Official Thread for Denial of GreenHouse Effect and Radiative Physics.

[Toddsterpatriot]

yep, ideal radiator is a blackbody.

Yep. And a non-ideal radiator is a grey body.

That's why this View attachment 270795 comes into play.

the statement says for an ideal radiator. it doesn't say otherwise. durr

View attachment 270802

I hope you're getting treatment for your brain injury.
Thoughts and prayers.

Ok, my error on the terminology miss on my part. but it does state hot objects. Last I knew, ice is not a hot object.

but it does state hot objects.

Any object over absolute zero.

Fine, show me the ice cube radiating heat!

Plug all the specifics of your ice cube into the formula.

 

[jc456]

the statement says for an ideal radiator. it doesn't say otherwise. durr

View attachment 270802

I hope you're getting treatment for your brain injury.
Thoughts and prayers.

Ok, my error on the terminology miss on my part. but it does state hot objects. Last I knew, ice is not a hot object.

but it does state hot objects.

Any object over absolute zero.

Fine, show me the ice cube radiating heat!

Plug all the specifics of your ice cube into the formula.

I asked for the observance of it, that's a math problem. so please, stop deflecting away from observance. let's see it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

View attachment 270802

I hope you're getting treatment for your brain injury.
Thoughts and prayers.

Ok, my error on the terminology miss on my part. but it does state hot objects. Last I knew, ice is not a hot object.

but it does state hot objects.

Any object over absolute zero.

Fine, show me the ice cube radiating heat!

Plug all the specifics of your ice cube into the formula.

I asked for the observance of it, that's a math problem. so please, stop deflecting away from observance. let's see it.

Well, if you don't know the variables for the formula, how are you going to measure the accuracy of your experimental results?

Why don't you just post your data and I'll try to dumb it down for you......

 

[jc456]

Ok, my error on the terminology miss on my part. but it does state hot objects. Last I knew, ice is not a hot object.

but it does state hot objects.

Any object over absolute zero.

Fine, show me the ice cube radiating heat!

Plug all the specifics of your ice cube into the formula.

I asked for the observance of it, that's a math problem. so please, stop deflecting away from observance. let's see it.

Well, if you don't know the variables for the formula, how are you going to measure the accuracy of your experimental results?

Why don't you just post your data and I'll try to dumb it down for you......

I want you to prove the math

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

but it does state hot objects.

Any object over absolute zero.

Fine, show me the ice cube radiating heat!

Plug all the specifics of your ice cube into the formula.

I asked for the observance of it, that's a math problem. so please, stop deflecting away from observance. let's see it.

Well, if you don't know the variables for the formula, how are you going to measure the accuracy of your experimental results?

Why don't you just post your data and I'll try to dumb it down for you......

I want you to prove the math

I want you to prove the math

You want me to prove the Stefan-Boltzmann math?

It's been out there for 140 years. Check it out...….

Stefan-Boltzmann law | Definition & Facts

If you've discovered some flaw, you should publish.

 

[jc456]

Fine, show me the ice cube radiating heat!

Plug all the specifics of your ice cube into the formula.

I asked for the observance of it, that's a math problem. so please, stop deflecting away from observance. let's see it.

Well, if you don't know the variables for the formula, how are you going to measure the accuracy of your experimental results?

Why don't you just post your data and I'll try to dumb it down for you......

I want you to prove the math

I want you to prove the math

You want me to prove the Stefan-Boltzmann math?

It's been out there for 140 years. Check it out...….

Stefan-Boltzmann law | Definition & Facts

If you've discovered some flaw, you should publish.

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates! I know you can’t! I accept your surrender

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Plug all the specifics of your ice cube into the formula.

I asked for the observance of it, that's a math problem. so please, stop deflecting away from observance. let's see it.

Well, if you don't know the variables for the formula, how are you going to measure the accuracy of your experimental results?

Why don't you just post your data and I'll try to dumb it down for you......

I want you to prove the math

I want you to prove the math

You want me to prove the Stefan-Boltzmann math?

It's been out there for 140 years. Check it out...….

Stefan-Boltzmann law | Definition & Facts

If you've discovered some flaw, you should publish.

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates! I know you can’t! I accept your surrender

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates!

If you have proof that ice doesn't radiate "proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature" you should post that proof.

 

[Wuwei]

The math idea for the SB law is very simple. It's based on the curve of the black body radiation law (Plank's law) as a function of wavelength. Boltzmann summed up the radiation energy of all wavelengths to come up with the total energy radiated.

Since the Stefan-Boltzmann law comes directly from Planck's law, if you don't believe the SB law, then you don't believe in black body radiation. (Smart photons, anyone?)

.

 

[jc456]

I asked for the observance of it, that's a math problem. so please, stop deflecting away from observance. let's see it.

Well, if you don't know the variables for the formula, how are you going to measure the accuracy of your experimental results?

Why don't you just post your data and I'll try to dumb it down for you......

I want you to prove the math

I want you to prove the math

You want me to prove the Stefan-Boltzmann math?

It's been out there for 140 years. Check it out...….

Stefan-Boltzmann law | Definition & Facts

If you've discovered some flaw, you should publish.

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates! I know you can’t! I accept your surrender

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates!

View attachment 270915

If you have proof that ice doesn't radiate "proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature" you should post that proof.

I observed the ice didn't radiate, the spoon didn't get warmer. therefore radiation wasn't present from the ice. A math problem is a problem based on observance. so show me the observed ice cube radiating.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Well, if you don't know the variables for the formula, how are you going to measure the accuracy of your experimental results?

Why don't you just post your data and I'll try to dumb it down for you......

I want you to prove the math

I want you to prove the math

You want me to prove the Stefan-Boltzmann math?

It's been out there for 140 years. Check it out...….

Stefan-Boltzmann law | Definition & Facts

If you've discovered some flaw, you should publish.

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates! I know you can’t! I accept your surrender

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates!

View attachment 270915

If you have proof that ice doesn't radiate "proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature" you should post that proof.

I observed the ice didn't radiate, the spoon didn't get warmer. therefore radiation wasn't present from the ice. A math problem is a problem based on observance. so show me the observed ice cube radiating.

I observed the ice didn't radiate

Observed with what instruments?

the spoon didn't get warmer.

As measured by what instruments?
Post some pictures of your experimental set up.

 

[jc456]

I want you to prove the math

I want you to prove the math

You want me to prove the Stefan-Boltzmann math?

It's been out there for 140 years. Check it out...….

Stefan-Boltzmann law | Definition & Facts

If you've discovered some flaw, you should publish.

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates! I know you can’t! I accept your surrender

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates!

View attachment 270915

If you have proof that ice doesn't radiate "proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature" you should post that proof.

I observed the ice didn't radiate, the spoon didn't get warmer. therefore radiation wasn't present from the ice. A math problem is a problem based on observance. so show me the observed ice cube radiating.

I observed the ice didn't radiate

Observed with what instruments?

the spoon didn't get warmer.

As measured by what instruments?
Post some pictures of your experimental set up.

thermometers, the spoon never got warmer.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I want you to prove the math

You want me to prove the Stefan-Boltzmann math?

It's been out there for 140 years. Check it out...….

Stefan-Boltzmann law | Definition & Facts

If you've discovered some flaw, you should publish.

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates! I know you can’t! I accept your surrender

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates!

View attachment 270915

If you have proof that ice doesn't radiate "proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature" you should post that proof.

I observed the ice didn't radiate, the spoon didn't get warmer. therefore radiation wasn't present from the ice. A math problem is a problem based on observance. so show me the observed ice cube radiating.

I observed the ice didn't radiate

Observed with what instruments?

the spoon didn't get warmer.

As measured by what instruments?
Post some pictures of your experimental set up.

thermometers, the spoon never got warmer.

Was it a mercury thermometer?

 

[jc456]

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates! I know you can’t! I accept your surrender

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates!

View attachment 270915

If you have proof that ice doesn't radiate "proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature" you should post that proof.

I observed the ice didn't radiate, the spoon didn't get warmer. therefore radiation wasn't present from the ice. A math problem is a problem based on observance. so show me the observed ice cube radiating.

I observed the ice didn't radiate

Observed with what instruments?

the spoon didn't get warmer.

As measured by what instruments?
Post some pictures of your experimental set up.

thermometers, the spoon never got warmer.

Was it a mercury thermometer?

nope, was yours?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates!

View attachment 270915

If you have proof that ice doesn't radiate "proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature" you should post that proof.

I observed the ice didn't radiate, the spoon didn't get warmer. therefore radiation wasn't present from the ice. A math problem is a problem based on observance. so show me the observed ice cube radiating.

I observed the ice didn't radiate

Observed with what instruments?

the spoon didn't get warmer.

As measured by what instruments?
Post some pictures of your experimental set up.

thermometers, the spoon never got warmer.

Was it a mercury thermometer?

nope

Post some pictures, I'll point out your mistakes.

 

[jc456]

I observed the ice didn't radiate, the spoon didn't get warmer. therefore radiation wasn't present from the ice. A math problem is a problem based on observance. so show me the observed ice cube radiating.

I observed the ice didn't radiate

Observed with what instruments?

the spoon didn't get warmer.

As measured by what instruments?
Post some pictures of your experimental set up.

thermometers, the spoon never got warmer.

Was it a mercury thermometer?

nope

Post some pictures, I'll point out your mistakes.

once you post yours!

 

[westwall]

Well, if you don't know the variables for the formula, how are you going to measure the accuracy of your experimental results?

Why don't you just post your data and I'll try to dumb it down for you......

I want you to prove the math

I want you to prove the math

You want me to prove the Stefan-Boltzmann math?

It's been out there for 140 years. Check it out...….

Stefan-Boltzmann law | Definition & Facts

If you've discovered some flaw, you should publish.

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates! I know you can’t! I accept your surrender

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates!

View attachment 270915

If you have proof that ice doesn't radiate "proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature" you should post that proof.

I observed the ice didn't radiate, the spoon didn't get warmer. therefore radiation wasn't present from the ice. A math problem is a problem based on observance. so show me the observed ice cube radiating.

Ice does radiate though. That's the whole point.

 

[jc456]

I want you to prove the math

I want you to prove the math

You want me to prove the Stefan-Boltzmann math?

It's been out there for 140 years. Check it out...….

Stefan-Boltzmann law | Definition & Facts

If you've discovered some flaw, you should publish.

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates! I know you can’t! I accept your surrender

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates!

View attachment 270915

If you have proof that ice doesn't radiate "proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature" you should post that proof.

I observed the ice didn't radiate, the spoon didn't get warmer. therefore radiation wasn't present from the ice. A math problem is a problem based on observance. so show me the observed ice cube radiating.

Ice does radiate though. That's the whole point.

it will when around a colder object.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I observed the ice didn't radiate

Observed with what instruments?

the spoon didn't get warmer.

As measured by what instruments?
Post some pictures of your experimental set up.

thermometers, the spoon never got warmer.

Was it a mercury thermometer?

nope

Post some pictures, I'll point out your mistakes.

once you post yours!

I've never attempted such a silly experiment.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I want you to prove the math

You want me to prove the Stefan-Boltzmann math?

It's been out there for 140 years. Check it out...….

Stefan-Boltzmann law | Definition & Facts

If you've discovered some flaw, you should publish.

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates! I know you can’t! I accept your surrender

Sure, post evidence that ice radiates!

View attachment 270915

If you have proof that ice doesn't radiate "proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature" you should post that proof.

I observed the ice didn't radiate, the spoon didn't get warmer. therefore radiation wasn't present from the ice. A math problem is a problem based on observance. so show me the observed ice cube radiating.

Ice does radiate though. That's the whole point.

it will when around a colder object.

How does the ice know if a colder object is nearby?

 

[jc456]

thermometers, the spoon never got warmer.

Was it a mercury thermometer?

nope

Post some pictures, I'll point out your mistakes.

once you post yours!

I've never attempted such a silly experiment.

well you said the ice radiates around a warmer object, so you must have observed it correct? a math problem is but a problem until validated. so post that validation.