John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 28,982
- 15,073
- 1,288
You got it wrong, Rambunctious, and you yelling looks funny to everyone. Will Bill has been drinking again, and he is wrong.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The report completely exonerated Biden. The rest is just the inappropriate BS opinion of a problematic Trump-appointee who was upset that he had to exonerate Biden.
But, Biden is the one who isn't mentally capable of standing trial...lolSure, he is, Will Bill. Trump is a neurosyphlitic, too.
RFKjr responds to these spurious charges.Look at y'all....y'all never give up do ya.
View attachment 899910
Bribem regime denies him secret service protection and now they've ordered an investigation into one of their own...and A KENNEDY TO BOOT. Now that is what you call power MAD. Not just hungry. MAD.
That's right. It should be Trump, but we will make an exception for him.But, Biden is the one who isn't mentally capable of standing trial...lol
Of course you want Trump held to a different standard. It's all about getting the Bad Orange Man, not about justice.That's right. It should be Trump, but we will make an exception for him.
Not much of a reader, are you?Trump isn't an old senile bag of bones, like Creepy Joe...lol
Biden isn't even competent to stand trial...lol
Maybe we should let Sihran Sihran out, just to be complete.Bribem regime denies him secret service protection and now they've ordered an investigation into one of their own...and A KENNEDY TO BOOT. Now that is what you call power MAD. Not just hungry. MAD.
The report also specified that the VIC illegally retained classified material and shared it with other people.Hur’s report specified how Biden alerted authorities, voluntarily returned records and consented to searches, whereas special counsel Jack Smith’s indictment against Trump accused the former president of refusing to return records and enlisting others to destroy evidence.
“Several material distinctions between Mr. Trump’s case and Mr. Biden’s are clear,” Hur wrote in his report released Thursday. “Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.”
Loading…
www.washingtonpost.com
Hur correctly assessed that “the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” As the report observed, “Historically, after leaving office, many former presidents and vice presidents have knowingly taken home sensitive materials related to national security from their administrations without being charged with crimes.”The report also specified that the VIC illegally retained classified material and shared it with other people.
Hur said that Biden couldn't be tried because he's a vegetable.Hur correctly assessed that “the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” As the report observed, “Historically, after leaving office, many former presidents and vice presidents have knowingly taken home sensitive materials related to national security from their administrations without being charged with crimes.”
Of particular note, Ronald Reagan “left the White House in 1989 with eight years’ worth of handwritten diaries, which he appears to have kept at his California home even though they contained Top Secret information.”
Equally important, as Hur noted, Biden’s conduct was far less egregious than what Trump is charged with in the Mar-a-Lago documents case. As much as Trump and his allies will try to conflate the two situations and claim that Trump is being unfairly prosecuted, the evidence in the two cases is very different.
As alleged in the indictment, Trump “not only refused to return the documents for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about it,” the report notes. “In contrast, Mr. Biden turned in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.”
Loading…
www.washingtonpost.com
No, he did not. You just replied to Hur correctly assessed that “the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”Hur said that Biden couldn't be tried because he's a vegetable.
The report completely exonerated Biden. The rest is just the inappropriate BS opinion of a problematic Trump-appointee who was upset that he had to exonerate Biden.