opinion on how to reestablish control over our own sovereign national borders and immigration flow.
 
I back Trump 100% on WHATEVER it takes to remove illegals and stop them from coming to America. PERIOD.

How fucking dare her follow the law and not do what the King tells her to do.

Nielsen wanting to follow the law and human decency got her fired
nah, the so called 'human decency' would have stopped her from doing it the first time around with no regard for the children and no intentions to ever return these children stolen from the parents... back to them... :(

she's refusing because the court ruled it was illegal...

doing it, would land her in prison....

The LAWLESS Trump believes she should obey him, and he seems to believe following the constitution and the laws created from it by the powers given to congress in it, are meant to be broken...! :p

How cool is that...we have President so committed to working for the RIGHT Americans that he’s willing to break our stupid fucking laws to do so....WOW....What a badass!

I always knew you hated the Constitution. Thanks for proudly telling the world that you do.

I suppose I’ve reached the point where I hate wetbacks more than I love the Constitution huh? See what you wack-jobs have done?

don't blame others for your choices.
 
...Refugees are not invaders...
Yes they are, when they're all scamming the system by claiming 'refugee' (asylum-seeker) status.

...The Jews who fled Nazi Germany were turned away by every western country in the world, including the USA...
Yep.

...Every first world country said "never again" would decent people turn away those running in fear for their lives...
The problem comes-in, when, for every legitimate asylum seeker, you have a thousand phony ones.

...Many of the men, women and children who are refused asylum, and were deported, are now dead...
Link to hard, reliable, statistically significant numbers, please?

..These refugees were murdered in their home countries American courts refused to believe were a threat to them.
Link to hard, reliable, statistically significant numbers, please?

----------

And why is it that WE must take all these in?

What about Mexico?

What about Canada?

What about other countries in the Western Hemisphere that are doing well?

What about packing a few boatloads of them off to other countries across the oceans... let others do their fair share, as well.

What about sending the countries-of-origin a running "tab" - a bill or invoice - for our care of their people - per capita?

When do we send them back to their countries of origin, once conditions change there?

When do we establish long-term Refugee Camps to hold them until those conditions change?

Who pays for that?

Vast legions of Central and South Americans have been gaming our system and playing us for decades.

On November 8, 2016, Americans sent a very clear message, that they've had a bellyful of this $hit.

Enough is enough.

Everything else is a difference of opinion on how to reestablish control over our own sovereign national borders and immigration flow.
FYI
Mexico is taking the Central Americans in, by the thousands...

And Canada took all of the Syrian refugees in... that the Trump admin cut off...
 
Everything Trump does, has made things worse, at the border. Telling people "We're full. We can't take any more people" is the worst thing he could do. This surge is being caused by Trump saying he's closing the border. People are trying to get in before that happens.

creating a crisis is easier than solving one....

Many of the men, women and children who are refused asylum, and were deported, are now dead. These refugees were murdered in their home countries American courts refused to believe were a threat to them.
Yet there is a 'world court' ....

You are right, DHS isn't the military, but apparently, from your post, you support people breaking the law as long as it suits the current president.

exactly the conundrum

which will obviously fall in the lap of the DHS successor

That Trump thinks he can fire policy along w/subordinates isn't getting biz done, it's denying that it CAN be done

~S~
 
If your boss tells you to do something and you say no, you typically get fired.

Depends. If you are in the military, and someone gives you an order that you know to be unlawful, not only do they have the right to refuse to follow it, they also have the duty to refuse the order and report it.
Yes, but the military is not the Department of Homeland Security. It is a Department of the Executive Branch and the President is the boss. He can do what he wants there. If they won't follow illegal orders, good for them, but he still has the right to get rid of them and find some folks who WILL follow illegal orders..

So, in your opinion, it is okay for someone to break the law if they are following the orders of the president? I thought that one of the things that made this country great was that we are a nation of laws, and we follow them.
No, of course not. It just seems that is what we are dealing with.

Hey, you were the one that said if they won't follow illegal orders, then Trump should find some who would follow illegal orders. Sure sounds like you are advocating for Trump and his minions to break the law.
I never said (or implied) that Trump should give illegal orders. I said that is what he seems to be doing. I have always been disgusted with the President's attitude toward immigrants and immigration and although I dislike illegal immigration as much as anyone, we need to change the laws and procedures for dealing with them, not declare pretend "war" on them. They're just unarmed people who are looking for something better for themselves and their children. What monsters, huh?
 
Refusing to follow illegal orders is not a bad thing. It has also been reported Trump was always bugging her at home with unreasonable demands. That's a dick move even for someone like Trump.
it is illegal to house children with adults
What did you say? I couldn't hear you over the loud sucking sound coming from the White House.
why do democrats want to break the law?
Why republicans think the answer to every problem involves treating someone like garbage?

You spelled Democrats wrong!

We just had an investigation for over two years about Democrats treating a large number of people like garbage.
Oh really? then you will have no problem showing us this full report, supporting your accusations, right? :D
 
If your boss tells you to do something and you say no, you typically get fired.

"Ms. Nielsen’s disagreement with the president’s desire to restart separations, fueled by her concerns about the policy’s legality, was the latest example of Mr. Trump becoming frustrated with her because he felt she was too willing to operate within the legal boundaries of the immigration system he wants to revamp."

Trump Is Pushing to Restart Family Separations at Border


"we were just following orders" was the all too common refrain from the aryans who actually tossed jews into ovens!

You know....the aryan nazis who actually all got away with murder.....

"we were just following orders" (wink wink, nudge nudge)

In the US military, if someone tells you to do something that you know for a fact is unlawful, not only do you have the right to refuse it, but you also have the duty to report it.
So, you're not going to offer up the caveat then?

That if you refuse and it is because your interpretation of the lawful order is not the interpretation of those above you and your immediate officer, you WILL pay the consequences. Which will be some form of jail time and loss of rank, dishonorable discharge and a federal record.
 
If they were being mistreated so badly, why would hordes of them continue to flood across the border and go out of their way to surrender to ICE agents?

Because in order to apply for asylum they must first stand on American soil, and then ask a government agent for asylum. They MUST enter the country before they can ask for asylum. Trump tried to slow down the numbers crossing the border by saying that the border agent could only process X number of application per day, and they would have to wait in Mexico for their turn to come up. And then Trump closed some of the ports of entry, to further slow the numbers, and this resulted in refugees making dangerous desert crossing.

Everything Trump does, has made things worse, at the border. Telling people "We're full. We can't take any more people" is the worst thing he could do. This surge is being caused by Trump saying he's closing the border. People are trying to get in before that happens.
Even if that's true, it's just another good reason to build the wall.

Once the stand on American soil, they can go right back to where they came from to wait for their approval.
 
Exactly, just like Pontius Pilate who stated that he was not responsible for the execution of Jesus and reluctantly sent him to his death

Ms Nielsen objected to the nazistic policy wherein she was responsible for separating children from their families and thereby causing deaths and misery.

.

They separate them because you can't store adults and children together. They were not executing them.


Provide a Link showing that the children of WHITE EUROPEANS were separated from their parents at Ellis Island.

.

Could it be that white Europeans didnt bring children with them so they had a better chance of getting in?
Or maybe those white Europeans weren't prone to raping the children,or trafficking children?


HUH?

What the fucketh?

Deflecting using a bullshit irrelevant pretext. At any rate:

Yo Vernon one of the most prolific pedophiles was Earl Brian Bradley , . What part of Mexico was he from?

.
f3fc3c45fd59bc3cb7fe8ad224519132--lemon-face-language-immersion.jpg


.
And let's all take a moment to think of pedophile Dennis Hastert....voted most popular Representative in the House by the GOP....aka Speaker of the House.
What about? Are you seriously implying the Dennis Hastert is a justification for admitting pedophiles into the country?
 
...Nope there is no such thing as going to far...
"Your Honor... the Prosecution rests."

gettyimages-515586328-2.jpg


My condolences.

=====================

I'm about as anti-Illegal Aliens as you can get, but even most hardliners will not condone the shooting of women and children.

The fact that you would support shooting border crossers indiscriminately as a demonstration speaks volumes about you.
Yes it does speak volumes,that NOTHING even women and children invaders come before defending my people and my country.

Refugees are not invaders. The Jews who fled Nazi Germany were turned away by every western country in the world, including the USA. Every first world country said "never again" would decent people turn away those running in fear for their lives.

Many of the men, women and children who are refused asylum, and were deported, are now dead. These refugees were murdered in their home countries American courts refused to believe were a threat to them.
They're phony refugees. Mexico isn't Nazi Germany.

Many countries in Europe are turning back the phony "refugees" landing on their shores.
 
Why is everything left-tards oppose "racist?"


Have you read the Chinese Exclusion Case wherein SCOTUS USURPED the authority to detain and deport?

The alleged "emergency" that existed in 1899 was that the Chinese wanted to work in the California Gold Mines and employers preferred to hire them instead white Europeans.

It wasn't because the Chinese were on Welfare, or abusing Obama Hellcare or creating Chinese gangs such as MS13., or because they were pedophiles.......ad nauseam

WHY DO REPUG-TARDS want to pretend that racism wasn't the issue?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

/
The date is 2019, not 1899. The fact that they were Chinese was only an issue because they were willing to work for half the wage as Americans.

Everything revolves around race, for dumbass leftists. In the real world, pay checks are the bottom line.


Yo Dingle Berry. in 1898 Puerto Rico was annexed as a territory.

Congresscritters immediately made sure that it was understood that Puerto Rico was considered an UNICORPORATED TERRITORY which could not become a state. They referred to us a jungle bunnies, stump jumpers who liked to racially intermarry

We recently requested equal treatment under the law - the date is 2019 - not 1898 - the Congresscritters immediately took a shit on the petition . What REPUG-TARD adjective do you want to use?


.

.
Of what relevance is any of that? 1899 was still 120 years ago. Things have changed since then.

You are right, things have definitely changed since then. So, since you admit that, why are you still trying to say that Republicans are the same as they were under Lincoln?
One thing we know: Dims haven't changed since the Lincoln administration.
 
Good riddance to the heartless bitch
That's very unfair imo. I mean sure she may have hung up immigrant children by their thumbs with chains in a cell's ceiling. But a lot of those kids are malnourished and will be short as adults, so how are we to know she wasn't trying to be humane by trying to stretch them. (-:

Similarly, we males need to train ourselves to drink lots of fluid before 6pm and then drink little so we don't have to get up to try and pee so often. She may have denied children fluids with the best of intentions.
 
If your boss tells you to do something and you say no, you typically get fired.

Depends. If you are in the military, and someone gives you an order that you know to be unlawful, not only do they have the right to refuse to follow it, they also have the duty to refuse the order and report it.
DHS isn't the military, shit for brains.

You are right, DHS isn't the military, but apparently, from your post, you support people breaking the law as long as it suits the current president.
What law has he broken?
 

Forum List

Back
Top