Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,438
- 2,290
We've learned that even shooting someone in the back is even against the law. But you're right tho, if we considered everything that a jury says is right, then OJ didn't do it.
Bill Cosby is just a dude who likes to party. And Capone was just a lazy accountant.
Seems legit.
So you responded to my question without giving an answer. And no, there is no law against shooting somebody in the back. If a police officer is chasing a dangerous suspect, and the officer believes that the suspect will jeopardize the public, he can shoot the suspect down before he reaches the public. Or if a hostage broke free and the suspect is trying to chase the hostage down to recapture them. Or if an outraged husband or boyfriend is chasing their girlfriend or wife down the street with a knife. A police officer (or armed citizen) has the right to use deadly force.
If you know the guy is a dangerous felon !! That Cleveland case was not that . He pulled the guy over for a traffic bullshit stop .
You're going in circles. Which Cleveland case are you talking about? It doesn't matter why he pulled the guy over, what matters is that he didn't listen to the orders of an officer that caused him concern over his own safety.
What you leftists have to understand is that a jury (or prosecutor) has to prove a law was broken by a police officer in order to convict him. So again I ask, what law was the jury supposed to convict the officer of breaking?