protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 57,249
- 18,396
- 2,250
- Thread starter
- #1,381
I have not refuted that you are an idiot.You have refuted NOTHING!
![auiqs.jpg :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:](/styles/smilies/new/auiqs.jpg.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have not refuted that you are an idiot.You have refuted NOTHING!
WHAT "goalposts" ? This isn't football.Don't try to move the goal posts at this point by expanding on your erroneous claim that Islam is not a religion. If you understand that the Constitution is the Supreme law of the land then how is it that you fail to also understand that the First Amendment which is part of the U.S. Constitution protects "the people of the United States" from interference by the government with their right to worship [or not] as they see fit?
What you're advocating is using our government to interfer with what the First Amendment protects so that a select group of individuals, those of the Islamic religion, lose their Constitutional rights when this is strictly prohibited by the U.S. Constitution which is the Supreme law of the land.
I realize my comment contains a lot of redundencies but generally that's how you explain things to a child who is having difficulty grasping a concept.
Muslims are not being interfered with by the government in a right to worship, because there is no worshiping, because Islam is not a religion, and only uses that façade to shield themselves from criticism, by getting dupes like you to believe that it's a religion. Get it ?
And what YOU fail to understand (or turn a blind eye to) is that Islam is in violation of the Constitution (Article 6, section 2, part 1), by virtue of its supremacy.
PS - the first amendment is a weak document that has many exceptions. The Supremacy Clause has NEVER had one.
You're confused, probably because the terrorists have you all trained just like Pavlo's dog.And if just the Muslim terrorists were responsible for their terrorism, and not Islam, we wouldn't hear the constant repetition of "ALLAH AKBAR" right at the time of the terrorist acts.
Maybe your masters degree is one of your problems. Lots of people come out of universities (as the one I used to teach in) having been MISeducated about social affairs.I have a Master's degree, and a certificate for teaching this topic in school. What do you have? A lot of suppositions, bad judgements, and criminally incorrect facts!
I have not refuted that you are an idiot.You have refuted NOTHING!![]()
What part of compatibly don't you understand ??? It all hinges on that one word. If not compatible then it fails. Period.Don't try to move the goal posts at this point by expanding on your erroneous claim that Islam is not a religion. If you understand that the Constitution is the Supreme law of the land then how is it that you fail to also understand that the First Amendment which is part of the U.S. Constitution protects "the people of the United States" from interference by the government with their right to worship [or not] as they see fit?How could it sail over my head, when I was the one who introduced the notion (supremacy clause means the US Constitution is the law of the land) in this thread ? (and many others)LOL. Way to turn it around back on him but somehow I expect your comment to sail right over his head.
Secondly, dum dum still is trying to push the idea of Islam being a religion, despite it being saturated with vile immoralities.![]()
What you're advocating is using our government to interfer with what the First Amendment protects so that a select group of individuals, those of the Islamic religion, lose their Constitutional rights when this is strictly prohibited by the U.S. Constitution which is the Supreme law of the land.
I realize my comment contains a lot of redundencies but generally that's how you explain things to a child who is having difficulty grasping a concept.
Being trained like Pavlov's dog is YOUR reason for YOUR confusion. Do you support murder, wife-beating, misogyny, rape, pedophilia, slavery, supremacism over the Constitution ? No ? Then why are you so accepting of Islam ?You're confused, probably because the terrorists have you all trained just like Pavlo's dog.
Are you going to add or complain ?I have not refuted that you are an idiot.You have refuted NOTHING!![]()
Tell me one statement I have made that is wrong. I have listed yours. You haven't done shit except act like a 3 year-old and scream, "Nuh-unh"!
Trump's in the White House, apparently not.Aren't there rules about putting crazy people into political jobs ?
Maybe your masters degree is one of your problems. Lots of people come out of universities (as the one I used to teach in) having been MISeducated about social affairs.Right, right, and right, imbecile. You need not keep showing how stupid you are. Everyone already knows.Wrong, wrong, and wrong again, dumbass!
I have a Master's degree, and a certificate for teaching this topic in school. What do you have? A lot of suppositions, bad judgements, and criminally incorrect facts!
I cringe when I think about what they must be teaching kids about Islam these days. I'll bet the books they prescribe aren't by the authors they really need to read >> (Brigitte Gabriel, Robert Spencer, Andrew McCarthy, Paul Sperry, P. David Gaubatz)
That's what you want to see American's doing ??American muslims have the same level of education as do Americans overall. Which means a below average guy like you should be the one serving them the appetizers. Dont forget to ask if they want another drink.Why shouldn't Muslims be allowed to serve hors d'oeuvres? Somebody has to serve, can't have Mexicans leaving the fields after all
Are you going to add or complain ?I have not refuted that you are an idiot.You have refuted NOTHING!![]()
Tell me one statement I have made that is wrong. I have listed yours. You haven't done shit except act like a 3 year-old and scream, "Nuh-unh"!
No but the people as a whole do, so quit fighting it already.And what do you do with those who are intent on committing atrocities, but just haven't gotten into the right position yet for maximum effect ?? How many planned attacks have been spolied by Homeland security (you know that thing AOC is wanting to end) ?Has nothing to do with "every" Muslim (or MINO), as already explained repeatedly. Ho hum.Because fear mongering is a tried and true method of getting elected. It goes hand in hand with the shift in news coverage from a service to the public to big business. And when do people watch the news? When they are afraid. Scare the public with news stories and they will watch more and more news, which boosts ratings even more, which makes more profits.
Even this thread is a product of the fear mongering. There are 3.45 million Muslims living in the US. But the news and talk shows make it sound as though every Muslim is a blood-thirsty terrorist. So the knee-jerk reaction is to ban them.
![]()
PS =- the liberal catchprase "fear mongering" has already fizzled out, along with white supremacist, Nazi, divisive, and tolerance.
LMAO!! Fizzled out? No. It is an accurate description of the tactics used by BOTH parties.
Oh, so not every Muslim. So how do you tell the difference between a Muslim you will allow to hold office (after applying a question that is blatantly unconstitutional) and Muslims you will not allow to hold office? It isn't the ones that have committed atrocities. They are either dead or in prison, so the chances of them winning an election are pretty slim.
Yes we want all around the world to come here in order to enjoy the diversities of their culture's along with ours. The only thing though, is that they have to be compatible to American religion's as is practiced, our culture, our laws, and our way of government here. If can't then we don't need them here, and this includes any group or individual's from around the globe.
You don't get to decide.
Don't make me ask again.Are you going to add or complain ?I have not refuted that you are an idiot.You have refuted NOTHING!![]()
Tell me one statement I have made that is wrong. I have listed yours. You haven't done shit except act like a 3 year-old and scream, "Nuh-unh"!
Your post made about as much sense as your others. None!
Obviously I was being facetious in response to his comment. Come on,man. Big boy pants.That's what you want to see American's doing ?
No but the people as a whole do, so quit fighting it already.And what do you do with those who are intent on committing atrocities, but just haven't gotten into the right position yet for maximum effect ?? How many planned attacks have been spolied by Homeland security (you know that thing AOC is wanting to end) ?Has nothing to do with "every" Muslim (or MINO), as already explained repeatedly. Ho hum.Because fear mongering is a tried and true method of getting elected. It goes hand in hand with the shift in news coverage from a service to the public to big business. And when do people watch the news? When they are afraid. Scare the public with news stories and they will watch more and more news, which boosts ratings even more, which makes more profits.
Even this thread is a product of the fear mongering. There are 3.45 million Muslims living in the US. But the news and talk shows make it sound as though every Muslim is a blood-thirsty terrorist. So the knee-jerk reaction is to ban them.
![]()
PS =- the liberal catchprase "fear mongering" has already fizzled out, along with white supremacist, Nazi, divisive, and tolerance.
LMAO!! Fizzled out? No. It is an accurate description of the tactics used by BOTH parties.
Oh, so not every Muslim. So how do you tell the difference between a Muslim you will allow to hold office (after applying a question that is blatantly unconstitutional) and Muslims you will not allow to hold office? It isn't the ones that have committed atrocities. They are either dead or in prison, so the chances of them winning an election are pretty slim.
Yes we want all around the world to come here in order to enjoy the diversities of their culture's along with ours. The only thing though, is that they have to be compatible to American religion's as is practiced, our culture, our laws, and our way of government here. If can't then we don't need them here, and this includes any group or individual's from around the globe.
You don't get to decide.
Don't make me ask again.Are you going to add or complain ?I have not refuted that you are an idiot.You have refuted NOTHING!![]()
Tell me one statement I have made that is wrong. I have listed yours. You haven't done shit except act like a 3 year-old and scream, "Nuh-unh"!
Your post made about as much sense as your others. None!![]()
Oh... Ok.. lolObviously I was being facetious in response to his comment. Come on,man. Big boy pants.That's what you want to see American's doing ?
Thank you, because you sure aren't adding anything.Don't make me ask again.Are you going to add or complain ?I have not refuted that you are an idiot.![]()
Tell me one statement I have made that is wrong. I have listed yours. You haven't done shit except act like a 3 year-old and scream, "Nuh-unh"!
Your post made about as much sense as your others. None!![]()
Yeah, we can't put up with any more stupid than this. The thread is saturated. I'll just ignore your stupidty.
What part of compatibly don't you understand ??? It all hinges on that one word. If not compatible then it fails. Period.
The facts don't lie, and when those facts point out a serious problem, then we are fools to place our heads in the sand. Doing that very thing has caused us to lose family members over the years, and these are people we can't get back, and they ended up dying to early at the hands of ignorant people.