Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Republican extremism is almost unbelievable.
They are like lemmings to the sea.
The Republican extremism is almost unbelievable.
They are like lemmings to the sea.
You for sure would know what a lemming is...
Hail Obama..
The Republican extremism is almost unbelievable.
They are like lemmings to the sea.
You for sure would know what a lemming is...
Hail Obama..
Hail indeed....
George W. Bush inherited a strong economy, a budget surplus, and a nation at peace.
Eight years later, he left Obama with a shattered economy, a trillion dollar deficit, and two useless wars.
Obama saved the country from another Great Depression, rebuilt GM, reformed healthcare, reformed Wall Street, doubled the stock market, created 8 straight quarters of GDP growth, created 22 straight months of private sector job growth, got Bin Laden, got Gaddafi, and got us out of Iraq.
And now with the automatic spending cuts and the expiration of the Bush tax cuts in 2012, Obama has solved the deficit problem as well.
Obama has done a very good job.
Old is good! That's why I liked Mike Gravel. The main problem with Obama is he's too young to not care whose toes he steps on. FDR is one good example of what I mean. No concerns about the future.Sanders is too old. [...]
Yeah. Obama is doing a great job of cleaning up Bush's destruction of terrorism, his dismantling of Ghaddafi's nuclear capability, increased respect for the US in the middle east, dismantling Saddam's regime and stabilizing the country, lower tax rates, etc etc.
The truth is Obama is the biggest fuck up to occupy the Oval Office. Period. Paragraph.
By all means, we can pretend that Bush did not leave behind a massive, deep, broad and complicated financial disaster and two expensive wars that cost the lives, limbs and minds of thousands of Americans and Middle East innocents, wars that will ulitmately prove to be fruitless when the bad guys take over in each country. We can play pretend on anything.
We can divert away from what Bush left behind and blame Obama for where we are. That's partisan politics, intellectual honesty is always optional.
.
You can pretend all you want.
The facts are that the economy was about to bottom out, Obama's moves prolonged the recession. Iraq was pretty much done, and Obama simply followed Bush's timeline of withdrawl. The difference is Bush would have negotiated a continued presence and Obama just folded, guaranteeing we wil have to go back in 5 years. Bush's strategy in Afghanistan was working just fine. Obama spent many more lives and resources and announced at the outset when we were leaving. That gave the bad guys all the info they needed.
I would accuse you of no intellectual honesty but you would need an intellect first.
By all means, we can pretend that Bush did not leave behind a massive, deep, broad and complicated financial disaster and two expensive wars that cost the lives, limbs and minds of thousands of Americans and Middle East innocents, wars that will ulitmately prove to be fruitless when the bad guys take over in each country. We can play pretend on anything.
We can divert away from what Bush left behind and blame Obama for where we are. That's partisan politics, intellectual honesty is always optional.
.
You can pretend all you want.
The facts are that the economy was about to bottom out, Obama's moves prolonged the recession. Iraq was pretty much done, and Obama simply followed Bush's timeline of withdrawl. The difference is Bush would have negotiated a continued presence and Obama just folded, guaranteeing we wil have to go back in 5 years. Bush's strategy in Afghanistan was working just fine. Obama spent many more lives and resources and announced at the outset when we were leaving. That gave the bad guys all the info they needed.
I would accuse you of no intellectual honesty but you would need an intellect first.
The economy was about to bottom out? As a financial advisor, I can tell you that is nowhere near true (not that this matters). The ramifications of this disaster are going to be felt for a very long time, just as all of us in the industry said at the time. You're either being dishonest or you're absolutely ignorant of the severity of what has happened. I'm going to guess it is the former.
The wars cost us thousands of American lives; hundreds of thousands of innocent indigenous lives; thousands of American limbs and thousands of young minds. Not to mention trillions of dollars. We could have stayed in both countries for 50 years, and when we left, the bad guys were going to move back in. Unless you think (and you evidently do) that it's our "right" to occupy sovereign countries at our whim. We'll just have to disagree there; I don't believe we own the planet.
And, of course, the predictable personal insult: "you would need an intellect first." Okay, I'm sure you're far more intelligent than anyone who dares to disagree with you. The hardcore lefties tell me the same thing. Standard partisan defense mechanism, evidently.
I definitely give you credit for defending the disaster Bush left behind. I can only imagine how much energy that kind of spinning must require.
.
The Republican extremism is almost unbelievable.
They are like lemmings to the sea.
The Republican extremism is almost unbelievable.
They are like lemmings to the sea.
Drink more kool aid. It's good for you.
You for sure would know what a lemming is...
Hail Obama..
Hail indeed....
George W. Bush inherited a strong economy, a budget surplus, and a nation at peace.
Eight years later, he left Obama with a shattered economy, a trillion dollar deficit, and two useless wars.
Obama saved the country from another Great Depression, rebuilt GM, reformed healthcare, reformed Wall Street, doubled the stock market, created 8 straight quarters of GDP growth, created 22 straight months of private sector job growth, got Bin Laden, got Gaddafi, and got us out of Iraq.
And now with the automatic spending cuts and the expiration of the Bush tax cuts in 2012, Obama has solved the deficit problem as well.
Obama has done a very good job.
Try again. Bush inherited a busted internet bubble, a paper surplus and a free-ranging Osama.
We could have been in a robust recovery for the past two years is Obama hadn't stalled it with ACA and taken his eye off the ball of how the stimulus was being used.
Obama has shown that he has no loyalty to the Constitution and there is no telling what damage he will try to do to us next.
If Obama's President, why do we even need elections?
By all means, we can pretend that Bush did not leave behind a massive, deep, broad and complicated financial disaster and two expensive wars that cost the lives, limbs and minds of thousands of Americans and Middle East innocents, wars that will ulitmately prove to be fruitless when the bad guys take over in each country. We can play pretend on anything.
We can divert away from what Bush left behind and blame Obama for where we are. That's partisan politics, intellectual honesty is always optional.
.
You can pretend all you want.
The facts are that the economy was about to bottom out, Obama's moves prolonged the recession. Iraq was pretty much done, and Obama simply followed Bush's timeline of withdrawl. The difference is Bush would have negotiated a continued presence and Obama just folded, guaranteeing we wil have to go back in 5 years. Bush's strategy in Afghanistan was working just fine. Obama spent many more lives and resources and announced at the outset when we were leaving. That gave the bad guys all the info they needed.
I would accuse you of no intellectual honesty but you would need an intellect first.
The economy was about to bottom out? As a financial advisor, I can tell you that is nowhere near true (not that this matters). The ramifications of this disaster are going to be felt for a very long time, just as all of us in the industry said at the time. You're either being dishonest or you're absolutely ignorant of the severity of what has happened. I'm going to guess it is the former.
The wars cost us thousands of American lives; hundreds of thousands of innocent indigenous lives; thousands of American limbs and thousands of young minds. Not to mention trillions of dollars. We could have stayed in both countries for 50 years, and when we left, the bad guys were going to move back in. Unless you think (and you evidently do) that it's our "right" to occupy sovereign countries at our whim. We'll just have to disagree there; I don't believe we own the planet.
And, of course, the predictable personal insult: "you would need an intellect first." Okay, I'm sure you're far more intelligent than anyone who dares to disagree with you. The hardcore lefties tell me the same thing. Standard partisan defense mechanism, evidently.
I definitely give you credit for defending the disaster Bush left behind. I can only imagine how much energy that kind of spinning must require. Funny thing is, I suspect YOU don't even believe it.
.
You can pretend all you want.
The facts are that the economy was about to bottom out, Obama's moves prolonged the recession. Iraq was pretty much done, and Obama simply followed Bush's timeline of withdrawl. The difference is Bush would have negotiated a continued presence and Obama just folded, guaranteeing we wil have to go back in 5 years. Bush's strategy in Afghanistan was working just fine. Obama spent many more lives and resources and announced at the outset when we were leaving. That gave the bad guys all the info they needed.
I would accuse you of no intellectual honesty but you would need an intellect first.
The economy was about to bottom out? As a financial advisor, I can tell you that is nowhere near true (not that this matters). The ramifications of this disaster are going to be felt for a very long time, just as all of us in the industry said at the time. You're either being dishonest or you're absolutely ignorant of the severity of what has happened. I'm going to guess it is the former.
The wars cost us thousands of American lives; hundreds of thousands of innocent indigenous lives; thousands of American limbs and thousands of young minds. Not to mention trillions of dollars. We could have stayed in both countries for 50 years, and when we left, the bad guys were going to move back in. Unless you think (and you evidently do) that it's our "right" to occupy sovereign countries at our whim. We'll just have to disagree there; I don't believe we own the planet.
And, of course, the predictable personal insult: "you would need an intellect first." Okay, I'm sure you're far more intelligent than anyone who dares to disagree with you. The hardcore lefties tell me the same thing. Standard partisan defense mechanism, evidently.
I definitely give you credit for defending the disaster Bush left behind. I can only imagine how much energy that kind of spinning must require. Funny thing is, I suspect YOU don't even believe it.
.
If you were advising clients to steer clear of stocks at Obama's inauguration then they missed one of the big market moves up of the decade.
So much for your information.
How much did 9/11 cost? What about Khobar Towers or all the other terrorist attacks that Clinton responded to by lobbing a missile? Both wars were cheap, as wars go. Both accomplished many objectives, foreseen and unforeseen. And both are being lost as we speak by an administration quaking in its boots from the military, the most politically-driven administration in history.
The economy was about to bottom out? As a financial advisor, I can tell you that is nowhere near true (not that this matters). The ramifications of this disaster are going to be felt for a very long time, just as all of us in the industry said at the time. You're either being dishonest or you're absolutely ignorant of the severity of what has happened. I'm going to guess it is the former.
The wars cost us thousands of American lives; hundreds of thousands of innocent indigenous lives; thousands of American limbs and thousands of young minds. Not to mention trillions of dollars. We could have stayed in both countries for 50 years, and when we left, the bad guys were going to move back in. Unless you think (and you evidently do) that it's our "right" to occupy sovereign countries at our whim. We'll just have to disagree there; I don't believe we own the planet.
And, of course, the predictable personal insult: "you would need an intellect first." Okay, I'm sure you're far more intelligent than anyone who dares to disagree with you. The hardcore lefties tell me the same thing. Standard partisan defense mechanism, evidently.
I definitely give you credit for defending the disaster Bush left behind. I can only imagine how much energy that kind of spinning must require. Funny thing is, I suspect YOU don't even believe it.
.
If you were advising clients to steer clear of stocks at Obama's inauguration then they missed one of the big market moves up of the decade.
So much for your information.
How much did 9/11 cost? What about Khobar Towers or all the other terrorist attacks that Clinton responded to by lobbing a missile? Both wars were cheap, as wars go. Both accomplished many objectives, foreseen and unforeseen. And both are being lost as we speak by an administration quaking in its boots from the military, the most politically-driven administration in history.
So the horrific costs I specified are acceptable to you. Don't know what to say.
Worse, it's tough to communicate with people who think the stock market is the economy. My clients do just fine, thanks, I keep a close eye on the markets for them. And since you think the stock market is the economy, I won't burn any more time on this.
.
If you were advising clients to steer clear of stocks at Obama's inauguration then they missed one of the big market moves up of the decade.
So much for your information.
How much did 9/11 cost? What about Khobar Towers or all the other terrorist attacks that Clinton responded to by lobbing a missile? Both wars were cheap, as wars go. Both accomplished many objectives, foreseen and unforeseen. And both are being lost as we speak by an administration quaking in its boots from the military, the most politically-driven administration in history.
So the horrific costs I specified are acceptable to you. Don't know what to say.
Worse, it's tough to communicate with people who think the stock market is the economy. My clients do just fine, thanks, I keep a close eye on the markets for them. And since you think the stock market is the economy, I won't burn any more time on this.
.
So "financial adviser" now=Economist? Really?
Were the costs of 9/11 acceptable to you? Must be. Other terrorist acts? Yeah, probably. Those were friends and relatives who died in 9/11, totally innocent bystanders. The soldiers who were killed were volunteers and accepted the risks. I guess the distinction is beyond you.
Perhaps we should just have declared defeat and adopted sharia law? That would cost less, right?
So, 'financial adviser", we will be recovering for a long time. Recovering from Obama's corruption of bankruptcy law, his Dodd-Frank monstrosity, his "consumer affairs" monstrosity, his illegal and unconstitutional acts. Yes, a long time until we can undo all the damage that idiot has done.
If you were advising clients to steer clear of stocks at Obama's inauguration then they missed one of the big market moves up of the decade.
So much for your information.
How much did 9/11 cost? What about Khobar Towers or all the other terrorist attacks that Clinton responded to by lobbing a missile? Both wars were cheap, as wars go. Both accomplished many objectives, foreseen and unforeseen. And both are being lost as we speak by an administration quaking in its boots from the military, the most politically-driven administration in history.
So the horrific costs I specified are acceptable to you. Don't know what to say.
Worse, it's tough to communicate with people who think the stock market is the economy. My clients do just fine, thanks, I keep a close eye on the markets for them. And since you think the stock market is the economy, I won't burn any more time on this.
.
So "financial adviser" now=Economist? Really?
Were the costs of 9/11 acceptable to you? Must be. Other terrorist acts? Yeah, probably. Those were friends and relatives who died in 9/11, totally innocent bystanders. The soldiers who were killed were volunteers and accepted the risks. I guess the distinction is beyond you.
Perhaps we should just have declared defeat and adopted sharia law? That would cost less, right?
So, 'financial adviser", we will be recovering for a long time. Recovering from Obama's corruption of bankruptcy law, his Dodd-Frank monstrosity, his "consumer affairs" monstrosity, his illegal and unconstitutional acts. Yes, a long time until we can undo all the damage that idiot has done.
You do realize that Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11 don't you?
You do realize that Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11 don't you?
Good catch, missed that one. First he thinks the stock market is the economy, then he thinks that Iraq perpetrated 9/11. I can't keep up!
.