Okay.....Will An Apology Get You Off Of My Fat Ass?

[mudwhistle]

The republican obsession with Hillary is laughable, much like the Benghazi stupidity.

I wouldn't call it an obsession.

She's like a case of Herpes that keeps coming back.

 

[Sallow]

Well no, she didn't.

What's happening now is partisans are coming in and second guessing. This is one of those "classified" moments.

The Story Behind Hillary Clinton's Mysterious Gefilte Fish Email

Operation "Gefilte Fish". You can't make this stuff up.

Well no, she didn't.

The New York Times has a story that disagrees with your feeling.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/08/u...ation-was-in-hillary-clintons-email.html?_r=0

So you're saying the Executive branch works for the CIA? Interesting. Interesting even more you are using the NY Times, a publication you have seldom agreed with in the past.

So you're saying the Executive branch works for the CIA?

You think I claimed that? Where?

Interesting even more you are using the NY Times,

I figured you'd appreciate that.
So do you feel that because Hillary was part of the Executive Branch she's allowed to mishandle classified info?

The Executive branch CLASSIFIES information. That's by DESIGN. And if you knew anything at all about the NY Times, which you obviously do not, they have an Anti-Clinton bias.

The originating agency classifies it, and they are the only agency that can declassify it...

In other words, for the mentally impaired, HILLARY DIDN'T HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DECLASSIFY ANYTHING THAT THE CIA CLASSIFIED!!!

The CIA works for the Executive branch. You really should bone up on this before you post.

 

[paulitician]

Are we done with Hillary yet? I hope so. No Clintons or Bush's. Let's go in a different direction.

 

[Sallow]

Well no, she didn't.

What's happening now is partisans are coming in and second guessing. This is one of those "classified" moments.

The Story Behind Hillary Clinton's Mysterious Gefilte Fish Email

Operation "Gefilte Fish". You can't make this stuff up.

Well no, she didn't.

The New York Times has a story that disagrees with your feeling.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/08/u...ation-was-in-hillary-clintons-email.html?_r=0

So you're saying the Executive branch works for the CIA? Interesting. Interesting even more you are using the NY Times, a publication you have seldom agreed with in the past.

So you're saying the Executive branch works for the CIA?

You think I claimed that? Where?

Interesting even more you are using the NY Times,

I figured you'd appreciate that.
So do you feel that because Hillary was part of the Executive Branch she's allowed to mishandle classified info?

The Executive branch CLASSIFIES information. That's by DESIGN. And if you knew anything at all about the NY Times, which you obviously do not, they have an Anti-Clinton bias.

The Executive branch CLASSIFIES information. That's by DESIGN.

So that means Hillary is allowed to mishandle it? Because that's the design? LOL!
You can't be serious.

How did she "mishandle" it? I mean, insofar has precedence goes. Did she do anything different than the previous Secretary of State?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Well no, she didn't.

The New York Times has a story that disagrees with your feeling.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/08/u...ation-was-in-hillary-clintons-email.html?_r=0

So you're saying the Executive branch works for the CIA? Interesting. Interesting even more you are using the NY Times, a publication you have seldom agreed with in the past.

So you're saying the Executive branch works for the CIA?

You think I claimed that? Where?

Interesting even more you are using the NY Times,

I figured you'd appreciate that.
So do you feel that because Hillary was part of the Executive Branch she's allowed to mishandle classified info?

The Executive branch CLASSIFIES information. That's by DESIGN. And if you knew anything at all about the NY Times, which you obviously do not, they have an Anti-Clinton bias.

The Executive branch CLASSIFIES information. That's by DESIGN.

So that means Hillary is allowed to mishandle it? Because that's the design? LOL!
You can't be serious.

How did she "mishandle" it? I mean, insofar has precedence goes. Did she do anything different than the previous Secretary of State?

How did she "mishandle" it?

By receiving it, sending it or holding it on a non-government server.
Unless you have some proof that the SOS is allowed to mishandle classified info, she should be charged.

Did she do anything different than the previous Secretary of State?

I don't know, did Condoleezza Rice receive, send and store classified info on a server at her house?

 

[Obiwan]

Well no, she didn't.

The New York Times has a story that disagrees with your feeling.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/08/u...ation-was-in-hillary-clintons-email.html?_r=0

So you're saying the Executive branch works for the CIA? Interesting. Interesting even more you are using the NY Times, a publication you have seldom agreed with in the past.

So you're saying the Executive branch works for the CIA?

You think I claimed that? Where?

Interesting even more you are using the NY Times,

I figured you'd appreciate that.
So do you feel that because Hillary was part of the Executive Branch she's allowed to mishandle classified info?

The Executive branch CLASSIFIES information. That's by DESIGN. And if you knew anything at all about the NY Times, which you obviously do not, they have an Anti-Clinton bias.

The originating agency classifies it, and they are the only agency that can declassify it...

In other words, for the mentally impaired, HILLARY DIDN'T HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DECLASSIFY ANYTHING THAT THE CIA CLASSIFIED!!!

The CIA works for the Executive branch. You really should bone up on this before you post.

Exactly what are you trying to claim... That Hillary received information with the highest possible security classification, and either Hillary or her aides made an attempt to declassify it where they could send it over an unsecure network???

 

[Oldstyle]

most americans are against politicians breaking the law... She made this mess...let it play out.
why do you want to change the subject?

How is whether or not she got an email some bureaucrat later decided was a secret going to improve my life one iota?

Here's the thing. I voted for Bush twice. And I made excuses for him over Iraq and Katrina and a lot of his other fuck-ups, until the day came when his fuckups cost me my job and well-being.

I really, really don't care if Hillary got a "Secret" e-mail, especially since a lot of these "secrets" were things that were already out in the media. One of them was on North Korea's nuclear program. Was there someone who still didn't know the NorKs have a bomb now?

Which of these people are going to make my life better? Frankly, my life was pretty sweet when her husband was president, I'd LOVE to go back to that.

That's the biggest mistake you could make, thinking for one second that Hillary is Bill.

And I happen to believe that Bill worked with the republican congress to make some good decisions. Not all good but some good.

Clinton never worked with a "republican" congress because they had no interest in working with him. The impeachment should have told you that. Oh, and they shut down the government.

You're one of the more clueless posters on the board, Sallow. When Bill Clinton lost in the midterms of his first term in office he did in fact "pivot" to the center and work with a Newt Gingrich led House. He did the exact opposite of what Barack Obama did when the same thing happened to him because Clinton was an astute enough politician to know that he didn't have a choice.

 

[Rotagilla]

Well no, she didn't.

The New York Times has a story that disagrees with your feeling.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/08/u...ation-was-in-hillary-clintons-email.html?_r=0

So you're saying the Executive branch works for the CIA? Interesting. Interesting even more you are using the NY Times, a publication you have seldom agreed with in the past.

So you're saying the Executive branch works for the CIA?

You think I claimed that? Where?

Interesting even more you are using the NY Times,

I figured you'd appreciate that.
So do you feel that because Hillary was part of the Executive Branch she's allowed to mishandle classified info?

The Executive branch CLASSIFIES information. That's by DESIGN. And if you knew anything at all about the NY Times, which you obviously do not, they have an Anti-Clinton bias.

The originating agency classifies it, and they are the only agency that can declassify it...

In other words, for the mentally impaired, HILLARY DIDN'T HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DECLASSIFY ANYTHING THAT THE CIA CLASSIFIED!!!

The CIA works for the Executive branch. You really should bone up on this before you post.

on paper... ask jfk if that's accurate in reality...

 

[Obiwan]

Well no, she didn't.

The New York Times has a story that disagrees with your feeling.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/08/u...ation-was-in-hillary-clintons-email.html?_r=0

So you're saying the Executive branch works for the CIA? Interesting. Interesting even more you are using the NY Times, a publication you have seldom agreed with in the past.

So you're saying the Executive branch works for the CIA?

You think I claimed that? Where?

Interesting even more you are using the NY Times,

I figured you'd appreciate that.
So do you feel that because Hillary was part of the Executive Branch she's allowed to mishandle classified info?

The Executive branch CLASSIFIES information. That's by DESIGN. And if you knew anything at all about the NY Times, which you obviously do not, they have an Anti-Clinton bias.

The originating agency classifies it, and they are the only agency that can declassify it...

In other words, for the mentally impaired, HILLARY DIDN'T HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DECLASSIFY ANYTHING THAT THE CIA CLASSIFIED!!!

The CIA works for the Executive branch. You really should bone up on this before you post.

But they are under the Director of National Intelligence... NOT THE STATE DEPARTMENT ...

When they classify something, the SOS has NO authority to change it...

So maybe you need to clarify your position...

Are you trying to say Hillary mishandled that information, or that Obama cleared her to pass TS/NOFOR (Keyhole) information around by declassifying it when it shouldn't have been declassified???

 

[Sallow]

So you're saying the Executive branch works for the CIA? Interesting. Interesting even more you are using the NY Times, a publication you have seldom agreed with in the past.

So you're saying the Executive branch works for the CIA?

You think I claimed that? Where?

Interesting even more you are using the NY Times,

I figured you'd appreciate that.
So do you feel that because Hillary was part of the Executive Branch she's allowed to mishandle classified info?

The Executive branch CLASSIFIES information. That's by DESIGN. And if you knew anything at all about the NY Times, which you obviously do not, they have an Anti-Clinton bias.

The Executive branch CLASSIFIES information. That's by DESIGN.

So that means Hillary is allowed to mishandle it? Because that's the design? LOL!
You can't be serious.

How did she "mishandle" it? I mean, insofar has precedence goes. Did she do anything different than the previous Secretary of State?

How did she "mishandle" it?

By receiving it, sending it or holding it on a non-government server.
Unless you have some proof that the SOS is allowed to mishandle classified info, she should be charged.

Did she do anything different than the previous Secretary of State?

I don't know, did Condoleezza Rice receive, send and store classified info on a server at her house?

Colin Powell Also Used Personal Email While Serving As Secretary Of State, Aide Confirms


Condoleezza Rice 'rarely used email' as secretary of state - Business Insider

Powell had a private email server. Rice rarely used email.

 

[Obiwan]

So you're saying the Executive branch works for the CIA?

You think I claimed that? Where?

Interesting even more you are using the NY Times,

I figured you'd appreciate that.
So do you feel that because Hillary was part of the Executive Branch she's allowed to mishandle classified info?

The Executive branch CLASSIFIES information. That's by DESIGN. And if you knew anything at all about the NY Times, which you obviously do not, they have an Anti-Clinton bias.

The Executive branch CLASSIFIES information. That's by DESIGN.

So that means Hillary is allowed to mishandle it? Because that's the design? LOL!
You can't be serious.

How did she "mishandle" it? I mean, insofar has precedence goes. Did she do anything different than the previous Secretary of State?

How did she "mishandle" it?

By receiving it, sending it or holding it on a non-government server.
Unless you have some proof that the SOS is allowed to mishandle classified info, she should be charged.

Did she do anything different than the previous Secretary of State?

I don't know, did Condoleezza Rice receive, send and store classified info on a server at her house?

Colin Powell Also Used Personal Email While Serving As Secretary Of State, Aide Confirms


Condoleezza Rice 'rarely used email' as secretary of state - Business Insider

Powell had a private email server. Rice rarely used email.

But you can't show evidence they sent Top Secret information over it... Hillary sent it over her private network!!!

THAT is the issue, dummy!!!

 

[jknowgood]

So you're saying the Executive branch works for the CIA?

You think I claimed that? Where?

Interesting even more you are using the NY Times,

I figured you'd appreciate that.
So do you feel that because Hillary was part of the Executive Branch she's allowed to mishandle classified info?

The Executive branch CLASSIFIES information. That's by DESIGN. And if you knew anything at all about the NY Times, which you obviously do not, they have an Anti-Clinton bias.

The Executive branch CLASSIFIES information. That's by DESIGN.

So that means Hillary is allowed to mishandle it? Because that's the design? LOL!
You can't be serious.

How did she "mishandle" it? I mean, insofar has precedence goes. Did she do anything different than the previous Secretary of State?

How did she "mishandle" it?

By receiving it, sending it or holding it on a non-government server.
Unless you have some proof that the SOS is allowed to mishandle classified info, she should be charged.

Did she do anything different than the previous Secretary of State?

I don't know, did Condoleezza Rice receive, send and store classified info on a server at her house?

Colin Powell Also Used Personal Email While Serving As Secretary Of State, Aide Confirms


Condoleezza Rice 'rarely used email' as secretary of state - Business Insider

Powell had a private email server. Rice rarely used email.

Did Powell get classified information on it, or did he also have a secure email for classified documents?

 

[Sallow]

most americans are against politicians breaking the law... She made this mess...let it play out.
why do you want to change the subject?

How is whether or not she got an email some bureaucrat later decided was a secret going to improve my life one iota?

Here's the thing. I voted for Bush twice. And I made excuses for him over Iraq and Katrina and a lot of his other fuck-ups, until the day came when his fuckups cost me my job and well-being.

I really, really don't care if Hillary got a "Secret" e-mail, especially since a lot of these "secrets" were things that were already out in the media. One of them was on North Korea's nuclear program. Was there someone who still didn't know the NorKs have a bomb now?

Which of these people are going to make my life better? Frankly, my life was pretty sweet when her husband was president, I'd LOVE to go back to that.

That's the biggest mistake you could make, thinking for one second that Hillary is Bill.

And I happen to believe that Bill worked with the republican congress to make some good decisions. Not all good but some good.

Clinton never worked with a "republican" congress because they had no interest in working with him. The impeachment should have told you that. Oh, and they shut down the government.

You're one of the more clueless posters on the board, Sallow. When Bill Clinton lost in the midterms of his first term in office he did in fact "pivot" to the center and work with a Newt Gingrich led House. He did the exact opposite of what Barack Obama did when the same thing happened to him because Clinton was an astute enough politician to know that he didn't have a choice.

Not "clueless" at all.

The Republicans shut down the government in the second term and impeached him.

I don't know what reality you are living in..

United States federal government shutdowns of 1995–1996 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Impeachment and acquittal of Bill Clinton - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Sallow]

The Executive branch CLASSIFIES information. That's by DESIGN. And if you knew anything at all about the NY Times, which you obviously do not, they have an Anti-Clinton bias.

The Executive branch CLASSIFIES information. That's by DESIGN.

So that means Hillary is allowed to mishandle it? Because that's the design? LOL!
You can't be serious.

How did she "mishandle" it? I mean, insofar has precedence goes. Did she do anything different than the previous Secretary of State?

How did she "mishandle" it?

By receiving it, sending it or holding it on a non-government server.
Unless you have some proof that the SOS is allowed to mishandle classified info, she should be charged.

Did she do anything different than the previous Secretary of State?

I don't know, did Condoleezza Rice receive, send and store classified info on a server at her house?

Colin Powell Also Used Personal Email While Serving As Secretary Of State, Aide Confirms


Condoleezza Rice 'rarely used email' as secretary of state - Business Insider

Powell had a private email server. Rice rarely used email.

But you can't show evidence they sent Top Secret information over it... Hillary sent it over her private network!!!

THAT is the issue, dummy!!!

No one made it an issue, "dummy".

 

[jknowgood]

most americans are against politicians breaking the law... She made this mess...let it play out.
why do you want to change the subject?

How is whether or not she got an email some bureaucrat later decided was a secret going to improve my life one iota?

Here's the thing. I voted for Bush twice. And I made excuses for him over Iraq and Katrina and a lot of his other fuck-ups, until the day came when his fuckups cost me my job and well-being.

I really, really don't care if Hillary got a "Secret" e-mail, especially since a lot of these "secrets" were things that were already out in the media. One of them was on North Korea's nuclear program. Was there someone who still didn't know the NorKs have a bomb now?

Which of these people are going to make my life better? Frankly, my life was pretty sweet when her husband was president, I'd LOVE to go back to that.

That's the biggest mistake you could make, thinking for one second that Hillary is Bill.

And I happen to believe that Bill worked with the republican congress to make some good decisions. Not all good but some good.

Clinton never worked with a "republican" congress because they had no interest in working with him. The impeachment should have told you that. Oh, and they shut down the government.

You're one of the more clueless posters on the board, Sallow. When Bill Clinton lost in the midterms of his first term in office he did in fact "pivot" to the center and work with a Newt Gingrich led House. He did the exact opposite of what Barack Obama did when the same thing happened to him because Clinton was an astute enough politician to know that he didn't have a choice.

Not "clueless" at all.

The Republicans shut down the government in the second term and impeached him.

I don't know what reality you are living in..

United States federal government shutdowns of 1995–1996 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Impeachment and acquittal of Bill Clinton - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

His impeachment was his own fault.

 

[Obiwan]

The Executive branch CLASSIFIES information. That's by DESIGN.

So that means Hillary is allowed to mishandle it? Because that's the design? LOL!
You can't be serious.

How did she "mishandle" it? I mean, insofar has precedence goes. Did she do anything different than the previous Secretary of State?

How did she "mishandle" it?

By receiving it, sending it or holding it on a non-government server.
Unless you have some proof that the SOS is allowed to mishandle classified info, she should be charged.

Did she do anything different than the previous Secretary of State?

I don't know, did Condoleezza Rice receive, send and store classified info on a server at her house?

Colin Powell Also Used Personal Email While Serving As Secretary Of State, Aide Confirms


Condoleezza Rice 'rarely used email' as secretary of state - Business Insider

Powell had a private email server. Rice rarely used email.

But you can't show evidence they sent Top Secret information over it... Hillary sent it over her private network!!!

THAT is the issue, dummy!!!

No one made it an issue, "dummy".

Probably because there is no evidence that Powell or Rice mishandled classified information...

Hillary DID, and that's a FELONY.

 

[Sallow]

How did she "mishandle" it? I mean, insofar has precedence goes. Did she do anything different than the previous Secretary of State?

How did she "mishandle" it?

By receiving it, sending it or holding it on a non-government server.
Unless you have some proof that the SOS is allowed to mishandle classified info, she should be charged.

Did she do anything different than the previous Secretary of State?

I don't know, did Condoleezza Rice receive, send and store classified info on a server at her house?

Colin Powell Also Used Personal Email While Serving As Secretary Of State, Aide Confirms


Condoleezza Rice 'rarely used email' as secretary of state - Business Insider

Powell had a private email server. Rice rarely used email.

But you can't show evidence they sent Top Secret information over it... Hillary sent it over her private network!!!

THAT is the issue, dummy!!!

No one made it an issue, "dummy".

Probably because there is no evidence that Powell or Rice mishandled classified information...

Hillary DID, and that's a FELONY.

Cool.

Look up the law and link it.

 

[Obiwan]

How did she "mishandle" it?

By receiving it, sending it or holding it on a non-government server.
Unless you have some proof that the SOS is allowed to mishandle classified info, she should be charged.

Did she do anything different than the previous Secretary of State?

I don't know, did Condoleezza Rice receive, send and store classified info on a server at her house?

Colin Powell Also Used Personal Email While Serving As Secretary Of State, Aide Confirms


Condoleezza Rice 'rarely used email' as secretary of state - Business Insider

Powell had a private email server. Rice rarely used email.

But you can't show evidence they sent Top Secret information over it... Hillary sent it over her private network!!!

THAT is the issue, dummy!!!

No one made it an issue, "dummy".

Probably because there is no evidence that Powell or Rice mishandled classified information...

Hillary DID, and that's a FELONY.

Cool.

Look up the law and link it.

She took it off of a secure system, let people without a security clearance handle the server, and even transferred it to thumb drives...

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

 

[Sallow]

Colin Powell Also Used Personal Email While Serving As Secretary Of State, Aide Confirms


Condoleezza Rice 'rarely used email' as secretary of state - Business Insider

Powell had a private email server. Rice rarely used email.

But you can't show evidence they sent Top Secret information over it... Hillary sent it over her private network!!!

THAT is the issue, dummy!!!

No one made it an issue, "dummy".

Probably because there is no evidence that Powell or Rice mishandled classified information...

Hillary DID, and that's a FELONY.

Cool.

Look up the law and link it.

She took it off of a secure system, let people without a security clearance handle the server, and even transferred it to thumb drives...

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

I'll give you props for actually doing a little research.

You should have probably read and understood it, however. It doesn't apply at all.

 

[Obiwan]

But you can't show evidence they sent Top Secret information over it... Hillary sent it over her private network!!!

THAT is the issue, dummy!!!

No one made it an issue, "dummy".

Probably because there is no evidence that Powell or Rice mishandled classified information...

Hillary DID, and that's a FELONY.

Cool.

Look up the law and link it.

She took it off of a secure system, let people without a security clearance handle the server, and even transferred it to thumb drives...

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

I'll give you props for actually doing a little research.

You should have probably read and understood it, however. It doesn't apply at all.

I've done research, and I also spent 7 years with a security clearance in the military...

And you???