This is his justification for his people shitting on the floors at the capital and he is sitting right in front of us saying his solution to take back the power from government is to force in a dictator, one as cruel hateful and ugly as Trump.I should have worded it differently to be more clear. I like when people pay attention and give me a chance to clarify. All three separate branches of power should be equal in weight to balance the scales… one often considered the highest branch is the executive but as the US is not a dictatorship it is not above the other two in a way that it can easily cancel out the actions of the other two branches without an EO and much ado. My observation is that congress- both houses, must be held accountable always (yet they’re often not- many examples from both sides) and they also must be responsibly limited in their powers restricted by the constitution and nothing more. That is my point. If a majority of the people begin to feel like the government can tell us how to live our lives in all areas, that will be the end of our functioning representative democracy. You can’t have it both ways. A government that slowly increases its power over time, hoping the public doesn’t really notice, is a legitimate concern. As public opinion still matters and still basically leads the horse (although including many deliberate attempts to spin the message) this matters.Nobody suggested "Instead". You literally imagined that and believed it immediately.yet the idea that crimes should be investigated by the government instead of law enforcement professionals is accepted by the masses that voters are at the mercy of their government overlords.