Obama's Economy FAIL- 0.0% GDP Growth In The First Quarter

Yup, getting the 8 million jobs back that the Bush Great Recession lost and adding an additional 4.5 million is a failure.

What a bunch of fucking fruit loops.
You do mean the Pelosi/Reid/Dodd/Frank recession, but, of course you feel the need to suck up to Obamacraps.
The great majority of Americans do not agree with you fruit loops. You know it, I know it, and the GOP kingmakers know it. Ain't gonna be no Ted Cruz, no Mike Huckabee, or the other weirdies of the far right on our GOP ticket.

Spoke like a true liberal

-Geaux
 
Yup, getting the 8 million jobs back that the Bush Great Recession lost and adding an additional 4.5 million is a failure.

What a bunch of fucking fruit loops.
You do mean the Pelosi/Reid/Dodd/Frank recession, but, of course you feel the need to suck up to Obamacraps.
The great majority of Americans do not agree with you fruit loops. You know it, I know it, and the GOP kingmakers know it. Ain't gonna be no Ted Cruz, no Mike Huckabee, or the other weirdies of the far right on our GOP ticket.
Spoke like a true liberal Geaux
Spoken like a true GOP mainstreamer who, with the scores of other millions of mainstreamers, are no longer putting up with you fruit loops.
 
Poor Jake so much Obama cock to suck, so little time.
That's your image in the mirror with it all running down your chin.

You would not be able to retire without the ACA.

LOL which has nothing to do with anything ;) You have Bammy jizz all over your face pop.
That's your image with it on your face, Antares. And, yes, you who were not going to be able to retire before ACA are now getting rich. :lol:

Oh, gross, roo, we can hear you gurgling. Oh, no, it was gurging we heard, you vomiting in your own mouth.
 
Last edited:
Yup, getting the 8 million jobs back that the Bush Great Recession lost and adding an additional 4.5 million is a failure.

What a bunch of fucking fruit loops.
If our economy is doing so well, why are so many people complaining about it?
Because righties are never happy when there's a Democrat in the White House. Meanwhile ....



The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index® Rebounds

The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index®, which had decreased in February, improved in March. The Index now stands at 101.3 (1985=100), up from 98.8 in February.​
 
Poor Jake so much Obama cock to suck, so little time.
That's your image in the mirror with it all running down your chin.

You would not be able to retire without the ACA.

LOL which has nothing to do with anything ;) You have Bammy jizz all over your face pop.
That's your image with it on your face, Antares. And, yes, you who were not going to be able to retire before ACA are now getting rich. :lol:

Oh, gross, roo, we can hear you gurgling. Oh, no, it was gurging we heard, you vomiting in your own mouth.


Poor Jakey Foo Foo.

We're coming for you fake Conservatives pop.
 
Poor Jake so much Obama cock to suck, so little time.
That's your image in the mirror with it all running down your chin.

You would not be able to retire without the ACA.

LOL which has nothing to do with anything ;) You have Bammy jizz all over your face pop.
That's your image with it on your face, Antares. And, yes, you who were not going to be able to retire before ACA are now getting rich. :lol:

Oh, gross, roo, we can hear you gurgling. Oh, no, it was gurging we heard, you vomiting in your own mouth.


Poor Jakey Foo Foo. We're coming for you fake Conservatives pop.
Sure, you are. :lol:
 
Spits the rightard who said retired folks are not a factor in the labor force participation. :cuckoo:


yawn

they arent the reason for the 40-year low in labor market participation

the numbers of yearly retirees has remained relatively constant for a decade

keep trying
When do you stop making shit up ...? In reality, the number retirees is up about 150% since 2007 after baby boomers first began hitting the retirement age of 62 in 2008. Here is the last decade, which you idiotically described as "relatively constant." :cuckoo:

2005 462,381
2006 470,351
2007 512,458
2008 718,481
2009 1,248,266
2010 1,071,081
2011 996,804
2012 1,127,041
2013 1,189,658
2014 1,146,382

Social Security Beneficiary Statistics

Just asking a question. Are the 10's of thousands of younger people that got SSI included in those statistics or are they all, as you imply, 62 to 65 year old retirees?
Fair question ... I checked it again and see it includes not only children of retirees receiving benefits but their spouses as well. I apologize and here are the numbers of just the retirees, which is still doubled from 2007 (which 2007 is almost doubled from just a few years earlier).

2005 502,217
2006 516,174
2007 553,626
2008 748,047
2009 1,239,768
2010 1,079,409
2011 1,006,724
2012 1,120,242
2013 1,171,737
2014 1,117,746

Social Security Beneficiary Statistics

I used your chart and came up with these numbers.

Retired Workers only

2005 30,455,298
2014 39.000,771

An increase in 9 years of 8,454,473

Disabled workers only.

2005 6,524,587
2014 8,954,518

An increase of 2,429,931
Yeah, so? Someone made the idiotic claim that the number of people retiring has remained relatively constant over the last decade. The numbers I posted show that is not true at all since the number of people retiring has doubled since baby boomers began turning 62.
 
The housing market bust credit goes to Barney Fagnk

-Geuax
Care to explain how one lone House member of the minority party managed to drive the economy against the wishes of the majority party which controlled the House for 12 years straight?
 
Yup, getting the 8 million jobs back that the Bush Great Recession lost and adding an additional 4.5 million is a failure.

What a bunch of fucking fruit loops.
You do mean the Pelosi/Reid/Dodd/Frank recession, but, of course you feel the need to suck up to Obamacraps.

"Thanks to our policies, home ownership in America is at an all-time high." ~ George Bush, 9.2.2004, RNC acceptance speech

Funny how the right took credit for the housing boom before it went bust. Ever since it popped, they've been blaming the left for what they once took credit for.

Go figger. :dunno:
 
There were 76 million people born between the years 1946 and 1964, the traditional window for the baby boom generation. That means that they will retire over a 19-year period. Simple math shows that 76 divided by 19 is 4 million, or almost 11,000 people a day.

While a certain percentage will die before they reach retirement age, analysts say that immigrants will actually boost the number of potential baby-boomer retirees to nearly 80 million —and not everyone retires exactly at 65 or 66. Some baby boomers likely retired at 62. So let’s say it’s 80 million over 20 years—which still yields 4 million a year.

Thus, as a simple round figure, 10,000 a day is pretty close. In fact, that a number used by the Social Security Administration in a 2012 report, which Portman spokeswoman Caitlin Conant said was a source used by the senator. She also cited a Pew Research Center report that used this figure.
 
And the majority of them fell for the government pyramid scheme for their retirement. In fact they kept voting in favor of it.
Prior to Social Security, very few Americans could retire at all
And guess what? Today they still can't do it without putting the nation into deeper and deeper debt. Who's fault is that?
 

Forum List

Back
Top