LibocalypseNow
Senior Member
- Jul 30, 2009
- 12,337
- 1,368
- 48
Obviously i vote Yea on this one. This matter should be looked into further. Serious crimes could have been committed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would tend to believe this scenario is true...notice the near complete silence from the MSM opinion reporters on this subject...someone will have to fall on their sword over this to save Obama's legacy. I waiting for the claims of "roving bands of anti-Obama racist bloggers making a big deal out of nothing" card to be played.
This is commonplace, and has been for hundreds of years.
Welcome to politics.
And, just for shits and giggles, exactly what "impeachable offense" has occurred?
Gott agree.
This shit goes on all the time in politics. Both sides of the aisle No big news in my book.
The only thing I can't figure out is why Barry Boy and his possee don't come right out and tell the tale???
Nothing impeachable here folks.
Should Special Prosecutor Be Appointed Over Possible Sestak Bribe?...
Should Special Prosecutor Be Appointed Over Possible Sestak Bribe?...
It won't matter. The Democrats control America right now, so it won't happen even if the case has merit. The only thing Americans can do is to vote against 1-party rule in the future. Let's hope they make the right choices.
cause we so needed another troll thread on this subject... .
lol.
Should Special Prosecutor Be Appointed Over Possible Sestak Bribe?...
It won't matter. The Democrats control America right now, so it won't happen even if the case has merit. The only thing Americans can do is to vote against 1-party rule in the future. Let's hope they make the right choices.
Democrats control Georgia?
LOL.![]()
I just heard an interesting observation about the Sestak incident on Al Jazeera...what are your opinions on this comment.
"If Sestak was lying or there was no possibilty of criminal suspicion with respect to the position offered and who knew, the White House would have already come out and defended themselves over the snowballing scandal."
I just heard an interesting observation about the Sestak incident on Al Jazeera...what are your opinions on this comment.
"If Sestak was lying or there was no possibilty of criminal suspicion with respect to the position offered and who knew, the White House would have already come out and defended themselves over the snowballing scandal."
And one hour ago...
____
Sestak, himself a retired Navy admiral, alleges that the White House did offer him a job, but wont go beyond that, either.
We agree with Weiner. The present situation is not going to satisfy the public and sooner or later the White House is going to have to come clean, as Weiner says.
_____
Weiner Urges White House To Tell All About Rumored Job Offer | www.qgazette.com | Queens Gazette
I just heard an interesting observation about the Sestak incident on Al Jazeera...what are your opinions on this comment.
"If Sestak was lying or there was no possibilty of criminal suspicion with respect to the position offered and who knew, the White House would have already come out and defended themselves over the snowballing scandal."
![]()
I just heard an interesting observation about the Sestak incident on Al Jazeera...what are your opinions on this comment.
"If Sestak was lying or there was no possibilty of criminal suspicion with respect to the position offered and who knew, the White House would have already come out and defended themselves over the snowballing scandal."
Then what is the White House hiding?
Gibbs said that The Obama White House had investigated The Obama White House and cleared the Obama White House of wrong-doing.
All they have to do is to provide the details of the investigation. The fact that they haven't is not a good sign.