Our Corrupt DOJ Thinks These People Are A Threat To Overthrow The Government?

Proof is in the pudding as they say. Why hasn't the white house released any of the footage they captured?

You know why.

But we're supposed to believe this group won a POTUS selection.
 
An insurrection is the attempted overthrow of a government and a violent attempt to seize power.
Full definition:

"an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government"
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/insurrection

...and the uprising - manifested by the assault on the US Capitol and the Congress on January 6, 2021, can certainly be legitimately interpreted as just that.


I don't think a tug of war with Pelosi's mall cops over bike racks set up to restrict movement at the
capitol by a bunch of middle aged unarmed angry people counts for any of that.
Nope. Your political bedfellows are not going to be able to weasel out of their criminal and legal troubles by trying to play that card.

That's not how you take over the US Government, numb nuts.
US Code says nothing about taking it over... it merely speaks to revolting against civil authority or established government.

And what happened on 1/6 is about as close to insurrection (note all the people arrested and NOT charged
with insurrection) as someone standing too close to someone else in a grocery store and being charged
with attempted murder.
Nope. No Sale.

It's like calling pissed off parents "domestic terrorists". It is using the partisan hack Merrick Garland's
office to weaponize his postiion for political gain and it's plainly an abuse of his office and power.
Nope. No Sale. Irrelevant to the nature of the crimes committed against the United States on January 6, 2021, by Trump supporters.
It's a gross misuse of the term insurrection for political reasons. When Cognitively Impaired fool
Joe Biden is tossed from office Merrick Garland will go along with him.
Nope. No Sale. The usage fits perfectly. And the fate of Sleepy Old Uncle Joe or Garland is immaterial to the nature of the crimes of January 6, 2021.
 
Proof is in the pudding as they say. Why hasn't the white house released any of the footage they captured?

You know why.

But we're supposed to believe this group won a POTUS selection.
What does this post even trying to convey? You're losing it.....
 
Why don't you shed some light on it yourself, then? Tell us, oh wise one, what "insurrection" is, in your mind?
Insurrection is conspiring with others to undermine the President of The United States and frame him for crimes he did not commit in an attempt to usurp his authority.
 
Nope. The US Departmen t of Justice deals in Fact and in The Law. You fools were suckered-in by an expert-level con-man. Sux to be you.
No....not this DOJ.
They don't care about facts.
They have a target they want to prosecute, and they go about finding evidence, or manufacturing evidence, they can use to prosecute that target which is innocent Americans.
The goal is to prevent law-abiding Americans from exercising their constitutional rights.
 
No....not this DOJ.
Yes... THIS DoJ...
They don't care about facts.
Thank you for your personal opinion. Now it's time to complete the indictments and let the courts sort it out.
They have a target they want to prosecute, and they go about finding evidence,
Wassa madda... back the wrong horse again, didja? :badgrin: ...on the Wrong Side of History again? :badgrin: ...they don't have to look far to find evidence... :badgrin:
or manufacturing evidence
Example?
, they can use to prosecute that target which is innocent Americans.
The traitorous insurrectionists of January 6, 2021, are not 'innocent'... it is even arguable that they are 'Americans'...
The goal is to prevent law-abiding Americans from exercising their constitutional rights.
Nope. the goal is to prevent a dictator-wannabe from ever again coming that close to overturning a legitimate general election through mob violence.
 
Yes... THIS DoJ...

Thank you for your personal opinion. Now it's time to complete the indictments and let the courts sort it out.

Wassa madda... back the wrong horse again, didja? :badgrin: ...on the Wrong Side of History again? :badgrin: ...they don't have to look far to find evidence... :badgrin:

Example?

The traitorous insurrectionists of January 6, 2021, are not 'innocent'... it is even arguable that they are 'Americans'...

Nope. the goal is to prevent a dictator-wannabe from ever again coming that close to overturning a legitimate general election through mob violence.
You're just talking to a mirror, shitforbrains.
Everything you commie bastards accuse us of...you are guilty of yourself.
 
You're just talking to a mirror, shitforbrains.
Everything you commie bastards accuse us of...you are guilty of yourself.
Commie?

Hardly.

My own political desires are...

* Stop Illegal immigration and send the goddamned Illegal Aliens back where they came from
* Tough stance on China
* Tough stance on Russia
* Alliance with Israel
* Fiscal responsibility
* Voter ID and elimination of vote-by-mail
* Rebuild American manufacturing beginning with strategically vital areas
* Rebuild American infrastructure
* Level the playing field in American cities - breaking the back of various Urban Democratic Machines
* Halt further immigration from Muslim-dominated countries for a decade or two
* Ensure the US continues to develop and maintain the strongest military on the face of the planet
* Vigorously suppress race-rioting in American cities and make rioters pay heavily for participating
...etc... etc... etc...

Where I do a 180 on you Klowns is with respect to your Orange Baboon-God...

A lying, arrogant, ignorant, power-mad morally bankrupt cowardly con-man who doesn't give two $hits about anyone but himself...

I want much of what he's selling but the trouble is that he (in a position of high political power) is FAR too high a price for me to get what I want...
 
Reality check

Oh look, an article you didn't read.

In a nutshell, the article is saying our brain damaged Oath Keeper friend believed the transfer of power was UNLAWFUL, not lawful.

Therefore, his actions were not sedition.

Well what a convenient defense.

It's also a pile of hot garbage. And here is why:

Following this line of reasoning, this man would have been Justified in stopping the certification of election by force, simply because he believes everyone in that room was committing a crime.

This defense is not going to work.
 
Last edited:
Such a stupid thread. It's the intent that matters. And that they committed violence to meet their goal.

Take your fellow cultist that sent incompetently built, nonfunctioning pipe bombs to several people:

Just because he is too big a moron to be a threat with his failed bomb making doesn't get him a pass. He sits in prison.

Same goes for these lobotomized hillbillies.
SO intent matters now? Okay, you better go arrest all those people in Portland who tried to set fire to a federal building after trapping people inside. You morons claimed it was fine to let them go with no charges because they “didn’t succeed”. Oh wait, those “hillbillies” are YOURS aren’t they?
 
The fact they could not have succeeded is irrelevant. That they desired and conspired to do so is the issue.
From a legal standpoint. Not from the standpoint of comparing it to 9/11 and Pearl Harbor. But Democrats will lie and cheat all the way to the midterms. This is what happens when Joe Xiden and his affirmative action hire are an EPIC FAIL.
 
Eh I think you did say I was right. But it's nice to know that you just disagree with me not on the basis of actual factual information, but for who I am and what I represent to you. You're pathetic.
Not nearly as pathetic as a fool who claims he’s going to dance after guaranteeing a Dem victory in Virginia. Oh wait , that’s YOU......
 
Such embarrassing BS.
Yes, every post of yours IS embarrassingly bullshit. But you keep posting it anyway. Garland is an asshole abusing his authority by siccing the FBI on innocent parents to help his daughter and her husband with their selling of CRT bullshit to schools. You know this, but just can’t say anything bad about your masters. Embarrassing.
 
Full definition:

"an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government"
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/insurrection

...and the uprising - manifested by the assault on the US Capitol and the Congress on January 6, 2021, can certainly be legitimately interpreted as just that.

Nope. Your political bedfellows are not going to be able to weasel out of their criminal and legal troubles by trying to play that card.

US Code says nothing about taking it over... it merely speaks to revolting against civil authority or established government.

Nope. No Sale.

Nope. No Sale. Irrelevant to the nature of the crimes committed against the United States on January 6, 2021, by Trump supporters.

Nope. No Sale. The usage fits perfectly. And the fate of Sleepy Old Uncle Joe or Garland is immaterial to the nature of the crimes of January 6, 2021.
Again moron, NOBODY has been charged with insurrection. Now about the crimes committed by Dem terrorist groups like BLM and Antifa......
 

Forum List

Back
Top