So why all the hysteria?No. This ruling has no effect on copyrights.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So why all the hysteria?No. This ruling has no effect on copyrights.
Like how social media companies can’t be compelled to create speech for users they don’t like.This is about speech, not services. Under this ruling, artists can't be compelled to create messages they don't like, that's it.
Let us know how that works out for ya.It's against my religion to serve bigots so my business would have a sign that said no Christians allowed.
I'm not homosexual I'm just not afraid of them like you are.Let us know how that works out for ya.
I know if I had a "No Faggots" sign that would turn you right away, huh?
Doesnt sound very conservative to meIt’s not, but conservatives still demand it and have passed some clearly unconstitutional laws to do so.
This includes Ron DeSantis who proclaims himself the leader of freedom in Florida. Turns out his fight against “wokism” is big government authoritarianism.
Agree. The vast majority of conservatives are phony.Doesnt sound very conservative to me
I was obviously referring to the actual subject at hand.So you are advocating for the repeal of all criminal laws and punishments?
Saying that doesn't help much. Too many are.Most gay people are not a danger to anyone's children but bigots don't know that.
Liberals arent actual liberals.Agree. The vast majority of conservatives are phony.
You know, I wish all that wasn't currently true, but unfortunately, it is.Liberals arent actual liberals.
Conservatives arent actual conservatives.
Women arent actual men.
etc
Clown world.
So? It's called freedom of association. You should try it sometime.Right now, the TRUMPCourt is restricting its accepting religious intolerance only towards homosexuals.
But you are correct.
Their decisions have been open ended and there is nothing preventing someone claiming to be religious to refuse service to mixed race couples, adulterers, those of different faiths, atheists
Awwww, the poor MAGA snowflake's feewings are hurt!Idiot, you can't force me to do something I don't want to do.
Same with your bullshit vaccinations.
You have no right to impose ANYTHING on me. Especially not your moronic morality (or lack thereof).
It is? How?No. You are wrong, and you're lying.
The Christians didn't refuse to sell to gays, not at all. That is NOT what happened.
What happened is the Christians refused to make a gay symbol.
Which is something very different.
Oh, look! The MAGA snowflake ties himself into knots trying to justify his bullshit after he had his ass handed back to him in this thread.lol - lmao !!!
THIS ^^^ is how leftards think.
You just proved you're a dyed in the wool leftard, son.
INDIVIDUALS have rights, mister. Corporations have no rights at all. Nary a one.
FedGov also has NO rights. Not a single stinkin fuckin one. All they have is OBLIGATIONS.
So? It's called freedom of association. You should try it sometime.
It's still bigotry....even if it's based on a fake case.How long will it be before some business refuses service to black people because they say it's against the owner's religion?
How long before an employer gets to refuse to hire a woman because the business owner's religious belief is that a woman should be at home serving her husband and raising children?
And how many other laws will get to be ignored on the basis of a religious claim?
If you get a business license, you should follow business regulations and laws.You can associate with anyone you wish
Your business can not
Saying that doesn't help much. Too many are.
oh for cryin'outloud.How long will it be before some business refuses service to black people because they say it's against the owner's religion?
How long before an employer gets to refuse to hire a woman because the business owner's religious belief is that a woman should be at home serving her husband and raising children?
And how many other laws will get to be ignored on the basis of a religious claim?