colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
After he pepper sprayed Nazario and trying to weasel his way out of accountability for his clearly wrong actions.Where did the officer say that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
After he pepper sprayed Nazario and trying to weasel his way out of accountability for his clearly wrong actions.Where did the officer say that?
I provided my sourceRightwinger made it upLater in the tape, the officers say they will let Nazario go if he remained quiet about the incident, but that he would face additional charges if he complained. Nazario was later released at the scene and not charged.
Is that so? What time stamp did the officer say that? I watched my video and the video in your post and never heard the officer say that.
Searches require probable cause of a crime.
They had none.
reliable, un-edited...not your splice and dice from cbs, or msm, or cnn---they do not provide news, just opinions, which are biasedI provided my sourceRightwinger made it upLater in the tape, the officers say they will let Nazario go if he remained quiet about the incident, but that he would face additional charges if he complained. Nazario was later released at the scene and not charged.
Is that so? What time stamp did the officer say that? I watched my video and the video in your post and never heard the officer say that.
So you have all the video from the confrontation?
The guy was fucking fired. The FULL tape was presented against him
The driver acted appropriately and faced not even a traffic ticket.
The officer acted inappropriately and was dismissed
It’s a false description of what happened. It was a man who acknowledged the flashing lights by slowing down and pulling into a well lit area.Searches require probable cause of a crime.
They had none.
You had a driver that didn't immediately pull over for a police car.
You had a person who refused police orders by not getting out of the vehicle.
You had a person that refused to get on the ground when commanded.
You had a person that refused to put his hands behind his back.
And there is no probable cause he might be up to something?
You sure?You have no evidence to support that lieAfter he pepper sprayed Nazario and trying to weasel his way out of accountability for his clearly wrong actions.
Suspects are allowed to protect their safety and their rights.
His safety and rights were never threatened.
After he pepper sprayed Nazario and trying to weasel his way out of accountability for his clearly wrong actions.Where did the officer say that?
Apparently they were
and endangered the public....oj didnt
I said his safety was jeopardizedApparently they were
No they were not. They had their guns drawn because of a suspicious vehicle. They had a non-complaint driver. So what rights did they violate and how was his safety threatened?
I provided my source for the statement in post #150After he pepper sprayed Nazario and trying to weasel his way out of accountability for his clearly wrong actions.Where did the officer say that?
Went back again and I didn't hear the officer say anything close. Care to give me a timestamp?
I provided my source for the statement in post #150
You obviously don’t have tape beyond the driver being cuffed
They would have if the black guy had cooperatedofficers needed to de-escalate that situation.
which he didnt
I said his safety was jeopardized
Having two guns drawn on you and being pepper sprayed for a minor traffic incident jeopardizes your safety