Palestine Today

Status
Not open for further replies.
Palestinian farmer injured by IOF gunfire in northern Gaza

GAZA, (PIC)

A Palestinian farmer on Thursday morning suffered a bullet injury as he was working his land in the northern Gaza Strip.

According to media sources, the Israeli occupation forces (IOF) opened machinegun fire at a group of farmers in an agricultural area in Beit Hanoun, north of Gaza, wounding one of them.

The victim was moderately wounded and rushed to the Indonesia Hospital for medical assistance.

Despite the renewed ceasefire understandings over Gaza, the Israeli occupation army keeps targeting — sometimes injuring and killing — civilians, farmers and fishermen almost on a daily basis.

Read more at
Palestinian farmer injured by IOF gunfire in northern Gaza
@Copyright The Palestinian Information Center

Is the “ Palestinian Info. Center “ unbiased , non racist and impartial? :blahblah::blahblah::blahblah:

Nope, simply pathological liars...

Pal. Info Center ridiculed for announcing Grey's Anatomy star as new doctor for Gaza
 
Last edited:
Palestinian farmer injured by IOF gunfire in northern Gaza

GAZA, (PIC)

A Palestinian farmer on Thursday morning suffered a bullet injury as he was working his land in the northern Gaza Strip.

According to media sources, the Israeli occupation forces (IOF) opened machinegun fire at a group of farmers in an agricultural area in Beit Hanoun, north of Gaza, wounding one of them.

The victim was moderately wounded and rushed to the Indonesia Hospital for medical assistance.

Despite the renewed ceasefire understandings over Gaza, the Israeli occupation army keeps targeting — sometimes injuring and killing — civilians, farmers and fishermen almost on a daily basis.

Read more at
Palestinian farmer injured by IOF gunfire in northern Gaza
@Copyright The Palestinian Information Center

Is the “ Palestinian Info. Center “ unbiased , non racist and impartial? :blahblah::blahblah::blahblah:

Nope, simply pathological liars...

Pal. Info Center ridiculed for announcing Grey's Anatomy star as new doctor for Gaza

Now, THAT is a RIOT ! I’m surprised they didn’t have her killed like that alleged Palestinian “ Medic” who they mourn.
 
Palestinian farmer injured by IOF gunfire in northern Gaza

GAZA, (PIC)

A Palestinian farmer on Thursday morning suffered a bullet injury as he was working his land in the northern Gaza Strip.

According to media sources, the Israeli occupation forces (IOF) opened machinegun fire at a group of farmers in an agricultural area in Beit Hanoun, north of Gaza, wounding one of them.

The victim was moderately wounded and rushed to the Indonesia Hospital for medical assistance.

Despite the renewed ceasefire understandings over Gaza, the Israeli occupation army keeps targeting — sometimes injuring and killing — civilians, farmers and fishermen almost on a daily basis.

Read more at
Palestinian farmer injured by IOF gunfire in northern Gaza
@Copyright The Palestinian Information Center

Is the “ Palestinian Info. Center “ unbiased , non racist and impartial? :blahblah::blahblah::blahblah:
Well, at least you do not get all of the juvenile name calling like you get in pro Israel rags.
 
:auiqs.jpg:
Palestinian farmer injured by IOF gunfire in northern Gaza

GAZA, (PIC)

A Palestinian farmer on Thursday morning suffered a bullet injury as he was working his land in the northern Gaza Strip.

According to media sources, the Israeli occupation forces (IOF) opened machinegun fire at a group of farmers in an agricultural area in Beit Hanoun, north of Gaza, wounding one of them.

The victim was moderately wounded and rushed to the Indonesia Hospital for medical assistance.

Despite the renewed ceasefire understandings over Gaza, the Israeli occupation army keeps targeting — sometimes injuring and killing — civilians, farmers and fishermen almost on a daily basis.

Read more at
Palestinian farmer injured by IOF gunfire in northern Gaza
@Copyright The Palestinian Information Center

Is the “ Palestinian Info. Center “ unbiased , non racist and impartial? :blahblah::blahblah::blahblah:
Well, at least you do not get all of the juvenile name calling like you get in pro Israel rags.

Deflection, as usual Notice you have nothing to say about their LIE that the FICTIONAL Izzy ( Greys Anatomy “ is a MD in Gaza. :113::113:
 
Last edited:
RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

All this nonsense you raise concerning the application of the "Terrorist" label is just some sort of diversion. It is no more childish than labeling someone an Arab Palestinian.

FOR EXAMPLE (but not limited to)

IF a person or activity meets the criteria of any of the 19 cental international legal instruments to prevent terrorist acts, → THEN they are correctly labeled as a terrorist personality or activity.

IF a person or activity meets the criteria in the EU Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, → THEN they are correctly labeled as a terrorist personality or activity.

IF a person or activity meets the criteria outlined in the Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of Terrorism (1938),THEN they are correctly labeled as a terrorist personality or activity.​

Well, at least you do not get all of the juvenile name calling like you get in pro Israel rags.
(COMMENT)

While you may try to challenge the nomenclature (a system for giving names) of the "terrorist" → it is simply a "noun" (other than a pronoun) used to identify any of a class of people, places, or things.

IF your only counter is to come-up with "juvenile name-calling" as your best defense, THEN, maybe you should revisit your understanding of the meaning as it is being applied.

Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

All this nonsense you raise concerning the application of the "Terrorist" label is just some sort of diversion. It is no more childish than labeling someone an Arab Palestinian.

FOR EXAMPLE (but not limited to)

IF a person or activity meets the criteria of any of the 19 cental international legal instruments to prevent terrorist acts, → THEN they are correctly labeled as a terrorist personality or activity.

IF a person or activity meets the criteria in the EU Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, → THEN they are correctly labeled as a terrorist personality or activity.

IF a person or activity meets the criteria outlined in the Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of Terrorism (1938),THEN they are correctly labeled as a terrorist personality or activity.​

Well, at least you do not get all of the juvenile name calling like you get in pro Israel rags.
(COMMENT)

While you may try to challenge the nomenclature (a system for giving names) of the "terrorist" → it is simply a "noun" (other than a pronoun) used to identify any of a class of people, places, or things.

IF your only counter is to come-up with "juvenile name-calling" as your best defense, THEN, maybe you should revisit your understanding of the meaning as it is being applied.

Most Respectfully,
R
That is all well and good but could you be more specific? Just posting a load of stuff that you assume applies is not a strong argument.
 
RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

In this regard, the examples I gave were "criteria" and the "application." These describe actions or events.

That is all well and good but could you be more specific? Just posting a load of stuff that you assume applies is not a strong argument.
(COMMENT)

On 05 March 2020, "The Palestinian Activist Yaser Mazhar Calls on Palestinians to Carry out Suicide Bombings in Israel: We Long for Bus Bombings."

This is a terrorist event on multiple levels. It is a violation of:

◈ It is considered under Article 1(a) S/RES/1624 (2005) to be a Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;

◈ It is a violation of the Articles 19 and 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)
wherein any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law; and Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.

◈ Customary Law - Rule 6. Civilians are protected against attack, unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.

◈ International Humanitarian Law Article 51(3) of Additional Protocol I - or - Pursuant to Article 13(3) of Additional Protocol II, civilians are immune from direct attack “unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.”

It calls for the violation of Article 1§6 in the 1997 International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings; which specifically defines the bombing of public transporation systems as unlawful in the intentional use of explosives and other lethal devices in, into, or against various defined public places with intent to kill or cause serious bodily injury, or with intent to cause extensive destruction of the public place.
This is just one of the recent events which shed light upon the fact that the Arab Palestinians openly tolerate the use of the mass media to promote further violence, to amplify violence and to support the used of violence to further the illegal government agenda to use violence as the preferred solution to political complaints (as opposed to the dispute resolution alternatives available). The fact that it is open demonstrates that the vast majority of the Arab Palestinians support the terrorist operations that the Al-Quds Al-Youm (Palestine Islamic Jihad) foster. It is a violation of the 1999 International Convention for the Suppression of the Material Support of Terrorism by providing either direct or indirect resources to further their criminal acts.

Anyone that can stand with a straight face and argue that the Arab Palestinian culture does not routinely violate the various aspects that call for peace is simply NOT rational.


Most Respectfully,
R
 
E: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Yeah, those are strange ideas for an Arab Palestinian.

solution to political complaints (as opposed to the dispute resolution alternatives available).
What are those?
(COMMENT)

The general UN membership and (I'm assuming) the Arab Palestinians through the PLO under the provisions of A/RES/25/2625 (XXV) can use the UN Internal Justice System in resolving international disputes, including territorial disputes and problems concerning frontiers of States in accordance with the Charter. The Arab Palestinians have, unique to them, the Oslo Accords Process under Article XV, and seek early and just settlement of their international disputes by negotiation, inquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements or other peaceful means of their choice. OR --- They could just follow the procedures outline in the Handbook for Dispute Respoultion (1992); like most nations.

Most Respectfully,
R
 
E: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Yeah, those are strange ideas for an Arab Palestinian.

solution to political complaints (as opposed to the dispute resolution alternatives available).
What are those?
(COMMENT)

The general UN membership and (I'm assuming) the Arab Palestinians through the PLO under the provisions of A/RES/25/2625 (XXV) can use the UN Internal Justice System in resolving international disputes, including territorial disputes and problems concerning frontiers of States in accordance with the Charter. The Arab Palestinians have, unique to them, the Oslo Accords Process under Article XV, and seek early and just settlement of their international disputes by negotiation, inquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements or other peaceful means of their choice. OR --- They could just follow the procedures outline in the Handbook for Dispute Respoultion (1992); like most nations.

Most Respectfully,
R
This appears to be for treaty disputes. There is no treaty.
If there is something in there that would apply to Palestine, please quote and note page number.
 
RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

In this regard, the examples I gave were "criteria" and the "application." These describe actions or events.

That is all well and good but could you be more specific? Just posting a load of stuff that you assume applies is not a strong argument.
(COMMENT)

On 05 March 2020, "The Palestinian Activist Yaser Mazhar Calls on Palestinians to Carry out Suicide Bombings in Israel: We Long for Bus Bombings."

This is a terrorist event on multiple levels. It is a violation of:

◈ It is considered under Article 1(a) S/RES/1624 (2005) to be a Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;

◈ It is a violation of the Articles 19 and 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)
wherein any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law; and Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.

◈ Customary Law - Rule 6. Civilians are protected against attack, unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.

◈ International Humanitarian Law Article 51(3) of Additional Protocol I - or - Pursuant to Article 13(3) of Additional Protocol II, civilians are immune from direct attack “unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.”

It calls for the violation of Article 1§6 in the 1997 International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings; which specifically defines the bombing of public transporation systems as unlawful in the intentional use of explosives and other lethal devices in, into, or against various defined public places with intent to kill or cause serious bodily injury, or with intent to cause extensive destruction of the public place.
This is just one of the recent events which shed light upon the fact that the Arab Palestinians openly tolerate the use of the mass media to promote further violence, to amplify violence and to support the used of violence to further the illegal government agenda to use violence as the preferred solution to political complaints (as opposed to the dispute resolution alternatives available). The fact that it is open demonstrates that the vast majority of the Arab Palestinians support the terrorist operations that the Al-Quds Al-Youm (Palestine Islamic Jihad) foster. It is a violation of the 1999 International Convention for the Suppression of the Material Support of Terrorism by providing either direct or indirect resources to further their criminal acts.

Anyone that can stand with a straight face and argue that the Arab Palestinian culture does not routinely violate the various aspects that call for peace is simply NOT rational.


Most Respectfully,
R
You always assume that the Palestinians are the aggressors. Where do you get that?
 
A Palestinian family from Bethlehem in 1919

48156157_2281861048500017_7895061694425071616_n.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top