NYTimes Exterminates George Bush!

[PoliticalChic]

seriously ?

boy, the RW's are really reaching ... (or is it stooping) to new lows.

if the pic panned back far enough to include 43 you wouldn't have been able to recognize him anyway .. then they would have bitched about that .

SSDD

moving on .........................................................

He can be clearly seem in the OP pic, you dunce.

 

[asaratis]

The idea was to put Obama in the exact center of the photo. Had they been able to airbrush in a halo...we'd have seen Jesus leading the march.

 

[PoliticalChic]

That's because democrats favored and encouraged invasion.
Again, selective memory issues with democrats.

Well, 111 of them voted in favor, but 147 voted against. Not that facts matter to pseudo-cons.

What's your point? Usually parties vote monolithically. When that many dissent you have an endorsement. So stop with the rationalization and the phony. It wasn't Bush's invasion. That's propaganda aimed at partisan dupes.

There was nothing in the legislation that called for an invasion or an occupation. The entire Iraq debacle/blunder is on the Bush Administration.

Time for your remedial:

"... the overwhelming bipartisan support in Congress, in the media, and among the public — for reasons well beyond WMD. In October 2002, both houses of Congress passed 23 writs justifying the removal of Saddam, an update of Bill Clinton’s 1998 Iraq Liberation Act.

Senators Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, and Harry Reid were among those who not only enthusiastically called for Saddam’s removal, but also warned of intelligence estimates of Saddam’s WMD arsenals.... over 70 percent approval from the American people.

Bush, in that regard, had achieved what Clinton had not on the eve of the Serbian War — he had obtained a joint resolution of support from Congress before attacking, and had taken nearly a year in concerted (though failed) attempts to win U.N. approval for Saddam’s removal....

Had Bush not gone to Congress, had he made no attempt to go to the U.N., had he had no public support, or had he been opposed by the liberal press, he probably would not have invaded Iraq."
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/343870/why-did-we-invade-iraq-victor-davis-hanson/page/0/2



Wise up, you dope.

 

[boilermaker55]

Just helping out someone that needed a little help.
You are so welcome!

EXTERMINATES?
Who spelled the word for you?
LOL what a laughable headline.
At least faux news taught you one thing..........
ex·ag·ger·ate
iɡˈzajəˌrāt/
verb
verb: exaggerate; 3rd person present: exaggerates; past tense: exaggerated; past participle: exaggerated; gerund or present participle: exaggerating
represent (something) as being larger, greater, better, or worse than it really is.
"they were apt to exaggerate any aches and pains"
synonyms: overstate, overemphasize, overestimate, magnify, amplify, aggrandize, inflate

It was not by accident.
I use words with precision.

1. It means to eradicate, to remove, which is what the NYSlimes did to suggest he was not in attendance.

2. I exaggerated with purpose.
Glad it got so deeply under your skin that you defaulted to large pink font.
Pink is good for your political persuasion.

How does the media....wholly owned by Liberalism, Inc., pull the less astuted into their fold?

We got an example of it in the action this week by the NYSlimes....



1. "Predictable. NY Times Crops Out George W. Bush from Selma March Photo

2.

3. The 50th Anniversary of the Bloody Sunday march was held in Selma, Alabama on Saturday.

The New York Times cropped out the George and Laura Bush.
Discrimination still exists in America.


4. ....this is an example of how today's "authorized journalists" rewrite history as it actually happens. However, the truth is, it's not new. This has been going on for at least a century but really probably since the beginning of time.
Predictable. NY Times Crops Out George W. Bush from Selma March Photo The Gateway Pundit

It was not by accident.

1. It means to eradicate, to remove, which is what the NYSlimes did to suggest he was not in attendance.

2. I exaggerated with purpose.
Glad it got so deeply under your skin that you defaulted to large pink font.
Pink

EXTERMINATES?
Who spelled the word for you?
LOL what a laughable headline.
At least faux news taught you one thing..........
ex·ag·ger·ate
iɡˈzajəˌrāt/
verb
verb: exaggerate; 3rd person present: exaggerates; past tense: exaggerated; past participle: exaggerated; gerund or present participle: exaggerating
represent (something) as being larger, greater, better, or worse than it really is.
"they were apt to exaggerate any aches and pains"
synonyms: overstate, overemphasize, overestimate, magnify, amplify, aggrandize, inflate

How does the media....wholly owned by Liberalism, Inc., pull the less astuted into their fold?

We got an example of it in the action this week by the NYSlimes....



1. "Predictable. NY Times Crops Out George W. Bush from Selma March Photo

2.

3. The 50th Anniversary of the Bloody Sunday march was held in Selma, Alabama on Saturday.

The New York Times cropped out the George and Laura Bush.
Discrimination still exists in America.


4. ....this is an example of how today's "authorized journalists" rewrite history as it actually happens. However, the truth is, it's not new. This has been going on for at least a century but really probably since the beginning of time.
Predictable. NY Times Crops Out George W. Bush from Selma March Photo The Gateway Pundit

 

[PoliticalChic]

Just helping out someone that needed a little help.
You are so welcome!

EXTERMINATES?
Who spelled the word for you?
LOL what a laughable headline.
At least faux news taught you one thing..........
ex·ag·ger·ate
iɡˈzajəˌrāt/
verb
verb: exaggerate; 3rd person present: exaggerates; past tense: exaggerated; past participle: exaggerated; gerund or present participle: exaggerating
represent (something) as being larger, greater, better, or worse than it really is.
"they were apt to exaggerate any aches and pains"
synonyms: overstate, overemphasize, overestimate, magnify, amplify, aggrandize, inflate

It was not by accident.
I use words with precision.

1. It means to eradicate, to remove, which is what the NYSlimes did to suggest he was not in attendance.

2. I exaggerated with purpose.
Glad it got so deeply under your skin that you defaulted to large pink font.
Pink is good for your political persuasion.

How does the media....wholly owned by Liberalism, Inc., pull the less astuted into their fold?

We got an example of it in the action this week by the NYSlimes....



1. "Predictable. NY Times Crops Out George W. Bush from Selma March Photo

2.

3. The 50th Anniversary of the Bloody Sunday march was held in Selma, Alabama on Saturday.

The New York Times cropped out the George and Laura Bush.
Discrimination still exists in America.


4. ....this is an example of how today's "authorized journalists" rewrite history as it actually happens. However, the truth is, it's not new. This has been going on for at least a century but really probably since the beginning of time.
Predictable. NY Times Crops Out George W. Bush from Selma March Photo The Gateway Pundit

It was not by accident.

1. It means to eradicate, to remove, which is what the NYSlimes did to suggest he was not in attendance.

2. I exaggerated with purpose.
Glad it got so deeply under your skin that you defaulted to large pink font.
Pink

EXTERMINATES?
Who spelled the word for you?
LOL what a laughable headline.
At least faux news taught you one thing..........
ex·ag·ger·ate
iɡˈzajəˌrāt/
verb
verb: exaggerate; 3rd person present: exaggerates; past tense: exaggerated; past participle: exaggerated; gerund or present participle: exaggerating
represent (something) as being larger, greater, better, or worse than it really is.
"they were apt to exaggerate any aches and pains"
synonyms: overstate, overemphasize, overestimate, magnify, amplify, aggrandize, inflate

How does the media....wholly owned by Liberalism, Inc., pull the less astuted into their fold?

We got an example of it in the action this week by the NYSlimes....



1. "Predictable. NY Times Crops Out George W. Bush from Selma March Photo

2.

3. The 50th Anniversary of the Bloody Sunday march was held in Selma, Alabama on Saturday.

The New York Times cropped out the George and Laura Bush.
Discrimination still exists in America.


4. ....this is an example of how today's "authorized journalists" rewrite history as it actually happens. However, the truth is, it's not new. This has been going on for at least a century but really probably since the beginning of time.
Predictable. NY Times Crops Out George W. Bush from Selma March Photo The Gateway Pundit

There's really no explanation for your word-salad of a post, as you clearly didn't help anyone out, including yourself.
In fact, you came off looking pretty much a dunce, know what I mean, pinky?

You thought I inadvertently used 'exterminate,' and I disabused that notion.

So....the "You are so welcome!" is really seen as your effort to save face.

That's a quandary as well: how can you save what you never had?

 

[BlindBoo]

That's because democrats favored and encouraged invasion.
Again, selective memory issues with democrats.

Well, 111 of them voted in favor, but 147 voted against. Not that facts matter to pseudo-cons.

What's your point? Usually parties vote monolithically. When that many dissent you have an endorsement. So stop with the rationalization and the phony. It wasn't Bush's invasion. That's propaganda aimed at partisan dupes.

There was nothing in the legislation that called for an invasion or an occupation. The entire Iraq debacle/blunder is on the Bush Administration.

Nope. That's lefty propaganda and opportunism. Iraq was a bipartisan effort. Ask Hillary.

Well the proof is in the pudding isn't it?

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

(a) AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to --

He asked for it and he got it. But it wasn't an invasion plan nor was it a call for nation building.

 

[Preacher]

Only so much space on the paper...oh and there is no left/right,liberal/conservative when it comes to the media its just played like that to keep people off balance and not sniff to much and see the real culprits and their raping of America.

and who are these "real culprits" ?

These 6 Corporations Control 90 Of The Media In America - Business Insider
Six Jewish Companies Control 96 of the World s Media

Had to make sure to give you a source other than an alternate media option so you could verify it.

I knew it--------------------the evil corporations, got it.


Now, care to tell us how many people those 6 evil corporations provide employment for, both directly and indirectly? and how much those millions of people pay in federal state and local taxes? No? didn't think so.

And that has WHAT to do with this? European Americans could own them and have shows that reflect America and could employ just as many people.

Only so much space on the paper...oh and there is no left/right,liberal/conservative when it comes to the media its just played like that to keep people off balance and not sniff to much and see the real culprits and their raping of America.

and who are these "real culprits" ?

These 6 Corporations Control 90 Of The Media In America - Business Insider
Six Jewish Companies Control 96 of the World s Media

Had to make sure to give you a source other than an alternate media option so you could verify it.

Ah yes, radical anti-Semitic web sites are now reliable sources among radical anti-Semites.
Thanks, dolt.

Business Insider is a anti semite website! Hurry you better go tell them! How about some articles from your own race eh dickhead?Who runs Hollywood C mon - Los Angeles Times

There ya go sonny. He admits it and is quite proud of it! Hell I would be to. You decide what America sees and hears the easiest way to control them.

Do Jews Control the Media Alan Dershowitz

Ah an leftist jew he tries to downplay it of course...go ahead call the LA times and Huff Post anti semitic...

It's the worldwide Zionist conspiracy! Run!

Gets ass kicked screams insult and runs off with tail between legs.

 

[Stephanie]

The NYslimes isn't the only slimy people around. so are the Democrats

SNIP:

DNC Chief Wasserman Schultz Scrubs Bush From “Powerful And Moving Image” Of Obama At Selma Event…
A Republican scrubs Obama … raaaacist!

Pre-Bush scrubbing:




SNIP:

ALL of it here:
DNC Chief Wasserman Schultz Scrubs Bush From Powerful And Moving Image Of Obama At Selma Event Weasel Zippers

 

[AvgGuyIA]

How does the media....wholly owned by Liberalism, Inc., pull the less astuted into their fold?

We got an example of it in the action this week by the NYSlimes....



1. "Predictable. NY Times Crops Out George W. Bush from Selma March Photo

2.

3. The 50th Anniversary of the Bloody Sunday march was held in Selma, Alabama on Saturday.

The New York Times cropped out the George and Laura Bush.
Discrimination still exists in America.


4. ....this is an example of how today's "authorized journalists" rewrite history as it actually happens. However, the truth is, it's not new. This has been going on for at least a century but really probably since the beginning of time.
Predictable. NY Times Crops Out George W. Bush from Selma March Photo The Gateway Pundit

This is exactly how liberals document "overt racism" from republicans. Years from now, liberal USMB posters will show this NYT photo and ask, "where are the republicans? Why no republican president in this March?"

That's why the NYT cropped the photo. Count on it being used as ammo against republicans.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

That's because democrats favored and encouraged invasion.
Again, selective memory issues with democrats.

Well, 111 of them voted in favor, but 147 voted against. Not that facts matter to pseudo-cons.

What's your point? Usually parties vote monolithically. When that many dissent you have an endorsement. So stop with the rationalization and the phony. It wasn't Bush's invasion. That's propaganda aimed at partisan dupes.

There was nothing in the legislation that called for an invasion or an occupation. The entire Iraq debacle/blunder is on the Bush Administration.

Nope. That's lefty propaganda and opportunism. Iraq was a bipartisan effort. Ask Hillary.

Well the proof is in the pudding isn't it?

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

(a) AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to --

He asked for it and he got it. But it wasn't an invasion plan nor was it a call for nation building.

Dems are just as responsible for Iraq as Bush. It wasn't 'Bush's war'. But it is Obama's failure since he completely undermined the effort and gains made.

 

[Pogo]

The idea was to put Obama in the exact center of the photo. Had they been able to airbrush in a halo...we'd have seen Jesus leading the march.

Umm... who represents more national importance to any photo than the country's President?

 

[AvgGuyIA]

This is going to shock NLT, but I agree. Former Pres. Bush and former FLOTUS Laura Bush should not have been cropped out of the main photo. However, there was more than one photo,if I recall. I just don't think both of them made it into the article.

I think it is fantastic that they went. Good for them.

The NYT article does, however, report that they were there.

Folks get your ice right here. Straight from Hell.

 

[JoeMoma]

So Bush got slighted! So what? He is a big enough man to handle it.
On the other hand, not showing him helps the media to keep the narrative alive that republicans are racists.

 

[Synthaholic]

I'm saying you can't crop a person out of a photo if they weren't in the photo to begin with.

So for the claims of the OP to be valid, you have to show us that the original photo included GW. And the photo offered isn't the original photo.

Its a completely different picture.

Let's gauge the extent of your veracity;

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

Oh, so now it's gone from ONE photo cropped to two different photos taken on the same day.

lol, you're the second best poster on this forum for making Political C look stupid.

Here ya' go, NYLiar:



Same:
2. Similar in kind, quantity, or degree.
same - definition of same by The Free Dictionary



And, to review:

And here, a return performance at open mic night....the NYLiar!

His act includes only two tricks:

Trick #1....lies

Trick #2....obfuscation and changing the subject.


Today it's Trick #2 on display:

You don't crop a photo by using an entirely different photo. Why is that concept above your brain capacity?

Hmmmm.....you seem unable to respond to the questions.

Here, try again:

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

The cut and paste queen has OCD.

 

[Uncensored2008]

tissue?

Integrity?

 

[Synthaholic]

Cropping refers to the removal of the outer parts of an image to improve framing, accentuate subject matter or change aspect ratio.

So why then are you complaining about the NYTimes' professional desire to improve the framing, accentuate the subject matter, or change the aspect ratio?

Is it because Right-Wing Media is incapable of improving, so you lash out at those who can?

Did you spew hatred at the girls in High School who were better than you at math, too?

 

[Synthaholic]

Dems are just as responsible for Iraq as Bush. It wasn't 'Bush's war'.

Bullshit. It was Bush's decision, and ONLY Bush's decision.

 

[Uncensored2008]

But when it really mattered the NYT was in the tank, or in-bed-with the Bush Administration and the invasion and occupation of Iraq. They faithfully parroted every talking point from the propaganda arm of the Bush Regime.

That propaganda arm being Bill and Hillary Clinton, Pope Algore, Nancy Pelosi, et al...

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

It's cool BlindFool - you have a party to lie for.

 

[Jackson]

Of course they say they didn't do it on purpose...yeah...they just forgot that a former U.S. President was marching with their beloved one. It didn't occur to them to how that TWO Presidents being there, white and black, side by side..nah...that is not the message they want to put forth.
Dumbasses...

White House NYT leave Bushes out of lead photos from Selma march Fox News

NY Times Crops Bush Out Of Selma Picture Highlights Ferguson The Daily Caller

George W Bush cropped out of New York Times front cover image of Selma march - Telegraph


NYT front photo......

Actual event...

Look again at NYT photo...look who pops out next to the President...yeah...they chose a photo with Al Sharpton...so much more important that a former President of the United States.
Didn't fit the agenda.

DUMBASSES with a RACIST AGENDA.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Let's gauge the extent of your veracity;

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

Oh, so now it's gone from ONE photo cropped to two different photos taken on the same day.

lol, you're the second best poster on this forum for making Political C look stupid.

Here ya' go, NYLiar:



Same:
2. Similar in kind, quantity, or degree.
same - definition of same by The Free Dictionary



And, to review:

And here, a return performance at open mic night....the NYLiar!

His act includes only two tricks:

Trick #1....lies

Trick #2....obfuscation and changing the subject.


Today it's Trick #2 on display:

You don't crop a photo by using an entirely different photo. Why is that concept above your brain capacity?

Hmmmm.....you seem unable to respond to the questions.

Here, try again:

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

The cut and paste queen has OCD.

Watch how deftly I stump you: on what basis do you suggest 'cut and paste' as a pejorative?
I'll wait while you go to a neighbor to borrow a dictionary.....

"The cut and paste queen has OCD:
Can you support that?


The fact is that you keep trying to score points because I reveal the emptiness of your political perspective...as I did when I proved that you vote totalitarian rather than American.

I will continue to do so.

With metronomic regularity.