The Rabbi
Diamond Member
- Sep 16, 2009
- 67,733
- 7,923
So your answer to my question addressed to someone else is No. Got it.you are kidding right? Oh no you are not because you are a moronCan you point to areas where he intervened?That his anti interventionist policy has failed MASSIVELYBecause that is where they are based. He is simply too stubborn to admit it. He avoids using the word Syria at all costs. I find it amusing.I think it's the other way around. Most of us knew the threat ISIS presented MONTHS AGO. But Obama is gonna "inform us" lol
That was the part I found most amusing about his Meet the Press interview.
I alao find it amusing that he refuses to use the last S in ISIS. Just can't admit he is behind the curve.
Why should he use "the last S" in ISIS?
"ISIS" isn't actually their name.
That doesn't make any sense. What do you think he should "admit"?
Obama's foreign policy has not been "anti-interventionist" in any sense of the word.
No, of course not.