No, Chansley Was Not Escorted Into the Capitol Building

He entered with the people who did. That makes him guilty.
No. No it doesn’t.

All it does is prove that he was with some people who entered.

So, if the charge is just trespass, you’ve got a point. But mere association with a person who may have done more doesn’t prove anything but physical presence.
 
Uh..............not for nothing.............but pleading guilty, and being sentenced IS getting convicted.
What you failed to grasp is that by pleading guilty, one hopes for a measure of credit in the form of a lesser sentence. By going to trial and losing, the fear is that the sentence which gets imposed is likely to be significantly worse.
 
Exactly, he did what he did



After he followed an angry mob who busted through windows in order to gain entry.


Now there's some irony.


I'm a leftist?


There's a lot of retardation going on, but you're confused as to where it's coming from.


Yeah, you are an avowed leftist.
 
Did Taz ever acknowledge that his thread headline was misleading?
 
Chansley wasn’t violent and he wasn’t charged with being violent.

He pled guilty to disrupting a congressional proceeding which is exactly what he did. The video proves it. He knows it. We all know it.

The video wasn’t withheld and it isn’t exculpatory.
So the leader of the “insurrection” did nothing violent.

Some insurrection.
 
Obviously. Is that you trying to make a pointless or is it just that you can’t help it?

As I said. Yes. It’s so obvious even a dick like you comprehends that much.

Probably more than those who aren’t guilty.

So your thesis seem to boil down to the contention that becuae guilty people can plead guilty, therefore every guilty plea comes from a guilty person. You retard.
Nope you dope. You said you thought this traitor pled guilty and listed bogus conspiracy shit reasons why… and you know nothing about them. I know he’s on video tape. I know he pled guilty and what he pled to. You know he is guilty of it too, but are moronic about it.
 
Apparently, most of our liberals here at USMB leave that liberal thinking behind when it comes to their analysis of anything by which they hope to finally get Trump.
Yeah, partisanship like that distorts thinking. Mind you, we've got people like that as well.

You've got to make an effort to treat your political opponents fairly. My method on something like this is: what if it were the other side? In this case, suppose a mob of Lefties invaded the Capitol, etc. How would I respond? How would I want to see them treated by the legal system.?

For example, last year, there was a dumb Lefty 'anarchist' kid in Florida, I believe, who posted something about taking his gun to the state capitol to defend it from a rightwing mob. He got two years in prison!!! I thought we should all taken up his case and made a huge fuss about it, since his sentence was clearly way over the top.

[ A Florida Anarchist Will Spend Years in Prison for Online Posts Prompted by Jan. 6 Riot ]
 
That’s what you’re told it shows. But you don’t think for yourself, do you.
That’s what I watched in the video, Simp.

Nobody needs to say anything.

YOU we’re told it doesn’t show any it shows, Dumbass.
 
That’s what I watched in the video, Simp.

Nobody needs to say anything.
Tucker told you want to believe and you repeat it because you’re nothing more than meat puppet.

There’s no guided tour by nine officers.

That’s why you refuse to show the video. Because it’ll make you loo like a delusional pathetic little loser.
 

Forum List

Back
Top