House
Opinionated Ass
- Nov 1, 2012
- 3,310
- 719
Because ika is worthless and has said he's going to be worthless. You do know I'm not the only one voting him right?
B-I-N-G-O
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because ika is worthless and has said he's going to be worthless. You do know I'm not the only one voting him right?
Accusing people wildly is what both you and Ika are doing.
He is doing so in a straightforward fashion; whereas you are attempting to deceive.
Thus you not only confirm my vote; you reassure me that I am not tunneling.
Regards from Rosie
LOL-Where is ika wildly accusing anyone of anything?
He is saying that wildly lynching has a 60% success rate.
Even before he got here you were trying to prove that to be true.
Regards from Rosie
Riiiiiight................................and this makes me scum because?
Quoting myself from above:
But my vote stays because lashing out wildly at a large number of players is distractive from being noticed as scum.
That's why.
Regards from Rosie
OK so, ika and I are widly lashing out at a large number of players-him due to his 60% win rate by randomly lynching and me because of me trying to figure out how many mislynches can occur before the game is lost.
And therefore that makes me scum.
Yes Rosie, your argument against me is strong and your logic is flawless.
So far, I make one post answering Avi about how many times we can mislynch and still win and numerous people want to call me scum because of it.
Wow, just wow.
Kill me now.
LOL-Where is ika wildly accusing anyone of anything?
He is saying that wildly lynching has a 60% success rate.
Even before he got here you were trying to prove that to be true.
Regards from Rosie
Riiiiiight................................and this makes me scum because?
Quoting myself from above:
But my vote stays because lashing out wildly at a large number of players is distractive from being noticed as scum.
That's why.
Regards from Rosie
OK so, ika and I are widly lashing out at a large number of players-him due to his 60% win rate by randomly lynching and me because of me trying to figure out how many mislynches can occur before the game is lost.
And therefore that makes me scum.
Yes Rosie, your argument against me is strong and your logic is flawless.
So far, I make one post answering Avi about how many times we can mislynch and still win and numerous people want to call me scum because of it.
Wow, just wow.
Kill me now.
Fallback to your typical emotive positions is both town and scumtell for your meta, so it can be dismissed outright.
Regards from Rosie
He is saying that wildly lynching has a 60% success rate.
Even before he got here you were trying to prove that to be true.
Regards from Rosie
Riiiiiight................................and this makes me scum because?
Quoting myself from above:
But my vote stays because lashing out wildly at a large number of players is distractive from being noticed as scum.
That's why.
Regards from Rosie
OK so, ika and I are widly lashing out at a large number of players-him due to his 60% win rate by randomly lynching and me because of me trying to figure out how many mislynches can occur before the game is lost.
And therefore that makes me scum.
Yes Rosie, your argument against me is strong and your logic is flawless.
So far, I make one post answering Avi about how many times we can mislynch and still win and numerous people want to call me scum because of it.
Wow, just wow.
Kill me now.
Fallback to your typical emotive positions is both town and scumtell for your meta, so it can be dismissed outright.
Regards from Rosie
Yet you still found the need to respond to it instead of dismissing it. LOL
Riiiiiight................................and this makes me scum because?
Quoting myself from above:
But my vote stays because lashing out wildly at a large number of players is distractive from being noticed as scum.
That's why.
Regards from Rosie
OK so, ika and I are widly lashing out at a large number of players-him due to his 60% win rate by randomly lynching and me because of me trying to figure out how many mislynches can occur before the game is lost.
And therefore that makes me scum.
Yes Rosie, your argument against me is strong and your logic is flawless.
So far, I make one post answering Avi about how many times we can mislynch and still win and numerous people want to call me scum because of it.
Wow, just wow.
Kill me now.
Fallback to your typical emotive positions is both town and scumtell for your meta, so it can be dismissed outright.
Regards from Rosie
Yet you still found the need to respond to it instead of dismissing it. LOL
Certainly! It is instructive for those who don't know you well.
Just as others have commented on what is typical for me; I just did the same for you.
When she gets overly emotive, don't take it seriously, folks. She doesn't gnaw the scenery terribly badly. Best to.just ignore it.
Regards from Rosie
Quoting myself from above:
But my vote stays because lashing out wildly at a large number of players is distractive from being noticed as scum.
That's why.
Regards from Rosie
OK so, ika and I are widly lashing out at a large number of players-him due to his 60% win rate by randomly lynching and me because of me trying to figure out how many mislynches can occur before the game is lost.
And therefore that makes me scum.
Yes Rosie, your argument against me is strong and your logic is flawless.
So far, I make one post answering Avi about how many times we can mislynch and still win and numerous people want to call me scum because of it.
Wow, just wow.
Kill me now.
Fallback to your typical emotive positions is both town and scumtell for your meta, so it can be dismissed outright.
Regards from Rosie
Yet you still found the need to respond to it instead of dismissing it. LOL
Certainly! It is instructive for those who don't know you well.
Just as others have commented on what is typical for me; I just did the same for you.
When she gets overly emotive, don't take it seriously, folks. She doesn't gnaw the scenery terribly badly. Best to.just ignore it.
Regards from Rosie
Hey everyone. I seriously want more votes on me. There's at least 2 players that are either scum trying to start drama with me or they are so utterly condescending towards me and my play style that it'll be a constant distraction to the game.
It would be better for town if I'm out.
Quoting myself from above:
But my vote stays because lashing out wildly at a large number of players is distractive from being noticed as scum.
That's why.
Regards from Rosie
OK so, ika and I are widly lashing out at a large number of players-him due to his 60% win rate by randomly lynching and me because of me trying to figure out how many mislynches can occur before the game is lost.
And therefore that makes me scum.
Yes Rosie, your argument against me is strong and your logic is flawless.
So far, I make one post answering Avi about how many times we can mislynch and still win and numerous people want to call me scum because of it.
Wow, just wow.
Kill me now.
Fallback to your typical emotive positions is both town and scumtell for your meta, so it can be dismissed outright.
Regards from Rosie
Yet you still found the need to respond to it instead of dismissing it. LOL
Certainly! It is instructive for those who don't know you well.
Just as others have commented on what is typical for me; I just did the same for you.
When she gets overly emotive, don't take it seriously, folks. She doesn't gnaw the scenery terribly badly. Best to.just ignore it.
Regards from Rosie
Hey everyone. I seriously want more votes on me. There's at least 2 players that are either scum trying to start drama with me or they are so utterly condescending towards me and my play style that it'll be a constant distraction to the game.
It would be better for town if I'm out.
OK so, ika and I are widly lashing out at a large number of players-him due to his 60% win rate by randomly lynching and me because of me trying to figure out how many mislynches can occur before the game is lost.
And therefore that makes me scum.
Yes Rosie, your argument against me is strong and your logic is flawless.
So far, I make one post answering Avi about how many times we can mislynch and still win and numerous people want to call me scum because of it.
Wow, just wow.
Kill me now.
Fallback to your typical emotive positions is both town and scumtell for your meta, so it can be dismissed outright.
Regards from Rosie
Yet you still found the need to respond to it instead of dismissing it. LOL
Certainly! It is instructive for those who don't know you well.
Just as others have commented on what is typical for me; I just did the same for you.
When she gets overly emotive, don't take it seriously, folks. She doesn't gnaw the scenery terribly badly. Best to.just ignore it.
Regards from Rosie
Hey everyone. I seriously want more votes on me. There's at least 2 players that are either scum trying to start drama with me or they are so utterly condescending towards me and my play style that it'll be a constant distraction to the game.
It would be better for town if I'm out.
Wow.....and we're supposed to take that as pro-town? If you are a rebel why don't you try and prove to us that you are one instead of being challenging? You want us to take Ika out because you think he's anti-town in his way of playing, yet you're doing the same thing.
And, I'm not scum, I'm just scum hunting.
OK so, ika and I are widly lashing out at a large number of players-him due to his 60% win rate by randomly lynching and me because of me trying to figure out how many mislynches can occur before the game is lost.
And therefore that makes me scum.
Yes Rosie, your argument against me is strong and your logic is flawless.
So far, I make one post answering Avi about how many times we can mislynch and still win and numerous people want to call me scum because of it.
Wow, just wow.
Kill me now.
Fallback to your typical emotive positions is both town and scumtell for your meta, so it can be dismissed outright.
Regards from Rosie
Yet you still found the need to respond to it instead of dismissing it. LOL
Certainly! It is instructive for those who don't know you well.
Just as others have commented on what is typical for me; I just did the same for you.
When she gets overly emotive, don't take it seriously, folks. She doesn't gnaw the scenery terribly badly. Best to.just ignore it.
Regards from Rosie
Hey everyone. I seriously want more votes on me. There's at least 2 players that are either scum trying to start drama with me or they are so utterly condescending towards me and my play style that it'll be a constant distraction to the game.
It would be better for town if I'm out.
How is it better for town when we need you to help us find and lynch the scum?
Ignore those that insist on getting you riled up. Read their posts, but don't respond to them. Giving them any type of response just adds to the fire they want to start.
Are you scum?Ugh I am so tempted to vote Ika just so this nonsense ends. Having the discussion circling around ika instead of hunting gets us nowhere.
Are you scum?Ugh I am so tempted to vote Ika just so this nonsense ends. Having the discussion circling around ika instead of hunting gets us nowhere.
So the first 7 pages are filled with set-up ignorance, and Wolfsister both townslipping and scumslipping.
*sigh*
Are you scum?Ugh I am so tempted to vote Ika just so this nonsense ends. Having the discussion circling around ika instead of hunting gets us nowhere.
Town...again. I really ought to get a tattoo on my ass that says I am town.
What about you?
So the first 7 pages are filled with set-up ignorance, and Wolfsister both townslipping and scumslipping.
*sigh*
I do that a lot. Both townslip and scumslip. It's fun. You should try it sometime.![]()
Are you scum?Ugh I am so tempted to vote Ika just so this nonsense ends. Having the discussion circling around ika instead of hunting gets us nowhere.