jillian
Princess
The R's have a softball this election. If they can't win, they should disband and go away.
they *had* a softball election. that's no longer true because the "base" doesn't want anyone who can win; they want idealogues.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The R's have a softball this election. If they can't win, they should disband and go away.
If Santorum gets the nod, it will be helpful to look at 1964. The last time the GOP gave a Puritan the nomination, he went down in flames.I wouldn't say Obama is a shoo-in just yet. If UE stays above 8% he'll have a difficult time getting re-elected.
If Santorum gets the nod he is a shoe in.
If Romney does, it could get interesting, but they'll hammer the Mormon on his religion and tax havens...
At this point last year everyone was still saying that Hillary was going to be the next president.
Nothing is a lock. We can worry about Santorum's second term on Nov 7
who is best set to win in 2016? Hillary? Jeb Bush? Palin (hey, I do have a sense of humour!)
who is best set to win in 2016? Hillary? Jeb Bush? Palin (hey, I do have a sense of humour!)
If you're gonna flame, do it in the flame zone. Unless you have actual evidence to prove that Obama is a 'lock in' for 2012... which would suggest corrupt election practices.
who is best set to win in 2016? Hillary? Jeb Bush? Palin (hey, I do have a sense of humour!)
If you're gonna flame, do it in the flame zone. Unless you have actual evidence to prove that Obama is a 'lock in' for 2012... which would suggest corrupt election practices.
how was that a flame? he is stating his opinion, like everyone else on this board.
i also happen to agree with him. but that's neither here nor there.
i look forward to you interjecting on every thread about how obama is going to lose.
Obama will be elected in the same manner as Ahmadinejad.....
If you're gonna flame, do it in the flame zone. Unless you have actual evidence to prove that Obama is a 'lock in' for 2012... which would suggest corrupt election practices.
how was that a flame? he is stating his opinion, like everyone else on this board.
i also happen to agree with him. but that's neither here nor there.
i look forward to you interjecting on every thread about how obama is going to lose.
Apparently, some people find the pondering of a Hillary, Jeb, or Palin nomination as an attack.
Its already history and he is already in top contention for worst president ever.
Your just too brainwashed to see it
Fuck off dickhead.
I would venture to say your boys Obama and Carter will be neck and neck for worst Presidents of all time.
As I said. History will tell the tale.
What this country really needs is for its whacked-out, narcissistic political ideologues to find another hobby.
Well do us a favor and find a new hobby.
who is best set to win in 2016? Hillary? Jeb Bush? Palin (hey, I do have a sense of humour!)
If you're gonna flame, do it in the flame zone. Unless you have actual evidence to prove that Obama is a 'lock in' for 2012... which would suggest corrupt election practices.
Whoever it is, the Dems will still run a "Bush's fault" platform
I heard that Jeb Bush legally changed his name to Jeb Jesus Reagan Lincoln.
Whoever it is, the Dems will still run a "Bush's fault" platform
It's sad isn't it?
Bush fucked things up so badly that the impact will still be felt in 2016 and beyond
You have the wit of a rubber crutch.I heard that Jeb Bush legally changed his name to Jeb Jesus Reagan Lincoln.
I heard you changed your name to Kohler.
Oh no, you're just full of shit.
Whoever it is, the Dems will still run a "Bush's fault" platform
It's sad isn't it?
Bush fucked things up so badly that the impact will still be felt in 2016 and beyond
And the Dems should give thanks every day for Bush. Without him they might have to take some kind of responsibility.