Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The white flag comes up.You weren't even here during the Bush administration so I have no evidence one way or another to support or refute your claims.
Ame®icano;1610223 said:HA HA HA, Barry is such a pussy he fears a cable news network!
Maybe Hugo can help, he loathes FOX also!
Does anyone here wish Obama to be as critical and harsh of Iran, the Taliban, and Al Qaeda as he is Fox?
There should be a qualifacation about fair.Ame®icano;1610223 said:HA HA HA, Barry is such a pussy he fears a cable news network!
Maybe Hugo can help, he loathes FOX also!
Does anyone here wish Obama to be as critical and harsh of Iran, the Taliban, and Al Qaeda as he is Fox?
As someone whose family have spent and are about to spend more time in certain 'hot spots'.... YES! I would really like him to prioritize the issues where our fellow citizens are putting their lives on the line over whether Fox is fair or not.
The white flag comes up.You weren't even here during the Bush administration so I have no evidence one way or another to support or refute your claims.
In short, you were talking out of your ass.
NEXT!
There should be a qualifacation about fair.Ame®icano;1610223 said:Does anyone here wish Obama to be as critical and harsh of Iran, the Taliban, and Al Qaeda as he is Fox?
As someone whose family have spent and are about to spend more time in certain 'hot spots'.... YES! I would really like him to prioritize the issues where our fellow citizens are putting their lives on the line over whether Fox is fair or not.
While FOX is more 'fair' then other news orgs, they are not saints and do slant their coverage to conservatives.
The difference is they will at least attempt to give both sides a say, and not with fops and fools, they put up intelligent people like Juan Williams to speak for the left view of things.
But they are nowhere near a 'houseorgan' for the GoP and they did not cheerlead for Bush the way MSNBC does for Obama.
You lost son, get over it.Nope. Just making an educated guess based on the information available.
And that guess stands... and gets more educated with every post you make and thread you start.
Ame®icano;1610347 said:I am pretty sure that many on the left would like to see Fox shut down. The same people would let the government control who is allowed to broadcast news based on their preferences.
Those should remember their 1st Amendment, and something there called free speech. Whether or not you agree with Fox News, can you really lobby for it's removal simply for what they say? Does anyone here knows what oppression is? If they shut down one network today, there is door opened to shut down another tomorrow. You want that?
If you don't like Fox, change the channel. Period.
This is an excellent point.Ame®icano;1610347 said:There should be a qualifacation about fair.As someone whose family have spent and are about to spend more time in certain 'hot spots'.... YES! I would really like him to prioritize the issues where our fellow citizens are putting their lives on the line over whether Fox is fair or not.
While FOX is more 'fair' then other news orgs, they are not saints and do slant their coverage to conservatives.
The difference is they will at least attempt to give both sides a say, and not with fops and fools, they put up intelligent people like Juan Williams to speak for the left view of things.
But they are nowhere near a 'houseorgan' for the GoP and they did not cheerlead for Bush the way MSNBC does for Obama.
I am pretty sure that many on the left would like to see Fox shut down. The same people would let the government control who is allowed to broadcast news based on their preferences.
Those should remember their 1st Amendment, and something there called free speech. Whether or not you agree with Fox News, can you really lobby for it's removal simply for what they say? Does anyone here knows what oppression is? If they shut down one network today, there is door opened to shut down another tomorrow. You want that?
If you don't like Fox, change the channel. Period.
Ame®icano;1610347 said:I am pretty sure that many on the left would like to see Fox shut down. The same people would let the government control who is allowed to broadcast news based on their preferences.
Those should remember their 1st Amendment, and something there called free speech. Whether or not you agree with Fox News, can you really lobby for it's removal simply for what they say? Does anyone here knows what oppression is? If they shut down one network today, there is door opened to shut down another tomorrow. You want that?
If you don't like Fox, change the channel. Period.
I'm pretty sure VERY FEW people, if any, would like to see Fox shut down. But nice strawman attempt nonetheless.
I haven't seen anyone on this thread or anywhere on this forum lobby for Fox's removal simply for what they say.
And while I agree that Obama's whining about Fox and refusal to grant them interviews smacks of serious wussitis and insecurity, I don't see anything particularly nefarious or Orwellian about it, as has been stated or implied here by the likes of neocon water carrier Xenophon. It's just a thin skinned politician acting like a thin skinned politician.
Ame®icano;1610419 said:Ame®icano;1610347 said:I am pretty sure that many on the left would like to see Fox shut down. The same people would let the government control who is allowed to broadcast news based on their preferences.
Those should remember their 1st Amendment, and something there called free speech. Whether or not you agree with Fox News, can you really lobby for it's removal simply for what they say? Does anyone here knows what oppression is? If they shut down one network today, there is door opened to shut down another tomorrow. You want that?
If you don't like Fox, change the channel. Period.
I'm pretty sure VERY FEW people, if any, would like to see Fox shut down. But nice strawman attempt nonetheless.
I haven't seen anyone on this thread or anywhere on this forum lobby for Fox's removal simply for what they say.
And while I agree that Obama's whining about Fox and refusal to grant them interviews smacks of serious wussitis and insecurity, I don't see anything particularly nefarious or Orwellian about it, as has been stated or implied here by the likes of neocon water carrier Xenophon. It's just a thin skinned politician acting like a thin skinned politician.
So, Obama refusal to grand interview to one of the major channels in America is what? Obama has plenty of supporters of this action.
I cannot believe those people actually want one-sided news reporting across the board. If everyone reported the same news on all the news outlets, what would be the point of having multiple channels? Let's just run one state-run channel that will please the government. And all those who don't like it, let's send to Gulag. Does it ring a bell?
Without different opinion, we would be sheep with nothing to feed our own innate curiosity and desire for the truth.
Ame®icano;1610419 said:Ame®icano;1610347 said:I am pretty sure that many on the left would like to see Fox shut down. The same people would let the government control who is allowed to broadcast news based on their preferences.
Those should remember their 1st Amendment, and something there called free speech. Whether or not you agree with Fox News, can you really lobby for it's removal simply for what they say? Does anyone here knows what oppression is? If they shut down one network today, there is door opened to shut down another tomorrow. You want that?
If you don't like Fox, change the channel. Period.
I'm pretty sure VERY FEW people, if any, would like to see Fox shut down. But nice strawman attempt nonetheless.
I haven't seen anyone on this thread or anywhere on this forum lobby for Fox's removal simply for what they say.
And while I agree that Obama's whining about Fox and refusal to grant them interviews smacks of serious wussitis and insecurity, I don't see anything particularly nefarious or Orwellian about it, as has been stated or implied here by the likes of neocon water carrier Xenophon. It's just a thin skinned politician acting like a thin skinned politician.
So, Obama refusal to grand interview to one of the major channels in America is what? Obama has plenty of supporters of this action.
I cannot believe those people actually want one-sided news reporting across the board. If everyone reported the same news on all the news outlets, what would be the point of having multiple channels? Let's just run one state-run channel that will please the government. And all those who don't like it, let's send to Gulag. Does it ring a bell?
Without different opinion, we would be sheep with nothing to feed our own innate curiosity and desire for the truth.
Ame®icano;1610419 said:I'm pretty sure VERY FEW people, if any, would like to see Fox shut down. But nice strawman attempt nonetheless.
I haven't seen anyone on this thread or anywhere on this forum lobby for Fox's removal simply for what they say.
And while I agree that Obama's whining about Fox and refusal to grant them interviews smacks of serious wussitis and insecurity, I don't see anything particularly nefarious or Orwellian about it, as has been stated or implied here by the likes of neocon water carrier Xenophon. It's just a thin skinned politician acting like a thin skinned politician.
So, Obama refusal to grand interview to one of the major channels in America is what? Obama has plenty of supporters of this action.
I cannot believe those people actually want one-sided news reporting across the board. If everyone reported the same news on all the news outlets, what would be the point of having multiple channels? Let's just run one state-run channel that will please the government. And all those who don't like it, let's send to Gulag. Does it ring a bell?
Without different opinion, we would be sheep with nothing to feed our own innate curiosity and desire for the truth.
Obama's decision to not interview on Fox isn't going to stop them from reporting what they report. You don't actually believe that... do you?
You argue the same way people did in germany in the early 30s.Perhaps you misunderstand me Xeno, so let me be clear.
I NEITHER AGREE WITH NOR DEFEND OBAMA ON THIS.
I think he's wrong and acting like a pussy.
But the idea that this is more than him simply being a pussy, that it's somehow ushering in a new and unprecedented era of totalitarianism is absurd. So absurd that anyone who thinks it is either a retard or a kool-aid drinking neocon.
Ame®icano;1610454 said:Fox isn't going to stop reporting on what they feel they should report.
Ame®icano;1610454 said:I don't think Obama is doing a favor to left media by ignoring Fox. Quite opposite, he's doing a favor to fox.
Ame®icano;1610454 said:Now, whoever think that we should have not known about Van Jones, Acorn, Rev. Wright or similar stories, then I would ask them a question, why we shouldn't?