Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But I still believe living in your type of world has some interesting ideas.
You come upon a pretty bad accident.......do you ignore it and drive on.....or stop and see if you can negotiate some pay for the help you could give?
If you contracted me for service can I deny that service at the time you need my services most? Unless you pay me more.
No morality means the agreement we reached doesn't mean jack shit. Right. Morals are non existent so the constraints put up by trying to behave in a moral manner are also gone. Agreements don't mean much.
Interesting.
But I still believe living in your type of world has some interesting ideas.
You come upon a pretty bad accident.......do you ignore it and drive on.....or stop and see if you can negotiate some pay for the help you could give?
If you contracted me for service can I deny that service at the time you need my services most? Unless you pay me more.
No morality means the agreement we reached doesn't mean jack shit. Right. Morals are non existent so the constraints put up by trying to behave in a moral manner are also gone. Agreements don't mean much.
Interesting.
1. I keep going. I do not have the time, the skills or the tools to help out in such a situation.
2. If there is no legal document stating the terms of the agreement, you're more than free to change the terms. Now if there IS a legal contract then that remains in effect.
Morality exists. It's simply a matter that Morality is much more about honor, doing what's Right and taking care of oneself than about helping anyone else.
No more of that idea of your word being good. Used to be that a verbal agreement between two parties was as good as a paper agreement. Not in your world?If there is no legal document stating the terms of the agreement, you're more than free to change the terms. Now if there IS a legal contract then that remains in effect.
Morality exists. It's simply a matter that Morality is much more about honor, doing what's Right and taking care of oneself than about helping anyone else.
I am not so sure Huff is right, but if so: then all the more reason to get everyone in the system.
#4. Suppose there is a family of four, 3 "undocumented immigrants" with the youngest child being an American citizen because he is an anchor baby. I would think that the youngest child would qualify for SNAP. Is the SNAP benifit based on only the one child, or is it based on the family of four and their income? Does only the anchor baby eat the food bought with the SNAP benifits? If not, is that fraud? If it is fraud, is this included in the estimate of the 3% fraud rate?
I'm I wrong that the family can get SNAP benifits due to the anchor baby?
Look it up. It is your question.
Okay, I found this information from an article in the Huffington Post.
Are Anchor Babies Sinking the American Economy Michealene Cristini Risley
As far as healthcare, illegal aliens give birth to about 340,000 children nation wide each year, imposing tremendous medical costs on hospitals. Several hospitals, including ones in Stockton, CA and Dallas, TX, report as many as 70% of their deliveries are to non-residents. Similarly, since the parents of infant citizens still qualify for welfare in order to protect the child, the Center for Immigration studies estimates nearly $2 billion dollars goes to illegal aliens annually, in the form of food stamps and free lunches.
I would say that Myth #4 is confirmed.
Congress's legislative powers are enumerated in Section Eight:
The Congress shall have power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common defence[note 1] and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
General Welfare of the NATION, not the Citizens. The fact that you didn't know that, and that you probably didn't realize there's a difference doesn't surprise me much, considering the educational systems in this country over the last century.
Anthema answers to a false god: himself.
Personal responsibility has its place. But you interpretation of 'morality' is pure Hedonism.Ah!, You're a Hedonist!
Given that, no one is bound to take you and your 'morality' seriously.
Hedonists are a majority of one and do not deserve the benefits of larger society.
Not a Hedonist or an Anarchist. More like a Conservative, Personal Responsibility advocate.
No. You're a Hedonist. Right and wrong , so far as society is concerned, means nothing to you. Hedonists are basically self absorbed and with a feckless, boorish outlook on wider society.But I still believe living in your type of world has some interesting ideas.
You come upon a pretty bad accident.......do you ignore it and drive on.....or stop and see if you can negotiate some pay for the help you could give?
If you contracted me for service can I deny that service at the time you need my services most? Unless you pay me more.
No morality means the agreement we reached doesn't mean jack shit. Right. Morals are non existent so the constraints put up by trying to behave in a moral manner are also gone. Agreements don't mean much.
Interesting.
1. I keep going. I do not have the time, the skills or the tools to help out in such a situation.
2. If there is no legal document stating the terms of the agreement, you're more than free to change the terms. Now if there IS a legal contract then that remains in effect.
Morality exists. It's simply a matter that Morality is much more about honor, doing what's Right and taking care of oneself than about helping anyone else.
You do not understand the concept of right and wrong. If you did, you would instantly realize the essential flw of the particular philosophy you champion.
Your are wrong, only the child is entitle to benefits. To receive benefits: the parents must provide:
#4. Suppose there is a family of four, 3 "undocumented immigrants" with the youngest child being an American citizen because he is an anchor baby. I would think that the youngest child would qualify for SNAP. Is the SNAP benifit based on only the one child, or is it based on the family of four and their income? Does only the anchor baby eat the food bought with the SNAP benifits? If not, is that fraud? If it is fraud, is this included in the estimate of the 3% fraud rate?
I'm I wrong that the family can get SNAP benifits due to the anchor baby?
Your are wrong, only the child is entitle to benefits. To receive benefits: the parents must provide:
#4. Suppose there is a family of four, 3 "undocumented immigrants" with the youngest child being an American citizen because he is an anchor baby. I would think that the youngest child would qualify for SNAP. Is the SNAP benifit based on only the one child, or is it based on the family of four and their income? Does only the anchor baby eat the food bought with the SNAP benifits? If not, is that fraud? If it is fraud, is this included in the estimate of the 3% fraud rate?
I'm I wrong that the family can get SNAP benifits due to the anchor baby?
After all documents and application are received the parent must schedule an interview to review all documents. The interviewer must be satisfied that the family meets all requirements which includes, citizenship and naturalization status of all family members are correct. After a successful interview. The family will receive a SNAP card with a credit to card each month for the amount the child would be entitled based on a family of 4, one being a US citizen. In California, if the family income were say $15,000 or less, the family benefit if all members were citizens would be about $400. A child's portion would be about $80/mo. If the family income were about $40,000/yr. Then a child's benefit would be $15/mo. So, in this family for range of family incomes, the total benefit the family would recieive would be between $15 and $80/mo.
- A birth certificate or other proof that the child is a US citizen and the child's social security number.
- Proof of Immigration status must be provide for everyone in the household.
- Proof of address must be provided
- Proof of family earned income, pay check stubs) must be provided
- Proof of unearned income (copies of benefit checks, etc)
- Proof of self-employment income (copy of tax return, etc. )
- Proof of assets, (bank accounts, etc)
- Proof of Shelter costs (Landlord Verification Form)
- Proof of Utility costs
- Proof of Medical expenses for household members
- Proof of Child care or adult care expenses
- Proof of Court-ordered child support payments
http://www.massresources.org/snap-rules.html
Your are wrong, only the child is entitle to benefits. To receive benefits: the parents must provide:
#4. Suppose there is a family of four, 3 "undocumented immigrants" with the youngest child being an American citizen because he is an anchor baby. I would think that the youngest child would qualify for SNAP. Is the SNAP benifit based on only the one child, or is it based on the family of four and their income? Does only the anchor baby eat the food bought with the SNAP benifits? If not, is that fraud? If it is fraud, is this included in the estimate of the 3% fraud rate?
I'm I wrong that the family can get SNAP benifits due to the anchor baby?
After all documents and application are received the parent must schedule an interview to review all documents. The interviewer must be satisfied that the family meets all requirements which includes, citizenship and naturalization status of all family members are correct. After a successful interview. The family will receive a SNAP card with a credit to card each month for the amount the child would be entitled based on a family of 4, one being a US citizen. In California, if the family income were say $15,000 or less, the family benefit if all members were citizens would be about $400. A child's portion would be about $80/mo. If the family income were about $40,000/yr. Then a child's benefit would be $15/mo. So, in this family for range of family incomes, the total benefit the family would recieive would be between $15 and $80/mo.
- A birth certificate or other proof that the child is a US citizen and the child's social security number.
- Proof of Immigration status must be provide for everyone in the household.
- Proof of address must be provided
- Proof of family earned income, pay check stubs) must be provided
- Proof of unearned income (copies of benefit checks, etc)
- Proof of self-employment income (copy of tax return, etc. )
- Proof of assets, (bank accounts, etc)
- Proof of Shelter costs (Landlord Verification Form)
- Proof of Utility costs
- Proof of Medical expenses for household members
- Proof of Child care or adult care expenses
- Proof of Court-ordered child support payments
http://www.massresources.org/snap-rules.html
You said that I'm wrong, then you posted information that proved me right. Oh the irony!
Your are wrong, only the child is entitle to benefits. To receive benefits: the parents must provide:
#4. Suppose there is a family of four, 3 "undocumented immigrants" with the youngest child being an American citizen because he is an anchor baby. I would think that the youngest child would qualify for SNAP. Is the SNAP benifit based on only the one child, or is it based on the family of four and their income? Does only the anchor baby eat the food bought with the SNAP benifits? If not, is that fraud? If it is fraud, is this included in the estimate of the 3% fraud rate?
I'm I wrong that the family can get SNAP benifits due to the anchor baby?
After all documents and application are received the parent must schedule an interview to review all documents. The interviewer must be satisfied that the family meets all requirements which includes, citizenship and naturalization status of all family members are correct. After a successful interview. The family will receive a SNAP card with a credit to card each month for the amount the child would be entitled based on a family of 4, one being a US citizen. In California, if the family income were say $15,000 or less, the family benefit if all members were citizens would be about $400. A child's portion would be about $80/mo. If the family income were about $40,000/yr. Then a child's benefit would be $15/mo. So, in this family for range of family incomes, the total benefit the family would recieive would be between $15 and $80/mo.
- A birth certificate or other proof that the child is a US citizen and the child's social security number.
- Proof of Immigration status must be provide for everyone in the household.
- Proof of address must be provided
- Proof of family earned income, pay check stubs) must be provided
- Proof of unearned income (copies of benefit checks, etc)
- Proof of self-employment income (copy of tax return, etc. )
- Proof of assets, (bank accounts, etc)
- Proof of Shelter costs (Landlord Verification Form)
- Proof of Utility costs
- Proof of Medical expenses for household members
- Proof of Child care or adult care expenses
- Proof of Court-ordered child support payments
http://www.massresources.org/snap-rules.html
You said that I'm wrong, then you posted information that proved me right. Oh the irony!
Oh, you are one of those. Confusing facts. Yeah, you are wrong, Joe..
Sorry, I misread your last sentence. No I think the fraud rate of 3% is based on over-payment.Your are wrong, only the child is entitle to benefits. To receive benefits: the parents must provide:
#4. Suppose there is a family of four, 3 "undocumented immigrants" with the youngest child being an American citizen because he is an anchor baby. I would think that the youngest child would qualify for SNAP. Is the SNAP benifit based on only the one child, or is it based on the family of four and their income? Does only the anchor baby eat the food bought with the SNAP benifits? If not, is that fraud? If it is fraud, is this included in the estimate of the 3% fraud rate?
I'm I wrong that the family can get SNAP benifits due to the anchor baby?
After all documents and application are received the parent must schedule an interview to review all documents. The interviewer must be satisfied that the family meets all requirements which includes, citizenship and naturalization status of all family members are correct. After a successful interview. The family will receive a SNAP card with a credit to card each month for the amount the child would be entitled based on a family of 4, one being a US citizen. In California, if the family income were say $15,000 or less, the family benefit if all members were citizens would be about $400. A child's portion would be about $80/mo. If the family income were about $40,000/yr. Then a child's benefit would be $15/mo. So, in this family for range of family incomes, the total benefit the family would recieive would be between $15 and $80/mo.
- A birth certificate or other proof that the child is a US citizen and the child's social security number.
- Proof of Immigration status must be provide for everyone in the household.
- Proof of address must be provided
- Proof of family earned income, pay check stubs) must be provided
- Proof of unearned income (copies of benefit checks, etc)
- Proof of self-employment income (copy of tax return, etc. )
- Proof of assets, (bank accounts, etc)
- Proof of Shelter costs (Landlord Verification Form)
- Proof of Utility costs
- Proof of Medical expenses for household members
- Proof of Child care or adult care expenses
- Proof of Court-ordered child support payments
http://www.massresources.org/snap-rules.html
You said that I'm wrong, then you posted information that proved me right. Oh the irony!
No. You're a Hedonist. Right and wrong , so far as society is concerned, means nothing to you. Hedonists are basically self absorbed and with a feckless, boorish outlook on wider society.
You do not understand the concept of right and wrong. If you did, you would instantly realize the essential flw of the particular philosophy you champion.
"It's not moral to support people who can't support themselves."Anathema, your statement is immoral.
LOL. Morality is defined by Right and Wrong not by feeling good about yourself.
It is not moral to allow people to steal from you or to support people who can't or won't support themselves.
You have a rather strange sense of morality.
