Obama asking for open ended power to go to war

[Synthaholic]

I see now, you believe it without any evidence because you would hate to have voted for a man who would use them.

he's not going to use nukes.

oh good---that makes all the killing legal, right ?

I'm sorry, but Right-wingers who supported Bush have no credibility with their concern for innocents getting killed.

 

[dilloduck]

he's not going to use nukes.

oh good---that makes all the killing legal, right ?

I'm sorry, but Right-wingers who supported Bush have no credibility with their concern for innocents getting killed.

LOL is this like the "you don't have a vagina" slogans that abortionists use ?

 

[Geaux4it]

The limited strike will do nothing. And all out strike is the mother of all wars. I agree with Bolton, North and West that Iran is the issue. Syria is just a side show

-Geaux

 

[TemplarKormac]

Saying it's a limited strike is like giving someone a haircut with a guillotine.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Hes not going to use nukes

I see now, you believe it without any evidence because you would hate to have voted for a man who would use them.

he's not going to use nukes.

I am still waiting for you to explain that. Until you do, I will assume you are desperate because non desperate people don't pretend they can judge what people they have never met will do.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

he's not going to use nukes.

oh good---that makes all the killing legal, right ?

I'm sorry, but Right-wingers who supported Bush have no credibility with their concern for innocents getting killed.

Does Kerry have any credibility? After all, he supported Bush, and then lied about it.

 

[Geaux4it]

oh good---that makes all the killing legal, right ?

I'm sorry, but Right-wingers who supported Bush have no credibility with their concern for innocents getting killed.

Does Kerry have any credibility? After all, he supported Bush, and then lied about it.

Kerry is laughable. I peace creep, anti- war demonstrator, and Vietnam traitor, is now a hawk?

yeah right

-Geaux

 

[Plasmaball]

I see now, you believe it without any evidence because you would hate to have voted for a man who would use them.

he's not going to use nukes.

I am still waiting for you to explain that. Until you do, I will assume you are desperate because non desperate people don't pretend they can judge what people they have never met will do.

Still not going to use nukes.

 

[Plasmaball]

I see now, you believe it without any evidence because you would hate to have voted for a man who would use them.

he's not going to use nukes.

oh good---that makes all the killing legal, right ?

What killing? Please define that statement as to who you are talking about.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The problem for republicans is they simply can’t be believed.

Their opposition to limited military action in Syria isn’t consistent with their support of similar actions in the past, particularly under republican presidents.

 

[Circe]

Kerry is laughable. I peace creep, anti- war demonstrator, and Vietnam traitor, is now a hawk?

yeah right

-Geaux

He's trying to rehabilitate himself war-willing-wise so he can run for prez in 2016, I suppose.

 

[Circe]

The problem for republicans is they simply can’t be believed.

Their opposition to limited military action in Syria isn’t consistent with their support of similar actions in the past, particularly under republican presidents.

True. McCain and Graham already came at it from the hawk side --- that the strike is too limited.

I suppose the idea is to get in there and get the war going however they can.

Then when some mocked-up attack on us is arranged, all the neo-cons in Congress and elsewhere will roar and cheer for an attack on Iran and everybody everybody else, to support and help Israel. Neo-con Republicans are such incredible warmongers. They are eager to war on everybody anywhere, especially if it's supposed to fight for Israel.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I see now, you believe it without any evidence because you would hate to have voted for a man who would use them.

he's not going to use nukes.

oh good---that makes all the killing legal, right ?

Are you opposed to a military strike against Syria for objective reasons having nothing to do with Obama, or do you oppose the strike because Obama supports it?

Whatever your response, there’s no way to know whether you and others on the right are being truthful.

You and other conservatives have lied as to the president’s intent, ‘boots on the ground’ and similar idiocy, there’s no way to know if you’re lying as to your rationale for opposing a strike.

Conservatives have only themselves to blame, given their animosity and disdain for the current Administration.

And it’s easy to understand why conservatives and republicans have zero credibility when it comes to the ethics of killing, after Iraq and Afghanistan, two illegal and unnecessary wars, that pointlessly killed thousands.

 

[Circe]

You and other conservatives have lied as to the president’s intent, ‘boots on the ground’ and similar idiocy, there’s no way to know if you’re lying as to your rationale for opposing a strike.

Conservatives have only themselves to blame, given their animosity and disdain for the current Administration.

And it’s easy to understand why conservatives and republicans have zero credibility when it comes to the ethics of killing, after Iraq and Afghanistan, two illegal and unnecessary wars, that pointlessly killed thousands.

Exactly the same in every detail can be said of you and your side. Did you oppose Bush's war which he claimed was against the poison gas stocks of Saddam?? And why --- because Bush was a Republican, or because you were antiwar?

These two situations are identical. Poison gas in both cases, Middle East dictators in both cases. So if you were for one, you have to be for the other, unless you are a partisan hack and hated the Bush war because he was Republican and love the Obama war because he's a black Democrat.

 

[Synthaholic]

oh good---that makes all the killing legal, right ?

I'm sorry, but Right-wingers who supported Bush have no credibility with their concern for innocents getting killed.

LOL is this like the "you don't have a vagina" slogans that abortionists use ?

When Republicans publicly fret about possible loss of life by going to war, I know that a Democrat is president.

 

[Synthaholic]

Saying it's a limited strike is like giving someone a haircut with a guillotine.

Bullshit. They could bomb all the runways, grounding their planes, which were the likely means of dispersing gas.

 

[Synthaholic]

I see now, you believe it without any evidence because you would hate to have voted for a man who would use them.

he's not going to use nukes.

I am still waiting for you to explain that. Until you do, I will assume you are desperate because non desperate people don't pretend they can judge what people they have never met will do.

Why do you persist in this silly notion that we would ever use nukes against Syria?

It looks like trolling.

 

[Synthaholic]

oh good---that makes all the killing legal, right ?

I'm sorry, but Right-wingers who supported Bush have no credibility with their concern for innocents getting killed.

Does Kerry have any credibility? After all, he supported Bush, and then lied about it.

Dumb question/deflection attempt.

 

[Synthaholic]

I'm sorry, but Right-wingers who supported Bush have no credibility with their concern for innocents getting killed.

Does Kerry have any credibility? After all, he supported Bush, and then lied about it.

Kerry is laughable. I peace creep, anti- war demonstrator, and Vietnam traitor, is now a hawk?

yeah right

-Geaux

John Kerry is an American war hero.

So fuck off.

 

[Avatar4321]

That would be if obama thinks the terrorists are going to LOSE he will be able to step in and perhaps turn the tide.

Section 2. To protect allies. obama's allies are al quaeda and all of its affiliates.

Islamic extremists are on the GOP's team.

Then why is Obama supporting them?