NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
As a medical fact it does. At what stage of development is that life worth protecting?Life does not begin at conception.
Medical fact is not legal fact.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As a medical fact it does. At what stage of development is that life worth protecting?Life does not begin at conception.
And now we no longer need bother with you...I see, you think I have no morality, no respect for human life? You would.Roughly when you can put one of these on its head...As a medical fact it does. At what stage of development is that life worth protecting?
![]()
Why? Why not at age fifteen or older? It shouldn't matter to someone like you.
Now ask what's the difference between one a week from birth and one a week after birth and it gets interesting.
Yes. We have already determined that you have no morality. That case is closed.
As a medical fact it does. At what stage of development is that life worth protecting?Life does not begin at conception.
Medical fact is not legal fact.
A body can be life, that doesn't mean it's a person. People and fetuses (potential people) are not the same thing.Life versus person. Learn the difference.And, it's a bullshit charge. Pregnant women don't get to drive as two in the HOV lanes, or get charged twice when flying. Why, because they are one person until the baby is born.
Well, tell that to the California court.
View attachment 66152
The person IS the life.
A fetus is a term made up to shield the pregnant woman from the fact that she is actually murdering a baby. There is no such thing as a potential people or person. That baby is a person.
View attachment 66157
View attachment 66158
I think law should be tied to brain function. First trimester there is little doubt that brain function is not capable of producing thought. Therefore, at will abortions should be allowed in the first trimester.I see, you think I have no morality, no respect for human life? You would.Roughly when you can put one of these on its head...As a medical fact it does. At what stage of development is that life worth protecting?Life does not begin at conception.
![]()
Why? Why not at age fifteen or older? It shouldn't matter to someone like you.
Now ask what's the difference between one a week from birth and one a week after birth and it gets interesting.
As a medical fact it does. At what stage of development is that life worth protecting?Life does not begin at conception.
Medical fact is not legal fact.
Here is your "legal" argument. Go for it.
View attachment 66173
At a certain stage of development, the fetus becomes a human being. If you take the easy way out on either side, and say either that conception or birth is the moment it becomes a human being, you are scientifically wrong. A single cell is in no way worthy of protection as a human being.As a medical fact it does. At what stage of development is that life worth protecting?Life does not begin at conception.
Medical fact is not legal fact.
Here is your "legal" argument. Go for it.
View attachment 66173
Neither can a month old baby.A one month old fetus can't survive on its own.
Neither can a month old baby.A one month old fetus can't survive on its own.
Absolutely not.I know this Lady who has an abortion. Why? Cause the fetus insides where on the outside .
She should be forced to carry the kid to term so it can live a few minutes after a dangerous and traumatic birth ?
"Someone else could care for it" is not "survive on its own".Neither can a month old baby.A one month old fetus can't survive on its own.
Yes they can . You can leave a baby lying there for days and its be alive . Or someone else could care for it .
Not so wh the one month fetus .
With a vote of 64-12, House lawmakers sent the bill – the Humanity of the Unborn Child Act – to the state Senate. The measure would require Oklahoma public high schools to teach students in grades 9-12 “about the humanity of a child in utero.” The curriculum must also include education about fetal development during pregnancy.
Rep. Ann Coody (R) – the author of the legislation – is a former public school teacher, counselor, and principal, reports the Associated Press. She said parents of high school students could opt their children out of the curriculum.
Sounds good. They CAN opt out and its only for high school kids the ones most at risk to get pregnant for school age folks.
Political agendas always dictate education curricula. Education is always indoctrination.When political agendas dictate educational curricula, there's a word that's describes that.
Indentation? No that wasn't it. Indagation? No, that's not quite right. What was that word again?
Here. This should be better than sex for you murderers: