paperview
Life is Good
- Jul 27, 2009
- 14,558
- 2,968
Carb, did you happen to catch this one?Here's an 'oh yeah I remember that now' moment for some of you:
Remember back when the GOP had the majority in the Senate, and talk of the 'nuclear option' came up?
Remember what the conservatives - fancying themselves quite clever - came up with as the alternative name for the 'nuclear option'?
The 'constitutional option'.
...lol, oh yeah, now you remember...
Here's some fun for ya's
2005:
Liberty Counsel, as part of the National Coalition to End Judicial Filibusters, recently signed a letter urging the the U.S. Senate leadership "to end the judicial filibusters at the earliest possible moment and well before a Supreme Court vacancy should occur." The letter also pointed out that "while it is the right of the President to expect the Senate to give Advice and Consent within a reasonable period of time, it is the duty of every Senator to offer Advice and Consent through an honest, up or down vote."
A number of Republican senators still remain opposed or undecided on the issue. We have compiled a list you can use to call the Senators and ask them to end the judicial filibusters.
Liberty Counsel - Liberty Alert - Print Version
2013:
http://www.libertycounselaction.org/data/sites/74/pdfs/PressReleases/PR%2011212013%20Obama%20Stacks%20the%20Court%20in%20Frightening%20Power%20Grab.pdfWashington, DC – Today, Senator Harry Reid invoked the “nuclear option” on judicial nominations, not including nominations to the Supreme Court. Under the new rules change, a judicial nominee does not need to meet the 60-vote cloture threshold and can be confirmed by a simple majority vote.
“Today’s action by Harry Reid is frightening, and every freedom-loving American should be deeply concerned,” said Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel…
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
That's only half the fun...wait.